Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): AUA Guideline Amendment 2023.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline amendment is to provide a useful reference on the effective evidence-based management of male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary/attributed to BPH (LUTS/BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Minnesota Evidence Review Team searched Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) database to identify studies relevant to the management of BPH. The guideline was updated in 2023 to capture eligible literature published between September 2020 and October 2022. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions. RESULTS: The BPH amendment resulted in changes to statements/supporting text on combination therapy, photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT), laser enucleation, and prostate artery embolization (PAE). A new statement on temporary implanted prostatic devices (TIPD) was added. In addition, statements on transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) were removed and information regarding these legacy technologies was added to the background section. References and the accompanying treatment algorithms were updated to align with the updated text. CONCLUSION: This guideline seeks to improve clinicians' ability to evaluate and treat patients with BPH/LUTS based on currently available evidence. Future studies will be essential to further support these statements to improve patient care.

Sex Differences in Bladder Management, Symptoms, and Satisfaction After Spinal Cord Injury.

PURPOSE: We sought to characterize sex-stratified differences in bladder management and bladder symptoms and satisfaction after spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study; eligibility included: age ≥18 years and acquired spinal cord injury. Bladder management was grouped as (1) clean intermittent catheterization, (2) indwelling catheter, (3) surgery, and (4) voiding. Primary outcome was Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score. Secondary outcomes were subdomains of the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score and bladder-related satisfaction. Multivariable regression was used in sex-stratified models to establish associations between participant characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,479 participants enrolled in the study. Of the patients 843 (57%) were paraplegic and 585 (40%) were women. Median age and time from injury were 44.9 (IQR 34.3, 54.1) and 11 (IQR 5.1, 22.4) years. Women utilized clean intermittent catheterization at a lower rate (42.6% vs 56.5%) and surgery at a higher rate (22.6% vs 7.0%), especially catheterizable channel creation with or without augmentation cystoplasty (11.0% vs 1.9%). Women had worse measures of bladder symptoms and satisfaction across all outcomes. In adjusted analyses, women and men utilizing indwelling catheters had fewer associated overall symptoms (Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score), less incontinence, and fewer storage and voiding symptoms. Surgery was associated with fewer bladder symptoms (Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score) and less incontinence in women, and was also associated with better satisfaction in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant sex-stratified differences in bladder management after spinal cord injury, which included a much higher use of surgery. Bladder symptoms and satisfaction are worse across all measurements in women. Women have a substantial associated benefit with surgery, while both sexes have fewer bladder symptoms with indwelling catheters compared to clean intermittent catheterization.

Surveillance After Ureteroneocystostomy: Is it Necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of post-operative imaging after ureteroneocystostomy and whether long-term symptom or radiographic surveillance aided in the detection of recurrent obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients were identified who underwent a ureteroneocystostomy with or without psoas hitch or Boari flap between January 2012 and June 2021. Patients who underwent a bilateral procedure, had active malignancy or immediate failure, or did not have 6 months of follow-up with 2 imaging studies were excluded. Using the initial imaging study after stent removal, patients were categorized into normal and equivocal groups according to predefined radiologic criteria. Patients were followed longitudinally to determine whether they subsequently developed radiographic evidence of obstruction. Follow up visits were reviewed for patient symptoms suggestive of post-operative obstruction, defined as flank pain, hematuria, or pyelonephritis. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients met criteria. Normal and equivocal initial imaging was seen in 99 and 13 patients, respectively. At a mean radiologic follow-up of 32 months, stricture recurrence was identified in 3 patients with normal initial imaging. No patients with initial equivocal imaging demonstrated recurrent obstruction at mean radiologic follow-up of 29 months. All patients with recurrent stricture presented with symptoms of obstruction. Of patients who developed symptoms after ureteroneocystostomy, 13.6% had recurrent stricture. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic patients after ureteroneocystostomy who had either normal or equivocal post-operative imaging did not benefit from additional radiologic testing in this cohort. All patients that demonstrated failure presented with symptomatic obstruction that warranted imaging. Surgeons may consider restricting surveillance imaging to symptomatic patients after the initial post-operative period.

Association of stone surgery with patient-reported complications after spinal cord injury.

AIMS: To determine if a history of urinary stone surgery in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with an increased incidence of SCI-related complications and lower quality of life (QOL). METHODS: The Neurogenic Bladder Research Group (NBRG) registry is a multicenter, prospective, observational study which measures QOL after acquired SCI. Over 1.5 years, 1479 participants were enrolled and grouped according to history of stone surgery. We evaluated SCI-related complications, QOL, and associations between patient factors and prior stone surgery using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Participants were a median of 11 years post-SCI and 189 (12.8%) reported prior bladder or kidney stone surgery; 95.8% of these occurred after the SCI. Median time between SCI and first stone was 5.6 years (IQR: 1.8-12.8). Hospitalizations were higher for those with prior stone surgery, with common reasons including UTIs, blood clots, pressure ulcers, and pneumonia (p < 0.001). During the year of observation, the incidence of stone surgery was 17% in those with a prior history of stone surgery and 2% per year in those without prior stone surgery (p < 0.001). Controlling for covariates, bladder management strategy, age, BMI, and years since SCI were associated with history of stone surgery. CONCLUSIONS: People with SCI and a history of surgical stone disease are at high risk for episodes of recurrent stones and increased hospitalizations, particularly those with kidney stones and indwelling catheter use. Identification of high-risk patients may guide tailored surveillance for complications and stone prevention strategies.

Factors impacting bowel symptoms in a contemporary spinal cord injury cohort: results from the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group Registry.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional. OBJECTIVES: To identify variables associated with severe bowel symptoms in spinal cord injured people. SETTING: National cohort. METHODS: Adult spinal cord injured (SCI) people were recruited for an online registry and 1373 were included for analysis. Univariate analysis and logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between severity of bowel symptoms and variables. Bowel symptoms were assessed by the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD) score and patients scoring ≥14 were categorized as having severe bowel symptoms. Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) severity was measured using a six item questionnaire and reported as total AD score (0-24). Bladder management was categorized as: voiding, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), surgery (augmentation/diversion) or indwelling catheter. RESULTS: Severe bowel symptoms were reported in 570 (42%) On multivariable logistic regression, every point increase of AD total score was associated with 5% increased odds of having more severe bowel symptoms [OR 1.05 95% CI 1.03-1.10]. Type of bladder management was also associated with more severe symptoms (p = 0.0001). SCI people with indwelling catheters (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.40-3.32) or reconstructive surgery (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.08-3.32) were almost twice as likely to report more severe bowel symptoms than those performing CIC.

Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: AUA GUIDELINE PART II-Surgical Evaluation and Treatment.

PURPOSE: Surgical therapies for symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are many, and vary from minimally invasive office based to high-cost operative approaches. This Guideline presents effective evidence-based surgical management of male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary/attributed to BPH (LUTS/BPH). See accompanying algorithm for a detailed summary of procedures (figure[Figure: see text]). MATERIALS/METHODS: The Minnesota Evidence Review Team searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and AHRQ databases to identify eligible studies published between January 2007 and September 2020, which includes the initial publication (2018) and amendments (2019, 2020). The Team also reviewed articles identified by Guideline Panel Members. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table[Table: see text]). RESULTS: Twenty-four guideline statements pertinent to pre-operative and surgical management were developed. Appropriate levels of evidence and supporting text were created to direct urologic providers towards suitable and safe operative interventions for individual patient characteristics. A re-treatment section was created to direct attention to longevity and outcomes with individual approaches to help guide patient counselling and therapeutic decisions. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative and surgical management of BPH requires attention to individual patient characteristics and procedural risk. Clinicians should adhere to recommendations and familiarize themselves with criteria that yields the highest likelihood of surgical success when choosing a particular approach for a particular patient.

Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: AUA GUIDELINE PART I-Initial Work-up and Medical Management.

PURPOSE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a histologic diagnosis describing proliferation of smooth muscle and epithelial cells within the prostatic transition zone. The prevalence and severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men are progressive and impact the health and welfare of society. This revised Guideline provides a useful reference on effective evidence-based management of male LUTS/BPH. See the accompanying algorithm for a summary of the procedures detailed in the Guideline (figures 1 and 2[Figure: see text][Figure: see text]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Minnesota Evidence Review Team searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and AHRQ databases to identify eligible English language studies published between January 2008 and April 2019, then updated through December 2020. Search terms included Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords for pharmacological therapies, drug classes, and terms related to LUTS or BPH. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table 1[Table: see text]). RESULTS: Nineteen guideline statements pertinent to evaluation, work-up, and medical management were developed. Appropriate levels of evidence and supporting text were created to direct both primary care and urologic providers towards streamlined and suitable practices. CONCLUSIONS: The work up and medical management of BPH requires attention to individual patient characteristics, while also respecting common principles. Clinicians should adhere to recommendations and familiarize themselves with standards of BPH management.

Depth and Location of Sacral Suture Placement During Cadaveric Simulation of Open Sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the location and depth of placement of sacral sutures in a cadaveric sacrocolpopexy model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following a 1-hour instructional session, trainees performed an open sacrocolpopexy on unembalmed cadavers under guidance by a Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery board-certified surgeon. At completion of the session, the presacral tissues were dissected and the location and depth of each sacral suture was identified. RESULTS: A total of 19 sutures were placed by 9 trainees into 8 cadavers. The majority of sutures (14/19, 74%) were placed between L5 and S1. Three sutures (16%) were placed at L5 and 2 (11%) were placed at the S1 vertebral body. The mean depth of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) was 1.4 mm. When assessing depth of suture placement, 13 of 19 (68%) were placed into the ALL without penetrating the disc space. Two sutures (11%) were placed in the tissues superficial to the ALL and 4 (22%) were placed deep to the ALL into the periosteum or disc. CONCLUSION: This study of cadaveric simulation of open sacrocolpopexy finds that location of sacral suture placement is most commonly at the level of the L5-S1 disc space and that placement of sutures into the underlying disc occurs about 1 in 5 times.

Contemporary multicenter outcomes of continent cutaneous ileocecocystoplasty in the adult population over a 10-year period: A Neurogenic Bladder Research Group study.

AIMS: Evidence is sparse on the long-term outcomes of continent cutaneous ileocecocystoplasty (CCIC). We hypothesized that obesity, laparoscopic/robotic approach, and concomitant surgeries would affect morbidity after CCIC and aimed to evaluate the outcomes of CCIC in adults in a multicenter contemporary study. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of adult patients from sites in the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group undergoing CCIC (2007-2017) who had at least 6 months of follow-up. We evaluated patient demographics, surgical details, 90-day complications, and follow-up surgeries. the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables and χ² and Fisher's Exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. RESULTS: We included 114 patients with a median age of 41 years. The median postoperative length of stay was 8 days. At 3 months postoperatively, major complications occurred in 18 (15.8%), and 24 patients (21.1%) were readmitted. During a median follow-up of 40 months, 48 patients (42.1%) underwent 80 additional related surgeries. Twenty-three patients (20.2%) underwent at least one channel revision, most often due to obstruction (15, 13.2%) or incontinence (4, 3.5%). Of the channel revisions, 10 (8.8%) were major and 14 (12.3%) were minor. Eleven patients (9.6%) abandoned the catheterizable channel during the follow-up period. Obesity and laparoscopic/robotic surgical approach did not affect outcomes, though concomitant surgery was associated with a higher rate of follow-up surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary multicenter series evaluating CCIC, we found that the short-term major complication rate was low, but many patients require follow-up surgeries, mostly related to the catheterizable channel.

Robotic Versus Open Ureteroneocystostomy: Is There a Robotic Benefit?

Aim: We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent an open vs robotic ureteroneocystostomy for ureteral obstruction. Methods: Retrospective review was performed on adult patients who underwent primary ureteroneocystostomy for obstruction from January 2012 to April 2018. Intraoperative outcomes of estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time, as well as postoperative outcomes of catheter and stent duration, length of hospital stay, inpatient nurse-controlled opioid use, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and outpatient opioid prescription, complications, readmission, radiologic and clinical stricture recurrence, and follow-up, were compared. Among the open cohort, indications for an open approach were evaluated, identifying patients with prior complex open abdominal surgery that would make an open approach preferable. Results: Open ureteroneocystostomy was performed in 27 patients compared with 18 who underwent a robotic approach. The open and robotic cohorts were not significantly different in age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, stricture location or side, abdominal surgery (laparoscopic or open), pelvic radiation, or preoperative urinary tract infection. The robotic group had a significantly lower rate of prior open abdominal surgery. The robotic cohort had significantly lower EBL, length of stay (LOS), catheter duration, prescribed morphine milliequivalents (MME) at discharge, and rate of PCA usage. Among the open cohort, 13 (48%) patients demonstrated indications making an open approach preferable. Comparing the robotic group with the remaining 14 open patients revealed a significantly lower rate of inpatient PCA use, prescribed MME at discharge, LOS, and catheter duration. Mean operative time was higher in the robotic group. EBL was not significantly different in this subanalysis. Conclusions: Robotic ureteroneocystostomy provides similar outcomes when compared with an open approach in well-selected patients when assessing for recurrent ureteral obstruction or adverse events. Robotic surgery is associated with lower postoperative narcotic pain prescriptions at discharge, lower PCA usage, and shorter LOS, which are important benefits when compared with open surgery.

Optimizing Outcomes in Urological Surgery: Postoperative Care.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding best practices in perioperative care is critical for quality of care for our urology patients. We compiled a single, concise resource that provides recommendations for optimizing postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing urological surgery. METHODS: Optimal postoperative care includes minimizing complications, optimizing recovery and improving patient outcomes. The assembled White Paper multidisciplinary writing team included experts in a number of different areas (urologists, nurses, anesthesiologists) to address a comprehensive set of topics that urological providers face when caring for postoperative patients. This article provides a summary of key elements to optimize postoperative care in adult urological surgery, including in-hospital considerations, transition/discharge, and followup and surveillance. RESULTS: In-hospital postoperative considerations include checklists, handoffs for safe transitions from the anesthesia to surgical team, level of care planning and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®). Embedded in ERAS are postoperative nutrition, mobilization, wound care, judicious use of catheters and drains, and postoperative medications and transfusions. As the patient transitions to the outpatient setting, the urologist must provide clear and readable postoperative education, which includes medication management and coordinated followup with primary care providers and home health as needed. Finally, followup visits should be carefully considered using innovative methods such as telehealth and patient reported outcomes to elevate postoperative and long-term care. CONCLUSIONS: This article summarizes postoperative factors that may impact surgical outcomes in urology. By understanding and applying best practices for postoperative care, urologists can optimize the quality of care for their patients.

Optimizing Outcomes in Urologic Surgery: Intraoperative Environmental, Behavioral, and Performance Considerations.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative surgical outcomes are influenced by a wide variety of environmental, provider and institutional factors. There is little in the current literature that provides guidance for practitioners interested in adapting these factors to improve the quality of the urological care they provide. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of subject matter experts (urologists, nurses, anesthesiologists) was convened to evaluate the existing literature, create a white paper, and disseminate this to providers and institutions to fuel quality improvement efforts in urological surgery. Focusing on intraoperative environmental, behavioral and performance factors, a narrative review was performed, highlighting practical interventions when available. RESULTS: Intraoperative performance is optimized by encouraging a culture of safety, improving intraoperative teamwork, thoughtfully navigating conflict and disruptive behavior, improving surgeon ergonomics, minimizing noise/distractions and engaging in ongoing technical performance improvement. In addition, practical tools are provided to assist in the challenging task of quality improvement in the surgical context. CONCLUSIONS: We summarize the influence of organizational culture, environment and behavior on surgical performance and outcomes. This work is intended to support local quality improvement efforts by educating the urological community regarding less well-known environmental, behavioral and institutional factors that influence surgical performance and patient outcomes.

Optimizing Outcomes in Urological Surgery: Preoperative Care.

PURPOSE: Understanding best practices in preoperative care is critical for quality of care for our urology patients. We compiled a concise resource that provides recommendations for optimizing preoperative outcomes for patients undergoing urological surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urological preoperative care was defined as medical evaluation or treatment received in preparation for surgery or a procedure. The Preoperative White Paper Panel was comprised of practicing urologists and nurses. The topic was researched via literature published from 1980 through 2018 which focused on preoperative evaluation and safety. Best practice recommendations were also reviewed from specialty societies. Recommendations in this article reflect expert opinion from the Panel, and are based on review of available evidence and existing best practice statements. RESULTS: Preoperative optimization involves a good assessment and stratification of surgical risk for the patient about to undergo surgery or a procedure. This assessment starts with a timely history and physical evaluation, as well as review of underlying frailty and cognition. The assessment helps inform potential postoperative needs. Risk stratification calculators are available to determine potential cardiac and pulmonary morbidity as well as overall surgical risk. Optimization of endocrine and gastrointestinal comorbidities can also reduce complications for patients. Modifiable preoperative behaviors and needs such as malnutrition and smoking cessation should also be discussed before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We summarize the preoperative factors that may impact surgical outcomes in urology. By understanding and applying best practices for preoperative care, urologists can optimize the quality of care for their patients.

Optimizing Outcomes in Urological Surgery: Intraoperative Patient Safety and Physiological Considerations.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative surgical outcomes are influenced by a wide variety of patient, surgeon and institutional factors. The current literature lacks comprehensive resources that describe best practices in preventing patient safety events and optimizing patient physiology during urological surgery. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of subject matter experts (urologists, nurses, anesthesiologists) was convened to evaluate the existing literature, create a white paper and disseminate this to urological providers. Focusing on intraoperative patient safety and physiology, a narrative review was undertaken and relevant guidelines and practical interventions were highlighted. RESULTS: Patient safety is optimized by preventing surgical site infections, wrong site surgery, venous thromboembolism, falls/positioning injuries, laser/fire injuries, excessive radiation exposure and harm from the adoption of new technology. Goals for intraoperative physiological parameters (temperature, glucose, fluid balance) are addressed as well as analgesic and anesthetic considerations in urological patients. In addition, practical tools are provided to assist in the quality improvement process. CONCLUSIONS: This article summarizes intraoperative factors related to patient safety and optimal physiology that can impact urological surgical outcomes. This overview can be used as a practical guide for process improvement to optimize the quality of intraoperative care.

Does Early Ureteroneocystostomy After Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury Jeopardize Outcome?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients who underwent early repair (≤7 days) of iatrogenic ureteral injury with ureteroneocystostomy and compare them to those repaired in a delayed fashion (>7 days). METHODS: A retrospective review of billing data between 2012 and 2018 identified patients who underwent ureteroneocystostomy for a benign ureteral disease. Inclusion criteria included all ureteral injuries related to a laparoscopic, robotic, or open surgical injury. Patients with ureteral injury related to radiation, stones, or reconstructive surgery were excluded. Patients undergoing reconstruction during the initial injury or within ≤7 days were designated as having undergone early repair, while the remaining were considered delayed repair. Demographics, as well as inpatient and postdischarge data were acquired, and statistical analysis was performed comparing the 2 groups. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Early repair was performed on 12 patients, while 55 underwent delayed repair. No significant difference in age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Score, laterality, stricture location, or history of pelvic/abdominal radiation was noted. Inpatient complications were significantly higher in the immediate group (58 vs 18%, P =.004). Thirty- and 90-day complications were similar. Two patients in the delayed group and none in the immediate group demonstrated stricture recurrence (P =.710). A higher rate of Boari flap ureteral reconstruction was performed in the delayed cohort (P =.001). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, there was no detectable difference in outcomes when comparing early and delayed ureteroneocystostomy for iatrogenic ureteral injuries.

Advanced Management of Patients With Ulcerative Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a stepwise management of patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) with Hunner's lesions and present single institution long-term outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a single tertiary center experience with management of patients with Hunner's lesions from January 2005 to January of 2015. Patients who met the diagnostic criteria for IC/BPS were included. Systematic approach to treatment of patients with Hunner's lesions is proposed based on our results. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with IC/BPS and Hunner's lesions were included. Mean age was 65.0 ±12.7 years, 76.4% (42/55) were female, and median symptom duration was 2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.7). All patients had a biopsy to rule out malignancy with therapeutic fulguration which resulted in subjective symptom improvement in 81.8% (45/55) and median time to repeat procedures was 12 months (IQR 621). Triamcinolone injection into the lesion was done in 35 patients and 91.4% (32/35) reported subjective improvement. Repeat injections were done for 74% (26/35) and median time between injections was 8 months (IQR 4, 13). AUA symptom scores and quality of life improved significantly with both treatment modalities. Adjunctive treatment with cyclosporine was used in 47.2% (26/55), and 7.2% (4/55) went on to have a cystectomy. CONCLUSION: Patients with Hunner's lesions benefit from early progression from conservative treatments to endoscopic management. Excellent symptom control can be achieved with biopsy/fulguration and triamcinolone injections but recurrence is common and repeat treatments are needed for most patients.

Outcomes of renal calculi in patients with spinal cord injury.

AIMS: Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at risk of developing renal calculi. This study describes the management of renal calculi among patients with SCI with attention to factors influencing surgical management vs observation. METHODS: This retrospective, cohort study identified patients with SCI and renal calculi between 2009 to 2016 from an institutional neurogenic bladder database and detailed the management of their stones. A stone episode was defined as radiographic evidence of new calculi. RESULTS: Of 205 patients with SCI, 34 had renal stones, for a prevalence of 17%. The mean age was 50 years (range 22,77) and most had cervical SCI (n = 22, 65%). There were 41 stone episodes with 98 individual stones identified with a mean stone size of 4.9 mm (range 1-19). Of the 41 episodes, 10 (24%) underwent surgery after initial diagnosis. Pain was the most common primary indication for surgery (n = 9, 60%). The median time from diagnosis to intervention for all patients was 4 months (interquartile range 1,23). Of the 41 episodes, 31 (76%) were initially observed and among these, 5 ultimately required surgery (16%) while 26 (84%) did not. Of these 26, 12 (46%) stones passed spontaneously and 14 (53%) remained unchanged. The need for surgery correlated with more stone episodes (P = .049). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients with SCI and small, nonobstructing renal stones, 76% (n = 31) were offered observation. Of these observed patients, 84% (n = 26) did not require further intervention at a median of 4 years of follow-up.

Incontinence after Prostate Treatment: AUA/SUFU Guideline.

PURPOSE: Urinary incontinence after prostate treatment (IPT) is one of the few urologic diseases that is iatrogenic, and, therefore, predictable and perhaps preventable. Evaluation of the incontinent patient, risk factors for IPT, the assessment of the patient prior to intervention, and a stepwise approach to management are covered in this guideline. Algorithms for patient evaluation, surgical management, and device failure are also provided. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This guideline was developed using a systematic review from the Mayo Clinic Evidence Based Practice Center with additional supplementation by the authors. A research librarian conducted searches from 2000 to December 21st, 2017 using Ovid, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews. Additional references through 12/31/2018 were identified. RESULTS: This guideline was developed by a multi-disciplinary panel to inform clinicians on the proper assessment of patients with IPT and the safe and effective management of the condition in both surgical and non-surgical contexts. Statements guiding the clinician on proper management of device failure are also included. CONCLUSION: Most patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP), and some patients who undergo radiation therapy (RT) or surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), will experience IPT. Although non-surgical options, such as pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME), can hasten continence recovery, patients who remain incontinent at one-year post-procedure, or have severe incontinence at six months, may elect to undergo surgical treatment (e.g. artificial urinary sphincter). Prior to IPT surgery, the risks, benefits, alternatives, and additional likely procedures should be discussed with the patient.

Patient Reported Bladder Related Symptoms and Quality of Life after Spinal Cord Injury with Different Bladder Management Strategies.

PURPOSE: Neurogenic bladder significantly impacts individuals after spinal cord injury. We hypothesized that there would be differences in bladder related symptoms and quality of life for 4 common bladder management methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study we measured neurogenic bladder related quality of life after spinal cord injury. Study eligibility included age 18 years or greater and acquired spinal cord injury. Bladder management was grouped as 1) clean intermittent catheterization, 2) an indwelling catheter, 3) surgery (bladder augmentation, a catheterizable channel or urinary diversion) and 4) voiding (a condom catheter, involuntary leaking or volitional voiding). The primary outcomes were the NBSS (Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score) and the SCI-QoL Difficulties (Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Measurement System Bladder Management Difficulties). Secondary outcomes were the NBSS subdomains and satisfaction with urinary function. Multivariable regression was done to establish differences between the groups, separated by level. RESULTS: Of the 1,479 participants enrolled in the study 843 (57%) had paraplegia and 894 (60%) were men. Median age was 44.9 years (IQR 34.4-54.1) and median time from injury was 11 years (IQR 5.1-22.4). Bladder management was clean intermittent catheterization in 754 cases (51%), an indwelling catheter in 271 (18%), surgery in 195 (13%) and voiding in 259 (18%). In regard to primary outcomes, in cases of paraplegia and tetraplegia an indwelling catheter and surgery were associated with fewer urinary symptoms on the NBSS compared to clean intermittent catheterization while voiding was associated with more symptoms. In paraplegia and tetraplegia cases surgery was associated with fewer bladder management difficulties according to the SCI-QoL Difficulties. In regard to secondary outcomes, surgery was associated with improved satisfaction in individuals with paraplegia or tetraplegia. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with spinal cord injury fewer bladder symptoms were associated with an indwelling catheter and surgery, and worse bladder symptoms were noted in voiding individuals compared to those on clean intermittent catheterization. Satisfaction with the urinary system was improved after surgery compared to clean intermittent catheterization.

The effects of augmentation cystoplasty and botulinum toxin injection on patient-reported bladder function and quality of life among individuals with spinal cord injury performing clean intermittent catheterization.

AIMS: Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is recommended after spinal cord injury (SCI) because it has the least complications, however, CIC has a high discontinuation rate. We hypothesized that bladder botulinum toxin injection or augmentation cystoplasty may improve satisfaction with CIC. METHODS: The NBRG registry is a multicenter, prospective, observational study asking SCI participants about neurogenic bladder (NGB) related quality of life (QoL). In this study, participants performing CIC as primary bladder management were categorized into 3 groups: (1) CIC alone (CIC); (2) CIC with botulinum toxin (CIC-BTX); and (3) CIC with augmentation cystoplasty (CIC-AUG). Outcomes included primary: Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) and SCI-QoL Bladder Management Difficulties, and secondary: NBSS subdomains (Incontinence, Storage & Voiding, Consequences) and the NBSS final question (satisfaction with urinary function). Multivariable regression, controlling for multiple factors was used to establish differences between the three groups. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-nine participants performed CIC as primary bladder management and had the following characteristics: mean age 43.4 (±12.9) and years from injury 13.7 (±10.7), tetraplegia in 284 (32%), and 543 (62%) were men. Bladder management was CIC in 593 (67%), CIC-BTX in 161 (19%), and CIC-AUG in 125(15%). Primary outcomes: CIC-AUG had associated improved total NBSS versus CIC(-3.2(-5.2 to -1.2), P = 0.001 and CIC-BTX(-3.9(-6.3 to -1.6), P = 0.001), CIC-AUG also had better SCI-QoL Difficulties scores versus CIC(-4(-5.48 to -2.53, P < 0.001) and CIC-BTX(-4.4(-6.15 to -2.65, P < 0.001). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: CIC-AUG had associated improved Incontinence and Satisfaction scores versus CIC and CIC-BTX. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients performing CIC with or without botulinum toxin treatment, those with augmentation cystoplasty had associated better urinary function and satisfaction with their urinary symptoms.