The role of compression therapy after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) - review.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a rising problem in western countries. There are several stages of CVD that can be treated with different ways. One of the methods of treating varicosity, C2 stage of CVD, is still developing endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). This method is popular due to its short operation time, less bleeding, quick recovery and no surgical scars. The compression therapy in form of compression stockings has been widely used as a conservative treatment of early stage CVD and it's also used after EVLA. However there are no strong recommendations towards using compression therapy after this kind of surgery.</br> <b><br>Aim and Method:</b> This paper is aimed to review existing knowledge about compression therapy benefits and its recommended time period after EVLA. Search engines used in review: Pubmed and Cochrane.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> Studies focusing on the compression therapy after EVLA of varicose veins have questioned the prolonged use of compression therapy as it brings no additional benefits and might be difficult for patients to adhere. The existing studies recommended the time period no greater than 1-2 weeks. There are no significant changes in reoccurrence rate and return to normal activities between compression and non-compression group. It is proven that compression therapy significantly reduces the postoperative pain and consumption of analgesics.</br> <b><br>Discussion:</b> Compression therapy seems as a safe option for low pain management. There is a need for further research involving the impact of the compression therapy after EVLA, especially in group of low energy delivered settings as the results of treatment are promising.</br>.

Dataset of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (EL-COVID) survey.

This dataset supports the findings of the vascular e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic survey (the EL-COVID survey). The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union was taken into consideration in all steps of data handling. The survey was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Primary Investigator and an online English survey consisting of 18 questions was developed ad-hoc. A bilingual English-Mandarin version of the questionnaire was developed according to the instructions of the Chinese Medical Association in order to be used in mainland People's Republic of China. Differences between the two questionnaires were minor and did affect the process of data collection. Both questionnaires were hosted online. The EL-COVID survey was advertised through major social media. All national and regional contributors contacted their respective colleagues through direct messaging on social media or by email. Eight national societies or groups supported the dissemination of the EL-COVID survey. The data provided demographics information of the EL-COVID participants and an insight on the level of difficulty in accessing or citing previously attended online activities and whether participants were keen on citing these activities in their Curricula Vitae. A categorization of additional comments made by the participants are also based on the data. The survey responses were filtered, anonymized and submitted to descriptive analysis of percentage.

Vascular e-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The EL-COVID Survey.

BACKGROUND: The corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has radically changed the possibilities for vascular surgeons and trainees to exchange knowledge and experience. The aim of the present survey is to inventorize the e-learning needs of vascular surgeons and trainees as well as the strengths and weaknesses of vascular e-Learning. METHODS: An online survey consisting of 18 questions was created in English, with a separate bilingual English-Mandarin version. The survey was dispersed to vascular surgeons and trainees worldwide through social media and via direct messaging from June 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-six records from 84 different countries could be included. Most participants attended several online activities (>4: n = 461, 54%; 2-4: n = 300, 35%; 1: n = 95, 11%) and evaluated online activities as positive or very positive (84.7%). In deciding upon participation, the topic of the activity was most important (n = 440, 51.4%), followed by the reputation of the presenter or the panel (n = 178, 20.8%), but not necessarily receiving accreditation or certification (n = 52, 6.1%). The survey identified several shortcomings in vascular e-Learning during the pandemic: limited possibility to attend due to lack of time and increased workload (n = 432, 50.5%), no protected/allocated time (n = 488, 57%) and no accreditation or certification, while technical shortcomings were only a minor problem (n = 25, 2.9%). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic vascular e-Learning has been used frequently and was appreciated by vascular professionals from around the globe. The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in current e-Learning that can be used to further improve online learning in vascular surgery.

Career in vascular surgery - the medical student's perspective.

AIM: Under the supervision of the Department of General and Vascular Surgery of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, a questionnaire was distributed online or as a paper version to medical students (MSs) in order to better understand the attitudes towards surgery as a specialty and to determine the reasons why students do and do not choose vascular surgery as their career path. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The questionnaire was distributed online or as a paper version to MSs in the 3rd, 5th, and 6th year of the PUMS 6-year M.D. PROGRAM: It provided the data on the year of study, grade point average (GPA), sex, age, respondent's specialty choice, 33 questions with responses on a 1-5 Likert scale (1 was the least important reason and 5 was the most important reason), and 2 questions with socres between 0 and 4. A total of 136 Polish MSs of PUMS completed the survey. RESULTS: For MSs who choose vascular surgery as their career path, "endovascular capabilities of vascular surgery" and "higher income possibilities than a general surgeon" were the most important reasons. The "poor availability of work in other places than the vascular surgery department of your choice, few such clinics in the region" was the most important reason not to choose vascular surgery. A role of gender was also noted - 13% of male MSs classified gender as an "important factor", in contrast to 60% of female MSs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study might help to develop better strategies to attract future trainees to surgical specialties, particularly vascular surgery, and improve work environment.