RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Myasthenic crisis (MC) is a potentially life-threatening complication of myasthenia gravis. Its precipitating factors include surgical procedures, particularly thymectomy. The role of preoperative intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in preventing MC in patients scheduled for thymectomy and other surgery with general anaesthesia is unknown. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that preoperative IVIg is effective in preventing myasthenic crisis in patients with myasthenia gravis scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia, including thymectomy. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-centre study was conducted over a 4-year period. The treatment group received IVIg, 0.4 g/kg/day preoperatively for 5 consecutive days, and the placebo group received saline solution under the same conditions. The two groups were age-matched, with similar functional status, and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class. All patients had well-controlled myasthenia gravis with minimal manifestations before surgery. The primary outcome measured was MC. Intubation times, time in the recovery room, number of postoperative complications, and days of hospitalization were the secondary outcomes measured. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were randomized, 25 to the IVIg group and 22 to placebo. There were 19 men and 28 women, with a mean age of 58.6 years, mean body mass index of 27.8 kg/m2, and mean acetylcholine receptor antibodies of 12.9 nmol/l. The mean forced vital capacity was 84.4%. The mean quantitative myasthenia gravis sum score was 6.3. Ten patients (five in each arm) had a history of MC. Thymectomy was performed in 16 patients. Only one patient in the placebo group presented with MC requiring non-invasive ventilation (but no reintubation) for 6 days. Neither differences between groups in the univariate analysis nor risk factors for MC in the multivariate analysis were found. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative IVIg to prevent MC does not appear to be justified in well-controlled myasthenia gravis patients. This study provides class I evidence that preparation with IVIg to prevent MC is not necessary in well-controlled myasthenia gravis patients scheduled for surgery with general anaesthesia.
RESUMO
Objective: To assess the transthyretin (TTR) stabilization activity of tolcapone (SOM0226) in patients with hereditary ATTR amyloidosis, asymptomatic carriers and healthy volunteers. Methods: A phase IIa proof-of-concept trial included two phases separated by a 6-week washout period. Phase A: single 200 mg dose of tolcapone; phase B: three 100 mg doses taken at 4 h intervals. The primary efficacy variable was TTR stabilization. Results: Seventeen subjects were included (wild type, n = 6; mutation TTR Val30Met, n = 11). TTR stabilization was observed in all participants. Two hours after dosing, 82% of participants in phase A and 93% of those in phase B reached a TTR stabilization value of at least 20%. In phase A, there was an increase of 52% in TTR stabilization vs baseline values 2 h after dosing, which decreased to 22.9% at 8 h. In phase B, there was a significant increase of 38.8% in TTR stabilization 2 h after the first 100 mg dose. This difference was maintained after 10 h and decreased after 24 h. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: The ability of tolcapone for stabilizing TTR supports further development and repositioning of the drug for the treatment of ATTR amyloidosis. EudraCT trial number: 2014-001586-27 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02191826.
Assuntos
Neuropatias Amiloides Familiares/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Albumina/metabolismo , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Agregação Patológica de Proteínas/prevenção & controle , Tolcapona/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Neuropatias Amiloides Familiares/metabolismo , Inibidores de Catecol O-Metiltransferase/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação de Sentido Incorreto , Pré-Albumina/genética , Tolcapona/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pleurofibrinolysis has been reported to be potentially beneficial in the management of complicated parapneumonic effusions (CPPE) and empyemas in the adult population. METHODS: Prospective, controlled, randomized, and double-blind study, to evaluate intrapleural alteplase 10 mg (initially 20 mg was considered but bleeding events forced dose reduction) versus 100,000 UI urokinase every 24 h for a maximum of 6 days in patients with CPPE or empyemas. The primary aim was to evaluate the success rate of each fibrinolytic agent at 3 and 6 days. Success of therapy was defined as the presence of both clinical and radiological improvement, making additional fibrinolytic doses unnecessary, and eventually leading to resolution. Secondary outcomes included the safety profile of intrapleural fibrinolytics, referral for surgery, length of hospital stay, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included, of whom 51 received alteplase and 48 urokinase. Success rates for urokinase and alteplase at 3 and 6 days were not significantly different, but when only the subgroup of CPPE was considered, urokinase resulted in a high proportion of cures. There were no differences in mortality or surgical need (overall, 3 %). Five (28 %) patients receiving 20 mg of alteplase and 4 (12 %) receiving 10 mg presented serious bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: If intrapleural fibrinolytics are intended to be used, urokinase may be more effective than alteplase in patients with non-purulent CPPE and have a lower rate of adverse events.
Assuntos
Empiema Pleural/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Derrame Pleural/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tecidual/uso terapêutico , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tipo Uroquinase/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Tubos Torácicos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers are renoprotective but both may increase serum potassium concentrations in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The proportion of affected patients, the optimum follow-up period and whether there are differences between drugs in the development of this complication remain to be ascertained. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, phase IV, controlled, crossover study we recruited 30 patients with stage 3 CKD under restrictive eligibility criteria and strict dietary control. With the exception of withdrawals, each patient was treated with olmesartan and enalapril separately for 3 months each, with a 1-week wash-out period between treatments. Patients were clinically assessed on 10 occasions via measurements of serum and urine samples. We used the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics for comparison of categorical data between groups. Comparisons were also made using independent two-sample t-tests and Welch's t-test. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed when necessary. We used either a Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test if the distribution was not normal or the variance not homogeneous. RESULTS: Enalapril and olmesartan increased serum potassium levels similarly (0.3 mmol/L and 0.24 mmol/L respectively). The percentage of patients presenting hyperkalemia higher than 5 mmol/L did not differ between treatments: 37% for olmesartan and 40% for enalapril. The mean e-GFR ranged 46.3 to 48.59 ml/mint/1.73 m2 in those treated with olmesartan and 46.8 to 48.3 ml/mint/1.73 m2 in those with enalapril and remained unchanged at the end of the study. The decreases in microalbuminuria were also similar (23% in olmesartan and 29% in enalapril patients) in the 4 weeks time point. The percentage of patients presenting hyperkalemia, even after a two month period, did not differ between treatments. There were no appreciable changes in sodium and potassium urinary excretion. CONCLUSIONS: Disturbances in potassium balance upon treatment with either olmesartan or enalapril are frequent and without differences between groups. The follow-up of these patients should include control of potassium levels, at least after the first week and the first and second month after initiating treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial EudraCT "2008-002191-98".
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Hiperpotassemia/etiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The therapeutic benefit of inhaled corticoids in bronchiectasis not due to cystic fibrosis is still not well documented. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticoids in this disease. SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital in the city of Barcelona, Catalonia, (Spain). METHOD: A prospective, double-blind, parallel, placebo-masked study was conducted. Seventy-seven patients (40 women; mean age: 68 years) were randomly assigned to receive either 400 mcg budesonide twice daily or placebo and were regularly reviewed for six months. RESULTS: Differences in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in the first second between the beginning and end of the study were not significantly lower in the budesonide group than in the placebo group, either in absolute values [-17.4 (386.9) versus -21.4 (375.5)] or in percentages [-1.9(9.5) versus -2.8 (11.6)]. Microbiological criteria applied to evaluate changes between the beginning and end of the study showed no worsening in the budesonide group compared with the control group, whereas a non-significant improvement was obtained in 8.1 % of cases in the budesonide group compared to 3 % in the placebo group. Although significance was only achieved for sputum eosinophils (p = 0.021), a consistent tendency towards improvement was also observed in secondary end-points (symptoms, number and duration of exacerbations, quality of life, sputum cytology and interleukin-8) in the budesonide group. CONCLUSION: Although further studies are required, inhaled corticoid treatment may be efficacious and safe in bronchiectasis not due to cystic fibrosis.
Assuntos
Bronquiectasia/tratamento farmacológico , Budesonida/efeitos adversos , Budesonida/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Administração por Inalação , Idoso , Bronquiectasia/sangue , Bronquiectasia/microbiologia , Budesonida/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado/efeitos dos fármacos , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Interleucina-8/sangue , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Escarro/citologia , Escarro/microbiologia , Capacidade Vital/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have usually been administered for replacement therapy of humoral immunodeficiencies, but their use in treating other disorders with an immune pathogenesis is increasing. The exact mechanism of action by which IVIG are of benefit in such diseases is complex and only partly understood. One of the proposed mechanisms of action is the modulation of cytokine release. METHODS: We selected 29 patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia (common variable immunodeficiency), receiving long-term substitutive therapy with IVIG, and 14 healthy blood donors as a control group. Blood samples were then taken before and 1 hour after finishing the IVIG infusion. Only one blood sample was obtained from the healthy controls. The cytokines studied were interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and interferon (IFN)-gamma. RESULTS: Patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia showed significantly higher serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1Ra, and TNF alpha than healthy controls. IVIG infusion significantly increased serum concentration levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1Ra, and TNF alpha. No significant variation was observed in serum levels of IL-beta, IFN gamma, or IL-2 after IVIG infusion. Age, IVIG commercial preparation, and IVIG dose did not influence cytokine serum levels. Moreover, a significant correlation was observed between serum level variations of IL-1Ra and TNF alpha, as well as an associative trend between maximum changes in IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: IVIG administration significantly alters the serum pattern of selected cytokines, which might explain, at least in part, the mechanism of action of IVIG in autoimmune or inflammatory disorders.
Assuntos
Agamaglobulinemia/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Interferon gama/sangue , Interleucinas/sangue , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with bronchiectasis usually develop chronic bronchial infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) that is related to worsening lung function and increased morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether direct aerosol delivery of tobramycin to the lower airways may control infection and produce only low systemic toxicity. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial involving 30 patients was conducted to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of 6-month tobramycin inhalation therapy. Patients received 300 mg of aerosolized tobramycin or placebo twice daily in 2 cycles, each for 6 months, with a one-month washout period. The number of exacerbations, number of hospital admissions, number of hospital admission days, antibiotic use, pulmonary function, quality of life, tobramycin toxicity, density of PA in sputum, emergence of bacterial resistance, and emergence of other opportunistic bacteria were recorded. RESULTS: The number of admissions and days of admission (mean +/- SD) during the tobramycin period (0.15 +/- 0.37 and 2.05 +/- 5.03) were lower than those during the placebo period (0.75 +/-1.16 and 12.65 +/- 21.8) (p < 0.047). A decrease in PA density in sputum was associated with tobramycin administration in the analysis of the first 6-month cycle (p = 0.038). No significant differences were observed in the number of exacerbations, antibiotic use, pulmonary function, and quality of life. The emergence of bacterial resistance and other bacteria did not differ between the 2 periods of study. Inhaled tobramycin was associated with bronchospasm in 3 patients, but not with detectable ototoxicity or nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosol administration of high-dose tobramycin in non-CF bronchiectatic patients for endobronchial infection with PA appears to be safe and decreases the risk of hospitalization and PA density in sputum. Nevertheless, pulmonary function and quality of life are not improved, and the risk of bronchospasm is appreciable.