Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urol Case Rep ; 56: 102825, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39247688

RESUMO

This article discusses a case study of a 68-year-old male patient with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) who developed solitary renal metastasis. The importance of routine imaging for detecting asymptomatic renal metastasis is highlighted. The efficacy of various treatment options, including nephrectomy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and cryoablation, is explored. The study underscores the need for a multidisciplinary team approach in managing LUSC with renal metastasis, due to the lack of clear treatment guidelines.

2.
BMC Nephrol ; 25(1): 281, 2024 Aug 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39210338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLPS) is a relatively rare disease. Liposarcomas vary in size, but sizeable RPLPS larger than 30 cm in diameter are very rare, and their diagnosis and treatment present significant challenges. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 58-year-old male patient who was admitted to the hospital with an increased abdominal circumference and was later diagnosed with a giant RPLPS. The liposarcoma was found to adhere to the right kidney and the entire ureter, invading the ascending colon. The patient underwent complete combined surgical resection. The tumor was removed intact, measured 55.0 cm × 30.0 cm × 18.0 cm, and weighed 19.8 kg. Histopathologic analysis revealed well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS). The patient was successfully discharged from the hospital and followed up for 6 months with no signs of recurrence. CONCLUSION: RPLPS is a rare tumor with atypical clinical presentation. Surgery remains the most effective method of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas, with complete removal if there is local invasion. Preoperative examination, including three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, is essential for surgical success. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy remains controversial. However, clinicians should not rule them out as viable options.


Assuntos
Lipossarcoma , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/patologia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/cirurgia , Masculino , Lipossarcoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Lipossarcoma/patologia , Lipossarcoma/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
BMC Urol ; 23(1): 201, 2023 Dec 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38053112

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe a technique to improve exposure of prostate during extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (EP-RARP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March 2020 to June 2022, a total of 41 patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery underwent EP-RARP. Twenty-three patients improved exposure by traction of prostate through urinary catheter. The catheter traction prostatectomy (CTP) group was compared with the standard prostatectomy (SP) group using three robotic arms (18 patients) in terms of estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, positive surgical margin rate, the recovery rate of urinary continence, Gleason score and postoperative hospital stays. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. RESULTS: The operative time was lower in the CTP group (109.63 min vs. 143.20 min; P < 0.001). EBL in the CTP group was 178.26 ± 30.70 mL, and in the standard prostatectomy group, it was 347.78 ± 53.53 mL (P < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, recovery rate of urinary continence, catheterization time and positive surgical margin were observed between both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 6 months of follow-up, the Post-op Detectable prostate specific antigen was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: CTP is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in EP-RARP. Application of CTP improved the exposure of prostate, reduced operative time and blood loss in comparison with the conventional procedure.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Margens de Excisão , Tração , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/etiologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Cateteres Urinários , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA