RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic liver disease resulting from hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) virus infections is still a major concern in kidney recipients. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalences, risk factors, and impact of HBV and HCV infections in adult renal transplant recipients in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected on 1633 kidney recipients transplanted between 1989 and 2002 at the 21 German renal transplant centers participating in MOST, the prospective Multinational Observational Study in Transplantation. Subgroup analyses compared HBV- and HCV-positive patients vs those with HBV/HCV-negative serology at the time of transplantation. RESULTS: The prevalences of 4.4% (n = 72) for HBV and 5.8% (n = 94) for HCV showed a marked decline over the last 15 years. Retransplantations were significantly more common among HBV+ (29%) and HCV+ (36%) than HBV-/HCV- patients (12%). HCV+ patients experienced significantly longer dialysis times and received significantly more pretransplantation blood transfusions. Between all groups, no significant differences were observed in acute rejection rate at 12 months or in renal graft function up to 5 years posttransplantation (mean glomerular filtration rate: HBV+, 57.3 mL/min; HCV+, 58.5 mL/min; HBV-/HCV-, 59 mL/min). No progressive elevations in liver enzymes and bilirubin were noted during the 5-year observation period. CONCLUSIONS: HBV and HCV infections currently have a low prevalence among German kidney graft recipients. Long dialysis times, blood transfusions, and retransplantations were identified as risk factors for hepatitis infections. At 5 years posttransplantation, kidney and liver functions did not differ significantly between HBV+ and HCV+ vs HBV-/HCV- renal transplant recipients.
Assuntos
Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Transplante de Rim/fisiologia , Adulto , Transfusão de Sangue , Feminino , Alemanha , Hepatite B/transmissão , Hepatite C/transmissão , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic) is safe and effective in renal transplant patients treated with the standard dose of 2 g MMF. In this 6-month, international, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial, a large cohort of maintenance renal transplant patients receiving different doses of MMF were converted under normal clinical conditions to equimolar doses of EC-MPS. Mean calculated creatinine clearance remained stable from the time of study entry (59.6 +/- 19.7 mL/min) to the end of the study (58.3 +/- 19.8 mL/min). Adverse events were reported by 152 patients (67%), with gastrointestinal complications being observed in 45 patients (20%). Thirty-three patients (15%) experienced adverse events or infections with a suspected relation to EC-MPS, including one case of anemia and two cases of leukopenia. Eleven patients (4.9%) required a reduction in EC-MPS dose and seven patients (3.1%) permanently discontinued EC-MPS owing to adverse events. At month 6 after conversion, five patients (2.2%) experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection. There were no graft losses or deaths. These data support earlier findings that stable maintenance renal transplant patients receiving MMF with cyclosporine with or without corticosteroids can be converted to EC-MPS with no compromise in efficacy and tolerability, and no adverse effect on renal function.
Assuntos
Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Micofenólico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Micofenólico/efeitos adversos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Comprimidos com Revestimento Entérico , Fatores de Tempo , Doadores de Tecidos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Due to the persistant organ shortage for kidney transplantation, donor selection has changed in the past years. Although hypertension and diabetes mellitus are known to be risk factors for renal insufficiency, kidneys from donors with these diagnoses in their history have been accepted for kidney transplantation even with an increased risk of poor graft function. Herein we have reported our experience with kidney transplantation using grafts from donors with both, a history of type II diabetes and hypertension. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2005, ten patients were grafted using donors with history of type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Mean donor age was 58 +/- 7.5 years and recipient age, 52.2 +/- 15.7 years. Mean HLA mismatch was 0.8 (A); 1.2 (B) and 0.9 (DR). Cold ischemia time was 17.4 +/- 4.1 hours. Immunosuppression was based on CyA (n = 7), tacrolimus (n = 2) or sirolimus (n = 1). RESULTS: Six patients (60%) showed good initial function, and four (40%) had delayed graft function (DGF). One patient died at ten weeks due to multiorgan failure. Two (20%) biopsy-proven rejections were diagnosed, one of which was resistant to therapy. Six months after kidney transplantation, 7 (77%, n = 9) showed good graft function (creatinine 1.3 to 2.4 mg/dL), but one patient displayed long-lasting DGF with poor function. CONCLUSION: Grafts from donors with a history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension are suitable for kidney transplantation. Elevated rate of DGF (40%) would justify allocation of these organs to local transplant centers to shorten ischemia time and thereby reduce DGF and achieve better long-term results. Identification and detailed evaluation of these donors prior to allocation (eg, HbAlc, biopsy) may help transplant centers to accept these kidneys.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipertensão , Nefrectomia , Doadores de Tecidos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Obtenção de Tecidos e ÓrgãosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Ureteral necrosis is a serious problem in kidney transplantation. Sometimes re-ureterocystostomy is possible, while other cases require an elaborate reconstruction to maintain kidney function. We report our experience with ileum interposition for ureteral reconstruction. METHODS: After 9 years of dialysis treatment a 58-year-old patient was grafted using the left kidney of a 59-year-old donor with a cold ischemic time of 9.5 hours. The early postoperative course was uneventful apart from delayed graft function. Immunosuppression consisted of an IL-2-receptor antibody, calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Discharge serum creatinine was 2.3 mg/dL. In month 4 the patient showed a pararenal urinoma; cystoscopy revealed necrosis of the distal ureter. Operative revision showed urine leakage from the renal pelvis through the urinoma into the bladder. As the whole ureter was necrotic, a re-ureterocystostomy was not possible. The patient's own ureter had been extirpated, and the bladder was too small to do a direct anastomosis between it and the kidney. Consequently, an ileum interposition was performed. RESULTS: The postoperative course was uneventful. Kidney function was stable with a nadir creatinine concentration of 2.0 mg/dL 18 months' posttransplantation, and 14 months' post ileal interposition the kidney function was still satisfactory, with a creatinine level of 2.0 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: Ureteral necrosis is a serious complication following kidney transplantation. Whenever a re-ureterocystostomy or an uretero-ureterostomy is not possible, the interposition of the ileal segment represented a safe procedure to deal with this problem.
Assuntos
Íleo/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Ureter/patologia , Ureter/cirurgia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Necrose , Procedimentos de Cirurgia PlásticaAssuntos
Alopurinol/farmacologia , Ciclosporina/toxicidade , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Circulação Renal/fisiologia , Animais , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos WKY , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional/efeitos dos fármacos , Circulação Renal/efeitos dos fármacosAssuntos
Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Ciclosporina/urina , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Análise de Variância , Biomarcadores/urina , Biópsia , Creatinina/sangue , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/patologia , Transplante de Rim/fisiologia , Masculino , Análise de Regressão , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Hypertensive crisis is defined as an extreme elevation of arterial blood pressure, with diastolic pressure > 120 mm Hg, and represents an imminent risk to the patient. In such cases, a rapid orientating diagnosis and adequate antihypertensive treatment to avoid sequelae are needed, sometimes even before diagnostic tests are completed. Hypertensive emergencies and hypertensive urgencies can be distinguished. If the critical increase in blood pressure is associated with end-organ damage such as encephalopathy, acute left heart failure and pulmonary edema, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction or dissecting aortic aneurysm, a hypertensive emergency is present, that is an acute threat to the patient's life. A hypertensive emergency requires effective lowering of blood pressure within minutes, but not necessarily to normal range. The choice of suitable antihypertensive agents depends on clinical symptoms, contraindications, duration of pressure elevation and underlying conditions, prior cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and renal disorders. The risk of imminent end-organ damage must be weighed against the risk of rapid blood pressure lowering. In hypertensive urgencies without end-organ complications, blood pressure can be lowered more slowly over several hours, often with oral agents to avoid detrimental fall in blood pressure. The drugs of choice are mainly urapidil i.v. and nitroglycerine.