Outcomes and Disposition of Patients After Case Cancellation on Day of Surgery for Reasons Attributed to Medical or Anesthetic Care: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many day-of-surgery cancellations are avoidable, and different strategies are used to prevent these costly adverse events. Despite these past analyses and evaluations of positive interventions, studies have not examined the final disposition of patients whose cases were canceled in this late manner. This study sought to determine whether surgical procedures canceled for medical or anesthetic reasons were ultimately rescheduled, and the time elapsed between cancellation and completion. In addition, the resolution of the underlying issue leading to cancellation was examined. METHODS: Two years of surgical case data were reviewed in the electronic health record to isolate all procedures canceled on the intended operative date. These cases were then filtered by the documented reason for cancellation into 2 categories: 1 for cases related to medical or anesthetic care and 1 for unrelated cases. Medical- or anesthetic-related cases were further categorized to better elucidate the underlying reason for cancellation. Cases were then traced to determine if and when the procedure was ultimately completed. If a case was rescheduled, the record was reviewed to determine whether the underlying reason for cancellation was resolved. RESULTS: A total of 4472 cases were canceled in the study period with only 20% associated with medical or anesthetic causes. Of these, 72% were rescheduled and 83% of all rescheduled cases resolved the underlying issue before the rescheduled procedure. Nearly half of all cases (47.8%) canceled on the day of surgery for reasons linked to medical and/or anesthetic care were due to acute conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a fifth of cases that are canceled on the date of surgery are never rescheduled and, if they are rescheduled, the delay can be substantial. Although the majority of patients whose procedure are canceled for reasons related to medical or anesthetic care have resolved the underlying issue that led to initial postponement, a significant portion of patients have no change in their status before the ultimate completion of their surgical procedure.

The Benefit of Primary Tumor Surgical Resection in Distant Metastatic Carcinomas of the Thyroid.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Thyroid cancer with distant metastasis (TCDM) at diagnosis has significantly worse survival rates when compared to localized/regional thyroid cancer. This study sought to report on the characteristics of patients presenting with TCDM and the potential survival advantage of surgical resection. STUDY DESIGN: Data were acquired from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with cases from 2004 to 2015. METHODS: TCDM cases (n = 2,558) were identified from the SEER database. The Bonferroni correction was applied for multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to obtain disease-specific survival (DSS) rates. Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify independent factors significantly associated with survival. RESULTS: The average age of diagnosis of TCDM was 62.0 (±17.5) years. Patients were predominantly white (74.6%), female (54.6%), in a relationship (56.0%), and between ages 36 and 80 years (76.4%). Cases consisted of papillary (57.2%), follicular (16.0%), medullary (8.9%), anaplastic (17.9%) TCDM histological variants. Overall 1-, 5-, and 10-year DSS rates were 72.0%, 56.8%, and 43.8%, respectively. Anaplastic and medullary variants had the worst 10-year DSS (0% and 25.5%, respectively). Patients who underwent surgical resection only and surgical resection with radiation were 49% and 59% less likely to die, respectively. Treatment, age, histology, T staging, relationship status, and metastasis site were determined to be significant predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection with radiation was found to be a significant predictor of survival after applying the Bonferroni correction for all thyroid cancer variants except medullary. To increase survival, surgical intervention should be recommended in patients who are deemed to be medically tolerant of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1026-1034, 2021.

Evaluating the impact of metabolic syndrome on postoperative thyroidectomy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has previously been linked to increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality in other surgical undertakings. Because MetS is a consequence of endocrine dysfunction, and given the thyroid's crucial role in endocrine homeostasis, we sought to evaluate the association between MetS and postoperative outcomes of thyroidectomy. METHODS: Data were acquired from the ACS-NSQIP database from years 2005 to 2017. Patients with obesity, diabetes, and hypertension were defined as having MetS. Odds ratios (OR) were obtained for outcomes to quantify risk with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Outcomes significantly affected by MetS included overall complication (OR: 2.00), extended postoperative stay (OR: 1.52), medical complication (OR: 1.48), surgical complication (OR: 1.62), and mortality (OR: 2.33). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MetS undergoing thyroidectomy are at increased risk of an increased length of stay, overall complications, and mortality.

Patient frailty as a risk assessment tool in surgical management of long bone fractures.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is an important predictor of surgical outcomes and has been quantified by several models. The modified frailty index (mFI) has recently been adapted from an 11-item index to a 5-item index and has promise to be a valuable risk assessment tool in orthopedic trauma patients. We perform a retrospective analysis of the 5-item mFI and evaluate its effectiveness in predicting outcomes in patients with long bone fractures. METHODS: The National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2006-2016 database was queried for surgical procedures in the treatment of long bone fractures by current procedural terminology (CPT) codes, excluding those performed on metacarpals and metatarsals. Cases were excluded if they were missing demographic, frailty, and variable data. The 5-item frailty index was calculated based on the sum of presence of 5 conditions: COPD/pneumonia, congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, and impaired functional status. Chi square was used to determine variables significantly associated with each outcome. The significant variables were included in multivariate logistic regression along with the mFI. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 140,249 fixation procedures performed on long bone fractures in NSQIP, 109,423 cases remained after exclusion criteria were applied. The majority of patients were between the ages of 61 and 80 (34.0%), were female (65.6%) and Caucasian (86.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that mFI scores ≥3 were predictive of unplanned reoperation (OR = 1.57), wound disruption (OR = 2.83), unplanned readmission (OR = 2.12), surgical site infection (OR = 1.90), major complications (OR = 3.04), and discharge destination (OR = 3.06). CONCLUSIONS: Our study analyzed the relationship of frailty and postoperative complications in patients with long bone fractures. Patients had increased likelihood of morbidity, independent of other comorbidities and demographic factors. The mFI may have a role as a simple, easy to use risk assessment tool in cases of orthopedic trauma.