Effect of Comfort Care on Perioperative Outcomes and Postoperative Recovery of Breast Cancer Patients.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of comfort care on perioperative outcomes and postoperative recovery of breast cancer patients. Evaluating comfort care is important in the context of breast cancer surgery because it can potentially alleviate pain, improve patient comfort, enhance postoperative recovery, and reduce complications, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes. Methods: Between March 2020 and December 2021, 78 patients undergoing breast cancer surgery at our hospital were randomly assigned to receive either routine nursing (routine group) or comfort care (experimental group). The comfort care intervention included various components such as health education, preoperative care, intraoperative care, postoperative care, pain care, and psychological care. The routine group received standard nursing care following medical advice. Results: The patient characteristics between the two groups were comparable. Comfort care resulted in significantly higher visual analog scale (VAS) scores, indicating reduced pain, and better improvement in functional recovery of the upper limb compared to routine nursing. Comfort care was also associated with better postoperative recovery, as evidenced by lower self-rating depression scale (SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores. The experimental group had a significantly lower incidence of complications compared to the routine group. Additionally, the experimental group reported better 24-hour comfort and higher nursing satisfaction. Conclusion: In conclusion, comfort care effectively reduces postoperative pain, promotes postoperative recovery, improves patient emotions, lowers the incidence of complications, and enhances comfort and care satisfaction in breast cancer patients undergoing radical surgery. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating comfort care interventions in the perioperative management of breast cancer patients. Further research and implementation of comfort care strategies may have implications for improving clinical practice and patient outcomes in the future.

Global development of artificial intelligence in cancer field: a bibliometric analysis range from 1983 to 2022.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely applied in cancer field nowadays. The aim of this study is to explore the hotspots and trends of AI in cancer research. Methods: The retrieval term includes four topic words ("tumor," "cancer," "carcinoma," and "artificial intelligence"), which were searched in the database of Web of Science from January 1983 to December 2022. Then, we documented and processed all data, including the country, continent, Journal Impact Factor, and so on using the bibliometric software. Results: A total of 6,920 papers were collected and analyzed. We presented the annual publications and citations, most productive countries/regions, most influential scholars, the collaborations of journals and institutions, and research focus and hotspots in AI-based cancer research. Conclusion: This study systematically summarizes the current research overview of AI in cancer research so as to lay the foundation for future research.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has been widely applied in patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, the safety and application value of LG in elderly patients with GC was still unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LG for elderly patients with GC using the meta-analysis. METHODS: Studies comparing elderly patients and nonelderly patients who underwent LG for GC were reviewed and collected from the PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Outcomes such as operative results, postoperative recovery, and morbidity were compared and analyzed. The Review Manager 5.3 was used to portray the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Eleven observational studies with a total of 3275 patients were included. Compared with nonelderly patients, elderly patients had shorter operation time (WMD -10.46; 95% CI -17.06 to -3.86; P = .002), less retrieved lymph nodes (WMD -2.34; 95% CI -3.77 to -0.92; P = .001), delayed time to first flatus (WMD 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.51; P = .003), longer postoperative hospital stays (WMD 1.06; 95% CI 0.07-2.05; P = .04), higher risk for overall postoperative complication (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.08-1.67; P = .009), nonsurgical postoperative complication (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.24-3.15; P = .004), and postoperative pulmonary complication (OR: 3.09; 95% CI 1.68-5.68; P < .001). There was no significance between nonelderly patients and elderly patients regarding the estimated blood loss, incidences of surgical postoperative complication, surgical site infection, and ileus (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Outcomes of LG for elderly patients were comparable to those in nonelderly patients. Age alone should not preclude LG in elderly patients.

microRNA-148a suppresses human gastric cancer cell metastasis by reversing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulators of gastric cancer development and progression. miR-148a is one of the most frequently and highly downregulated miRNAs in gastric cancer and is associated with advanced clinical stage and poor prognosis. In this study, we investigated the role of miR-148a in gastric cancer metastasis. Levels of miR-148a were determined by qRT-PCR in 60 gastric cancer samples. Cell migration and invasion assays were performed in a stably expressing miRNA-148a gastric cancer cell line established using a lentivirus expression system. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was evaluated using qRT-PCR and Western Blots to detect epithelial marker E-cadherin and mesenchymal marker, vimentin. Luciferase reporter assays were used to identify downstream targets and biological function of miR-148a. Gastric cancer tissue had significantly lower expression of miR-148a compared to non-tumor tissue. Low miR-148a levels were associated with lymph node metastasis, N stage, and blood vessel invasion. miR-148a overexpression inhibited metastasis of gastric cancer cells. miR-148a overexpression also downregulated vimentin expression and upregulated E-cadherin expression, suggesting that miR-148a inhibited EMT. Finally, the SMAD2 gene was identified as the direct and functional target of miR-148a. MiR-148a suppresses gastric cancer metastasis and EMT, likely via SMAD2. Restoration of miR-148a expression could have important implications in gastric cancer therapy.