The effects of length and width of the stem on proximal humerus stress shielding in uncemented primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: To preserve humeral bone during RTSA, stems have been made shorter and cement avoided whenever possible. However, with the increased use of uncemented RTSA, a phenomenon comparable to the stress shielding of the hip has been described for the proximal humerus. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of stem length and width on proximal humeral bone resorption after primary uncemented RTSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective shoulder arthroplasty database of our institution was reviewed for all primary uncemented RTSAs from 2017 to 2020 in osteoarthritis and cuff tear arthropathy cases with > 2-year follow-up. We compared the clinical and the radiographic 2-year outcome of the short and standard length stems of the same prosthesis design. This allowed us to assess the effects of stem length and width with regard to stress shielding. Furthermore, we defined a cut-off value for the filling ratios to prevent stress shielding. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in the analysis, nineteen were in the short stem group (SHORT) and thirty-one in the standard stem group (STANDARD). After 2 years, SHORT showed a relative Constant Score of 91.8% and STANDARD of 98.3% (p = 0.256). Stress shielding was found in 4 patients (21%) in SHORT and in 16 patients (52%) in STANDARD (p = 0.03); it occurred more frequently in patients with higher humeral filling ratios (p < 0.05). The calculated cut-off to prevent stress shielding was 0.7 (± 0.03) for the metaphyseal and distal filling ratio. CONCLUSION: While short and standard stems for RTSA have good results after 2 years, we found a significant negative effect of higher length and width of the stem with regard to stress shielding. Even though the clinical effects of stress shielding have to be assessed, short stems should be chosen with a filling ratio at the metaphyseal and distal position below 0.7. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-CONTROL STUDY): III.

Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly-a retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in elderly patients was introduced at our institution in 2017. Recent reports have raised concerns about increased rates of early bone resorption at the proximal humerus with uncemented fracture stems. The aim of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in functional or radiographic outcomes between cemented and uncemented RTSA for PHF. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent uncemented RTSA (group nC) in 2017 and 2018 were age and sex matched (propensity score matching 1:2) to 34 patients with cemented RTSA implanted between 2011 and 2016 (group C) for the primary treatment of PHF. These two groups were compared in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years after the index surgery. RESULTS: The mean bone quality was low in both groups: in group nC the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) was 1.43 (1.22-1.72) and in group C 1.42 (1.22-1.67). At the final 2 year follow-up, the relative CS was 98.3% (71-118) in group nC and 97.9% (36-125) in group C (p = 0.927); the absolute CS was 70.2 (49-89) in group nC and 68.0 (30-94) in group C (p = 0.509). Lucent lines at the humeral site were seen in 8 cases (47%) in group nC and in 13 cases (38%) in group C (p = 0.056). Compared to 3% in group C, all patients in group nC showed at least grade 1 and 65% showed grade 3 bone resorption at the proximal humerus (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to cemented RTSA bone resorption at the proximal humerus was significantly more frequent in patients with uncemented RTSA for PHF. So far, this is rather a radiographic than a clinical finding, because both groups showed very satisfying functional outcomes and low revision rates at the 2 year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: A retrospective case-control study.

Outcomes of Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Patient-Specific, Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithms.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified risk factors for different types of treatment of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) and allowed the development of a patient-specific, evidence-based treatment algorithm with the potential of improving overall outcomes and reducing complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results and complications of treating PHF using this algorithmic approach. METHODS: All patients with isolated PHF between 2014 and 2017 were included and prospectively followed. The initial treatment algorithm (Version 1 [V1]) based on patients' functional needs, bone quality, and type of fracture was refined after 2 years (Version 2 [V2]). Adherence to protocol, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed at a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 334 patients (mean age, 66 years; 68% female): 226 were treated nonoperatively; 65, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); 39, with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA); and 4, with hemiarthroplasty. At 1 year, the preinjury EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) values were regained (0.88 and 0.89, respectively) and the mean relative Constant Score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) (and standard deviation [SD]) were 96% ± 21% and 85% ± 16%. Overall complications and revision rates were 19% and 13%. Treatment conforming to the algorithm outperformed non-conforming treatment with respect to relative CS (97% versus 88%, p = 0.016), complication rates (16.3% versus 30.8%, p = 0.014), and revision rates (10.6% versus 26.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treating PHF using a patient-specific, evidence-based algorithm restored preinjury quality of life as measured with the EQ-5D and approximately 90% normal shoulders as measured with the relative CS and the SSV. Adherence to the treatment algorithm was associated with significantly better clinical outcomes and substantially reduced complication and revision rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is serial radiological evaluation of one-part proximal humeral fractures necessary?

AIMS: In order to determine whether and for whom serial radiological evaluation is necessary in one-part proximal humerus fractures, we set out to describe the clinical history and predictors of secondary displacement in patients sustaining these injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and April 2016, all patients with an isolated, nonoperatively treated one-part proximal humerus fracture were prospectively followed up. Clinical and radiological evaluation took place at less than two, six, 12, and 52 weeks. Fracture configuration, bone quality, and comminution were determined on the initial radiographs. Fracture healing, secondary displacement, and treatment changes were recorded during follow-up. RESULTS: In 100 patients (59 female, 41 male; mean age 57 years), 91 of the fractures (91%) remained stable. In five of nine patients (55%) with secondary displacement, surgery was recommended. Comminution, present in 23 patients (23%), was identified as a predictor of secondary displacement (p < 0.001). Patients' age, sex, fracture configuration, and bone quality were not associated with secondary displacement (p ≥ 0.438). Nonoperative treatment resulted in a mean absolute Constant score (CS) of 80 (49 to 98), relative CS of 101% (63% to 138%), median subjective shoulder value of 95% (interquartile range (IQR) 90% to 100%), and median EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire score of 0.89 (IQR 0.80 to 1.00) with bone union in all cases at one-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Radiological re-evaluation was only necessary in patients presenting with comminution and may be redundant for 77% of patients with one-part proximal humerus fractures. Nonoperative treatment of one-part proximal humerus fractures remains the mainstay of treatment with a low rate of secondary surgery, a high union rate, and good clinical results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1307-1312.

Evidence-based algorithm to treat patients with proximal humerus fractures-a prospective study with early clinical and overall performance results.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of patients' demands, bone quality, and fracture type, we developed an evidence-based treatment algorithm for proximal humerus fractures (PHF) that includes all treatment modalities from open reduction and internal fixation, hemiprosthesis, to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. This study was done to assess its feasibility and early clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with isolated PHF in 2014 and 2015 were included in this prospective study. The quality of life (EQ-5D) and the level of autonomy before injury were recorded. The fractures were classified and local bone quality was measured. When possible, patients were treated according to the algorithm. Radiographic and clinical follow-up-Constant score, subjective shoulder value, and EQ-5D-took place after 3 months and 1 year. The rate of unplanned surgery was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients (mean age 66 years; 58 male, 134 female) were included. Of these, 160 (83%) were treated according to the algorithm. In total, 132 patients were treated conservatively, 36 with open reduction and internal fixation and 24 with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. Generally, the mean EQ-5D before trauma and 1 year after treatment was equal to 0.88 to 0.9 points. After 1 year, the overall mean relative Constant score was 95% and mean subjective shoulder value 84%. Unplanned surgery was necessary in 21 patients. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive algorithm is designed as a noncompulsory treatment guideline for PHF, which prioritize the patient's demands and biology. The high adherence proves that it is a helpful tool for decision making. Furthermore, this algorithm leads to very satisfying overall results with low complication and revision rates.

Early Arthroscopic Repair of Acute Traumatic Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Leads to Reliable Reversal of Pseudoparesis: Clinical and Radiographic Outcome.

PURPOSE: It was the aim of this study to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcome after early arthroscopic repair regardless of the age of patients. METHODS: Patients with massive traumatic cuff tear and clinical pseudoparesis for forward elevation treated by subsequent early arthroscopic repair from 2011 until 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Exclusion criteria were Goutallier grade ≥3 fatty infiltration and prior shoulder problems or surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radiographs, and functional assessments were performed preoperatively and at follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (male/female 15/6; age range: 30-83) were included. Preoperative MRI showed complete 2 tendon tears in 7 patients, 3 tendon tears in 13 patients and all tendons ruptured in one patient. All patients had full passive range of motion and the mean active elevation was 35.7° (range: 0°-60°). Nine patients also had a pseudoparesis for external rotation (mean: 10°, range: -30° to 40°). The mean delay until surgery was 33 days (range: 13-60). At follow-up (mean: 39 months, range: 24-60) all patients showed reversal of pseudoparesis, mean elevation of 165.2° (range: 110°-180°) and mean external rotation of 49.3° (range: -20° to 80°). The mean Constant score was 82 points (range: 56-95), and the mean subjective shoulder value was 93% (range: 50-100). The overall retear rate was 20% (n = 4). Fatty infiltration increased at least 1 grade in patients who had a retear and in 56% of patients (n = 9) without retear. Age was not a predictor for retear. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that early arthroscopic repair of traumatic massive RCT with pseudoparesis may lead to successful results regardless of patients' age. A complete restoration of the function can be expected even in patients with retear. The retear rate is low and the increase of fatty infiltration minimal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Blackburne-Peel ratio predicts patients' outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Alterations in patellar height and posterior tibial slope (PTS) are frequently measured radiographic parameters associated with postoperative impairments after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Few studies correlate the clinical outcome of TKA with the radiological indices. Both the modified Insall-Salvati ratio (mISR) and the Blackburne-Peel ratio (BPR) were hypothesised to correlate with the clinical outcome after TKA. METHODS: A total of 282 computer navigated primary LCS®-TKAs, implanted in our institution from 2008 to 2012, were included. Data (ROM, FJS-12, WOMAC, and revision surgery) were collected independently and prospectively. Patellar height (mISR, BPR), joint-line position, and PTS were measured on pre- and postoperative radiographs. Bivariate and multiple regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Mean mISR (1.5-1.4) and BPR (0.8-0.6) decreased from preoperatively to 1 year follow-up. Mean joint-line shift in a cranial direction was 2 mm after TKA implantation. Analysis of dichotomous variables (presence of PB and PPB or not) only showed significantly lower flexion in patients with PPB (p < 0.001). However, multiple regression revealed that BPR was a significant positive independent predictor for FJS-12 (p = 0.016) and flexion (p < 0.001) at 1 year follow-up. Postoperative PTS (p < 0.01) and initial patella height (p < 0.001) were both predictive for BPR at follow-up, while the joint-line height was not. CONCLUSIONS: The BPR is a useful and reliable radiographic parameter to predict patient outcomes 1 year after primary navigated TKA. Lowering the BPR should be avoided, as this may lead to significant restrictions in terms of ROM and PROMs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Radiocapitellar arthroplasty: a consecutive case series with 2 to 6 years' follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze indications, outcomes, and complications in patients treated with radiocapitellar arthroplasty. METHODS: This prospective analysis of clinical and radiographic results included 16 elbows in 15 patients. RESULTS: This study included 4 men and 11 women (mean age, 51.9 years; age range, 32-65 years). The mean follow-up period was 3.4 years (range, 2-6 years). The indications were post-traumatic (n = 10) and primary radiohumeral osteoarthritis (n = 6). A mean of 2 surgical procedures (range, 0-4) had been performed before radiocapitellar arthroplasty. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score significantly improved from 46 points to 85 points (P < .01). The arc of motion improved from 106° to 117° (P = .27). Radiographic ulnohumeral degeneration progressed in 40% of cases but was not symptomatic in any. Subsequent surgery was required in 5 elbows (31%). Revision of the radial head component was necessary in 4 patients (25%). In 3 patients this was a result of loosening of the stem. The radial component was subsequently removed because of persistent pain in 1. Radiographic loosening not requiring revision was found in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: The overall Mayo Elbow Performance Score was good to excellent after radiocapitellar arthroplasty. Both the revision and reoperation rates were high, and one should consider this before performing this procedure. Loosening of the radial head component was a problem. An improved fixation technique or an adaptation of the design is needed before this type of surgery can be recommended as a standard procedure.

Evaluation of ninety-six periprosthetic hip joint infections seen within five consecutive years.

Periprosthetic hip joint infections (PHJI) are severe complications. In 2003 Zimmerli published a well-noted treatment algorithm for PHJI. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcome, analyze the applied treatment regimen and compare it to the proposed algorithm. We evaluated the outcome of 96 PHJI treated at our institution between 2008 and 2012 and analysed adherence to the algorithm and outcome in coherence with the algorithm. The operations performed were irrigation and debridement with exchange of mobile parts (45%), two-stage exchange (36%), one-stage exchange (12%) and permanent explantation (7%). 47% were acute infections, 53% were chronic. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen. The overall success rate was 88%. In 12% of the cases the chosen operation didn't follow the algorithm. Of these only 10% was successfully treated with the primary operation. We find that the algorithm proposed by Zimmerli is a useful tool and easy to translate into clinical practice. When followed it yields a high success rate.

How bone quality may influence intraoperative and early postoperative problems after angular stable open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI), a simple radiographic tool has become available to measure bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of local bone mineral density on the early failure rate after angular stable open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). METHODS: We retrospectively followed up all patients treated with angular stable implants for PHFs from 2007 to 2014. The fractures were classified according to Neer, and the DTI, metaphyseal head extension (MHE), medial hinge displacement, and quality of reduction were assessed. Failures were defined as head screw cutouts. RESULTS: The study included 146 patients (mean age, 66 years; range, 20-94 years). The mean follow-up period was 11 months (range, 3-94 months). Of the fractures, 91% were classified as 2- or 3-part fractures and 9% as 4-part fractures. The mean DTI was 1.44 (range, 1.19-2.11), and the mean MHE was 12 mm (range, 0-48 mm). The reduction result was at least acceptable in 80% of fractures. Screw cutouts were found in 23%. The DTI and MHE were the most significant preoperative predictors for the reduction result. The DTI (P = .036) and age (P = .02) were independent preoperative factors, and a good reduction (P = .001) was the only intraoperative factor influencing cutout. DISCUSSION: This study proves that good bone quality and a long MHE are helpful for the reduction. Furthermore, good bone quality, a younger age, and a good reduction prevent later cutout. We conclude that local bone quality is a relevant factor in the treatment plan for PHFs.

A new stem extractor with specific multigrip pliers for revision hip arthroplasty - a biomechanical investigation.

INTRODUCTION: It was the aim of this biomechanical study to test a new extractor with 2 specific multigrip pliers on different stem designs and to compare it to a commonly used prefabricated one (UnMod). METHODS: The new extractor comprises 2 specific multigrip pliers, 1 neck-pliers and 1 shoulder-pliers. The tests were performed on a tapered and a nontapered neck stem. They were fixed in specific moulds allowing torque adjustability. The first endpoint was maximum grip with the extractors being tested up to 70 hits or failure (pliers off) in maximally fixed stems. The second endpoint was hits/attempts until stem extraction or failure (pliers off > than 5 times) in moderately fixed stems. RESULTS: The best grip on the tapered neck was achieved by the neck-pliers without failure, whereas the others failed consistently (shoulder-pliers: mean 42.9 hits, SD: 3.5/UnMod: 40.1, SD: 5.4; p<0.01). The shoulder-pliers had the best grip on the nontapered neck withstanding more hits (11.9, SD: 1.9) than the others (neck-pliers: 4.8, SD: 1.7/UnMod: 2.8, SD 1.0; p<0.01). None of the devices failed to extract the tapered neck (UnMod best: 4, SD: 1.3). The shoulder-pliers were able to extract the nontapered neck in 60% of the tests, whereas the others failed 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The new extractor with specific pliers for neck/shoulder grip seems to be a valuable tool for stem extraction in revision hip arthroplasty. Compared to UnMod, the neck-pliers showed better grip on the tapered neck and the shoulder-pliers performed the best on the nontapered neck.

10-Year Survival of Acetabular Reinforcement Rings/Cages for Complex Hip Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular reinforcement rings/ cages (AR) are commonly used for reconstruction of bone defects in complex hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the 10-year survival rate of Ganz reinforcement rings and Burch-Schneider cages used in a single institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between September 1999 and June 2002 all ARs, implanted in one institution, were identified. All patients had regular clinical and radiographic follow-up and were included in this study. Their prospectively collected clinical and radiographic data was retrospectively analyzed. In case of death before the 10-year follow-up examination, patient's families or their general practitioner was contacted by telephone. The main outcome measures were survival of the ARs and kind of revision surgery. RESULTS: The 10-year survival rate was 77.7%. At 10-year follow-up, 5/60 (8,3%) patients could not be located and had to be excluded therefore. 27/55 (49,1%) were dead, whereof 22 had no revision of the ARs before death (after a mean of 66 months; range: 0 - 123). Of the remaining 28/55 (50,9%) patients, 23 patients (24 ARs) had no revision of the ARs. CONCLUSION: Despite the high mortality rate of this study's collective, ARs for complex primary or revision total hip arthroplasty provided predictable long term results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Clinical investigation.

The extended medial elbow approach-a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: The two most commonly used approaches to expose medial elbow structures are the flexor carpi ulnaris split and the Hotchkiss over-the-top approach. The aim of this study was to define the extended medial approach to the elbow, featuring advantages of over-the-top (proximal exposure) and additional complete exposure of the coronoid and proximal medial ulna, while respecting the internervous plane between the flexor pronator mass and flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. METHODS: In this comparative anatomic study, 12 fresh frozen cadaveric elbows were dissected alternately to study the distal limitation and exposed area of the extended medial elbow approach compared with splitting the flexor carpi ulnaris. RESULTS: Proximal ulna exposure area was comparable between the extended medial elbow approach (average, 840 mm(2)) and the flexor carpi ulnaris split (average, 810 mm(2); P = .44). The extended medial approach was limited distally by the posterior recurrent ulnar artery (mean 68 mm from medial epicondyle), whereas the first motor branch for the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle limited the second approach in 75% of the specimens (mean 29 mm from medial epicondyle, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The extended medial elbow approach is a single approach allowing full exposure of the medial elbow and combining the advantages of the over-the-top approach with a safe distal extension to the medial ulna. In contrast to the flexor carpi ulnaris split, our approach respects the internervous plane.

Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A Simple Radiographic Tool to Assess Local Bone Quality in Proximal Humerus Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis may complicate surgical fixation and healing of proximal humerus fractures and should be assessed preoperatively. Peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT) and the Tingart measurement are helpful methods, but both have limitations in clinical use because of limited availability (pQCT) or fracture lines crossing the area of interest (Tingart measurement). The aim of our study was to introduce and validate a simple cortical index to assess the quality of bone in proximal humerus fractures using AP radiographs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) How do the deltoid tuberosity index and Tingart measurement correlate with each other, with patient age, and local bone mineral density (BMD) of the humeral head, measured by pQCT? (2) Which threshold values for the deltoid tuberosity index and Tingart measurement optimally discriminate poor local bone quality of the proximal humerus? (3) Are the deltoid tuberosity index and Tingart measurement clinically applicable and reproducible in patients with proximal humerus fractures? METHODS: The deltoid tuberosity index was measured immediately above the upper end of the deltoid tuberosity. At this position, where the outer cortical borders become parallel, the deltoid tuberosity index equals the ratio between the outer cortical and inner endosteal diameter. In the first part of our study, we retrospectively measured the deltoid tuberosity index on 31 patients (16 women, 15 men; mean age, 65 years; range, 22-83 years) who were scheduled for elective surgery other than fracture repair. Inclusion criteria were available native pQCT scans, AP shoulder radiographs taken in internal rotation, and no previous shoulder surgery. The deltoid tuberosity index and the Tingart measurement were measured on the preoperative internal rotation AP radiograph. The second part of our study was performed by reviewing 40 radiographs of patients with proximal humerus fractures (31 women, nine men; median age, 65 years; range, 22-88 years). Interrater (two surgeons) and intrarater (two readings) reliabilities, applicability, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed. RESULTS: The correlations between radiograph measurements and local BMD (pQCT) were strong for the deltoid tuberosity index (r = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-0.90; p < 0.001) and moderate for the Tingart measurement (r = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42-0.83; p < 0.001). There was moderate correlation between patient age and the deltoid tuberosity index (r = 0.65; p < 0.001), patient age and the Tingart measurement (r = 0.69; p < 0.001), and patient age and pQCT (r = 0.73; p < 0.001). The correlation between the deltoid tuberosity index and the Tingart measurement was strong (r = 0.84; p < 0.001). We determined the cutoff value for the deltoid tuberosity index to be 1.44, with the area under the curve = 0.87 (95% CI, 0.74-0.99). This provided a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.80. For the Tingart measurement, we determined the cutoff value to be 5.3 mm, with the area under the curve = 0.83 (95% CI, 0.67-0.98), which resulted in a sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.85. The intraobserver reliability was high and not different between the Tingart measurement (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] = 0.75 and 0.88) and deltoid tuberosity index (ICC = 0.88 and 0.82). However, interobserver reliability was higher for the deltoid tuberosity index (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) than for the Tingart measurement (ICC = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93).The clinical applicability on AP radiographs of fractures was better for the deltoid tuberosity index (p = 0.025) because it was measureable on more of the radiographs (77/80; 96%) than the Tingart measurement (69/80; 86%). CONCLUSIONS: The deltoid tuberosity index correlated strongly with local BMD measured on pQCT and our study evidence shows that it is a reliable, simple, and applicable tool to assess local bone quality in the proximal humerus. We found that deltoid tuberosity index values consistently lower than 1.4 indicated low local BMD of the proximal humerus. Furthermore, the use of the deltoid tuberosity index has important advantages over the Tingart measurement regarding clinical applicability in patients with proximal humerus fractures, when fracture lines obscure the Tingart measurement landmarks. However, further studies are needed to assess the effect of the deltoid tuberosity index measurement and osteoporosis on treatment and outcome in patients with proximal humerus fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, diagnostic study.

Pre-operative embolisation of spinal metastasis: technique, complication rate and outcome-clinical experience.

PURPOSE: Pre-operative embolisation of metastatic spinal tumours has the potential to decrease intra-operative blood loss. Intra-operative blood loss is multifactorial and one factor may be the embolisation technique used. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyse the effect of three different pre-operative embolisation techniques on intra-operative blood loss, complication rate and tumour aetiology in patients treated with a corpectomy and dorsoventral stabilisation at our institution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of embolisation procedures for vertebral metastases performed from January 2002 to December 2011. Only pre-operatively embolised patients treated by a single-level hemicorpectomy or corpectomy procedure from T4-L5, including posterior spinal stabilisation using pedicle screws, were included. All patient charts and examinations were analysed regarding the embolisation technique, gender, age, primary tumour, time between the embolisation and surgery, intra-operative blood loss, intra-operative transfusions and complications related to embolisation. RESULTS: We identified a total of 46 patients, 25 male and 21 female patients. The mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range 39-84 years). The tumours treated were: 15 (33%) renal cell carcinomas, six (13%) breast carcinomas, five (11%) lung carcinomas, five (11%) urothelial carcinomas, four (9%) myelomas and 11 (24%) miscellaneous types including rectal carcinoma, thymoma and melanoma. Embolisation with coils was performed in 23 patients, particles were used in six and a combination of coils and particles in 18. The mean time between the embolisation and surgery was 23 hours (range 80-4,430 minutes). The median overall intra-operative estimated blood loss (EBL) was 2,300 ml (range 500-15,000 ml). In patients embolised with coils and particles, EBL was 2,200 ml compared to 1,450 ml in patients embolised with particles and 2,500 ml in the coil group. No statistically significant differences between the three groups could be detected. There were no complications related to the embolisation techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative embolisation of spinal metastases using coils, particles or a combination of both is a safe and reproducible procedure. In our cohort we reported no complications during the three different embolisation techniques. No statistically significant difference regarding blood loss between the three embolisation techniques could be detected. Our data confirm existing studies concerning the control of intra-operative blood loss using different embolisation techniques. The benefit of embolisation with a combination of coils and particles compared to embolisation with particles only is questionable.

Incidence and risk factors for early adjacent vertebral fractures after balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic fractures: analysis of the SWISSspine registry.

PURPOSE: The SWISSspine registry (SSR) was launched in 2005 to assess the safety and effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). In the meantime, repeated reports on high rates of adjacent vertebral fractures (ASF) after BKP of vertebral insufficiency fractures were published. The causes for ASF and their risk factors are still under debate. The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and potential risk factors of ASF within the SSR dataset. METHODS: The SSR data points are collected perioperatively and during follow-ups, with surgeon- and patient-based information. All patients documented with a monosegmental osteoporotic vertebral insufficiency fracture between March 2005 and May 2012 were included in the study. The incidence of ASF, significant associations with co-variates (patient age, gender, fracture location, cement volume, preoperative segmental kyphosis, extent of kyphosis correction, and individual co-morbidities) and influence on quality of life (EQ-5D) and back pain (VAS) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 375 patients with a mean follow-up of 3.6 months was included. ASF were found in 9.9 % (n = 37) and occurred on average 2.8 months postoperatively. Preoperative segmental kyphosis >30° (p = 0.026), and rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.038) and cardiovascular disease (p = 0.047) were significantly associated with ASF. Furthermore, patients with ASF had significantly higher back pain at the final follow-up (p = 0.001). No further significant associations between the studied co-variates and ASF were seen in the adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that patients with a preoperative segmental kyphosis >30° or patients with co-morbidities like rheumatoid arthritis and a cardiovascular disease are at high risk of ASF within 6 months after the index surgery. In case of an ASF event, back pain levels are significantly increased. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Short- or long-stem prosthesis for intramedullary bypass of proximal humeral fractures with severe metaphyseal bone loss: evaluation of primary stability in a biomechanical model.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures with substantial metaphyseal comminution are challenging to treat. In the elderly with osteoporotic bone, arthroplasty sometimes remains the only valuable option; however, the minimally required length of stem fixation is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the primary stability of cemented short- and long-stem prostheses with different intramedullary fracture bypass lengths. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Osteoporotic composite bone models of the humerus (Synbone, Malans, Switzerland) with 3 different fracture levels (group A, 6 cm distal to surgical neck; group B, 7 cm distal to surgical neck; and group C, 8 cm distal to surgical neck) were prepared with a cemented standard short (S)- or long (L)-stem prosthesis and were tested for torque to failure. As a reference, we used models with intact bone (group R-O) and a short-stem prosthesis implanted at the surgical neck (group R-P). The radiographic bypass index (BI) was calculated before testing (fracture level to stem tip [in millimeters]/outer cortical diameter at fracture level [in millimeters]). RESULTS: The resulting BIs of each group were as follows: 1.7 in group A-S, 3.4 in group A-L, 1.4 in group B-S, 3.2 in group B-L, 1.0 in group C-S, and 2.9 in group C-L. Compared with group R-O, the torques to failure of groups B-S and C-S were significantly lower, whereas only group C-S was significantly weaker than group R-P (P < .01). Comparing short- and long-stem bypasses of different fracture heights, we found that only group C-L showed a significantly higher resistance to torque (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: A short-stem bypass with a BI of 1.7 was sufficient for primary stability tested by torque to failure in this biomechanical setting. For smaller BIs, a long-stem prosthesis should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study, biomechanics.

The first 100 elbow arthroscopies of one surgeon: analysis of complications.

BACKGROUND: Elbow arthroscopy is technically challenging and prone to complications especially due to the close relation of nerves and vessels. Complication rates up to 20% are reported, depending on indication and how complications are defined. This study analyzes the complications of the first 100 elbow arthroscopies done by 1 fellowship- and cadaver-trained surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2004 to April 2009, 100 consecutive elbow arthroscopies were performed, and thus consequently standardized, by 1 surgeon in 1 institution. The clinical data of all patients were retrospectively analyzed for indication-specific complications. Complications were divided into minor (transient) and major (persistent or infection). RESULTS: Included were 65 male and 35 female patients (mean age, 41 years; range, 12-70 years) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (clinical or telephone). The following indications were documented (several per patient were possible): osteoarthritis in 29, stiffness in 27, loose bodies in 27, tennis elbow in 24, traumatic sequelae in 19, and others in 24. No major complications occurred, but 6 minor complications occurred in 5 patients (5%), comprising 2 hematoma, 2 transient nerve lesions, 1 wound-healing problem, and 1 complex regional pain syndrome. No revision surgery was necessary. Complications were not significantly associated with the indication for operation or the surgeon's learning curve. CONCLUSION: This study shows an acceptable complication rate of the first 100 elbow arthroscopies from a single surgeon. A profound clinical education, including cadaver training as well as standardization of patient position, portals, and surgery, help to achieve this.

Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Locking plates for open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humeral fractures are widely used. We observed an unusually high number of patients with complications referred to our institution. It was the purpose of this study to report these complications, as well as their treatment and outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2010, all patients treated for complications after ORIF with locking plates for proximal humeral fractures were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were followed up clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: In total, 121 patients (67 women and 54 men; mean age, 59 years) were referred after primary locking plate ORIF; 80% had a 3- or 4-part fracture. A mean of 3 complications occurred per patient, including malreduction, primary screw cutout, malunion, nonunion, avascular necrosis, and infection. Secondary screw cutout was found in 57% of patients, causing glenoid destruction in 33% of patients. A mean of 1.5 revision surgeries were needed. Hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty improved the mean Constant score (24 to 55 points, P < .05; 29 to 54 points, P = .3; and 25 to 48 points, P < .05, respectively) after a mean of 24 months. In 6 patients, glenoid implantation was no longer possible because of the destruction by perforated head screws. CONCLUSION: In this negatively selected series, complications resulted in secondary arthroplasties in over 50% of the patients. Shoulder function, though improved, remained substantially restricted even after revision surgery. Glenoid destruction by locking screws was the most devastating and previously almost unseen complication, which limited the options of treatment.

The PHILOS plate for proximal humeral fractures--risk factors for complications at one year.

BACKGROUND: Since 2003, we have used the Proximal Humerus Interlocking System plate for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Although many patients have good and excellent results, the reported rate of complications varies. We have focused on the complication rate and risk factors for complications 1 year after surgery. METHODS: From 2003 until 2008, a total of 294 (223 women; 71 men; median age, 72.9) patients were included. General data were collected at the time of injury (Charlson Index, smoking, and steroid therapy). Fractures were classified (AO/OTA) retrospectively. The follow-up of 1 year included radiographs and Constant-Murley score for functionality. Complications and revision surgeries were analyzed specifically. RESULTS: We found 83 (28.2%) patients with a total of 105 complications, requiring a total of 72 (24.5%) revision surgeries. The most frequent complication was screw cutout (33 of 294, 11.2%), because of secondary fracture displacement or avascular necrosis (AVN). AVN (20 of 294, 6.8%) was the main reason for secondary arthroplasty. Smoking more than 20 pack years had a significant impact on the complication rate. Fractures classified 11-A3 showed more implant failures. Fracture dislocations predisposed to secondary screw cutout and AVN. Patients without complications (211, 71.8%) achieved a median Constant-Murley score of 89 (40-100) points. CONCLUSION: This study points out several predisposing factors for negative outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the Proximal Humerus Interlocking System plate (fracture type: 11-A3, fracture dislocations, and smoking). Accounting for these, patient's risk for complications can be evaluated more individually and taken into consideration for the concept of treatment. Altering the surgical technique was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of secondary screw cutout.