Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
3.
Ann Oncol ; 30(12): 1992-2003, 2019 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31560068

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: STAMPEDE has previously reported that the use of upfront docetaxel improved overall survival (OS) for metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer patients starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy. We report on long-term outcomes stratified by metastatic burden for M1 patients. METHODS: We randomly allocated patients in 2 : 1 ratio to standard-of-care (SOC; control group) or SOC + docetaxel. Metastatic disease burden was categorised using retrospectively-collected baseline staging scans where available. Analysis used Cox regression models, adjusted for stratification factors, with emphasis on restricted mean survival time where hazards were non-proportional. RESULTS: Between 05 October 2005 and 31 March 2013, 1086 M1 patients were randomised to receive SOC (n = 724) or SOC + docetaxel (n = 362). Metastatic burden was assessable for 830/1086 (76%) patients; 362 (44%) had low and 468 (56%) high metastatic burden. Median follow-up was 78.2 months. There were 494 deaths on SOC (41% more than the previous report). There was good evidence of benefit of docetaxel over SOC on OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95, P = 0.009) with no evidence of heterogeneity of docetaxel effect between metastatic burden sub-groups (interaction P = 0.827). Analysis of other outcomes found evidence of benefit for docetaxel over SOC in failure-free survival (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.76, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.81, P < 0.001) with no evidence of heterogeneity of docetaxel effect between metastatic burden sub-groups (interaction P > 0.5 in each case). There was no evidence that docetaxel resulted in late toxicity compared with SOC: after 1 year, G3-5 toxicity was reported for 28% SOC and 27% docetaxel (in patients still on follow-up at 1 year without prior progression). CONCLUSIONS: The clinically significant benefit in survival for upfront docetaxel persists at longer follow-up, with no evidence that benefit differed by metastatic burden. We advocate that upfront docetaxel is considered for metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer patients regardless of metastatic burden.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Docetaxel/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antagonistas de Androgênios/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Ann Oncol ; 29(5): 1235-1248, 2018 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29529169

RESUMO

Background: Adding abiraterone acetate with prednisolone (AAP) or docetaxel with prednisolone (DocP) to standard-of-care (SOC) each improved survival in systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic prostate cancer: evaluation of drug efficacy: a multi-arm multi-stage platform randomised controlled protocol recruiting patients with high-risk locally advanced or metastatic PCa starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The protocol provides the only direct, randomised comparative data of SOC + AAP versus SOC + DocP. Method: Recruitment to SOC + DocP and SOC + AAP overlapped November 2011 to March 2013. SOC was long-term ADT or, for most non-metastatic cases, ADT for ≥2 years and RT to the primary tumour. Stratified randomisation allocated pts 2 : 1 : 2 to SOC; SOC + docetaxel 75 mg/m2 3-weekly×6 + prednisolone 10 mg daily; or SOC + abiraterone acetate 1000 mg + prednisolone 5 mg daily. AAP duration depended on stage and intent to give radical RT. The primary outcome measure was death from any cause. Analyses used Cox proportional hazards and flexible parametric models, adjusted for stratification factors. This was not a formally powered comparison. A hazard ratio (HR) <1 favours SOC + AAP, and HR > 1 favours SOC + DocP. Results: A total of 566 consenting patients were contemporaneously randomised: 189 SOC + DocP and 377 SOC + AAP. The patients, balanced by allocated treatment were: 342 (60%) M1; 429 (76%) Gleason 8-10; 449 (79%) WHO performance status 0; median age 66 years and median PSA 56 ng/ml. With median follow-up 4 years, 149 deaths were reported. For overall survival, HR = 1.16 (95% CI 0.82-1.65); failure-free survival HR = 0.51 (95% CI 0.39-0.67); progression-free survival HR = 0.65 (95% CI 0.48-0.88); metastasis-free survival HR = 0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.03); prostate cancer-specific survival HR = 1.02 (0.70-1.49); and symptomatic skeletal events HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.55-1.25). In the safety population, the proportion reporting ≥1 grade 3, 4 or 5 adverse events ever was 36%, 13% and 1% SOC + DocP, and 40%, 7% and 1% SOC + AAP; prevalence 11% at 1 and 2 years on both arms. Relapse treatment patterns varied by arm. Conclusions: This direct, randomised comparative analysis of two new treatment standards for hormone-naïve prostate cancer showed no evidence of a difference in overall or prostate cancer-specific survival, nor in other important outcomes such as symptomatic skeletal events. Worst toxicity grade over entire time on trial was similar but comprised different toxicities in line with the known properties of the drugs. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00268476.


Assuntos
Acetato de Abiraterona/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Androgênios/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Docetaxel/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Acetato de Abiraterona/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Antagonistas de Androgênios/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/normas , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Metanálise em Rede , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Padrão de Cuidado
5.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 29(2): 155-7, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12633558

RESUMO

AIM: Postoperative mortality following total mesorectal excision is increased if this is performed more than 3 days after the completion of short course preoperative radiotherapy. Suppression of neutrophil leucocytosis which is normally seen following surgery has been a suggested reason. This study was to determine the relationship between postoperative complications and perioperative neutrophil counts. METHOD: A database of 176 patients treated at a single radiotherapy centre in 1998 and 1999 was used. A two-sample Wilcoxon test was used to compare preoperative neutrophil counts, postoperative neutrophil counts and their ratio in patients with and without complications. RESULTS: There was no association between acute complications and preoperative (P = 0.25) or postoperative (P = 0.45) neutrophil count. The post/preoperative ratio was significantly higher in patients without complications (median 1.61 vs 1.16, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be an inverse relationship between the magnitude of postoperative neutrophil leucocytosis and the risk of acute complications following short course preoperative radiotherapy.


Assuntos
Leucocitose/etiologia , Neutrófilos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Neoplasias Retais/radioterapia , Doença Aguda , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Neoplasias Retais/sangue , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA