Outcomes in patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing heart transplantation: the eurotransplant experience.

BACKGROUND: When advanced heart failure occurs in cardiac amyloidosis, prognosis is poor. In this setting heart transplantation (HTX) is a treatment option for selected patients. We here present the results of post-transplantation outcomes in cardiac amyloidosis within the Eurotransplant area, investigating possible predictors of survival. METHODS: Of 115 patients undergoing HTX due to cardiac amyloidosis in the Eurotransplant region between November 1987 and May 2020, detailed assessment prior to transplantation was available in 85 patients. The present study was conducted in a retrospective approach. Primary endpoint was mortality after HTX. Baseline variables were entered in a Cox proportional hazards model with the primary endpoint as a dependent variable. RESULTS: Median overall survival following HTX was 6.3 years in the overall collective and the subgroup. Univariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed a significant relationship between overall survival and the transplantation period (2008 to 2020 vs 1987 to 2007; median survival 9.7 years vs 1.8 years, hazard ratio 0.45, p = 0.01). Further predictors were albumin concentration (hazard ratio 0.92, p < 0.001), and systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio 0.96, p < 0.001). The transplant period as well as albumin concentration remained significant independent predictors in the AL sub cohort in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSIONS: HTX is a viable treatment option for patients at an advanced stage of cardiac amyloidosis as overall survival after transplantation has improved in the modern age. Patients at a very advanced stage of the disease, indicated by low serum albumin and blood pressure, show worse outcomes following HTX. Optimal timing and careful patient selection may therefore be particularly important to further improve post-HTX survival in amyloidosis patients.

The Effect of Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate Solution and University of Wisconsin Solution: An Analysis of the Eurotransplant Registry.

BACKGROUND: Both University of Wisconsin (UW) and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solutions are currently used in the Eurotransplant region for preservation of liver allografts. Previous studies on their effect have led to a lot of discussion. This study aims to compare the effect of HTK and UW on graft survival. METHODS: First liver transplantations in recipients 18 years or older from January 1, 2007, until December 31, 2016, were included. Graft survival was compared for livers preserved with HTK and UW at 30 days, 1, 3, and 5 years. Multivariable analysis of risk factors was performed and outcome was adjusted for important confounders. RESULTS: Of all 10 628 first liver transplantations, 8176 (77%) and 2452 (23%) were performed with livers preserved with HTK and UW, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in graft survival between HTK and UW at 30 days (89% vs 93%, P=<0.001), 1 year (75% vs 82%, P=<0.001), 3 years (67% vs 72%, P<0.001), and at 5 years (60% vs 67%, P<0.001). No significant differences in outcome were observed in separate analyses of Germany or non-German countries. In multivariable analysis, UW was associated with a decreased risk of graft loss at 30 days (HR 0.772, P=0.002) and at 1 year (0.847 (0.757-0.947). When adjusted for risk factors, no differences in long term outcome could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: Because the use of preservation fluids is clustered geographically, differences in outcome by preservation fluids are strongly affected by regional differences in donor and recipient characteristics. When adjusted for risk factors, no differences in graft survival exist between transplantations performed with livers preserved with either HTK or UW.

Heart re-transplantation in Eurotransplant.

Internationally 3% of the donor hearts are distributed to re-transplant patients. In Eurotransplant, only patients with a primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within 1 week after heart transplantation (HTX) are indicated for high urgency listing. The aim of this study is to provide evidence for the discussion on whether these patients should still be allocated with priority. All consecutive HTX performed in the period 1981-2015 were included. Multivariate Cox' model was built including: donor and recipient age and gender, ischaemia time, recipient diagnose, urgency status and era. The study population included 18 490 HTX, of these 463 (2.6%) were repeat transplants. The major indications for re-HTX were cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) (50%), PGD (26%) and acute rejection (21%). In a multivariate model, compared with first HTX hazards ratio and 95% confidence interval for repeat HTX were 2.27 (1.83-2.82) for PGD, 2.24 (1.76-2.85) for acute rejection and 1.22 (1.00-1.48) for CAV (P < 0.0001). Outcome after cardiac re-HTX strongly depends on the indication for re-HTX with acceptable outcomes for CAV. In contrast, just 47.5% of all hearts transplanted in patients who were re-transplanted for PGD still functioned at 1-month post-transplant. Alternative options like VA-ECMO should be first offered before opting for acute re-transplantation.