"Your own pace, your own path": perspectives of adolescents navigating life after bariatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery, an established weight-loss tool, may be offered to some adolescents with severe obesity. However, few studies explore adolescents' postoperative experiences beyond physical and metabolic outcomes and quality-of-life measures. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2021, 45 semi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescents (16-20 years) at 6 months (N = 15), 12 months (N = 15), and 24 months (N = 15) following bariatric surgery. A deductive thematic analysis framework was applied by two independent coders (Cronbach's α = 0.84). Themes were identified and refined iteratively, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. RESULTS: Five major themes emerged related to: (1) weight-loss expectations vs. reality, (2) social landscape, (3) body image, (4) eating and moving, and (5) challenges for long-term success. The pace of and satisfaction with weight loss and side effects was heterogenous among participants, with most changes occurring early and stabilizing by 24 months. Adolescents adapted over time to their new social landscapes (e.g., relationships) and reported improved body image and confidence, yet persistently struggled to reconcile their internal identity with evolving external perceptions and discomfort with new attention. Participants experienced changes to lifestyle routines after surgery (e.g., eating, moving, habits), which introduced distress at 6 months but resolved over time. Life transitions in early adulthood (e.g., moving away, university/college, employment), concurrent with their evolving and increasing autonomy, physical, social, and financial independence, imposed unexpected challenges to postoperative routines and support systems. Participants unanimously reaffirmed that bariatric surgery is a lifelong journey and that they were committed to long-term success. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide insight into optimizing adolescent selection for bariatric surgery and perioperative support. Specifically, important life transitions during this developmental period impact postoperative experiences and outcomes and adolescents may benefit from postoperative counseling focused on managing weight-loss expectations and adapting to evolving nutritional needs and changing social circumstances.

"It's a tool, not a cure": the preoperative teen perspective on bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is well established in adults as the most effective tool for sustained weight loss and reduction of obesity-related co-morbidities, and is an emerging option for adolescents in whom conservative approaches have failed. Narratives are vital in understanding the motivating reasons and psychosocial profiles of adolescents considering bariatric surgery during a developmental period of evolving self-concept, body image sensitivity, peer pressure, and increased opportunity for risky behaviors. OBJECTIVES: To explore preoperative adolescent patient perspectives on their decision to pursue bariatric surgery, anticipated physical and psychosocial effects, and preparation process. SETTINGS: The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews with adolescents (16-18 yr old) 2-4 months before bariatric surgery. A theoretical thematic analysis was conducted with 3 independent reviewers (interrater reliability, Cronbach's α= .81) and conflicts were resolved through discussion. RESULTS: Patients' perspectives are captured in 4 themes: motivation for surgery, effects on health and habits, psychosocial changes, and support systems during preparation. Participants perceived surgery as a tool but not a solution for weight loss. Most were motivated for health and daily functional improvement rather than aesthetic reasons, and some anticipated improved social interactions while maintaining their self-identity. Participants were selective in sharing news of their surgery, and received varying levels of support from families, friends, and healthcare teams. CONCLUSION: Adolescents seem generally prepared for and informed about surgery, with expectations for weight loss and psychosocial improvements, although uncertainty and contradictory thoughts were prevalent. Insights provided by these adolescent patients will help optimize bariatric surgery assessments and support from clinical teams and inform preoperative education for future patients and families.

Evolution and Outcomes of a Canadian Pediatric Bariatric Surgery Program.

PURPOSE: An interdisciplinary obesity management program was established in 2007 at our quaternary hospital, including bariatric surgery for selected adolescent patients. We report the evolution of surgical management within the program and outcomes following bariatric surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of adolescents who underwent bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2017. All cases were performed by a pediatric surgeon and an adult bariatric surgeon. Baseline demographics, BMI, co-morbidities, and post-operative outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent bariatric surgery. Median age at entrance into the program was 16.5 (range, 12.1-17.4) years and at time of surgery was 17.4 (range, 13.6-18.8) years. Eight patients had laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) from 2007 to 10. Between 2011 and 2017, 18 had laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and 12 had laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). There were no intraoperative complications or conversions. Postoperative complications included wound infection, bleeding requiring transfusion and re-exploration, and internal hernia. Of patients who had LAGB, 2 required surgical revision, and 3 underwent subsequent removal. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent bariatric surgery in the context of a multidisciplinary obesity management program is safe and effective. RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy are associated with superior weight loss in the immediate post-operative period and at most recent follow-up and lower reoperation rates than gastric banding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.