Intraoperative computer-assisted prediction of intraarticular contact pressures in the knee during high tibial osteotomy.

OBJECTIVES: To develop an accurate intraoperative method to estimate changes in intraarticular contact pressures during high tibial osteotomy (HTO). METHODS: Changes in knee alignment and pressure were monitored in real time in seven cadaver specimens that received HTO. Intraarticular contact pressure (N/mm2 ) in each knee compartment was estimated based on extraarticularly acquired data (leg alignment, correction, and ankle tilt) and based on the application of an axial force of half bodyweight (400-450 N). RESULTS: Contact pressure estimation was more accurate in the lateral compartment (R2  = 0.940) than in the medial compartment of the knee (R2  = 0.835). The optimism-corrected R2 was 0.936 for the lateral compartment and 0.821 for the medial compartment. CONCLUSIONS: We have established a framework for estimating the change in intraarticular contact pressures based on extraarticular data. This research could be helpful in generating appropriate algorithms to estimate joint alignment changes based on applied loads.

Effect of Femoral Antetorsion on Tibiofemoral Translation and Rotation in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficient Knee.

We aimed to investigate how increased or decreased femoral antetorsion would affect the biomechanics of the knee in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient cadaveric model. We hypothesized that external or internal rotation of the distal femur, achieved through a femoral osteotomy, would affect the magnitude of tibiofemoral translation and rotation. Navigated measurements of tibiofemoral translation and rotation during the anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests were performed on six whole-body cadaveric specimens in each of the following four conditions: native, ACL-deficient knee, ACL-deficient knee and 20-degree internal distal femur rotation, and ACL-deficient knee and 20-degree external distal femur rotation. Increased femoral antetorsion significantly reduced anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee during the anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests (p < 0.05). Conversely, decreasing femoral antetorsion resulted in an increase in anterior tibial translation in the anterior drawer (nonsignificant), Lachman (p < 0.05), and pivot shift (p < 0.05) tests. Internally rotating the distal femur significantly reduced the magnitude of tibial rotation during the pivot shift test in the ACL-deficient knee (p < 0.05), whereas external rotation of the distal femur significantly increased tibial rotation (p < 0.05). The magnitude of femoral antetorsion affects tibiofemoral translation in an ACL-deficient cadaveric mode. Internally rotating the distal femur 20 degrees reduced the magnitude of tibial translation and rotation similar to that of the native knee, whereas externally rotating the distal femur aggravated translational and rotational instability.

Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty achieves better postoperative alignment compared to conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in a low-volume setting.

BACKGROUND: Procedure volume is an important determinant of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes. We aimed to determine whether computer navigation or patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) would improve postoperative alignment in a low-volume setting. HYPOTHESIS: PSI for TKA achieves better limb and implant alignment compared to conventional TKA and to computer navigated TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 385 primary TKAs (Women=59%. Mean age=67years. Mean BMI=30.1kg/m2), which were performed using conventional instrumentation (n=117; 30%), computer navigation (n=209; 54%), or patient-specific instrumentation (n=59; 15%) in a low-volume center (<50 TKAs/year). The risk of postoperative leg and implant mechanical alignment outliers in the coronal plane (>3° from neutral), average alignment and operation time were assessed. RESULTS: The risk of postoperative mechanical alignment outliers (>3°) was reduced by 89% in the navigated group (4% outliers) compared to the conventional group (35%) (RR=0.11; p<0.0001). No significant improvement was observed in the PSI group (27%) (RR=0.91; p=0.772). The risk of postoperative femoral component coronal alignment outliers was reduced by 63% in the navigated group (11%) compared to the conventional group (31%) (RR=0.37; p=0.018). No significant reduction in outliers was observed in the PSI group (32%) (RR=1.08; p=0.816). There was a reduction in the risk of tibial component coronal malalignment of 66% in the navigated group (5%) compared to the conventional group (13%) (RR=0.33; p=0.070). There was a two-fold increase in the risk of tibial component alignment outliers in the PSI group (29%) (RR=1.94; p=0.110). DISCUSSION: Computer navigation improved postoperative alignment in TKA. No evidence of improved alignment was seen with patient-specific instrumentation. The routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in low-volume centers is not supported by the currently available data. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. Level IV.

Repeatability and reproducibility of a telemanipulated fracture reduction system.

We evaluate the inter- and intraobserver variability of a telemanipulated femur fracture reduction system using a joystick device. Five examiners performed virtual reduction of 3D femur fracture models on two separate occasions. We assessed the inter- and intraobserver variability for the final alignment and reduction. The average difference between testing rounds was only 0.3 mm for overall displacement and 0.5° for overall rotation. There was an average time reduction between rounds of 11.7 s. The mean differences in overall displacement between examiners ranged between 0.2 and 0.9 mm; between 0.2° and 3.2° for overall rotation; and between 9 and 82 s for time to reduction. The time required to complete the reduction did not have a significant effect on the overall displacement or rotation of the final model. Telemanipulated fracture reduction is a reliable and reproducible technique, which does not require extensive training.

Robotic technique improves entry point alignment for intramedullary nailing of femur fractures compared to the conventional technique: a cadaveric study.

We aimed to test whether a robotic technique would offer more accurate access to the proximal femoral medullary cavity for insertion of an intramedullary nail compared to the conventional manual technique. The medullary cavity of ten femur specimens was accessed in a conventional fashion using fluoroscopic control. In ten additional femur specimens, ISO-C 3D scans were obtained and a computer program calculated the ideal location of the cavity opening based on the trajectory of the medullary canal. In both techniques, the surgeon opened the cavity using a drill and inserted a radiopaque tube that matched the diameter of the cavity. The mean difference in angle between the proximal opening and the medullary canal in the shaft of the femur was calculated for both groups. Robotic cavity opening was more accurate than the manual technique, with a mean difference in trajectory between the proximal opening and the shaft canal of 2.0° (95% CI 0.6°-3.5°) compared to a mean difference of 4.3° (95% CI 2.11°-6.48°) using the manual technique (P = 0.0218). The robotic technique was more accurate than the manual procedure for identifying the optimal location for opening the medullary canal for insertion of an intramedullary nail. Additional advantages may include a reduction in total radiation exposure, as only one ISO-C 3D scan is needed, as opposed to multiple radiographs when using the manual technique.

Improving the human-robot interface for telemanipulated robotic long bone fracture reduction: Joystick device vs. haptic manipulator.

OBJECTIVES: Intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures. However, there are several problems associated with the technique, e.g. high radiation exposure and rotational malalignment. Experimental robotic assistance has been introduced to improve the quality of the reduction and to reduce the incidence of rotational malalignment. In the current study, we compare two devices for control of the fracture fragments during telemanipulated reduction. METHODS: Ten male and ten female subjects were asked to participate as examiners in this experiment. A computer program was developed to render and manipulate CT-based renderings of femur fracture bone fragments. The user could manipulate the fragments using either a simple joystick device or a haptic manipulator. Each examiner performed telemanipulated reduction of 10 virtual fracture models of varying difficulty with each device (five in a 'training phase' and five in a 'testing phase'). Mixed models were used to test whether using the haptic device improved alignment accuracy and improved reduction times compared to using a joystick. RESULTS: Reduction accuracy was not significantly different between devices in either the training phase or the testing phase (P > 0.05). Reduction time was significantly higher for the Phantom device than for the Joystick in the training phase (P < 0.0001), but it was no different in the testing phase (P = 0.865). High spatial ability with electronics had a significant effect on the alignment of fracture reduction and time to reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The Joystick and the Phantom devices resulted in similarly accurate reductions, with the Joystick having an easier learning curve. The Phantom device offered no advantage over the Joystick for fracture telemanipulation. Considering the high cost of the Phantom device and the lack of a demonstrable advantage over the Joystick, its use is not justified for implementation in a fracture telemanipulation workflow. The Joystick remains as a low-cost and effective device for developing 3D fracture telemanipulation techniques.

Comparison of algorithms for automated femur fracture reduction.

PURPOSE: We designed an experiment to determine the comparative effectiveness of computer algorithms for performing automated long bone fracture reduction. METHODS: Automated reduction of 10 3D fracture models was performed using two computer algorithms, random sample matching (RANSAM) and Z-buffering (Z-Buffer), and one of five options of post-processing: none; iterative closest point algorithm (ICP); ICP-X1; ICP-X2; and ICP-X3. We measured the final alignment between the two fragments for each algorithm and post-processing option. RESULTS: The RANSAM algorithm combined with postprocessing algorithm ICP-X1 or ICP-X3 resulted in the most accurate fracture reduction in the translational plane. No discernible difference was observed in the rotational plane. Automated reduction had more accurate translational displacement than telemanipulated manual reductions. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of the RANSAM algorithm for automated fracture reduction procedures. The use of ICP algorithms provides further optimization of the initial reduction.

Robotic distal locking of intramedullary nailing: Technical description and cadaveric testing.

Interlocked intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures. However, distal locking is a technically challenging part of the procedure that can result in distal femoral malrotation and high radiation exposure. We have tested a robotic procedure for robotic distal locking based on the computation of a drilling trajectory on two calibrated fluoroscopic images. Twenty distal holes were attempted in ten cadaveric femur specimens. Successful screw hole drilling was achieved at the first attempt in each of the ten specimens (20 drill holes in total). No failures were recorded. The average total number of images needed was 6.5 +/- 3.6. The average computation time was 16.5+/- 16.0 seconds. Robotic distal locking was feasible in this test and can be integrated into a fully robotic intramedullary nailing procedure.

Robotic guided waterjet cutting technique for high tibial dome osteotomy: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Oscillating saws generate high levels of heat (up to 150°C), which can lead to tissue necrosis, delayed healing and infection. Abrasive waterjet-cutting techniques have been described as a new tool to perform bone cuts, with less heat generation. METHODS: Four lower-limbs of four human alcohol conserved cadavers were tested. Navigation references were attached to the tibia and an intraoperative fluoroscopy-based 3D scan was obtained. A 1.2 mm diameter nozzle was attached to a robotic arm, which was guided to follow a pre-specified path. In addition, a self-designed jet-absorber was applied to protect the posterior neurovascular structures. Magnesium was added as an abrasive substance to improve the cutting ability of the waterjet. RESULTS: In all four cadavers, the osteotomies could be carried out as planned, resulting in smooth cut surfaces. No damage to the soft-tissues was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of abrasive waterjet-cutting give it great potential in orthopaedic surgery. A current disadvantage is the amount of magnesium solute that is left on the surgical field and can be harmful to the patient.

Current Concepts for Patellar Dislocation.

CONTEXT: Patellar dislocation usually occurs to the lateral side, leading to ruptures of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) in about 90% of the cases. Even though several prognostic factors are identified for patellofemoral instability after patellar dislocation so far, the appropriate therapy remains a controversial issue. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Authors searched the Medline library for studies on both surgical and conservative treatment for patellar dislocation and patellofemoral instability. Additionally, the reference list of each article was searched for additional studies. RESULTS: A thorough analysis of the anatomical risk factors with a particular focus on patella alta, increased Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove (TT-TG) distance, trochlear dysplasia as well as torsional abnormalities should be performed early after the first dislocation to allow adequate patient counseling. Summarizing the results of all published randomized clinical trials and comparing surgical and conservative treatment after the first-time patellar dislocation until today indicated no significant evident difference for children, adolescents, and adults. Therefore, nonoperative treatment was indicated after a first-time patellar dislocation in the vast majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for patellar dislocation is indicated primarily in case of relevant concomitant injuries such as osteochondral fractures, and secondarily for recurrent dislocations.

Radiological outcome and intraoperative evaluation of a computer-navigation system for femoral nailing: a retrospective cohort study.

AIM: Intraoperative determinations of femoral antetorsion and leg length during fixation of femoral shaft fractures present a challenge. In femoral shaft fracture fixations, a computer-navigation system has shown promise in determining antetorsion and leg length discrepancies. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether the use of computer navigation during femoral nailing procedures reduced postoperative femoral malrotation and leg length discrepancy, as well as the number of revision cases. We also sought to determine whether radiation exposure time was reduced when computer navigation was used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 246 patients treated for femoral shaft fractures between 2004 and 2012, we selected those that received postoperative computed tomography for rotation and leg length control. We included 24 patients who received navigation-assisted treatments and 48 who received unassisted treatments, matched for age, sex, and fracture type. All patients were treated by femoral nailing. RESULTS: The groups showed significant differences in the mean (standard deviation (SD) delay before surgery (navigation-assisted vs. unassisted groups: 8.5 ± 3.2 vs. 5.2 ± 5.8 days; P<0.05) and surgery times (163.7 ± 43.94 vs. 98.3 ± 28.13 min; P<0.001). The groups were significantly different in the mean (SD) radiation exposure time (4.43 ± 1.35 vs. 3.73 ± 1.5 min; P=0.042), and were not significantly different in the postoperative femoral antetorsion difference (8.83 ± 5.52° vs. 12.4 ± 9.2°; P=0.056), or in the postoperative length discrepancy (0.92 ± 0.75 vs. 0.95 ± 0.94 cm; P=0.453). Four (16.7%) navigation-assisted and 15 (31.25%) unassisted surgeries got revision for torsion and/or length corrections. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that, compared to unassisted femoral surgery, the computer-navigation system did not improve postoperative results or reduce radiation exposure. In the future, improvements in handling and application could facilitate the workflow and may provide better postoperative results. Currently, computer navigation may provide advantages for complicated or sophisticated cases, such as complex three-dimensional deformity corrections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.