Enhanced Patient Portal Engagement Associated with Improved Weight Loss Outcomes in Post-Bariatric Surgery Patients.

Background: Bariatric surgery is an effective intervention for obesity, but it requires comprehensive postoperative self-management to achieve optimal outcomes. While patient portals are generally seen as beneficial in engaging patients in health management, the link between their use and post-bariatric surgery weight loss remains unclear. Objective: This study investigated the association between patient portal engagement and postoperative body mass index (BMI) reduction among bariatric surgery patients. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study included patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) between January 2018 and March 2021. Using generalized estimating equations, we estimated the association between active days of postoperative patient portal use and the reduction of BMI percentage (%BMI) at 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery. Covariates included duration since surgery, the patient's age at the time of surgery, gender, race and ethnicity, type of bariatric surgery, severity of comorbid conditions, and socioeconomic disadvantage. Results: The study included 1,415 patients, mostly female (80.9%), with diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. 805 (56.9%) patients underwent RYGB and 610 (43.1%) underwent SG. By one-year post-surgery, the mean (SD) %BMI reduction was 31.1% (8.3%), and the mean (SD) number of patient portal active days was 61.0 (41.2). A significantly positive association was observed between patient portal engagement and %BMI reduction, with variations revealed over time. Each 10-day increment of active portal use was associated with a 0.57% ([95% CI: 0.42- 0.72], P < .001) and 0.35% ([95% CI: 0.22- 0.49], P < .001) %BMI reduction at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The association was not statistically significant at 12 months postoperatively (ß=-0.07, [95% CI: -0.24- 0.09], P = .54). Various portal functions, including messaging, visits, my record, medical tools, billing, resources, and others, were positively associated with %BMI reduction at 3- and 6-months follow-ups. Conclusions: Greater patient portal engagement, which may represent stronger adherence to postoperative instructions, better self-management of health, and enhanced communication with care teams, was associated with improved postoperative weight loss. Future investigations are needed to identify important portal features that contribute to the long-term success of weight loss management.

High Prevalence of Positive Genetic Obesity Variants in Postoperative Bariatric Surgery Patients with Weight Regain Presenting for Medical Obesity Intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Genetic obesity susceptibility in postoperative bariatric surgery weight regain (PBSWR) remains largely unexplored. METHODS: A retrospective case series of adult (N = 27) PBSWR patients who had undergone genetic obesity testing was conducted between Sept. 2020 and March 2022. PRIMARY OUTCOME: frequency of genetic variants in patients experiencing weight regain following bariatric surgery. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: prevalence of obesity-related comorbidities, nadir BMI achieved post-bariatric surgery, and percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) achieved with obesity pharmacotherapies. RESULTS: Heterozygous mutations were identified in 22 (81%) patients, with the most prevalent mutations occurring in CEP290, RPGR1P1L, and LEPR genes (3 patients each). Median age was 56 years (interquartile range (IQR) 46.8-65.5), 88% female. Types of surgery were 67% RYGB, 19% SG, 4% gastric band, and 13% revisions. Median nadir BMI postoperatively was 34.0 kg/m2 (IQR 29.0-38.5). A high prevalence of metabolic derangements was noted; patients presented median 80 months (IQR 39-168.5) postoperative for medical weight management with 40% weight regain. BMI at initiation of anti-obesity medication (AOMs) was 41.7 kg/m2 (36.8-44.4). All received AOM and required at least 3 AOMs for weight regain. Semaglutide (N = 21), topiramate (N = 14), and metformin (N = 12) were most prescribed. Median %TBWL for the cohort at the first, second, and third visit was 1.7, 5.0, and 6.5 respectively. Fourteen (52%) achieved 5%TBWL, 10 (37%) achieved 10%TBWL, and 4 (15%) achieved 15%TBWL with combination AOMs and supervised medical intervention. CONCLUSION: An unusually high prevalence of genetic obesity variants in PBSWR was found, warranting further research.

Diagnostic challenge: A pediatric patient with severe obesity and complications of imminent death.

Background: A 15-year-old patient suffering from severe obesity (400 pounds, BMI 71.6 kg/m2) with a clinical phenotype suggestive of syndromic obesity was hospitalized for severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock. The hospital admission prompted a palliative care and heart transplant consultation given end-stage-disease and poor prognosis. It further necessitated a pediatric inpatient obesity consult, which was complicated by several significant hurdles including lack of insurance coverage, FDA approvals, availability of medications, and inadequate knowledge among the medical community. Methods: Innovative treatment, proactive, persistent advocacy, anti-obesity medication combination strategies modeled after diabetes and hypertension treatment algorithms, and latest evidence in obesity management were utilized to effectively and expeditiously overcome major challenges to care and the medical emergency. Results: The patient was stabilized and ultimately discharged home, after -25.2% weight loss over 4 months (weight down to 299 pounds, BMI 49.9 kg/m2) through collaborative medical obesity intervention. Conclusion: The typical delay in care sought by patients suffering from obesity, often due to stigma and lack of disease awareness, results in missed opportunities to prevent serious obesity-related complications. Skilled specialist expertise, fund of obesity-specific knowledge, and constant advocacy can be crucial in surmounting regulatory barriers to obesity care and in generating successful weight loss outcomes.

Tirzepatide after intensive lifestyle intervention in adults with overweight or obesity: the SURMOUNT-3 phase 3 trial.

The effects of tirzepatide, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, on weight reduction after successful intensive lifestyle intervention are unknown. This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized (1:1) adults with body mass index ≥30 or ≥27 kg/m2 and at least one obesity-related complication (excluding diabetes), who achieved ≥5.0% weight reduction after a 12-week intensive lifestyle intervention, to tirzepatide maximum tolerated dose (10 or 15 mg) or placebo once weekly for 72 weeks (n = 579). The treatment regimen estimand assessed effects regardless of treatment adherence in the intention-to-treat population. The coprimary endpoint of additional mean per cent weight change from randomization to week 72 was met with changes of -18.4% (standard error (s.e.) 0.7) with tirzepatide and 2.5% (s.e. 1.0) with placebo (estimated treatment difference -20.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI) -23.2%, -18.5%; P < 0.001). The coprimary endpoint of the percentage of participants achieving additional weight reduction ≥5% was met with 87.5% (s.e. 2.2) with tirzepatide and 16.5% (s.e. 3.0) with placebo achieving this threshold (odds ratio 34.6%; 95% CI 19.2%, 62.6%; P < 0.001). The most common adverse events with tirzepatide were gastrointestinal, with most being mild to moderate in severity. Tirzepatide provided substantial additional reduction in body weight in participants who had achieved ≥5.0% weight reduction with intensive lifestyle intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04657016 .

Combination anti-obesity medications to effectively treat bariatric surgery weight regain at an academic obesity center.

Background: Combination anti-obesity medications (AOMs) to treat postoperative bariatric surgery weight regain have limited data on their use in the clinical setting. Understanding the optimal treatment protocol in this cohort will maximize weight loss outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of bariatric surgery patients (N = 44) presenting with weight regain at a single academic multidisciplinary obesity center who were prescribed AOM(s) plus intensive lifestyle modification for 12 months. Results: Age: 28-76 years old, 93% female, mean weight 110.2 ± 20.3 kg, BMI 39.7 ± 7.4 kg/m2, presenting 5.2 ± 1.6 years post-bariatric surgery [27 (61.4%), 14 (31.8%), and 3 (6.8%) laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), and open RYGB, respectively], with 15.1 ± 11.1 kg mean weight gain from nadir. Mean weight loss after medical intervention at 3-, 6-, and 12-month time points was 4.4 ± 4.6 kg, 7.3 ± 7.0 kg, and 10.7 ± 9.2 kg, respectively. At 12 months, individuals prescribed 3 or more AOMs lost more weight than those prescribed one (-14.5 ± 9.0 kg vs. -4.9 ± 5.7 kg, p < 0.05) irrespective of age, gender, number of comorbidities, initial weight or BMI, type of surgery, or GLP1 use. RYGB patients lost less weight overall (7.4% vs. 14.8% VSG respectively; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Combination AOMs may be needed to achieve optimal weight loss results to treat post-operative weight regain.

Obesity Management in Children and Adolescents.

Obesity in the pediatric population is increasing in the United States and globally. Childhood obesity is associated with cardiometabolic and psychosocial comorbidities and decreased overall life span. The cause of pediatric obesity is multifactorial and includes genetic predisposition, lifestyle, behavioral patterns, and consequences of social determinants of health. Routine screening of BMI and comorbid conditions is essential to identifying patients who require treatment. The AAP recommends immediate Intensive Health Behavior and Lifestyle Treatment for children with obesity, encompassing lifestyle changes, behavioral changes, and mental health treatments. Pharmacologic interventions and metabolic and bariatric surgery are also available when indicated.

Literature review on antiobesity medication use for metabolic and bariatric surgery patients from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee.

The following literature search is in response to inquiries made to the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) regarding antiobesity medication (AOM) use in patients who are having or have already had metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). These recommendations are based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. This paper is not intended to establish a local, regional, or national standard of care. The paper will be revised in the future as additional evidence becomes available.

Understanding the pathophysiologic pathways that underlie obesity and options for treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a chronic, multifactorial condition with devastating health consequences. It was thought that obesity could be controlled with discipline and lifestyle changes, but we now know that the underlying pathophysiology is a dysregulation of the body's energy balance system, controlled by a complex interplay of neural, hormonal, and metabolic pathways. Recognizing obesity as a chronic disease places a greater responsibility on all health care professionals to screen and identify patients at risk and develop long-term tailored treatment plans. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review describes the central and peripheral pathways regulating obesity, the factors contributing to its development and how to effectively manage this disease. EXPERT OPINION: Obesity is a disease with pathophysiologic mechanisms and should be treated accordingly to reduce the significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Lifestyle interventions remain the cornerstones of treatment; however, these measures alone are rarely enough for long-term maintenance of weight loss. Additional interventions, such as pharmacotherapy or bariatric surgery, are indicated for many patients and should be recommended. Treatment considerations should include assessment of comorbidities or risk factors, as many anti-obesity agents and bariatric surgeries also have beneficial effects on other weight-associated comorbidities.Plain language summary: This plain language summary highlights information from a recent scientific article about obesity. Obesity is a disease that leads to excess accumulation of body fat that may negatively affect health. People can check if they have obesity by measuring their body mass index (BMI for short). The BMI is a screening tool to see if you are at risk of obesity. Obesity is defined as a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or higher with lower cut-offs in Asian populations. Obesity is a chronic health condition that leads to a shorter life span. People with obesity have a higher chance of having other health conditions, such as type 2 diabetes, fatty liver disease, heart disease, kidney problems, osteoarthritis, and some types of cancer. It can be hard for people with obesity to lose weight for various reasons. The aim of this article is to help doctors who treat people with obesity understand more about the causes for obesity, as well as the available treatment options, which include lifestyle changes, medicines, and for some people, weight loss surgery.[Figure: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text].

Marrow adipose tissue in adolescent girls with obesity.

BACKGROUND: Marrow adipose tissue (MAT) is increasingly recognized as an active and dynamic endocrine organ that responds to changes in nutrition and environmental milieu. Compared to normal weight controls, adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa have higher MAT content, which is associated with impaired skeletal integrity, but data are limited regarding MAT content in adolescents with obesity and how this interacts with bone endpoints. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (i) MAT content in adolescents with obesity compared to normal-weight controls, (ii) the association of MAT with bone endpoints, and (iii) whether these associations of MAT are affected by body weight. METHODS: We assessed MAT, bone endpoints, and body composition in 60 adolescent girls 14-21 years old: 45 with obesity (OB) and 15 normal-weight controls (NW-C). We used (i) DXA to assess areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the lumbar spine and total hip, and total body fat and lean mass, (ii) proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) to assess MAT at the 4th lumbar vertebra and femur, and MRI to assess visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), (iii) high resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) to assess volumetric BMD (vBMD), (iv) individual trabeculae segmentation to evaluate trabecular bone (plate-rod morphology), and (v) finite element analysis to assess stiffness (a strength estimate) at the distal radius and tibia. RESULTS: Groups did not differ for age or height. Weight, BMI, and areal BMD Z-scores at all sites were higher in the OB group (p<0.0001). MAT was lower in OB at the femoral diaphysis (p= <0.0001) and the lumbar spine (p=0.0039). For the whole group, MAT at the lumbar spine and femoral diaphysis was inversely associated with BMI, total fat mass, lean mass, and VAT. Even after controlling for body weight, independent inverse associations were observed of femoral diaphyseal and lumbar MAT with total tibial vBMD, and of lumbar MAT with radial trabecular vBMD. CONCLUSION: Adolescent girls with obesity have lower MAT than normal-weight controls despite having an excess of total body fat. These findings confirm that MAT is regulated uniquely from other adipose depots in obesity. MAT was inversely associated with vBMD, emphasizing an inverse relationship between MAT and bone even in adolescent girls with obesity.

Clinical Challenge: Patient With Severe Obesity BMI 46 kg/m2.

Obesity causes and exacerbates many disease processes and affects every organ system. Thus it is not surprising that clinical providers are often overwhelmed with the multitude of symptomatology upon initial presentation in patients with obesity. However, despite a "complicated medical history," a systematic, organized approach in obesity medicine utilizes a personalized-tailored treatment strategy coupled with understanding of the disease state, presence of comorbidities, contraindications, side effects, and patient preferences. Here, we present the case of a young patient with Class 3b severe obesity, several obesity-related complications, and extensive psychological history. Through synergistic and additive treatments (behavioral/nutritional therapy combined with anti-obesity pharmacotherapy and concurrent enrollment in our bariatric surgery program), the patient was able to achieve significant -30.5% total body weight loss with improvement of metabolic parameters. Though these results are not typical of all patients, we must emphasize the need to encompass all available anti-obesity therapies (lifestyle, pharmacotherapy, medical devices, bariatric surgery in monotherapy or combination) in cases of refractory or severe obesity, as we do similarly for other disease modalities such as refractory hypertension or poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes that requires robust escalation in therapy.

Use of Lisdexamfetamine to Treat Obesity in an Adolescent with Severe Obesity and Binge Eating.

Approximately two-thirds of US children and adolescents have either obesity or overweight status, with almost 24% of adolescents (ages 12⁻19 years) afflicted with severe obesity, defined as >1.2 × the 95th BMI percentile for age/gender. Despite the increasing disproportionate rise in severe or extreme childhood obesity, many children in weight management programs do not achieve a healthy weight. Most often, these patients will go on to require metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), but challenges and limitations may prohibit MBS on adolescents. Thus, tertiary care pediatric weight management centers are compelled to treat select pediatric obesity subtypes presenting with disease progression and disability with the available adult FDA-approved therapeutic modalities, specifically pharmacotherapy, in order to alleviate the disease state and provide relief to the patient. Here, we describe a case of severe pediatric obesity where a dedicated multidisciplinary pediatric weight management team at a tertiary care center utilizes a progressive pharmacotherapeutic approach with enormous benefits to the patient, highlighting the urgent gap and clinical care needs of this special population niche of severe adolescent obesity.

Clinical Considerations Regarding the Use of Obesity Pharmacotherapy in Adolescents with Obesity.

A growing number of youth suffer from obesity and in particular severe obesity for which intensive lifestyle intervention does not adequately reduce excess adiposity. A treatment gap exists wherein effective treatment options for an adolescent with severe obesity include intensive lifestyle modification or metabolic and bariatric surgery while the application of obesity pharmacotherapy remains largely underutilized. These youth often present with numerous obesity-related comorbid diseases, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, prediabetes/type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, musculoskeletal problems, and psychosocial issues such as depression, anxiety, and social stigmatization. Current pediatric obesity treatment algorithms for pediatric primary care providers focus primarily on intensive lifestyle intervention with escalation of treatment intensity through four stages of intervention. Although a recent surge in the number of Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for obesity treatment has emerged in adults, pharmacotherapy options for youth remain limited. Recognizing treatment and knowledge gaps related to pharmacological agents and the urgent need for more effective treatment strategies in this population, discussed here are the efficacy, safety, and clinical application of obesity pharmacotherapy in youth with obesity based on current literature. Legal ramifications, informed consent regulations, and appropriate off-label use of these medications in pediatrics are included, focusing on prescribing practices and prescriber limits.

Future Pharmacotherapy for Obesity: New Anti-obesity Drugs on the Horizon.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Obesity is a global health crisis with detrimental effects on all organ systems leading to worsening disease state and rising costs of care. Persons with obesity failing lifestyle therapies need to be escalated to appropriate pharmacological treatment modalities, medical devices, and/or bariatric surgery if criteria are met and more aggressive intervention is needed. The progression of severe obesity in the patient population coupled with related co-morbidities necessitates the development of novel therapies for the treatment of obesity. This development is preceded by increased understanding of the underpinnings of energy regulation and neurohormonal pathways involved in energy homeostasis. RECENT FINDINGS: Though there are approved anti-obesity drugs available in the USA, newer drugs are now in the pipeline for development given the urgent need. This review focuses on anti-obesity drugs in the pipeline including centrally acting agents (setmelanotide, neuropeptide Y antagonist [velneperit], zonisamide-bupropion [Empatic], cannabinoid type-1 receptor blockers), gut hormones and incretin targets (new glucagon-like-peptide-1 [GLP-1] analogues [semaglutide and oral equivalents], amylin mimetics [davalintide, dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonists], dual action GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonists [oxyntomodulin], triple agonists [tri-agonist 1706], peptide YY, leptin analogues [combination pramlintide-metreleptin]), and other novel targets (methionine aminopeptidase 2 inhibitor [beloranib], lipase inhibitor [cetilistat], triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor [tesofensine], fibroblast growth factor 21), including anti-obesity vaccines (ghrelin, somatostatin, adenovirus36). With these new drugs in development, anti-obesity therapeutics have potential to vastly expand allowing better treatment options and personalized approach to obesity care.

A Specialized Medical Management Program to Address Post-operative Weight Regain in Bariatric Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Although bariatric surgery results in massive weight loss, weight regain over time up to as much as 25% is not uncommon. Weight regain in this population often leads to long-term weight loss failure and non-compliance in clinical follow-up and program recommendations. METHODS: We analyzed early weight outcomes at 3 and 6 months of 48 bariatric patients referred to an individualized, multidisciplinary medical management program at the Center for Obesity Medicine (COM) to address weight regain in 2015 and compared to a group of matched non-bariatric patients. The medical management center, under the direction of a medical obesity specialist and complementary to the surgical program and multidisciplinary team, addressed weight regain with intensive lifestyle (diet, activity, anti-stress therapy, behavioral counseling, sleep) and with medical intervention (one or more anti-obesity medications). RESULTS: According to early findings, the average percentage post-operative weight regain of patients entering the weight management program was 20% above nadir and time since surgery averaged 6 years (range = 1 to 20 years) with a mean weight loss of - 2.3 kg after 3 months and - 4.4 kg at 6 months into the program. Individuals most successful with weight loss were those treated with anorexigenic pharmaceuticals. Weight and percent weight loss were significantly greater for the non-surgical than the surgical patients at 3 and 6 months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A medically supervised weight management program complementary to surgery is beneficial for the treatment of weight regain and may prove important in assisting the surgical patient achieve long-term weight loss success.

Current pharmacotherapy for obesity.

More than one-third of adults in the USA have obesity, which causes, exacerbates or adversely impacts numerous medical comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Despite intensive lifestyle modifications, the disease severity warrants further aggressive intervention, including pharmacotherapy, medical devices and bariatric surgery. Noninvasive anti-obesity drugs have thus now resurfaced as targeted adjunctive therapeutic approaches to intensive lifestyle intervention, bridging the gap between lifestyle and bariatric surgery. In this Review, we discuss FDA-approved anti-obesity drugs in terms of safety and efficacy. As most of these drugs have a mean percentage weight loss reported in clinical trials but individual variations in response rates, a future direction of obesity pharmacotherapy research might include the potential for personalized medicine to target early responders to these anti-obesity drugs.