Application of 3D Printing in Cleft Lip and Palate Repair.

This manuscript reviews the transformative impact of 3-dimensional (3D) printing technologies in the treatment and management of cleft lip and palate (CLP), highlighting its application across presurgical planning, surgical training, implantable scaffolds, and postoperative care. By integrating patient-specific data through computer-aided design and manufacturing, 3D printing offers tailored solutions that improve surgical outcomes, reduce operation times, and enhance patient care. The review synthesizes current research findings, technical advancements, and clinical applications, illustrating the potential of 3D printing to revolutionize CLP treatment. Further, it discusses the future directions of combining 3D printing with other innovative technologies like artificial intelligence, 4D printing, and in situ bioprinting for more comprehensive care strategies. This paper underscores the necessity for multidisciplinary collaboration and further research to overcome existing challenges and fully utilize the capabilities of 3D printing in CLP repair.

A rhPDGF-BB/bovine type I collagen/ß-TCP mixture for the treatment of critically sized non-union tibial defects: An in vivo study in rabbits.

Non-union during healing of bone fractures affects up to ~5% of patients worldwide. Given the success of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-B chain homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) in promoting angiogenesis and bone fusion in the hindfoot and ankle, rhPDGF-BB combined with bovine type I collagen/ß-TCP matrix (AIBG) could serve as a viable alternative to autografts in the treatment of non-unions. Defects (~2 mm gaps) were surgically induced in tibiae of skeletally mature New Zealand white rabbits. Animals were allocated to one of four groups-(1) negative control (empty defect, healing for 8 weeks), (2 and 3) acute treatment with AIBG (healing for 4 or 8 weeks), and (4) chronic treatment with AIBG (injection 4 weeks post defect creation and then healing for 8 weeks). Bone formation was analyzed qualitatively and semi-quantitatively through histology. Samples were imaged using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography for defect visualization and volumetric reconstruction, respectively. Delayed healing or non-healing was observed in the negative control group, whereas defects treated with AIBG in an acute setting yielded bone formation as early as 4 weeks with bone growth appearing discontinuous. At 8 weeks (acute setting), substantial remodeling was observed with higher degrees of bone organization characterized by appositional bone growth. The chronic healing, experimental, group yielded bone formation and remodeling, with no indication of non-union after treatment with AIBG. Furthermore, bone growth in the chronic healing group was accompanied by an increased presence of osteons, osteonal canals, and interstitial lamellae. Qualitatively and semiquantitatively, chronic application of AI facilitated complete bridging of the induced non-union defects, while untreated defects or defects treated acutely with AIBG demonstrated a lack of complete bridging at 8 weeks.

Effect of oestrogen modulation on semen parameters in men with secondary hypogonadism: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Selective oestrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors stimulate endogenous gonadotrophins and testosterone in men with hypogonadism. There are no systematic reviews/meta-analyses assessing the effects of selective oestrogen receptor modulators/aromatase inhibitors on semen parameters in men with secondary hypogonadism. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of monotherapy or a combination of selective oestrogen receptor modulators/aromatase inhibitors on sperm parameters and/or fertility in men with secondary hypogonadism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions reporting effects of selective oestrogen receptor modulators and/or aromatase inhibitors on semen parameters or fertility in men with low testosterone with low/normal gonadotrophins were selected. The risk of bias was assessed using ROB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. The results of randomised controlled trials were summarised using vote counting while summarising effect estimates where available. Non-randomised studies of intervention meta-analysis were conducted using the random-effect model. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Five non-randomised studies of interventions (n = 105) of selective oestrogen receptor modulators showed an increase in sperm concentration (pooled mean difference 6.64 million/mL; 95% confidence interval 1.54, 11.74, I2  = 0%) and three non-randomised studies of interventions (n = 83) of selective oestrogen receptor modulators showed an increase in total motile sperm count (pooled mean difference 10.52; 95% confidence interval 1.46-19.59, I2  = 0%), with very low certainty of evidence. The mean body mass index of participants was >30 kg/m2 . Four randomised controlled trials (n = 591) comparing selective oestrogen receptor modulators to placebo showed a heterogeneous effect on sperm concentration. Three included men with overweight or obesity. The results were of very low certainty of evidence. Limited pregnancy or live birth data were available. No studies comparing aromatase inhibitors with placebo or testosterone were found. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Current studies are of limited size and quality but suggest that selective oestrogen receptor modulators may improve semen parameters in those patients, particularly when associated with obesity.