Assessing health status in inflammatory bowel disease using a novel single-item numeric rating scale.

BACKGROUND: Current instruments used to measure disease activity and health-related quality of life in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are often cumbersome, time-consuming, and expensive; although used in clinical trials, they are not convenient for clinical practice. A numeric rating scale (NRS) is a quick, inexpensive, and convenient patient-reported outcome that can capture the patient's overall perception of health. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of an NRS and evaluate its use in clinical practice in patients with CD and UC. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated patient-reported NRS scores and measured correlations between NRS and a range of severity measures, including physician-reported NRS, Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI), inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with CD. Subsequently, we evaluated the correlation between the NRS and standard measures of health status (HBI or simple colitis clinical activity index [SCCAI]) and laboratory tests (sedimentation rate [ESR], CRP, and fecal calprotectin) in patients with CD and UC. RESULTS: The patient-reported NRS showed excellent correlation with CDAI (R (2) = 0.59, p < 0.0001), IBDQ (R (2) = 0.66, p < 0.0001), and HBI (R (2) = 0.32, p < 0.0001) in patients with CD. The NRS showed poor, but statistically significant correlation with SCCAI (R (2) = 0.25, p < 0.0001) in patients with UC. The NRS did not correlate with CRP, ESR, or calprotectin. The NRS was reliable and responsive to change. CONCLUSIONS: The NRS is a valid, reliable, and responsive measure that may be useful to evaluate patients with CD and possibly UC.

Pretransplant variables associated with quality of life in liver transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: With an increasing number of liver transplant recipients living, understanding quality-of-life issues is essential. Our goal is to identify pretransplant variables associated with post-transplant quality of life in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Three hundred and eight liver transplant recipients were administered the Short Form 36 and a basic demographical questionnaire. Variables associated with post-transplant quality of life were studied in a multivariate regression analysis. Interaction terms were used to examine effect modification. RESULTS: Male gender, longer pretransplant work hours and interaction term between work hours and male gender were independently associated with Physical Functioning. Work hours positively correlated with Role-Physical, while viral hepatitis and ascites were negatively associated with Role-Physical. Ascites and viral hepatitis were independently negatively associated with Bodily Pain. Encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma and viral hepatitis were independently associated with General Health. Ascites was also negatively associated with Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, Bodily Pain, General Health and Vitality. Viral hepatitis was negatively correlated with Vitality and Mental Functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant variables such as ascites, encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, viral hepatitis, work hours, time unable to work and gender were significantly associated with post-transplant quality of life in liver transplant recipients. Interventions addressing these issues may be initiated to improve the post-transplant quality of life.