Nutrition Assessment and Education of Patients with Heart Failure by Cardiologists.

Although nutritional assessment and education are important for hospitalized patients with heart failure, the extent of their implementation in real-world clinical practice is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the evaluation and management of nutrition during hospitalization for heart failure using a questionnaire survey for cardiologists.In this cross-sectional multicenter survey, 147 cardiologists from 32 institutions completed a web-based questionnaire (response rate, 95%).The survey showed that 78.2% of the respondents performed a nutritional assessment for hospitalized patients, whereas 38.3% used objective tools. In contrast, only 9.5% of the respondents evaluated the presence or absence of cardiac cachexia. Most respondents (89.8%) reported providing nutritional education to their patients before hospital discharge. However, compared with the number of respondents who provided information on sodium (97.0%) and water (63.6%) restrictions, a limited number of respondents provided guidance on optimal protein (20.5%) and micronutrient (9.1%) intake as part of the nutritional education. Less than 50% of the respondents provided guidance on optimal calorie intake (43.2%) and ideal body weight (34.8%) as a part of the nutritional education for patients identified as malnourished.Although nutritional assessment is widely performed for hospitalized patients with heart failure, most assessments are subjective rather than objective. Nutritional education, frequently provided before hospital discharge, is limited to information on water or salt intake restrictions. Therefore, more comprehensive and individualized nutritional assessments and counselling with a scientific basis are required.

Usefulness of HANBAH Score in Japanese Patients With Acute Heart Failure.

The HANBAH score is a novel simple risk score consisting of hemoglobin level, age, sodium (N) level, blood urea nitrogen level, atrial fibrillation, and high-density lipoprotein. We aimed to validate this score in an external population. This retrospective study included 744 patients hospitalized for acute heart failure between 2015 and 2019. Each of the following criteria was scored as 1 point: hemoglobin level (<13.0 g/L for men and <12.0 g/L for women), atrial fibrillation, age (>70 years), serum blood urea nitrogen level (>26 mg/100 ml for men and >28 mg/100 ml for women), serum high-density lipoprotein level (<25 mg/100 ml), and serum sodium level (<135 mg/100 ml). HANBAH scores were available for 736 patients (age, 75 ± 13 years; 60% male; reduced [<40%] and preserved ejection fraction [≥50%]: 35% and 49%, respectively). All-cause death during follow-up, a composite of death and heart failure rehospitalization, and in-hospital death were observed in 173, 274, and 51 patients, respectively. The HANBAH score was significantly associated with these end points after adjustment for covariates (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38 [95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.64], p <0.001; 1.27 [1.11 to 1.45], p <0.001; and 1.66 [1.18 to 2.33], p <0.001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic and net reclassification improvement analyses showed that the HANBAH score performed significantly better than AHEAD (atrial fibrillation, hemoglobin [anemia], elderly, abnormal renal parameters, diabetes mellitus) and AHEAD-U (AHEAD with uric acid) scores and similar to the multi-domain ACUTE HF score for all end points. In conclusion, the HANBAH score showed powerful risk stratification in this external Japanese cohort. Despite its simplicity, it performed better than other simple risk scores and similar to a multidomain risk score.

Prognostic value of estimating appendicular muscle mass in heart failure using creatinine/cystatin C.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Heart failure with concomitant sarcopenia has a poor prognosis; therefore, simple methods for evaluating the appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) are required. Recently, a model incorporating anthropometric data and the sarcopenia index (i.e., serum creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio [Cre/CysC]), was developed to estimate the ASMI. We hypothesized that this model was superior to the traditional model, which uses only anthropometric data to predict prognosis. This retrospective cohort study compared the prognostic value of low ASMI as defined by the biomarker and anthropometric models in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 847 patients, we estimated ASMI using an anthropometric model (incorporating age, body weight, and height) in 791 patients and a biomarker model (incorporating age, body weight, hemoglobin, and Cre/CysC) in 562 patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Overall, 53.4% and 39.1% of patients were diagnosed with low ASMI (using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia cut-off) by the anthropometric and biomarker models, respectively. The two models showed a poor agreement in the diagnosis of low ASMI (kappa: 0.57, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.63). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that a low ASMI was significantly associated with all-cause death in both models. However, this association was retained after adjustment for other covariates in the biomarker model (hazard ratio: 2.32, p = 0.001) but not in the anthropometric model (hazard ratio: 0.79, p = 0.360). CONCLUSION: Among patients hospitalized with heart failure, a low ASMI estimated using the biomarker model, and not the anthropometric model, was significantly associated with all-cause mortality.

Prevalence and prognostic impact of the coexistence of cachexia and sarcopenia in older patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: No study with an adequate patients' number has examined the relationship/overlap between sarcopenia and cachexia. We examined the prevalence of the overlap and prognostic implications of sarcopenia and cachexia in older patients with heart failure using well-accepted definitions. METHODS: This was a post-hoc sub-analysis of the FRAGILE-HF study, a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted at 15 hospitals in Japan. In total, 905 hospitalized older patients were classified into four groups based on the presence or absence of cachexia and/or sarcopenia, which were defined according to the Evans and Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria revised in 2019, respectively. The primary endpoint was 2-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Cachexia and sarcopenia prevalence rates were 32.7% and 22.7%, respectively. Patients were classified into the non-cachexia/non-sarcopenia (55.7%), cachexia/non-sarcopenia (21.7%), non-cachexia/sarcopenia (11.6%), and cachexia/sarcopenia (11.0%) groups. During the 2-year follow-up period after discharge, 158 (17.5%) all-cause deaths (124 cardiovascular deaths [CVD] and 34 non-CVD) were observed. The cachexia/sarcopenia group had the lowest body fat mass and exhibited significantly higher mortality rates (log-rank P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that cachexia/sarcopenia was an independent prognostic factor after adjusting for known prognostic factors (versus non-cachexia/non-sarcopenia: hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-4.29; P < 0.001). Neither cachexia/non-sarcopenia nor non-cachexia/sarcopenia were significantly associated with all-cause mortality compared with non-cachexia/non-sarcopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Cachexia and sarcopenia are prevalent among older hospitalized patients with heart failure; nonetheless, the overlap is not as prominent as previously expected. The presence of cachexia and sarcopenia is a risk factor for all-cause mortality.

Inaccurate recognition of own comorbidities is associated with poor prognosis in elderly patients with heart failure.

AIMS: A patient's understanding of his or her own comorbidities is part of the recommended patient education for those with heart failure. The accuracy of patients' understanding of their comorbidities and its prognostic impact have not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients hospitalized for heart failure (n = 1234) aged ≥65 years (mean age: 80.1 ± 7.7 years; 531 females) completed a questionnaire regarding their diagnoses of diabetes, malignancy, stroke, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and coronary artery disease (CAD). The patients were categorized into three groups based on the number of agreements between self-reported comorbidities and provider-reported comorbidities: low (1-2, n = 19); fair (3-4, n = 376); and high (5-6, n = 839) agreement groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year. The low agreement group had more comorbidities and a higher prevalence of a history of heart failure. The agreement was good for diabetes (κ = 0.73), moderate for malignancy (κ = 0.56) and stroke (κ = 0.50), and poor-to-fair for hypertension (κ = 0.33), COPD (κ = 0.25), and CAD (κ = 0.30). The fair and low agreement groups had poorer outcomes than the good agreement group [fair agreement group: hazard ratio (HR): 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.56; P = 0.041; low agreement group: HR: 2.74: 95% CI: 1.40-5.35; P = 0.003]. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to recognize their own comorbidities among older patients with heart failure was low. Patients with less accurate recognition of their comorbidities may be at higher risk for a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalization.

Urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein as a prognostic marker in patients with acute heart failure.

AIMS: Urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) is expressed in proximal tubular epithelial cells and excreted into the urine during tubular injury. We hypothesized that high urinary L-FABP is associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 623 patients (74 ± 13 years old; 60.0% male patients) with AHF. Urinary L-FABP levels were measured at the time of admission and adjusted for the urinary creatinine concentration. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The median value and interquartile range of urinary L-FABP levels were 6.66 and 3.37-21.1 µg/gCr, respectively. Urinary L-FABP levels were significantly correlated with both beta-2 microglobulin and cystatin C levels; the correlation with the former was higher than that with the latter. During the follow-up of 631 (interquartile range: 387-875) days, 142 deaths occurred. A high tertile of urinary L-FABP level was associated with high mortality; this association was retained after adjusting for other covariates (second tertile hazard ratio 1.40, P = 0.152 vs. first tertile; third tertile hazard ratio 1.94, P = 0.005 vs. first tertile). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary L-FABP is more closely associated with tubular dysfunction than with glomerular dysfunction. Tubular dysfunction, which was evaluated based on urinary L-FABP levels, in patients with AHF is associated with all-cause mortality and is independent of pre-existing risk factors. L-FABP should be considered for use in the prognosis of AHF.