RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Dilated common iliac arteries that complicate aortic aneurysm stent grafting usually have been managed with endograft extension across the iliac artery bifurcation with internal iliac artery (IIA) occlusion. We studied 25 patients with significant common iliac artery (CIA) dilation treated with two methods: endograft extension across the iliac bifurcation or a new approach with a flared cuff within the CIA that preserves the IIA. METHODS: Of 86 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who underwent bifurcated endovascular stent grafting (ESG), 25 (29.1%) had at least one dilated CIA. Two treatment groups had different methods of management of iliac artery dilation. Group 1 underwent ESG with straight extension across the iliac bifurcation and IIA coil embolization before the ESG procedure (n = 2) or simultaneously with ESG (n = 8). Group 2 underwent ESG with flared distal cuff (AneuRx, Medtronic AVE, Santa Rosa, Calif) contained within the CIA, the so-called "bell-bottom" procedure, thus preserving the IIA (n = 15). Iliac artery dimensions, operating room time, fluoroscopy time, and postoperative complications were prospectively gathered. RESULTS: Two women and 23 men had mean diameters of AAA of 56.6 mm (range, 38 to 98 mm) and of CIA of 21.4 mm (range, 15 to 48 mm). The diameters of CIA treated with device extension into external iliac artery after IIA coil embolization in group 1 and with the bell-bottom procedure in group 2 were not different (mean CIA diameter, 19.9 mm; range, 15 to 26 mm; and mean, 19.1 mm; range, 15 to 24 mm; respectively). However, significantly lower operating room and catheter procedure times were found in group 2 compared with group 1 (137 versus 192 minutes; 58 versus 106 minutes; P =.02 and.02, respectively). No periprocedural type I endoleaks were found in either group. Nine patients in group 2 also had a second contralateral CIA aneurysm, and five patients (mean CIA diameter, 33.0 mm; range, 22 to 48 mm) underwent treatment with extension across the iliac artery bifurcation and IIA occlusion. Use of the bell-bottom procedure on the other side allowed preservation of one IIA. Four cases (mean diameter, 19.3 mm) also underwent contralateral bell-bottom procedure. Two of these group 2 patients had complications, with severe buttock claudication in one and distal embolism necessitating limb salvage bypass after preoperative coil embolization of the IIA in another. CONCLUSION: Significant CIA ectasia or small aneurysm is often associated with AAA. In such cases, the bell-bottom procedure that preserves IIA circulation is a new alternative to the common practice of placement of endograft extensions across the iliac artery bifurcation in patients with at least one CIA diameter of less than 26 mm. Additional benefits include reduced total procedure time. Early technical success appears to justify continued use. However, long-term evaluation is necessary to determine durability because the risk of rupture as the result of potential expansion of the excluded iliac artery or late failure is unknown.
Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Prótese Vascular , Artéria Ilíaca/cirurgia , Pelve/irrigação sanguínea , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Dilatação Patológica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dilatação Patológica/fisiopatologia , Dilatação Patológica/cirurgia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Artéria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Ilíaca/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Pelve/fisiopatologia , Radiografia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of peritoneography in patients referred with inguinal pain (inguinodynia) and clinically absent inguinal hernia on physical examination. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In patients with chronic groin pain, peritoneography is a seldom-used yet available technique that can detect an occult inguinal hernia. The value of peritoneography in the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernia has been previously shown. METHODS: During a 60-month period, 80 consecutive patients with complaints of persistent inguinal pain (inguinodynia) without evidence of hernia on clinical examination were referred for outpatient evaluation by peritoneography. Twenty-nine patients had prior inguinal surgery in the region of their current pain. Peritoneography was performed using a midline or paraumbilical approach. Radiographs were obtained with patients in prone and prone oblique positions with the head elevated 20 degrees to 25 degrees, both with and without provocative maneuvers. All available records were retrospectively reviewed for radiographic findings and outcome. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients undergoing peritoneography, 36 (45%) were diagnosed radiographically to have inguinal hernias that were not detectable clinically. Twenty-seven of these patients subsequently underwent inguinal exploration, and a hernia was confirmed in 24 (89%). Of the patients having prior inguinal surgery in the region of their pain, 12/29 (41%) were diagnosed by peritoneography with a hernia. Two complications (2.5%), both colon perforations that did not require significant intervention, occurred as a result of peritoneography. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneography is highly reliable for detecting clinically occult inguinal hernia and has a low complication rate. Its usefulness is shown in a prospective consecutive series for detection of occult hernias in patients with chronic inguinal pain. The authors conclude that peritoneography is a safe and useful diagnostic test in the setting of persistent inguinal pain and a negative clinical examination.