mTOR inhibitors after lung transplantation: a real-life experience.

Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), antimetabolites and corticosteroids for immunosuppression after lung transplantation (TPL) have gained importance in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The goal of this study was to characterize lung transplant recipients (LTR) treated with mTOR inhibitors, with a special focus on kidney function. Methods: LTR transplanted at the University Hospital Zurich between December 1992 and April 2022 were analyzed. Demographics, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after mTOR initiation, TPL circumstances, immunosuppressive regimens, and allograft function were recorded. We used linear regression to calculate the Mitch curves and a linear mixed-effects model to compare the eGFR. Results: Of all LTR, 70/593 (12%) received mTOR inhibitors. Intolerance or adverse events of antimetabolites were the most common indications for mTOR inhibitor introduction. Discontinuation in 34/70 (49%) was often related to planned or urgent surgery to prevent impaired wound healing. The majority of patients had a preserved baseline eGFR at mTOR inhibitor introduction with CKD Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage G1 or 2. The mean annual eGFR decline changed significantly from -16.19 mL/min/1.73 m2/year [95% confidence interval (CI): -22.27 to -10.11] 12 months before to -6.16 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (95% CI: -13.37 to 1.05) 12 months after mTOR initiation (P=0.009) showing better outcomes with earlier mTOR inhibitor initiation after lung TPL. Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests stabilization of kidney function after mTOR inhibitor initiation in LTR documented by a slower eGFR decline after mTOR inhibitor introduction with better outcomes early after lung TPL. Intolerance or adverse events of antimetabolites are important indications for the introduction of mTOR inhibitors. A relatively high discontinuation rate (49%) can be explained by planned discontinuation of mTOR inhibitors prior to surgery to avoid impaired wound healing.

Endoscopic treatment of benign tracheal stenosis: a single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Benign tracheal stenosis is relatively rare but remains a significant chronic disease due to its drastic symptoms including dyspnoea and inspiratory stridor, and consequent negative effect on quality of life. Traditionally, the surgical approach by resection of the stenotic tracheal segment has been the therapy of choice. However, endoscopic techniques have arisen and may offer a safe and less invasive alternative. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the retrospective study was to evaluate procedure-related safety and outcome of endoscopic treatment of benign tracheal stenosis at a single centre. METHODS: The study included all patients at our institution who between 2013 and 2022 had received endoscopic treatment of benign tracheal stenosis by rigid tracheoscopy, radial incision by electric papillotomy needle and dilation (endoscopic tracheoplasty) followed by triamcinolone acetonide as a local submucosal injection and additionally, from 2020, budesonide inhalation. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were treated in a total of 38 interventions, each resulting in immediate improvement of symptoms. There were no peri-interventional complications or mortality. Of the 38 interventions, 11 received no triamcinolone acetonide administration, resulting in a 54.5% recurrence rate after an average of 21.1 (±18.0) months, while 27 had local triamcinolone acetonide, with a 37% recurrence rate. Since 2020, we additionally initiated post-interventional budesonide inhalation as recurrence prophylaxis for newly admitted patients and patients with recurrences(n = 8), of whom only one (12.5%) has to date experienced a recurrence. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that endoscopic tracheoplasty offers a safe and successful, minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for patients with benign tracheal stenosis. We recommend local administration of triamcinolone into the mucosa as an additional treatment to decrease the risk of recurrence. However, given the uncontrolled study design and low sample size, safety and effectiveness cannot be conclusively demonstrated. Nonetheless, our findings suggest promising avenues for further investigation. Further studies on the additional benefit of inhaled corticosteroids are warranted.

One-Lung Ventilation during Rigid Bronchoscopy Using a Single-Lumen Endotracheal Tube: A Descriptive, Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Using one-lung ventilation (OLV) through a single-lumen endotracheal tube (SLT) in the untreated lung during rigid bronchoscopy (RB) and jet ventilation, high oxygenation can be guaranteed, whilst procedures requiring thermal energy in the other lung are still able to be used. This pilot study aimed to examine the bronchoscopy-associated risks and feasibility of OLV using an SLT during RB in patients with malignant airway stenosis. All consecutive adult patients with endobronchial malignant lesions receiving OLV during RB from 1 January 2017 to 12 May 2021 were included. We assessed perioperative complications in 25 RBs requiring OLV. Bleeding grades 1, 2, and 3 complicated the procedure in two (8%), five (20%), and five (20%) patients, respectively. The median saturation of peripheral oxygen remained at 94% (p = 0.09), whilst the median oxygen supply did not increase significantly from 0 L/min to 2 L/min (p = 0.10) within three days after the bronchoscopy. The 30-day survival rate of the patients was 79.1% (95% CI 58.4-91.1%), all of whom reported an improvement in subjective well-being after the bronchoscopy. OLV using an SLT during RB could be a new treatment approach for endobronchial ablative procedures without increasing bronchoscopy-associated risks, allowing concurrent high-energy treatments.

Improved glucose tolerance after initiation of Elexacaftor / Tezacaftor / Ivacaftor in adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The novel triple CFTR modulator therapy Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) improves lung function, body mass index (BMI), sinus clearance, and quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis. Whether treatment with ELX/TEZ/IVA is associated with improved glucose tolerance is unknown. METHODS: This cohort study included adults with CF and at least one copy of F508del.. Study assessments before treatment and at least 3 months after ELX/TEZ/IVA initiation included an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with glucose and insulin measurements, BMI, lung function test, and sweat chloride levels. We used an analysis of response profiles to calculate changes in outcomes. RESULTS: 33 patients (27.8 ± 6.3 years; 73% male; 64% F508del homozygous) were included. After a median of 184 [IQR, 107 - 278] days following treatment initiation 16 (48.5%) patients improved their glucose tolerance category, while 13 (39.4%) remained unchanged and 4 (12.1%) deteriorated. Overall, 60, 90 and 120 min OGTT glycemia decreased significantly from 11.9 ± 2.7 mmol/l to 10.6 ± 2.8 mmol/l (p = 0.012), 10.4 ± 3.0 mmol/l to 8.4 ± 3.6 mmol/l (p = 0.002) and 7.3 ± 3.1 mmol/l to 5.7 ± 3.0 mmol/l (p = 0.012). HbA1c levels also improved significantly, from 5.50±0.24% to 5.39±0.25% (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: In adult patients with CF and at least one copy of F508del, treatment with the triple CFTR modulator was associated with possible improvement of glucose tolerance without increases of insulin secretion. Early initiation of treatment as assessed through long-term prospective trials is mandatory to demonstrate if decreased glucose control is preventable or even reversible.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical lung volume reduction compared with endobronchial valve treatment in patients with severe emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction, either by surgery or bronchoscopically by endobronchial valve treatment have been shown to be a cost-effective alternative compared with conservative therapy. However, there is no comparative analysis of lung volume reduction by surgery and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to provide a cost-effectiveness analysis of lung volume reduction by surgery compared with bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves. METHODS: The effectiveness of lung volume reduction was assessed using forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), residual volume (RV) and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), measured at baseline and at 4 to 12 weeks. Cost unit accounting derived from SwissDRG was used as a surrogate of the costs from the payer's perspective. RESULTS: In total, 67 patients (37 men and 30 women) with a mean age of 68.3 ± 7.4 years were included. Both clinical effectiveness and costs were comparable between surgical and bronchoscopic lung reduction. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for bronchoscopic compared with lung volume reduction by surgery for FEV1, RV and 6MWD were -101, 4 and 58, respectively. For RV and 6MWD, it could be shown that endobronchial valve treatment is justified as a probably cost-effective alternative to lung volume reduction by surgery. Endobronchial valve treatment resulted in an improvement of 0.25 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and an ICER of € 7657 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: A robust statement on the superiority of one of the two procedures in terms of cost-effectiveness cannot be made from the present study. Therefore, the study is not suitable for resource allocation. Two upcoming trials comparing lung volume reduction surgery and endobronchial valve treatment may be able to answer this question.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps.

When evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (LAD) or masses, guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as an initial technique for tissue analysis and diagnosis. However, owing to the small sample size obtained by needle aspiration, its diagnostic yield (DY) is limited. EBUS transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) used as a complimentary technique to EBUS-TBNA might allow for better histopathological evaluation, thus improving DY. In this retrospective bicentric study, we assessed the DY and safety of an EBUS-guided 1.5 mm mini-forceps biopsy combined with EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of mediastinal/hilar LAD or masses compared to EBUS-TBNA alone. In total, 105 patients were enrolled. The overall DY was 61.9% and 85.7% for TBNA alone and EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBFB, respectively (p < 0.001). While the combined approach was associated with a significantly higher DY for lung cancer diagnosis (97.1% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.016) and sarcoidosis (85.2% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.001), no significant differences in DY were calculated for subgroups with smaller sample sizes such as lymphoma. No major adverse events were observed. Using a 1.5 mm mini-forceps is a safe and feasible technique for biopsy of mediastinal or hilar LAD or masses with superior overall DY compared to EBUS-TBNA as a standalone technique.

Frailty predicts outcomes in cystic fibrosis patients listed for lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Survival predictors are not established for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients listed for lung transplantation (LT). Using the deficit accumulation approach, we developed a CF-specific frailty index (FI) to allow risk stratification for adverse waitlist and post-LT outcomes. METHODS: We studied adult CF patients listed for LT in the Toronto LT Program (development cohort 2005-2015) and the Swiss LT centres (validation cohort 2008-2017). Comorbidities, treatment, laboratory results and social support at listing were utilized to develop a lung disease severity index (LI deficits, d = 18), a frailty index (FI, d = 66) and a lifestyle/social vulnerability index (LSVI, d = 10). We evaluated associations of the indices with worsening waitlist status, hospital and ICU length of stay, survival and graft failure. RESULTS: We studied 188 (Toronto cohort, 176 [94%] transplanted) and 94 (Swiss cohort, 89 [95%] transplanted) patients. The median waitlist times were 69 and 284 days, respectively. The median follow-up post-transplant was 5.3 and 4.7 years. At listing, 44.7% of patients were frail (FI ≥ 0.25) in the Toronto and 21.3% in the Swiss cohort. The FI was significantly associated with all studied outcomes in the Toronto cohort (FI and post-LT mortality, multivariable HR 1.74 [95%CI:1.24-2.45] per 0.1 point of the FI). In the Swiss cohort, the FI was associated with worsening waitlist status, post-LT mortality and graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: In CF patients listed for LT, FI risk stratification was significantly associated with waitlist and post-LT outcomes. Studying frailty in young populations with advanced disease can provide insights on how frailty and deficit accumulation impacts survival.

Transbronchial Cryobiopsy Compared to Forceps Biopsy for Diagnosis of Acute Cellular Rejection in Lung Transplants: Analysis of 63 Consecutive Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a complication after lung transplantation (LTx). The diagnosis of ACR is based on histologic findings using transbronchial forceps biopsy (FB). However, its diagnostic accuracy is limited because of the small biopsy size and crush artifacts. Transbronchial cryobiopsy (CB) provides a larger tissue size compared with FB. METHODS: FB and CB were obtained consecutively during the same bronchoscopy (February 2020-April 2021). All biopsies were scored according to the ISHLT criteria by three pathologists. Interobserver agreement was scored by the kappa index. We assessed the severity of bleeding and the presence of pneumothorax. RESULTS: In total, 35 lung transplant recipients were included, and 126 CBs and 315 FBs were performed in 63 consecutive bronchoscopies. ACR (A1-A3, minimal-moderate) was detected in 18 cases (28.6%) by CB, whereas ACR was detected in 3 cases (4.8%) by FB. Moderate and severe bleeding complicated FB and CB procedures in 23 cases (36.5%) and 1 case (1.6%), respectively. Pneumothorax occurred in 6.3% of patients. The interobserver agreement was comparable for both CB and FB. CONCLUSIONS: CB provided an improved diagnostic yield for ACR diagnosis, leading to reclassification and changes in treatment strategies in 28.6% of cases. Prospective studies should better define the role of CB after LTx.

Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema (CPFE) Clinical Features and Management.

BACKGROUND: Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is an underrecognized syndrome characterized by chronic, progressive disease with a dismal prognosis. Frequent co-morbidities with a higher incidence than in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or emphysema alone are pulmonary hypertension (WHO group 3) in 47-90% of the patients and lung cancer in 46.8% of the patients. OBJECTIVE: Review current evidence and knowledge concerning diagnosis, risk factors, disease evolution and treatment options of CPFE. METHODS: We searched studies reporting CPFE in original papers, observational studies, case reports, and meta-analyses published between 1990 and August 2020, in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library databases and Google Scholar using the search terms [CPFE], [pulmonary fibrosis] OR [IPF] AND [emphysema]. Bibliographies of retrieved articles were searched as well. Further inclusion criteria were publications in English, French, German and Italian, with reference to humans. In vitro data and animal data were not considered unless they were mentioned in studies reporting predominantly human data. RESULTS: Between May 1, 1990, and September 1, 2020, we found 16 studies on CPFE from the online sources and bibliographies. A total of 890 patients are described in the literature. Although male/female ratio was not reported in all studies, the large majority of patients were male (at least 78%), most of them were current or former heavy smokers. CONCLUSION: CPFE is a syndrome presenting with dyspnea on exertion followed by disruptive cough and recurrent exacerbations. The disease may progress rapidly, be aggravated by pulmonary hypertension WHO group 3 and is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Smoking and male sex are important risk factors. There is a need for more research on CPFE especially relating to etiology, influence of genetics, treatment and prevention options. Antifibrotic therapy might be an interesting treatment option for these patients.

Calcineurin inhibitors revisited: A new paradigm for COVID-19?

Abstract The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can cause mild, moderate or severe disease (COVID-19). In severe disease, there is hyperinflammation causing severe symptoms. Severe COVID-19 is an immunological phenomenon, rather than a direct viral damage disease. Therapies for COVID-19 are all investigational therapies. In case of severe disease, treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor could be promising. In this article we explain the mechanisms of calcineurin inhibitor treatment for COVID-19, based on experiences seen in solid organ transplant recipients who suffered from COVID-19.

Bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation after unsuccessful lung volume reduction surgery: A case report.

Compared to surgery there is no evidence on bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (LVR) in patients with fading benefit after LVR surgery. CASE REPORT: We present a case of 64-year old female patient who was successfully treated with bronchial thermal vapor ablation (BTVA) after previous ineffective lung volume reduction (LVR) surgery several months earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Bronchoscopic LVR, in particular BTVA, might be considered in patients with fading or missing effects after previous LVRS. At least, the safety profile of BTVA seems not be adversely affected by previous LVRS, when proper patient selection and procedure planning are ensured.