Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(7): 2832-2839, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35488471

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Removal of the unwanted tattoo was initially focused treatment of picosecond laser in the setting of the unfractionated beam, whereas the fractionated 1064-nm picosecond lasers (Fr-Pico) has been successfully utilized in various skin conditions, including scar and benign pigmented lesions. However, no studies compared the combination of Fr-Pico and unfractional 1064-nm picosecond laser (UFr-Pico) and UFr-Pico alone in tattoo removal. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of Fr-Pico and UFr-Pico and the UFr-Pico and in tattoo removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen black tattoos in 11 patients were treated with UFr-Pico on one half and in combination with Fr-Pico on another half over three sessions with 4-week intervals and 4-week follow-up after the last session. Treatment efficacy was assessed using digital photographs, skin imaging analysis, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: After three treatments, tattoo clearance scores revealed that greater than 50% clearance was achieved in 11 (84.6%) tattoos treated with combination side and 9 (69.2%) tattoos with UFr-Pico alone. Significant differences were observed between the groups at 8 and 12 weeks. Skin textural changes also demonstrated significant improvements in the combination side at Week 12. Adverse events, such as blistering and textural changes, were fewer in the combination side. CONCLUSION: The combination of 1064 nm Fr-Pico and UFr-Pico may be more effective and safer in tattoo removal than UFr-Pico alone.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Tatuagem , Vesícula/etiologia , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Fotografação , Tatuagem/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Dermatol Surg ; 47(2): e58-e65, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910030

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To date, no studies have compared the fractional picosecond 1064-nm laser (FxPico) and fractional carbon dioxide laser (FxCO2) for the treatment of acne scars. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety between FxPico and FxCO2 for treating facial atrophic acne scars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five Asian patients with mild to moderate atrophic acne scars underwent single sessions of randomized split-face treatment with FxPico and FxCO2. Clinical efficacy was assessed by photographs, skin imaging analysis, and patient satisfaction. The adverse events were recorded on every visit. Skin biopsies were performed immediately and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: The physician improvement scores for skin texture and atrophy significantly increased on the FxPico sides, but no significant difference was observed between FxPico and FxCO2. Skin imaging also showed significant improvement on both sides for scar volume. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) was not reported on FxPico sides, whereas 6 patients (24%) experienced mild PIH on FxCO2 sides. Immediate post-FxPico skin biopsy revealed laser-induced optical breakdown with photoacoustic columns. Collagen and elastic fibers increased at 3 months after both treatments. CONCLUSION: FxPico was as effective as FxCO2 in treating atrophic acne scars, correlating with evidence of tissue remodeling with more safety profiles.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar/complicações , Cicatriz/cirurgia , Hiperpigmentação/epidemiologia , Terapia a Laser/instrumentação , Pele/patologia , Acne Vulgar/cirurgia , Adulto , Atrofia/etiologia , Atrofia/patologia , Atrofia/cirurgia , Cicatriz/diagnóstico , Cicatriz/etiologia , Cicatriz/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperpigmentação/diagnóstico , Hiperpigmentação/etiologia , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Gás/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Cosmet Laser Ther ; 21(7-8): 422-424, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711325

RESUMO

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) injection has become increasingly popular for esthetic minimally invasive procedures worldwide, owing to its efficacy and safety. Serious and long-term complications are rare. Here, we report a case of painless skin-colored cutaneous nodules on the face that developed a few days after BoNTA injection. The histopathology revealed a suppurative granuloma which yielded negative results for all organisms on histochemical staining and tissue culture. While waiting for the results of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we started administration of systemic broad-spectrum antibiotics that were effective against atypical mycobacteria, since suppurative granuloma is usually related to mycobacterial infection, and a negative result of histochemical staining is common among these organisms. The nodules were flattened down after antibiotics started 6 weeks . All lesions were clear without any scar after 6 months of treatment.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/efeitos adversos , Granuloma/etiologia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Granuloma/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA