GRIN3A: A biomarker associated with a cribriform pattern and poor prognosis in prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer with a cribriform pattern, including invasive cribriform carcinoma (ICC) and/or intraductal carcinoma (IDC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to identify biomarkers for this feature. Using a radical prostatectomy cohort, we performed within-patient differential expression analyses with RNA sequencing data to compare samples with a cribriform pattern to those with non-cribriform Gleason pattern 4 (NcGP4; n=13). ACSM1, GRIN3A, PCDHB2, and REG4 were identified as differentially expressed, and validation was performed using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (n=99; 321 RNA samples) and RNA in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays (n=479; 2047 tissue cores). GRIN3A was significantly higher expressed in cribriform pattern vs. NcGP4, when assessed within the same patient (n=27; p=0.005) and between different patients (n=83; p=0.001). Tissue cores with IDC more often expressed GRIN3A compared to ICC, NcGP4, and benign tissue (52 % vs. ≤ 32 %). When IDC and NcGP4 was compared within the same patient (173 pairs of tissue cores; 54 patients), 38 (22 %) of the tissue microarray core pairs had GRIN3A expression in only IDC, 33 (19 %) had expression in both IDC and NcGP4, 14 (8 %) in only NcGP4 and 88 (51 %) were negative in both entities (p=0.001). GRIN3A was as well associated with biochemical recurrence (log-rank, p=0.002). In conclusion, ectopic GRIN3A expression is an RNA-based biomarker for the presence of cribriform prostate cancer, particularly for IDC.

Expressed prognostic biomarkers for primary prostate cancer independent of multifocality and transcriptome heterogeneity.

The majority of prostate cancer patients are diagnosed with multiple primary malignant foci. The distinct foci are exceptionally heterogeneous with regard to DNA mutations, but whether this is recapitulated at the transcriptome level remains unknown. In this study, inter- and intrafocal heterogeneity has been assessed by whole-transcriptome sequencing of 87 tissue samples from 23 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. From each patient, multiple samples were taken from one or more malignant foci, in addition to one sample from benign prostate tissue. Transcriptomic profiles of different malignant foci from the same patient showed a similar level of heterogeneity as tumors from different patients. This applies to expression of genes, fusion genes, and somatic mutations. Within-patient pair-wise analyses identified expression patterns linked to ETS status and extraprostatic extension. A set of 62 genes were found with low intrapatient heterogeneity and high interpatient heterogeneity, retaining stable expression profiles across foci within the same patient. Among these, 16 genes are associated with biochemical recurrence in a separately published study and are therefore nominated as biomarkers with prognostic value regardless of which malignant focus is sampled. In conclusion, an extensive heterogeneity in multifocal prostate cancer is confirmed at the gene expression level. Diagnostic biomarkers were identified for ETS positive samples and samples from extraprostatic extensions. Finally, prognostic biomarkers independent of multifocal heterogeneity were found.

Technical differences between sequencing and microarray platforms impact transcriptomic subtyping of colorectal cancer.

Gene expression profiling has increasing relevance in the molecular screening of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated potential platform-specific effects on transcriptomic subtyping according to established frameworks by comparisons of expression profiles from RNA sequencing and exon-resolution microarrays in 126 primary microsatellite stable CRCs. There was a strong platform correspondence in global gene expression levels, albeit with systematic technical bias likely attributed to few sequencing reads covering short (<2000 nucleotides) and/or lowly expressed genes (<1 FPKM), as well as over-saturation of highly expressed genes on microarrays. Classification concordances according to both the consensus molecular subtypes and CRC intrinsic subtypes (CRIS) were also strong, but with disproportionate subtype distributions between platforms caused by frequent disagreements in adherence to sample classification thresholds. Subtypes defined largely by genes expressed at low levels, including the CRIS-D subtype and the estimated level of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic lymphocytes, had a weaker correspondence in classification metrics between platforms. In conclusion, even subtle differences between platforms suggest that clinical translation of transcriptomic CRC subtyping frameworks is dependent on assay standardization, and systematic technical biases reinforce the need for careful selection of classifier genes.

Alternative splicing expands the prognostic impact of KRAS in microsatellite stable primary colorectal cancer.

KRAS mutation is a well-known marker for poor response to targeted treatment and patient prognosis in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC). However, variation in clinical outcomes among patients wild-type for KRAS underlines that this is not a homogeneous population. Here, we evaluated the prognostic impact of KRAS alternative splicing in relation to mutation status in a single-hospital series of primary MSS CRCs (N = 258). Using splicing-sensitive microarrays and RNA sequencing, the relative expression of KRAS-4A versus KRAS-4B transcript variants was confirmed to be down-regulated in CRC compared to normal colonic mucosa (N = 41; p ≤ 0.001). This was independent of mutation status, however, gene set enrichment analysis revealed that the effect of splicing on KRAS signaling was specific to the KRAS wild-type subgroup, in which low relative KRAS-4A expression was associated with a higher level of KRAS signaling (p = 0.005). In concordance, the prognostic value of KRAS splicing was also dependent on mutation status, and for patients with Stage I-III KRAS wild-type MSS CRC, low relative KRAS-4A expression was associated with inferior overall survival (HR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.07-5.18, p = 0.033), a result not found in mutant cases (pinteraction = 0.026). The prognostic association in the wild-type subgroup was independent of clinicopathological factors, including cancer stage in multivariable analysis (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.18-6.09, p = 0.018). This suggests that KRAS has prognostic value beyond mutation status in MSS CRC, and highlights the importance of molecular heterogeneity in the clinically relevant KRAS wild-type subgroup.