Does prophylactic decompression of distal nerves following nerve repair improve functional recovery? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injuries are burdensome on healthcare systems, individuals and society as a whole. The current standard of treatment for neurotmesis is primary neurorrhaphy or nerve grafting. However, several patients do not recover their full function. There has been a suggestion that primary distal neurolysis at common entrapment sites maximises surgical outcomes; however, no guidelines exist on this practice. This scoping review aims to ascertain the existing evidence on prophylactic distal decompression of peripheral nerves following repair. METHODS: A literature search was performed using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published in the past 50 years. Studies were screened using a selection criteria and study quality was assessed using standardised tools. Furthermore, thematic content analysis was performed. RESULTS: Six studies were eligible for inclusion after screening; all studies were retrospective and at most level 3 evidence. No studies were designed specifically to assess the efficacy of distal neurolysis following proximal repair, thus no comparative data with control cohorts are available. All studies that recommended distal decompression of proximally repaired nerves based their conclusions on cases observed by the authors in practice or from theories on nerve regeneration. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that the evidence on the role of immediate distal neurolysis in primary neurorrhaphy is inadequate. Recommendations are limited by the lack of large-scale and generalisable data. Further research is needed with definitive objective outcomes and patient-related outcome measures.

Thirty-day mortality following surgical management of hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a prospective multi-centre UK study.

PURPOSE: Thirty-day mortality of patients with hip fracture is well researched and predictive; validated scoring tools have been developed (Nottingham Hip Fracture Score, NHFS). COVID-19 has significantly greater mortality in the elderly and comorbid patients which includes hip fracture patients. Non-operative treatment is not appropriate due to significantly higher mortality, and therefore, these patients are often exposed to COVID-19 in the peri-operative period. What is unclear is the effect of concomitant COVID-19 infection in these patients. METHODS: A multicentre prospective study across ten sites in the United Kingdom (responsible for 7% of hip fracture patients per annum in the UK). Demographic and background information were collected by independent chart review. Data on surgical factors included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, time to theatre, Nottingham Hip fracture score (NHFS) and classification of fracture were also collected between 1st March 2020 and 30th April 2020 with a matched cohort from the same period in 2019. RESULTS: Actual and expected 30-day mortality was found to be significantly higher than expected for 2020 COVID-19 positive patients (RR 3.00 95% CI 1.57-5.75, p < 0.001), with 30 observed deaths compared against the 10 expected from NHFS risk stratification. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection appears to be an independent risk factor for increased mortality in hip fracture patients. Whilst non-operative management of these fractures is not suggested due to the documented increased risks and mortality, this study provides evidence to the emerging literature of the severity of COVID-19 infection in surgical patients and the potential impact of COVID-19 on elective surgical patients in the peri-operative period.

Does using anatomical models improve patient satisfaction in orthopaedic consenting? Single-blinded randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction in consenting is a major pillar of clinical governance and healthcare quality assessment. The purpose was to observe the effect of using 3D anatomical models of knee and shoulder joints on patient satisfaction during informed consent in the largest single-blinded randomised controlled trial in this field. METHODS: 52 patients undergoing elective knee or shoulder surgery were randomised into two groups when being consented. The intervention group (n = 26) was shown an anatomical model of the knee/shoulder joint while the control group (n = 26) was given only a verbal explanation without a model. Patients rated their satisfaction on the validated Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS-26) questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were analysed for specific themes to determine key factors that influenced patient satisfaction. The mean score ±SD were calculated with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the overall satisfaction between the control and intervention cohorts (MISS-26 score 4.33 [86.6%] ± 0.646 vs 4.70 [94.0%] ± 0.335 respectively, 7.4% improvement, 8.5% difference, p = 0.01). Behavioural criteria showed a 13% increase in satisfaction (p = 0.02). Semi-structured interviews determined that the factors influencing satisfaction included the surgeon's interpersonal manner, the use of the visual aid and seeing the consultant surgeon in clinic. All patients in the intervention cohort identified factors contributing to their satisfaction, whereas a fifth of the control cohort claimed nothing at all made them feel satisfied. CONCLUSION: Anatomical models as visual aids significantly increased patient satisfaction during the consenting process and played an integral part of the surgeon's explanation. Patients exposed to anatomical models also claimed to be more satisfied with the surgeon's inter-personal skills. This study recommends the use of anatomical models, which are both cost-effective and easily implementable, during explanation and consent for orthopaedic procedures.

Augmented reality fluoroscopy simulation of the guide-wire insertion in DHS surgery: A proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures contribute to a significant clinical burden globally with over 1.6 million cases per annum and up to 30% mortality rate within the first year. Insertion of a dynamic hip screw (DHS) is a frequently performed procedure to treat extracapsular neck of femur fractures. Poorly performed DHS fixation of extracapsular neck of femur fractures can result in poor mobilisation, chronic pain, and increased cut-out rate requiring revision surgery. A realistic, affordable, and portable fluoroscopic simulation system can improve performance metrics in trainees, including the tip-apex distance (the only clinically validated outcome), and improve outcomes. METHOD: We developed a digital fluoroscopic imaging simulator using orthogonal cameras to track coloured markers attached to the guide-wire which created a virtual overlay on fluoroscopic images of the hip. To test the accuracy with which the augmented reality system could track a guide-wire, a standard workshop femur was used to calibrate the system with a positional marker fixed to indicate the apex; this allowed for comparison between guide-wire tip-apex distance (TAD) calculated by the system to be compared to that physically measured. Tests were undertaken to determine: (1) how well the apex could be targeted; (2) the accuracy of the calculated TAD. (3) The number of iterations through the algorithm giving the optimal accuracy-time relationship. RESULTS: The calculated TAD was found to have an average root mean square error of 4.2 mm. The accuracy of the algorithm was shown to increase with the number of iterations up to 20 beyond which the error asymptotically converged to an error of 2 mm. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates a novel augmented reality simulation of guide-wire insertion in DHS surgery. To our knowledge this has not been previously achieved. In contrast to virtual reality, augmented reality is able to simulate fluoroscopy while allowing the trainee to interact with real instrumentation and performing the procedure on workshop bone models.