Success rate 1 year after apical surgery: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was the retrospective analysis of the outcomes of teeth treated with apical surgery after a 1-year follow-up period. Furthermore, potential factors associated with the success rate were investigated. METHODS: All patients were treated at the Clinic of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery at the University of Zurich between 2010 and 2017. To be eligible for inclusion, all patients were required to have undergone apical surgery with a retrograde root-end filling, and a 1-year follow-up examination at the University of Zurich. Treatment success at the 1-year follow-up time-point was defined as an absence of clinical complaints and radiographically determined healing. Parameters that were analysed included tooth localisation, periapical index of the preoperative lesion, administration of antibiotics, smoker status, histopathology of the apical lesion, radiographically determined sufficiency of root canal treatment pain and clinical signs of inflammation at the initial examination. RESULTS: A total of 81 teeth fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. At the 1-year follow-up, 91.4% of the teeth exhibited successful clinical and radiographic healing. The type of tooth was significantly associated with the success of the surgery (p = 0.006), but radiological severity of periapical inflammation, lesion histopathology, administration of antibiotics, smoker status, the quality of the root canal treatment, and preoperative pain and clinical signs of inflammation were not. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that apical surgery with retrograde root-end filling is a reliable therapy for the preservation of teeth. Furthermore, there are limited factors that affect the treatment outcome.

Guided apicoectomy using a CAD/CAM drilling template.

AIM: Modern microsurgical techniques have increased the success rate of apicoectomy relative to that of traditional approaches. This case report introduces a novel workaround for guided apicoectomy using a patient-specific computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) three-dimensional (3D)-printed template. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Apicoectomy was performed on the mesial root of tooth 36 using template-guided trephine drilling, followed by retrograde filling with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Initially, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and an intraoral surface scan were imported into the planning software. After superimposition, virtual planning was performed to determine the exact localization for root resection. Subsequently, a tooth-supported drilling template was designed and 3D printed. Endodontic microsurgical approaches, including root-end cavity preparation and root-end filling, completed the surgical treatment. RESULT: The apical resection was easily feasible. There were no postoperative complications. Radiological assessment after a 6-month period showed signs of reossification. CONCLUSION: Guided apicoectomy allowed precise root resection, suggesting that this technique may be advantageous in complex anatomical situations.

CO2 laser application in stomatology / Der CO2-Laser und seine Anwendung in der Stomatologie

The CO2 laser has found great acceptance in the stomatologic field of dentistry. This article gives an overview of the most important bene fits. The absorption of the laser light produces photothermal effects such as coagulation, vaporization and photoablation. The main indications in stomatology are pain alleviation and prevention of recurences in aphthae and cold sores (minor aphthae, herpes simplex), ablation of benign and irritant tissue excess (stimulus fibroma), lip and tongue band correction and soft tissue hemostasis. One great advantage is the minimal bleeding in the surgical field, which allows for optimal visibility. In addition, the CO2 laser offers high patient comfort since no primary wound closure with sutures are required. However, in suspect of malignancy a sharp excision with a scalpel is still preferred due to possible compromisation of the histopathologic evaluation.