Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
J Cancer Surviv ; 10(1): 1-10, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25862543

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The study objectives are to examine prevalence of current smoking, and to assess the association of both health insurance (HI) and access to care with smoking cessation among cancer survivors. METHODS: We performed an analysis from a cross-sectional study of cancer survivors aged 18-64 years using nationally representative data from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey. We assessed the prevalence of current smoking among cancer survivors. Also, in a subset excluding never smokers, we assessed cessation status of cancer survivors operationalized as comparing current to former smokers. RESULTS: The study population (N = 18,896) was predominantly 45-64 years of age, female, and white. The prevalence of current smoking was substantially greater among cancer survivors without HI (40.9 %) than for those with HI (19.5 %). Cancer survivors with no HI had 2-fold greater adjusted odds of not quitting cigarette smoking compared to those with HI. Among those with insurance, cancer survivors who did not have regular health care provider or could not see doctor due to cost or had their last routine checkup ≥1 year ago had 60-80 % fold greater adjusted odds of not quitting cigarette smoking compared to cancer survivors who had better access to health care. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors without HI have substantially greater current smoking rates compared with those with HI. Among cancer survivors with HI, those who experienced health care access-related problems had lower cessation rates than their counterparts. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Smoking cessation needs to be recognized as a crucial component of preventive care for cancer survivors. Continuous patient engagement and cancer-patient-centered strategies are urgently needed to achieve optimal results for quit rates particularly for young cancer survivors who are most susceptible to current smoking.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias/reabilitação , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/terapia , Sobreviventes , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Sobreviventes/legislação & jurisprudência , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Public Health Dent ; 73(4): 261-70, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23521183

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to examine whether a higher proportion of current and former smokers reported having an oral cancer screening (OCS) exam in the past year compared with never smokers in Maryland between 2002 and 2008. METHODS: Secondary analysis of the Maryland Cancer Surveys (conducted in 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008), population-based, random-digit-dial surveys on cancer screening among adults age 40 years and older. Of 20,197 individuals who responded to the surveys, 19,054 answered questions on OCS and smoking. Results are weighted to the Maryland population. RESULTS: Self-reported OCS in the past year increased from 33 percent in 2002 to 40 percent in 2008. Screening among never and former smokers increased from about 35 percent to 42 percent and from 35 percent to 43 percent, respectively; screening among current smokers remained between 23 percent and 25 percent. In the adjusted analysis, current smokers had decreased odds of screening compared with never smokers; no significant difference was observed between former and never smokers. When the variable dental visit in the last year was included in the adjusted analysis, it became the strongest predictor of OCS. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2002 and 2008, self-reported OCS in the last year increased among former and never smokers, but remained unchanged for current smokers. A visit to a dental professional attenuated the difference in OCS between current and never smokers. Dental visit in the last year was the strongest predictor of OCS.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Bucais/diagnóstico , Fumar , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Bucais/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
J Cancer Surviv ; 7(2): 183-90, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23315210

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cancer survivors are at increased risk for influenza-related complications. Racial disparities in preventive health services have not been extensively studied among cancer survivors. Our objective is to compare influenza vaccination prevalence among black and white cancer survivors METHODS: We performed a secondary data analysis of 41,346 white and black cancer survivors (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey. Respondents were asked whether they had received an influenza vaccination in the previous year. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of having influenza vaccine by race. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of whites reported receiving the vaccine in the last year compared to 50 % of blacks. Blacks had significantly lower odds of vaccination after controlling for covariates significantly associated with the odds of influenza vaccination. Higher education, having health insurance, having a primary care provider, and having a routine check-up in the last year increased the odds of receiving an influenza vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis supports that racial disparities in vaccine coverage persist among cancer survivors, a group strongly recommended to receive annual influenza vaccine, even when predictors significantly associated with increased vaccination are controlled for. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: As a nationally representative survey with a large sample size, our study provides a picture of self-reported vaccine coverage among cancer survivors in the USA and the disparity that exists between blacks and whites in this population. Care teams can use these findings to better target follow-up care for cancer survivors.


Assuntos
População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Influenza , Neoplasias , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Sobreviventes/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Age Ageing ; 42(1): 102-6, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22918090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: fifteen percent of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are elderly; they are less likely to have complications and more likely to have colonic disease. OBJECTIVE: to compare disease behaviour in patients with CD based on age at diagnosis. DESIGN: cross-sectional study. SETTING: tertiary referral centre. SUBJECTS: patients with confirmed CD. METHODS: behaviour was characterised according to the Montreal classification. Patients with either stricturing or penetrating disease were classified as having complicated disease. Age at diagnosis was categorised as <17, 17-40, 41-59 and ≥ 60 years. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between advanced age ≥ 60 and complicated disease. RESULTS: a total of 467 patients were evaluated between 2004 and 2010. Increasing age of diagnosis was negatively associated with complicated disease and positively associated with colonic disease. As age of diagnosis increased, disease duration (P < 0.001), family history of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (P = 0.015) and perianal disease decreased (P < 0.0015). After adjustment for confounding variables, the association between age at diagnosis and complicated disease was no longer significant (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.21-1.65). CONCLUSIONS: patients diagnosed with CD ≥ 60 were more likely to have colonic disease and non-complicated disease. However, the association between age at diagnosis and complicated disease did not persist after adjustment for confounding variables.


Assuntos
Idade de Início , Doença de Crohn/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Doença de Crohn/classificação , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Fatores de Risco
5.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 8(5): A114, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21843417

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Blacks have the highest incidence of and death from prostate cancer in the United States. Screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) may decrease mortality. Repeated testing allows for the calculation of PSA velocity (change of PSA over time), which may be a more clinically useful test for prostate cancer than a single PSA measurement. The objective of this study was to examine whether blacks were as likely as whites to report having had repeated PSA testing. METHODS: The Maryland Cancer Survey 2006 was a population-based, random-digit-dialed statewide survey on cancer screening and risk behaviors of adults aged 40 years or older. We analyzed self-reported information on repeated PSA testing (2 PSA tests in the preceding 3 years) for 1,721 black and white men. We used logistic regression to estimate the effect of race and age on repeated PSA testing, adjusting for other covariates. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of men reported ever having had a PSA test; 41% had repeated PSA testing in the past 3 years. Blacks aged 40 to 49 were more likely to report having repeated PSA testing than whites in this age group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-6.5). Blacks aged 60 to 69 were less likely to report repeated PSA testing than whites (AOR, 0.4, 95% CI, 0.2-0.8). No difference was seen by race among men aged 50 to 59 and men aged 70 or older. Repeated PSA testing was associated with living in an urban area and with having higher education, health insurance, a family history of prostate cancer, and having discussed cancer screening with a doctor. CONCLUSION: Self-reported repeated PSA testing differed by age and race, being higher among blacks aged 40 to 49 and lower among blacks aged 60 to 69, compared with whites in their respective age groups.


Assuntos
Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/prevenção & controle , População Branca
6.
Prev Med ; 53(1-2): 70-5, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21679723

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a racial difference exists in self-reported recommendations for colorectal cancer screening from a health care provider, and whether this difference has changed over time. METHOD: Secondary analysis of the 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008 Maryland Cancer Surveys, cross-sectional population-based random-digit-dial surveys on cancer screening. Participants were 11,368 White and 2495 Black Maryland residents age ≥ 50 years. RESULTS: For each race, recommendations for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy increased over time (67%-83% for Whites, 57%-74% for Blacks; p<0.001 for both), but the race difference remained approximately 10% at each survey. Among respondents without a colonoscopy in the last 10 years (n=5081), recommendations for fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in the past year decreased over time for Whites (37%-24%, p<0.001) and for Blacks (36-28%, p=0.05), with no difference by race in any year. In multivariable analysis, the effect of race on the odds of reporting a provider recommendation did not vary significantly across time for either test (p=0.80 for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy, p=0.24 for FOBT for effect modification by year). CONCLUSION: Whites were more likely than Blacks to report ever receiving a provider recommendation for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy. Although the proportion of patients receiving recommendations for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy increased over time, the gap between races remained unchanged.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Relações Médico-Paciente , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Fezes/citologia , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Maryland , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20936146

RESUMO

This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73% documented the bowel preparation quality and 82% documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87% and 53%, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting.

8.
Public Health Rep ; 124(4): 495-502, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19618786

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Population-based landline telephone surveys are potentially biased due to inclusion of only people with landline telephones. This article examined the degree of telephone coverage bias in a low-income population. METHODS: The Charles County Cancer Survey (CCCS) was conducted to evaluate cancer screening practices and risk behaviors among low-income, rural residents of Charles County, Maryland. We conducted face-to-face interviews with 502 residents aged 18 years and older. We compared the prevalence of health behaviors and cancer screening tests for those with and without landline telephones. We calculated the difference between whole sample estimates and estimates for only those respondents with landline telephones to quantify the magnitude of telephone coverage bias. RESULTS: Of 499 respondents who gave information on telephone use, 80 (16%) did not have landline telephones. We found differences between those with and without landline telephones for race/ethnicity, health-care access, insurance coverage, and several types of cancer screening. The absolute coverage bias ranged up to 6.5 percentage points. Simulation scenarios showed the magnitude of telephone coverage bias decreases as the percent of the population with landline telephone coverage increases, and as landline telephone coverage increases, the estimates from a landline telephone survey would approximate the estimates from a face-to-face survey. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted the need for targeted face-to-face surveys to supplement telephone surveys to more fully characterize hard-to-reach subpopulations. Our findings also indicated that landline telephone-based surveys continue to offer a cost-effective method for conducting large-scale population studies in support of policy and public health decision-making.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Pobreza , População Rural , Telefone , Adolescente , Adulto , Viés , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Maryland , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos de Pesquisa , Adulto Jovem
9.
Cancer ; 113(2): 276-85, 2008 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18543276

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: African Americans (AAs) have low rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. To the authors' knowledge, factors that influence their participation, especially individuals with a family history of CRC ("family history"), are not well understood. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the 2002 Maryland Cancer Survey data examined predictors of risk-appropriate, timely CRC screening ("screening") in AAs with a family history and in individuals without a family history. Predictors that were evaluated included age, sex, family history, mammogram or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, body mass index, activity, fruit/vegetable consumption, alcohol, smoking, perceived risk of cancer, education, employment, insurance, access to a healthcare provider, and healthcare provider recommendation of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and/or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy. RESULTS: In individuals without a family history of CRC (N = 492), recommendation for FOBT (odds ratio [OR] of 11.90; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 6.84-20.71) and sigmoidoscopy/colonscopy (OR of 7.06; 95% CI, 4.11-12.14), moderate/vigorous activity (OR of 1.74; 95% CI, 1.06-2.28), and PSA screening history (OR of 2.68; 95% CI, 1.01-7.81) were found to be predictive of screening. In individuals with a family history (N = 88), recommendation for sigmoidoscopy/colonscopy (OR of 24.3; 95%, CI 5.30-111.34) and vigorous activity (OR of 5.21; 95% CI, 1.09-24.88) were found to be predictive of screening. However, family history did not predict screening when the analysis was controlled for age, education, and insurance. AAs who had a family history were less likely to screen compared with their white counterparts (N = 293) and compared with AAs who were at average risk for CRC (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of family history, healthcare provider recommendation and activity level were important predictors of screening. Lower screening rates were observed in AAs who had a family history compared with individuals who did not. The authors believe that, for AAs who have a family history, further examination of barriers and facilitators to CRC screening within the cultural context is warranted.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/etnologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Saúde da Família , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde/etnologia , Hereditariedade , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/etnologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
10.
Cancer Detect Prev ; 30(6): 499-506, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17113720

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current and former smokers are at increased risk to develop oral cancer. This analysis was performed to determine whether current and former smokers are more likely to undergo an exam for oral cancer than non-smokers. METHODS: The Maryland Cancer Survey performed in 2002 was a population-based random digit dial, statewide survey on cancer screening and risk behaviors, targeting adults aged 40 years and older. The dataset contains self-reported information on oral cancer examinations, current smoking status, and health care access information for 4840 Maryland residents. RESULTS: 2062 (42.6%) of Marylanders aged 40 years and older reported ever having had an oral cancer examination. Dentists and dental hygienists performed 90.9% of the exams. Current and former smokers were no more likely than those who have never smoked to have ever had the examination (adjusted OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.85-1.23 and OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.94-1.25, respectively). Other predictors associated with having an oral cancer exam included having more than a high school of education, being female, non-black, being in good to excellent health, and having a recent physical exam. Having visited the dentist in the last year had the highest odds of having ever had an oral cancer exam. CONCLUSIONS: Current and former smokers are a high-risk group who need to be targeted for oral cancer exams by dental professionals and primary care physicians.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Bucais/diagnóstico , Fumar , Adulto , Idoso , Coleta de Dados , Odontologia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Maryland , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Bucais/epidemiologia , Fumar/efeitos adversos
11.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 3(3): A88, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16776889

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Overweight and obese individuals are at increased risk for developing and dying from colorectal cancer. Studies suggest that overweight and obese women are more likely to avoid or delay cancer screening. Our objective was to determine whether overweight or obese adults aged 50 years and older living in Maryland in 2002 were less likely to be up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening than normal and underweight adults. METHODS: The relationship between body mass index and colorectal cancer screening was evaluated based on responses from 3436 participants aged 50 years and older to the Maryland Cancer Survey 2002, a population-based random-digit-dial telephone survey. The survey contains self-reported information on colorectal cancer screening, height, weight, and potential confounders. Logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, sex, race, employment, marital status, education, area of residence, and health-care-related variables. RESULTS: Overall, 64.9% of Marylanders aged 50 and older were up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening. Compared with normal and underweight individuals, overweight individuals had similar odds of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.33). Obese individuals had slightly lower odds, but this difference was not statistically significant (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.09). Recommendation by a health care provider for colorectal cancer screening was strongly associated with up-to-date colorectal cancer screening (OR, 36.7; 95% CI, 28.7-47.0). CONCLUSION: Our study shows no statistically significant association between body mass index levels and up-to-date colorectal cancer screening. We recommend that physicians and other health care providers increase up-to-date colorectal cancer screening rates in the population by referring their patients for appropriate screening.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População
12.
Teratology ; 65(3): 106-15, 2002 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11877773

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Single ventricle, a rare congenital cardiac defect, often occurs as part of a complex group of cardiovascular abnormalities. Little is known of its epidemiologic associations. METHODS: Using data from the Baltimore-Washington Infant Study [BWIS], (1981-89), a population based case-control study of cardiovascular malformations, infants with single ventricle were evaluated with respect to infant and family characteristics and maternal and paternal exposures. The cases were analyzed according to presence/absence of abnormal cardio-visceral situs. Controls were 3,572 infants without heart defects randomly selected from the regional cohort of live births. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used as measures of association. RESULTS: Single ventricle occurred in 1.25% of infants with congenital cardiovascular defects in the BWIS. Fifty-five infants had single ventricle. In 48 families (87.3%) the parents were interviewed. Thirty-three infants had normal situs and 15 had abnormal situs. Paternal alcohol consumption (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.9) and paternal cigarette smoking (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.1) were associated with all cases of single ventricle. These associations were even stronger in the subset of infants with abnormal situs. Maternal history of a previous induced abortion was also associated with infants born with abnormal situs (OR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-11.5). Paternal marijuana use was associated with cases of single ventricle in normal situs (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-5.2). CONCLUSIONS: Potential risk factors included paternal smoking and alcohol consumption, highlighting the need for future studies to consider environmental factors in the pathogenesis of this cardiac defect.


Assuntos
Ventrículos do Coração/anormalidades , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , District of Columbia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Virginia/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA