Avelumab Plus Talazoparib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: The JAVELIN PARP Medley Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Preclinical data suggest that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have synergistic activity when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, it is unknown which tumor types or molecular subtypes may benefit from this combination. Objective: To investigate responses associated with the combination of avelumab and talazoparib in different tumor types and/or molecular subtypes. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this phase 1b and 2 basket nonrandomized controlled trial, patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in the following cohorts: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); DNA damage response (DDR)-positive NSCLC; triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2)-negative, DDR-positive breast cancer; recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC); recurrent, platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC; urothelial cancer; metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); DDR-positive mCRPC; and BRCA1/2- or ATM-altered solid tumors. Data were analyzed between June 17, 2021, and August 6, 2021. Interventions: All patients in phases 1b and 2 received avelumab plus talazoparib. Main Outcomes and Measures: The phase 1b primary end point was dose-limiting toxic effects. The phase 2 primary end point was objective response, measured as objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included safety, time to response, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression and PSA response of 50% or greater (for mCRPC), cancer antigen 125 response (for OC), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers. Results: A total of 223 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [11.0] years; 117 [52.5%] men) were treated, including 12 patients in phase 1b and 211 patients in phase 2. The recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 800 mg every 2 weeks plus talazoparib 1 mg once daily. In phase 2, the ORR was 18.2% (95% CI, 5.2%-40.3%) in patients with TNBC; 34.8% (95% CI, 16.4%-57.3%) in patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and 63.6% (95% CI, 30.8%-89.1%) in patients with platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC. Responses occurred more frequently in patients with BRCA1/2-altered tumors. Durable responses were observed in patients with TNBC (median [range] DOR, 11.1 [3.4-20.4] months); HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC (median [range] DOR, 15.7 [3.9 to ≥20.6] months); and BRCA1/2-altered OC (median DOR not reached; range, 5.6 to ≥18.4 months). The most common grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events were anemia (75 patients [33.6%]), thrombocytopenia (48 patients [21.5%]), and neutropenia (31 patients [13.9%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This nonrandomized controlled trial found that ORRs for avelumab plus talazoparib were comparable with those with PARP inhibitor or ICI monotherapy. Prolonged DOR in patients with TNBC; HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and BRCA1/2-altered OC warrant further investigation in randomized clinical trials. These data highlight the importance of prospective patient selection in future studies of ICI and PARP-inhibitor combinations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03330405.

Radiation Dosimetry of Theragnostic Pairs for Isotopes of Iodine in IAZA.

Theragnostic pairs of isotopes are used to infer radiation dosimetry for a therapeutic radiopharmaceutical from a diagnostic imaging study with the same tracer molecule labelled with an isotope better suited for the imaging task. We describe the transfer of radiation dosimetry from the diagnostic radioiodine isotope 123I, labelled for the hypoxia tracer molecule iodoazomycin arabinoside ([123I]IAZA), to isotopes 131I (therapeutic) and 124I (PET imaging). Uncertainties introduced by the dissimilar isotope half-lives are discussed in detail. Radioisotope dosimetries for [123I]IAZA were obtained previously. These data are used here to calculate residence times for 131I and 124I and their uncertainties. We distinguish two cases when extrapolating to infinity: purely physical decay (case A) and physical decay plus biological washout (case B). Organ doses were calculated using the MIRD schema with the OLIDNA/EXM code. Significant increases in some organ doses (in mSv per injected activity) were found for 131I and 124I. The most affected organs were the intestinal walls, thyroid, and urinary bladder wall. Uncertainty remained similar to 123I for case A but considerably greater for case B, especially for long biological half-lives (GI tract). Normal tissue dosimetries for IAZA must be considered carefully when substituting isotope species. A long biological half-life can significantly increase dosimetric uncertainties. These findings are relevant when considering PET imaging studies with [124I]IAZA or therapeutic administration of [131I]IAZA.

Pivotal Considerations for Optimal Deployment of Healthy Volunteers in Oncology Drug Development.

Oncology drug development is among the most challenging of any therapeutic area, with first-in-human trials expected to deliver information on both safety and activity. Until recently, therapeutic approaches in oncology focused on cytotoxic chemotherapy agents, ruling out even the possibility of enrolling normal healthy volunteers (NHVs) in clinical trials due to safety considerations. The emergence of noncytotoxic modalities, including molecularly targeted agents with more favorable safety profiles, however, has led to increasing numbers of clinical pharmacology studies of these agents being conducted in NHVs. Beyond rapid enrollment and cost savings, there are other advantages of conducting specific types of studies in NHVs with the goal of more appropriate dosing decisions in certain subsets of the intended patient populations, allowing for enrollment of such patients in therapeutic trials from which they might otherwise have been excluded. Nevertheless, the decision must be carefully weighed against potential disadvantages, and although the considerations surrounding conduct of clinical trials using NHVs are generally well-defined in most other therapeutic areas, they are less well-defined in oncology.

Effects of Rifampin, a potent inducer of drug-metabolizing enzymes and an inhibitor of OATP1B1/3 transport, on the single dose pharmacokinetics of anacetrapib.

Anacetrapib is a novel cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor in development for treatment of dyslipidemia. This open-label, fixed-sequence, 3-period study was intended to evaluate the potential of anacetrapib to be a victim of OATP1B1/3 inhibition and strong CYP3A induction using acute and chronic dosing of rifampin, respectively, as a probe. In this study, 16 healthy subjects received 100 mg anacetrapib administered without rifampin (Day 1, Period 1), with single-dose (SD) 600 mg rifampin (Day 1, Period 2), and with multiple-dose (MD) 600 mg rifampin for 20 days (Day 14, Period 3). Log-transformed anacetrapib AUC0-∞ and Cmax were analyzed by a linear mixed effects model. The GMRs and 90% CIs for anacetrapib AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 1.25 (1.04, 1.51) and 1.43 (1.13, 1.82) for SD rifampin (Period 2/Period 1) and 0.35 (0.29, 0.42) and 0.26 (0.21, 0.32) for MD rifampin (Period 3/Period 1), respectively. Anacetrapib was generally well tolerated in both the absence/presence of SD and MD rifampin. In conclusion, treatment with SD rifampin, which inhibits the OATP1B1/3 transporter system, did not substantially influence the SD pharmacokinetics of anacetrapib, while chronic (20 days) administration of rifampin, which strongly induces CYP3A isozymes, reduced mean systemic exposure to SD anacetrapib by 65%.