Multifocal/multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter?

BACKGROUND: Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancer cases have been increasingly diagnosed owing to the extensive use of improved preoperative breast imaging. The current tumor-node-metastasis staging system uses the dimension of the largest tumor and recommends reporting the pathological features of the largest tumor in MF/MC breast cancers. AIM: This study aimed to explore whether the largest or aggregate dimensions of MF and MC breast cancers can better predict tumor behavior. We also attempted to study the histological and biological heterogeneities of separate foci in MF and MC breast cancers to determine whether it was necessary to examine each lesion. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 121 patients with MF/MC (103 with MF and 18 with MC) breast cancers and 484 patients with unifocal breast cancer who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Two methods were used to record the T stage (using the dimensions of the largest lesion and aggregate dimensions of all lesions). The histological grade, immunohistochemical parameters, and molecular subtypes of the largest lesion and other lesions in MF/MC breast cancers were studied to assess intertumoral heterogeneity. RESULTS: The use of aggregate dimensions upstaged 63 patients with MF/MC breast cancers to a more advanced stage and removed the independent effect of cancer multiplicity on lymph node positivity compared with the use of the largest dimension. Mismatches were found in the pathological type (9.9%), histological grade (4.1%), and molecular subtype (8.3%) among different foci. CONCLUSION: The tendency of MF/MC breast tumors to metastasize may be related to tumor load, which can be better predicted by the aggregate dimensions of all foci. The use of the current staging systems may require further evaluation and modification. Intertumoral heterogeneity indicates the necessity for pathological and immunohistochemical assessments of each lesion in patients with MF/MC breast cancers.

Endoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Glandular Gynecomastia.

BACKGROUND: Gynecomastia (GYN) is the most common benign disease in males. A vacuum-assisted biopsy is a minimally invasive surgical technique for GYN treatment that achieves satisfactory aesthetic results. However, due to the operation under non-direct vision, it is difficult to localize the bleeding points and assess the residual glandular tissue. Endoscopy was applied to observe the operative field after subcutaneous mastectomy. The present study aimed to recommend our initial experience in glandular GYN with endoscope-assisted minimally invasive subcutaneous mastectomy. METHODS: A total of 34 patients diagnosed with glandular GYN (50 breasts), treated with endoscope-assisted minimally invasive surgery at The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University between June 2018 and June 2020, were enrolled in this study. According to Simon's classification of the breast, 10 was grade I, 25 was grade IIA, and 15 was grade IIB. The characteristics of patients, operative data, postoperative complications, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: Endoscope-assisted minimally invasive mastectomy was performed successfully in all cases. The operative duration of the operation was 55-120 min/side. The total weight of the resected tissue of the 50 breasts was 55-350 g, and the blood loss was 10-105 mL/breast. Endoscopy detected five breasts with bleeding and three with residual glandular during the operation. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 1 breast, subcutaneous seroma in 3 breasts, dysesthesia of the nipple-areolar complex in 2 breasts, and skin redundancy in a bilateral patient. None of the patients experienced severe pain, infection, nipple necrosis, and nipple retraction, a saucer-like deformity. With a median follow-up of 21 months, all patients were satisfied with their cosmetic outcome (100%), and no recurrence occurred. CONCLUSION: Endoscope-assisted minimally invasive mastectomy could be used as a feasible technique for the treatment of glandular GYN. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online. Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .