Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Public Health Nutr ; 26(6): 1238-1253, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36775272

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examined associations between multiple dietary supplement (DS) categories and medical conditions diagnosed by health professionals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Volunteers completed an online questionnaire on DS use and demographic/lifestyle factors. Medical diagnoses were obtained from a comprehensive military electronic medical surveillance system and grouped into twenty-four clinically diagnosed medical conditions (CDMC). PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of US service members (SM) from all military services (n 26 680). RESULTS: After adjustment for demographic/lifestyle factors (logistic regression), higher risk was found for 92 % (22/24) of CDMC among individual vitamins/minerals users, 58 % (14/24) of CDMC among herbal users, 50 % (12/24) of CDMC among any DS users and 46 % (11/24) of CDMC among multivitamins/multiminerals (MVM) users. Among protein/amino acid (AA) users, risk was lower in 25 % (6/24) of CDMC. For combination products, risk was higher in 13 % (3/24) of CDMC and lower in 8 % (2/24). The greater the number of CDMC, the higher the prevalence of DS use in most DS categories except proteins/AA where prevalence decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Users in many DS categories had a greater number of CDMC, but protein/AA users had fewer CDMC; results for combination products were mixed. These data indicate those with certain CDMC were also users in some DS categories, especially individual vitamins/minerals, herbals and MVM. Data are consistent with the perception that use of DS enhances health, especially in those with CDMC. Protein/AA and combination product users were more likely to be younger, more physically active men, factors that likely reduced CDMC.


Assuntos
Militares , Masculino , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Suplementos Nutricionais , Vitaminas , Minerais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vitamina A , Vitamina K
2.
Sleep Med ; 101: 283-295, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36470164

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study investigated self-reported sleep duration and its association with a comprehensive range of clinically-diagnosed medical condition categories (CDMCs), as well as the relationship between short sleep duration (≤6 h) and demographic/lifestyle factors, among United States military service members (SMs). METHODS: A stratified random sample of SMs (n = 20,819) completed an online questionnaire on usual daily hours of sleep and demographic/lifestyle characteristics. CDMCs for a six-month period prior to questionnaire completion were obtained from a comprehensive military electronic medical surveillance system and grouped into 33 CDMCs covering both broad and specific medical conditions. Prevalence of CDMCs was compared among three sleep duration categories (≤4, 5-6 and ≥7 h). RESULTS: SMs reported a mean ± standard deviation of 6.3 ± 1.4 h of sleep per day. After adjustment for demographic/lifestyle characteristics, shorter sleep duration was associated with higher odds of a medical condition in 25 of 33 CDMCs, with most (n = 20) demonstrating a dose-response relationship. The five CDMCs with the largest differences between ≤4 vs ≥ 7 h sleep were: diseases of the nervous system (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 2.4-3.4), mental/behavioral diseases (OR = 2.7, 95%CI = 2.3-3.2), diseases of the musculoskeletal system (OR = 1.9, 95%CI = 1.6-2.1), diseases of the circulatory system (OR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.3-2.2), and diseases of the digestive system (OR = 1.6, 95%CI = 1.2-2.0). Six hours of sleep or less was independently associated with older age, less formal education, race, Hispanic ethnicity, higher body mass index, smoking, and military service branch. CONCLUSIONS: In this young, physically active population, reporting shorter sleep duration was associated with a higher risk of multiple CDMCs.


Assuntos
Militares , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Duração do Sono , Estudos Transversais , Sono , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia
3.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 972031, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36238571

RESUMO

Background: This cross-sectional study investigated the prevalence of, and factors associated with, filled prescription medications (FPMs) among United States (US) service members (SMs). Methods: A stratified random sample of active duty SMs from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy was obtained from military workforce records. Participants (n = 26,680) completed a questionnaire on demographics, physical characteristics, and lifestyle factors and approved access to their FPM for the previous 6 months. FPMs were obtained from the military Pharmacy Data Transaction Service that included all prescription medications dispensed at military medical treatment facilities, abroad, at retail pharmacies in the US, and/or through mail-order programs. Results: About two-thirds (65%) of SMs had ≥1 FPM in the 6 months surveillance period. Central nervous system (CNS) agents had the highest prevalence (41%), followed by anti-infective agents (20%), eye/ear/nose/throat preparations (20%), gastrointestinal drugs (18%), autonomic drugs (17%), skin and mucous membrane agents (13%), antihistamine drugs (12%), respiratory tract agents (12%) and cardiovascular drugs (9%). Among CNS agents, overall prevalence of dispensed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) was 30%. The odds of any FPM was independently associated with female gender, older age, higher body mass index, former tobacco use (smoking and smokeless tobacco), lower alcohol consumption, and was highest among Army, lowest among Marine Corps personnel. Conclusion: In this sample of SMs, dispensing of prescription medication was high, especially NSAIDs, but dispensing of cardiovascular drugs was much lower compared to the general US population, likely because of the younger age and higher level of physical activity of SMs.

4.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 122(10): 1841-1850, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35562046

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of prescription medications (PMs) with dietary supplements (DSs) can be hazardous because of potential adverse interactions, but patterns of dual use in military service members (SMs) has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: Investigate dual use of filled PMs (FPMs) and DSs, factors associated with dual use, and dual use among SMs with clinically diagnosed medical conditions (CDMCs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. Data on FPMs and CDMCs were obtained from medical surveillance records. Between December 2018 and August 2019, participants completed a questionnaire on DS use in the previous 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of 26,880 SMs from all military services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of dual use of FPMs with DSs within a 6-month period, demographic/lifestyle factors associated with dual use, and prevalence of dual use among SMs with CDMCs. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Prevalences were calculated as percents, χ2 statistics examined differences across various strata of demographic and lifestyle characteristics, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression determined the odds of using FPMs with DSs for various CDMCs. RESULTS: About one-half (49%) of SMs had dual use of FPMs with DSs in the 6-month period. Dual use was higher among women; increased with older age, more formal education, higher body mass index, and more physical activity; was highest among American Indian SMs and lowest among Asian SMs; was higher among former tobacco users; and was highest among Army personnel and lowest among Marine Corps personnel. The overall prevalence of dual use in the 6-month period was higher among those with a CDMC than those without (62% vs 19%), and this relationship was maintained for 20 International Classification of Diseases, Revision 10, code groupings covering virtually all CDMCs. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to document a high prevalence of dual FPMs and DSs in SMs, especially among those with CDMCs.


Assuntos
Militares , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Estudos Transversais , Suplementos Nutricionais , Feminino , Humanos , Prescrições
5.
Nutr J ; 21(1): 22, 2022 04 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35421992

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although representative data on caffeine intake in Americans are available, these data do not include US service members (SMs). The few previous investigations in military personnel largely involve convenience samples. This cross-sectional study examined prevalence of caffeine consumers, daily caffeine consumption, and factors associated with caffeine use among United States active duty military service members (SMs). METHODS: A stratified random sample of SMs were asked to complete an on-line questionnaire on their personal characteristics and consumption of caffeinated products (exclusive of dietary supplements). Eighteen percent (n = 26,680) of successfully contacted SMs (n = 146,365) completed the questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 87% reported consuming caffeinated products ≥1 time/week. Mean ± standard error per-capita consumption (all participants) was 218 ± 2 and 167 ± 3 mg/day for men and women, respectively. Caffeine consumers ingested 243 ± 2 mg/day (251 ± 2 mg/day men, 195 ± 3 mg/day women). On a body-weight basis, men and women consumed respectively similar caffeine amounts (2.93 vs 2.85 mg/day/kg; p = 0.12). Among individual caffeinated products, coffee had the highest use (68%), followed by sodas (42%), teas (29%), energy drinks (29%) and gums/candy/medications (4%). In multivariable logistic regression, characteristics independently associated with caffeine use (≥1 time/week) included female gender, older age, white race/ethnicity, higher body mass index, tobacco use or former use, greater alcohol intake, and higher enlisted or officer rank. CONCLUSION: Compared to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, daily caffeine consumption (mg/day) by SMs was higher, perhaps reflecting higher mental and physical occupational demands on SMs.


Assuntos
Bebidas Energéticas , Militares , Cafeína , Café , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Prevalência , Estados Unidos
6.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 122(10): 1851-1863, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35123127

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: About 50% of Americans and 70% of US military service members (SMs) regularly use dietary supplements (DSs) and some are associated with adverse effects (AEs). SMs are more likely to use unsafe DSs than civilians. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to examine the prevalence of, and factors associated with, AEs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of 200,000 US SMs from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy were obtained from military workforce records. Eighteen percent (n = 26,681) of successfully contacted SMs (n = 146,365) volunteered to participate between December 2018 and August 2019. Participants completed a detailed online questionnaire on demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and AEs associated with DS use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence of, and factors associated with, AEs among DS users. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Prevalence of AEs was calculated by DS categories. Linear trends, χ2 statistics, and multivariable logistic regression examined associations between AEs and demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and number DSs consumed. RESULTS: Proportion of DS users (≥ 1 time /week) reporting ≥1 AE was 18% overall, 20% for combination products (ie, weight loss, muscle building, and before/after workout supplements), 8% for purported prohormones, 6% for protein/amino acid products, 6% for multivitamin/multiminerals, 6% for individual vitamins/minerals, 4% for herbal products, and 2% for joint health products. Combination products are very popular in military personnel with nearly half of SMs regularly taking them. In multivariable analysis, reporting AEs were independently associated with female gender, younger age, higher body mass index, smoking, higher alcohol intake, service in the Army, Navy, or Marine Corps (compared with Air Force), and consumption of a greater number of DSs. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of SMs report experiencing AEs, especially users of combination products and purported prohormone supplements. This study presents contemporary data collected from a very large at-risk population on potentially hazardous categories of DSs.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Militares , Aminoácidos , Estudos Transversais , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Minerais/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vitaminas/efeitos adversos
7.
J Int Soc Sports Nutr ; 18(1): 59, 2021 Aug 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34433482

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sport-related nutritional supplements (SRNSs) include sport drinks, sport bars, and sport gels. Previous studies indicate that 25-35 % of athletes and 25-50 % of military personnel report using these supplements. This study examined prevalence, factors associated with use, and adverse effects (AEs) of SRNSs among United States military service members (SMs). METHODS: A stratified random sample of 200,000 SMs was obtained from military workforce records, and asked to complete a survey on demographics, SRNS use, and AEs experienced. About 18 % (n = 26,681) of contacted SMs (n = 146,365) completed the survey between December 2018 and August 2019. RESULTS: Overall, 45 % of SMs used ≥ 1 SRNS at least once per week in the past 6 months. Prevalence of use (± standard error) for sport drinks, bars, and gels were 32 ± 0.3, 27 ± 0.3, and 3 ± 0.1 %, respectively. Use of 1, 2, or 3 SRNSs was 28.9 ± 0.5, 13.6 ± 0.6, and 2.2 ± 0.6 %, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression indicated greater use of any SRNS was independently associated with male gender, younger age, single marital status, more weekly aerobic or resistance training, tobacco use, higher alcohol intake, officer status, combat arms occupations, and service in the Marine Corps or Navy (compared to the Air Force). Overall, the proportion of users reporting ≥ 1 AE was 2.0 ± 0.1 %, with 1.3 ± 0.1 % for sport drinks, 1.6 ± 0.2 % for sport bars, and 2.8 ± 0.6 % for sport gels. CONCLUSIONS: This large study of a stratified random sample of SMs found that nearly half of SMs consumed SRNSs weekly, and self-reported AEs were comparatively low. The AE incidence for SRNSs was much lower than typically found for dietary supplements, possibly because of more rigorous regulatory oversight for SRNSs.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Bebidas , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Géis , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Nutr ; 151(11): 3495-3506, 2021 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34293133

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: About 50% of Americans and 70% of US military service members use dietary supplements (DSs). OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional survey examined current prevalence of and factors associated with DS use in service members. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 200,000 service members from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy was obtained from military manpower records, and these service members were asked to complete a questionnaire on their DS use and personal characteristics. Chi-square statistics and multivariable logistic regression examined differences across various strata of demographic, lifestyle, and military characteristics. RESULTS: About 18% of successfully contacted service members (n = 26,681) completed the questionnaire between December 2018 and August 2019 (mean ± SD age: 33 ± 8 y, 86% male). Overall, 74% reported using ≥1 DS/wk. Multivitamins/multiminerals were the most commonly used DSs (45%), followed by combination products (44%), proteins/amino acids (42%), individual vitamins/minerals (31%), herbals (20%), joint health products (9%), and purported prohormones (5%). In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with DS use included female gender [OR (female/male): 1.91; 95% CI: 1.73, 2.11], older age [OR (≥40/18-24 y): 1.25; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.44], higher education level [OR (college degree/high school or less): 1.35; 95% CI: 1.19, 1.53], higher BMI [OR (≥30/<25 kg/m2): 1.37; 95% CI: 1.25, 1.52], more weekly resistance training [OR (>300/≤45 min/wk): 5.05; 95% CI: 4.55, 5.61], smokeless tobacco use [OR (user/nonuser): 1.30; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.44], higher alcohol intake [OR (≥72/0 mL/wk): 1.41; 95% CI: 1.29, 1.54], and higher military rank [OR (senior officer/junior enlisted): 1.26; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.51]. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with civilian data from the NHANES, service members were much more likely to use DSs and used different types of DSs, especially combination products and proteins/amino acids often used to purportedly enhance physical performance. Comparisons with previous military data suggest DS use has increased over time.


Assuntos
Militares , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Suplementos Nutricionais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Prevalência , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA