Can pelvic floor muscle function before surgery determine the outcome of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women?

AIM: The study aimed to determine whether pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function before surgery may correlate with the success of surgical interventions for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Our hypothesis was that addressing identified variables in preoperative rehabilitation could potentially improve surgical outcomes. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted at a single center and enrolled women qualified to mid-urethral tape insertion for SUI between 2020 and 2022. Digital palpation and manometry (Peritron™ 9300 V) were used to evaluate PFM function. The following parameters were acquired: vaginal resting pressure, vaginal pressure during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), the area under the curve during a 10-second MVC, moreover the ability to perform correct PFM contraction, reflexive PFM contraction during cough and relaxation were assessed. All measurements were performed before the surgical treatment and during follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The primary endpoint of the study was defined as objective cure, characterized by a negative cough stress test (CST), along with a subjective assessment based on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7). RESULTS: The study involved 57 eligible female participants, all of whom completed the 6-month follow-up. Objective cure was observed in 75.44% of cases, while subjective cure was reported in 33%. There was no association between PFM parameters and surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The success of surgical treatment of SUI 6 months postsurgery is not related to preoperative pelvic floor muscle function.

Impact of preoperative pelvic floor muscle function on the success of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to identify the potential characteristics of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in the preoperative assessment that could be associated with post-surgical prolapse severity. We hypothesized that the same variables, if identified, could be addressed in preoperative rehabilitation to improve surgical results. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective observational study that included women who underwent surgical pelvic organ prolapse repair between 2020-2022. Genital prolapse was evaluated according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. All the participants underwent a PFM assessment, including a vaginal digital assessment and manometry (Peritron™ 9300 V) before surgery and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Several PFM variables were recorded: vaginal resting pressure, vaginal pressure during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), area under the curve during a 10-second MVC, ability to correctly contract the PFMs, and reflexive activation during cough and relaxation. The primary endpoint of the analysis was objective surgical success defined as POP-Q 0 or 1 at the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, a change in pelvic floor muscle function was recorded during postoperative visits. RESULTS: A total of 106 females were included in the study. Fifty-one were lost during the 6-month follow-up, which is a major limitation of the study. None of the examined parameters evaluating PFM were associated with surgical success. No statistically significant difference was found in MVC and PFM endurance before and after surgery. Post-surgery, a significant change was observed in the vaginal resting pressure and the ability to correct PFM activation and relaxation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PFM function is not associated with surgical success 6 months after surgery.

Not all lasers are the same: a scoping review evaluating laser therapy for vulvodynia.

INTRODUCTION: Lasers are commonly used for treating various vaginal/vulvar conditions. To date, there is to our knowledge no available literature review on the effects of different types of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia, a condition that causes chronic pain in the vulvar area. OBJECTIVES: We sought to review the literature and summarize the existing published evidence regarding the effects of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia. METHODS: A scoping review with a systematic search was conducted that included studies investigating the use of laser treatment in women with vulvodynia. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools were used for the quality assessment. The type of laser, effects on pain and function, and participants' perceived improvement as well as adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: Eight studies investigating laser therapy were included in the analysis: 1 randomized controlled trial, 5 before-after studies, 1 nonrandomized intervention study, and 1 case report. Several types of laser therapies were identified, ranging from mild noninvasive photobiomodulation to more invasive ablative procedures. Of the 6 studies that included pain outcomes, 3 studies showed statistically significant improvements from baseline to follow-up, and 3 demonstrated a reduction in pain from subjectively interpreted data. Similarly, each of the 2 studies investigating sexual function also reported an improvement (based only on subjective interpretation). Of the 2 studies with a comparison group, neither study was adequately powered to detect between-group differences. Furthermore, 57%-78% of participants reported improvement, with 1 study showing a greater statistically significant improvement in the low-level laser therapy patient group compared to the sham laser group. Outcomes and adverse events varied depending on the type of laser used. CONCLUSIONS: Although these studies demonstrated some benefits of laser therapy for the treatment of vulvodynia, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the scarcity of the included studies that were robust and sufficiently powered. Future research should focus on conducting well-designed randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of different types of lasers in the treatment of vulvodynia.

Is PREHAB in Pelvic Floor Surgery Needed? A Topical Review.

Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence affect approximately 6-11% and 6-40% of women, respectively. These pathologies could result from a weakness of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) caused by previous deliveries, aging or surgery. It seems reasonable that improving PFM efficacy should positively impact both pelvic floor therapy and surgical outcomes. Nonetheless, the existing data are inconclusive and do not clearly support the positive impact of preoperative pelvic floor muscle training on the improvement of surgical results. The restoration of deteriorated PFM function still constitutes a challenge. Thus, further well-designed prospective studies are warranted to answer the question of whether preoperative PFM training could optimize surgical outcomes and if therapeutic actions should focus on building muscle strength or rather on enhancing muscle performance.