Survey of the Faculty Status of Optometrists at Academic Medical Centers in the United States.

SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study of the prevalence and faculty status of optometrists practicing at academic medical centers in the United States. PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify the number of optometrists at academic medical centers, along with faculty rank and post-doctoral training programs. METHODS: The official Web sites of academic medical centers and schools of medicine in the United States were examined during the 2021 to 2022 academic year to identify departments of ophthalmology and collect faculty profiles of employed optometrists. Institutional data were cross-referenced and analyzed by geographic distribution. Data were gathered from the Association of Schools and Colleges of Optometry and Accreditation Council on Optometry Education to identify post-graduate training programs in optometry. RESULTS: A total of 192 academic medical centers were identified, of which 121 (63.02%) had a residency or fellowship program in ophthalmology and/or optometry. One hundred twenty-five (65.10%) of these institutions had at least one staff optometrist. Seven hundred eighteen optometrists were found at these institutions, representing 1.83% of the 39,205 practicing optometrists estimated in the United States. Of the 718 optometrists, 369 (51.39%) held an academic appointment at a medical school. The most common academic rank was assistant professor (184 [25.63%]), followed by instructor (138 [19.22%]), associate professor (34 [4.74%]), and full professor (13 [1.81%]). The distribution of academic rank was similar across all regions but varied between institutions as to whether all, some, or none of the optometric faculty were appointed by a medical school. Of 296 optometry residency programs in the United States, 21 (7.09%) were at an academic medical center. Of 15 optometric fellowship programs in the United States, 3 (20%) were at an academic medical center. Of the 192 institutions in this study, 22 (11.46%) had a post-doctoral optometric training program. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the distribution of academic rank and post-doctoral training programs for optometrists at academic medical centers.

Accommodative Exercises to Lower Intraocular Pressure.

PURPOSE: This study investigated how a conscious change in ocular accommodation affects intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular biometrics in healthy adult volunteers of different ages. METHODS: Thirty-five healthy volunteers without ocular disease or past ocular surgery, and with refractive error between -3.50 and +2.50 diopters, were stratified into 20, 40, and 60 year old (y.o.) age groups. Baseline measurements of central cornea thickness, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, cornea diameter, pupil size, and ciliary muscle thickness were made by autorefraction and optical coherence tomography (OCT), while IOP was measured by pneumotonometry. Each subject's right eye focused on a target 40 cm away. Three different tests were performed in random order: (1) 10 minutes of nonaccommodation (gazing at the target through lenses that allowed clear vision without accommodating), (2) 10 minutes of accommodation (addition of a minus 3 diopter lens), and (3) 10 minutes of alternating between accommodation and nonaccommodation (1-minute intervals). IOP was measured immediately after each test. A 20-minute rest period was provided between tests. Data from 31 subjects were included in the study. ANOVA and paired t-tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Following alternating accommodation, IOP decreased by 0.7 mmHg in the right eye when all age groups were combined (p = 0.029). Accommodation or nonaccommodation alone did not decrease IOP. Compared to the 20 y.o. group, the 60 y.o. group had a thicker ciliary muscle within 75 µm of the scleral spur, a thinner ciliary muscle at 125-300 µm from the scleral spur, narrower anterior chamber angles, shallower anterior chambers, and smaller pupils during accommodation and nonaccommodation (p's < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Alternating accommodation, but not constant accommodation, significantly decreased IOP. This effect was not lost with aging despite physical changes to the aging eye. A greater accommodative workload and/or longer test period may improve the effect.