Evaluation of automated immunoassays in the diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/hep) complexes. The in vitro demonstration of PF4/hep antibodies using functional and immunological methods is essential for optimal management of patients suspected to have HIT. Since functional assays are technically challenging and limited to specialized laboratories, antigen-binding assays are commonly used in routine laboratories. STUDY DESIGN: Blood samples from 448 consecutive patients in whom HIT was suspected were investigated using a latex agglutination test HemosIL® HIT-Ab(PF4-H) (HemosIL-Ab), two chemiluminescence tests HemosIL AcuStar HIT-Ab(PF4-H) (HemosIL AcuStar-Ab) and AcuStar HIT-IgG(PF4-H) (HemosIL AcuStar-IgG), an in-house PF4/hep IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and the heparin induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) test. RESULTS: Antibodies against PF4/hep were detectable in 44 out of 119 samples using HemosIL-Ab among which 20 samples were also reactive in the HIPA; and in 122, 64 and 108 out of 448 sera using HemosIL AcuStar-Ab, HemosIL AcuStar-IgG and in-house PF4/hep IgG-EIA, respectively, among which 52 sera were also reactive in the HIPA. All assays had high sensitivities of >95% for platelet activating antibodies; however, they differed in their specificities. The highest specificity and positive predictive value was observed by HemosIL AcuStar-IgG (96% and 78%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Automated immunoassays are useful in the laboratory investigations of HIT and present a potential improvement toward standardization of laboratory investigations of HIT. The high positive predictive capability may justify treating the patient with alternative anticoagulants without waiting for the results of a functional assay.

Combined use of the high heparin step and optical density to optimize diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of an anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: IgG-specific anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-immunoassays (EIAs) are sensitive but not specific for platelet-activating antibodies, the cause of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Two features of EIA reactivity predict for presence of HIT antibodies - the magnitude of a positive result (in optical density [OD] units) and the inhibition of reactivity at high heparin concentrations - but their combined utility remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine for an IgG-specific EIA how the OD values of a positive reaction and its inhibition by high heparin can be optimally combined. METHODS: We screened 1,000 consecutive patients with suspected HIT using an IgG-specific PF4/heparin in-house EIA with and without high heparin (100 IU/mL); and by the heparin-induced platelet activation test. RESULTS: Platelet-activating antibodies were rarely detected (<0.2%) when the IgG-specific EIA was negative at the conventional cut-off (OD, 0.5). However, an OD cut-off of 1.0 resulted in an unacceptable loss of sensitivity (14/83=17%) for detecting platelet-activating antibodies. The high heparin step increased specificity for platelet-activating antibodies from 72% to 89% without loss of sensitivity when applied to weak-positive sera (OD≤1.0). However, decreased sensitivity was observed with strong-positive sera (OD>1.0): 11/69 such sera (16%) that did not show >40% inhibition by high heparin nevertheless contained platelet-activating antibodies. CONCLUSION: Specificity of an IgG-specific EIA for detecting platelet-activating antibodies can be optimized by applying the high heparin inhibition step to weak-positive reactions (0.5-≤1.0 OD). However, applying the high heparin inhibition step to strong-positive reactions (>1.0 OD) in our in-house assay risks falsely classifying a serum as negative for platelet-activating antibodies.

Human platelets express organic anion-transporting peptide 2B1, an uptake transporter for atorvastatin.

Statins are widely used to treat dyslipidemia. Effects of statins in addition to low-density lipoprotein lowering include altered platelet aggregation, requiring drug uptake into platelets. Possible candidates for mediating intraplatelet accumulation of statins include members of the organic anion-transporting polypeptide family such as OATP2B1 (SLCO2B1), a high-affinity uptake transporter for atorvastatin. Therefore, we analyzed OATP expression, localization, and function in human platelets. OATP2B1, but not OATP1B1, was detected in platelets and megakaryocytes on transcript and protein levels. Protein localization was almost exclusively confined to the plasma membrane. Moreover, we could demonstrate significant inhibition of estrone sulfate uptake into platelets by atorvastatin as well as direct transport of atorvastatin into platelets using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. As a consequence of OATP2B1-mediated uptake of atorvastatin, we observed significant atorvastatin-mediated reduction of thrombin-induced Ca(2+) mobilization in platelets (37.3 +/- 6.7% of control at 15 microM atorvastatin), mechanistically explainable by reduced lipid modification of signal proteins. This effect was reversed by addition of mevalonate. Finally, we demonstrated expression of HMG-CoA reductase, the primary target of atorvastatin, in platelet cytosol. In conclusion, OATP2B1 is an uptake transporter expressed in platelets and is involved in statin-mediated alteration of platelet aggregation.

Antihirudin antibodies following low-dose subcutaneous treatment with desirudin for thrombosis prophylaxis after hip-replacement surgery: incidence and clinical relevance.

Recombinant hirudin has been found to be immunogenic in patients treated with lepirudin following heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We assessed the incidence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antihirudin antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 112 patients enrolled in a dose-finding study with desirudin. Patients received desirudin subcutaneously following orthopedic hip surgery at 10 mg twice a day (n = 17), 15 mg twice a day (n = 75), and 20 mg twice a day (n = 20). Of 112 patients, 11 (9.8%) developed antihirudin antibodies independently of the dose. The rate of immunization did not differ from that observed in HIT patients treated with lepirudin (P =.113). Plasma concentrations of desirudin did not differ between antihirudin antibody-positive and -negative patients. Antihirudin antibodies had no impact on incidences of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, allergic reactions, and hemorrhage. However, the total number of immunized patients observed was low and so infrequent (but severe) effects of antihirudin antibodies cannot be excluded.