Strain surveillance during chemotherapy to improve cardiovascular outcomes: the SUCCOUR-MRI trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The detection of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) by reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chemotherapy usually triggers the initiation of cardioprotective therapy. This study addressed whether the same approach should be applied to patients with worsening of global longitudinal strain (GLS) without attaining thresholds of LVEF. METHODS: Strain sUrveillance during Chemotherapy for improving Cardiovascular Outcomes (SUCCOUR-MRI) was a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial involving 14 sites. Of 355 patients receiving anthracyclines with normal baseline LVEF, 333 patients (age 59±13 years, 79% women) with at least one other CTRCD risk factor, able to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), GLS and 3D echocardiography were tracked over 12 months. A total of 105 patients (age 59±13 years, 75% women, 69% breast cancer) developing GLS-CTRCD (>12% relative reduction of GLS without a change in LVEF) between cardioprotection with neurohormonal antagonists versus usual care were randomized. The primary endpoint was 12-month change in MRI-LVEF; the secondary endpoint was MRI LVEF-defined CTRCD. RESULTS: During follow-up, 2 patients died and 2 developed heart failure. Most patients were randomized at 3 months (62%). Median doses of angiotensin inhibition/blockade and beta-blockade were 75% and 50% of respective targets; 21 (43%) had side-effects attributed to cardioprotection. Due to a smaller LVEF change from baseline with cardioprotection than usual care (-2.5±5.4% vs -5.6±5.9%, p=0.009), follow-up LVEF was higher after cardioprotection (59±5% vs 55±6%, p<0.0001). After adjustment for baseline LVEF, the mean (95% confidence interval) difference in the change in LVEF between the two groups was -3.6% (-1.8% to -5.5%, p<0.001). After cardioprotection, 1/49 patients developed 12-month LVEF-CTRCD, compared to 6/56 in usual care (p=0.075). GLS improved at 3 months post-randomization in the cardioprotection group, with little change with usual care. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isolated GLS reduction after anthracyclines, cardioprotection is associated with better preservation of 12-month MRI-LVEF compared with usual care.

Cardiovascular toxicities of immune therapies for cancer - a scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC and the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology.

The advent of immunological therapies has revolutionized the treatment of solid and haematological cancers over the last decade. Licensed therapies which activate the immune system to target cancer cells can be broadly divided into two classes. The first class are antibodies that inhibit immune checkpoint signalling, known as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The second class are cell-based immune therapies including chimeric antigen receptor T lymphocyte (CAR-T) cell therapies, natural killer (NK) cell therapies, and tumour infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies. The clinical efficacy of all these treatments generally outweighs the risks, but there is a high rate of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are often unpredictable in timing with clinical sequalae ranging from mild (e.g. rash) to severe or even fatal (e.g. myocarditis, cytokine release syndrome) and reversible to permanent (e.g. endocrinopathies).The mechanisms underpinning irAE pathology vary across different irAE complications and syndromes, reflecting the broad clinical phenotypes observed and the variability of different individual immune responses, and are poorly understood overall. Immune-related cardiovascular toxicities have emerged, and our understanding has evolved from focussing initially on rare but fatal ICI-related myocarditis with cardiogenic shock to more common complications including less severe ICI-related myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, including conduction system disease and heart block, non-inflammatory heart failure, takotsubo syndrome and coronary artery disease. In this scientific statement on the cardiovascular toxicities of immune therapies for cancer, we summarize the pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of ICI, CAR-T, NK, and TIL therapies. We also highlight gaps in the literature and where future research should focus.

Evaluating a Remotely Delivered Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Intervention for Patients With Breast Cancer (REMOTE-COR-B): Protocol for a Single-Arm Feasibility Trial.

BACKGROUND: Exercise rehabilitation is a promising strategy for reducing cardiovascular disease risk among patients with breast cancer. However, the evidence is primarily derived from programs based at exercise centers with in-person supervised delivery. Conversely, most patients report a preference for home-based rehabilitation. As such, there is a clear need to explore strategies that can provide real-time supervision and coaching while addressing consumer preferences. Evidence from cardiac rehabilitation has demonstrated the noninferiority of a smartphone-based telerehabilitation approach (REMOTE-CR) to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in people with cardiovascular disease compared to a center-based program. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of the REMOTE-CR program adapted for patients with breast cancer at risk of cardiotoxicity (REMOTE-COR-B). We will also assess the satisfaction and usability of REMOTE-COR-B. METHODS: We will conduct a single-arm feasibility study of the REMOTE-COR-B program among patients with stage I-III breast cancer who are at risk of cardiotoxicity (taking treatment type and dose, as well as other common cardiovascular disease risk factors into account) and who are within 24 months of completing primary definitive treatment. Participants (target sample size of 40) will receive an 8-week smartphone-based telerehabilitation exercise program involving remotely delivered real-time supervision and behavior change support. The platform comprises a smartphone and wearable heart rate monitor, as well as a custom-built smartphone app and web application. Participants will be able to attend remotely monitored exercise sessions during set operating hours each week, scheduled in both the morning and evening. Adherence is the primary outcome of the trial, assessed through the number of remotely monitored exercise sessions attended compared to the trial target (ie, 3 sessions per week). Secondary outcomes include additional trial feasibility indicators (eg, recruitment and retention), safety, satisfaction, and usability, and objective and patient-reported efficacy outcomes (cardiovascular fitness, quality of life, fatigue, self-reported exercise, self-efficacy, habit strength, and motivation). Adherence, feasibility, and safety outcomes will be assessed during the intervention period; intervention satisfaction and usability will be assessed post intervention; and objective and patient-reported efficacy outcomes will be assessed at baseline, post intervention (2-month postbaseline assessment), and at follow-up (5-month postbaseline assessment). RESULTS: Recruitment for this trial commenced in March 2023, and 7 participants had been recruited as of the submission of the manuscript. The estimated completion date for the project is October 2024, with results expected to be published in mid-2025. CONCLUSIONS: The REMOTE-COR-B intervention is a novel and promising approach to providing exercise therapy to patients with breast cancer at risk of cardiotoxicity who have unique needs and heightened safety risks. This project will provide important information on the extent to which this approach is satisfactory to patients with breast cancer, safe, and potentially effective, which is necessary before larger-scale research or clinical projects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001557820; www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12621001557820.aspx. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/53301.

Sex-based differences in short- and longer-term diet-induced metabolic heart disease.

Sex-based differences in the development of obesity-induced cardiometabolic dysfunction are well documented, however, the specific mechanisms are not completely understood. Obesity has been linked to dysregulation of the epitranscriptome, but the role of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation has not been investigated in relation to the sex differences during obesity-induced cardiac dysfunction. In the current study, male and female C57BL/6J mice were subjected to short- and long-term high-fat/high-sucrose (HFHS) diet to induce obesogenic stress. Cardiac echocardiography showed males developed systolic and diastolic dysfunction after 4 mo of diet, but females maintained normal cardiac function despite both sexes being metabolically dysfunctional. Cardiac m6A machinery gene expression was differentially regulated by duration of HFHS diet in male, but not female mice, and left ventricular ejection fraction correlated with RNA machinery gene levels in a sex- and age-dependent manner. RNA-sequencing of cardiac transcriptome revealed that females, but not males may undergo protective cardiac remodeling early in the course of obesogenic stress. Taken together, our study demonstrates for the first time that cardiac RNA methylation machinery genes are regulated early during obesogenic stress in a sex-dependent manner and may play a role in the sex differences observed in cardiometabolic dysfunction.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sex differences in obesity-associated cardiomyopathy are well documented but incompletely understood. We show for the first time that RNA methylation machinery genes may be regulated in response to obesogenic diet in a sex- and age-dependent manner and levels may correspond to cardiac systolic function. Our cardiac RNA-seq analysis suggests female, but not male mice may be protected from cardiac dysfunction by a protective cardiac remodeling response early during obesogenic stress.

Integrating Cardio-Oncology Across the Research Pipeline, Policy, and Practice in Australia-An Australian Cardiovascular Alliance Perspective.

Over 18 million people worldwide were diagnosed with cancer in 2020, including over 150,000 people in Australia. Although improved early detection and treatment have increased the survival rates, cardiotoxic treatment and inadequate management of cardiovascular risk factors have resulted in cardiovascular disease (CVD) being one of the leading causes of non-cancer-related death and disability among cancer survivors. International guidelines outline the standards of care for CVD risk surveillance and management. However, Australian cardio-oncology policies and clinical guidelines are limited. There is increasing growth of cardio-oncology research in Australia and support from leading Australian professional bodies and advocacy and research networks, including the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, the National Heart Foundation of Australia, and the Australian Cardiovascular Alliance (ACvA). Thus, opportunities to drive multidisciplinary cardio-oncology initiatives are growing, including grant funding, position statements, and novel research to inform new policies. The ACvA has a unique flagship structure that spans the translational research pipeline from drug discovery to implementation science. This article aims to highlight how multidisciplinary cardio-oncology innovations could intersect with the seven ACvA flagships, and to showcase Australian achievements in cardio-oncology thus far. We summarise eight key priority areas for future cardio-oncology research that emerged. These strategies will strengthen cardio-oncology research and care in Australia, and drive new guidelines, policies, and government initiatives to ensure equity in health outcomes for all cardio-oncology patients.

Cancer Therapies and Cardiomyocyte Viability: Which Drugs are Directly Cardiotoxic?

BACKGROUND: Increased cancer survivorship represents a remarkable achievement for modern medicine. Unfortunately, cancer treatments have inadvertently contributed to cardiovascular (CV) damage, significantly threatening the health and quality of life of patients living with, through and beyond cancer. Without understanding the mechanisms, including whether the cardiotoxicity is due to the direct or indirect effects on cardiomyocytes, prevention and management of cardiotoxicity can pose challenges in many patients. To date, the cardiotoxicity profiles of most of the chemotherapy drugs are still poorly understood. AIM: To conduct a pilot study to investigate the direct effects of a range of cancer therapies on cardiomyocyte viability. METHODS: Primary human cardiomyocytes (HCM) were cultured and seeded into 96-well culture plates. A total of 35 different Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-cancer drugs were added to the HCM cells with a concentration of 1uM for 72 hours. The viability of HCMs was determined using CellTitre-Glo. The experiments were repeated at least three times for each drug with HCMs of different passages. RESULTS: We identified 15 anti-cancer agents that significantly reduced HCM viability. These drugs were: (1) anthracyclines (daunorubicin [HCM viability, mean %±standard error, 13.7±3.2%], epirubicin [47.6±5.3%]), (2) antimetabolite (azacitidine [67.1±2.4%]), (3) taxanes (paclitaxel [60.2±3.0%]), (4) protein kinase inhibitors (lapatinib [49.8±7.0%], ponatinib [42.4±9.0%], pemigatinib [68.1±2.3%], sorafenib [52.9±10.6%], nilotinib [64.4±4.5%], dasatinib [38.5±3.6%]), (5) proteasome inhibitors (ixazomib citrate [65.4±7.2%]), (6) non-selective histone-deacetylase inhibitor (panobinostat [19.1±4.1%]), poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitor (olaparib [68.2±1.7%]) and (7) vinca alkaloids (vincristine [44.6±7.4%], vinblastine [31.2±3.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: In total, 15 of the 35 commercially available anti-cancer drugs have direct cardiotoxic effects on HCM. Some of those, have not been associated with clinical cardiotoxicity, while others, known to be cardiotoxic do not appear to mediate it via direct effects on cardiomyocytes. More detailed investigations of the effects of cancer therapies on various cardiovascular cells should be performed to comprehensively determine the mechanisms of cardiotoxicity.

Global Cardio Oncology Registry (G-COR): Registry Design, Primary Objectives, and Future Perspectives of a Multicenter Global Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Global collaboration in cardio-oncology is needed to understand the prevalence of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in different risk groups, practice settings, and geographic locations. There are limited data on the socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities that may impact access to care and outcomes. To address these gaps, we established the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry, a multinational, multicenter prospective registry. METHODS: We assembled cardiologists and oncologists from academic and community settings to collaborate in the first Global Cardio-Oncology Registry. Subsequently, a survey for site resources, demographics, and intention to participate was conducted. We designed an online data platform to facilitate this global initiative. RESULTS: A total of 119 sites responded to an online questionnaire on their practices and main goals of the registry: 49 US sites from 23 states and 70 international sites from 5 continents indicated a willingness to participate in the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry. Sites were more commonly led by cardiologists (85/119; 72%) and were more often university/teaching (81/119; 68%) than community based (38/119; 32%). The average number of cardio-oncology patients treated per month was 80 per site. The top 3 Global Cardio-Oncology Registry priorities in cardio-oncology care were breast cancer, hematologic malignancies, and patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Executive and scientific committees and specific committees were established. A pilot phase for breast cancer using Research Electronic Data Capture Cloud platform recently started patient enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: We present the structure for a global collaboration. Information derived from the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry will help understand the risk factors impacting cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in different geographic locations and therefore contribute to reduce access gaps in cardio-oncology care. Risk calculators will be prospectively derived and validated.

When Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Intersect: The Challenge and the Opportunity of Cardio-Oncology.

Cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) commonly coexist, with increasing evidence that long-term cancer survivors are more likely to die from CVD than the general population. Effective management of CVD and its risk factors requires identification of patients at increased risk who may benefit from early intervention and their appropriate monitoring across the disease trajectory. Improving outcomes requires new models of multidisciplinary cancer care supported by care pathways. Such pathways require a clear delineation of the roles and responsibilities of all team members and provision of appropriate enablers for their delivery. These include accessible point-of-care tools/risk calculators, patient resources, and the provision of tailored training opportunities for health care providers.

Cardiovascular outcomes of cancer patients in rural Australia.

Background: Cancer and heart disease are the two most common health conditions in the world, associated with high morbidity and mortality, with even worse outcomes in regional areas. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in cancer survivors. We aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of patients receiving cancer treatment (CT) in a regional hospital. Methods: This was an observational retrospective cohort study in a single rural hospital over a ten-year period (17th February 2010 to 19th March 2019). Outcomes of all patients receiving CT during this period were compared to those who were admitted to the hospital without a cancer diagnosis. Results: 268 patients received CT during the study period. High rates of cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension (52.2%), smoking (54.9%), and dyslipidaemia (38.4%) were observed in the CT group. Patients who had CT were more likely to be readmitted with ACS (5.9% vs. 2.8% p = 0.005) and AF (8.2% vs. 4.5% p = 0.006) when compared to the general admission cohort. There was a statistically significant difference observed for all cause cardiac readmission, with a higher rate observed in the CT group (17.1% vs. 13.2% p = 0.042). Patients undergoing CT had a higher rate of mortality (49.5% vs. 10.2%, p ≤ 0.001) and shorter time (days) from first admission to death (401.06 vs. 994.91, p ≤ 0.001) when compared to the general admission cohort, acknowledging this reduction in survival may be driven at least in part by the cancer itself. Conclusion: There is an increased incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including higher readmission rate, higher mortality rate and shorter survival in people undergoing cancer treatment in rural environments. Rural cancer patients demonstrated a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors.

Elevated Soluble Suppressor of Tumorigenicity 2 Predict Hospital Admissions Due to Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE).

The role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity (sST2) as a biomarker in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we sought to determine the relationship between sST2 levels and any unplanned hospital readmissions due to a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) within 1 year of first admission. Patients (n = 250) admitted to the cardiology unit at John Hunter Hospital were recruited. Occurrences of MACE, defined as the composite of total death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, readmissions for heart failure (HF), or coronary revascularization, were recorded after 30, 90, 180, and 365 days of first admission. On univariate analysis, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and HF had significantly higher sST2 levels vs. those who did not. Increasing levels of sST2 by quartiles were significantly associated with AF, HF, older age, low hemoglobin, low eGFR, and high CRP levels. On multivariate analysis: high sST2 levels and diabetes remained as risk predictors of any MACE occurrence; an sST2 level in the highest quartile (Q4: >28.4 ng/mL) was independently associated with older age, use of beta-blockers, and number of MACE events within a 1 year period. In this patient cohort, elevated sST2 levels are associated with unplanned hospital admission due to MACE within 1 year, independent of the nature of the index cardiovascular admission.

Established and Emerging Cancer Therapies and Cardiovascular System: Focus on Hypertension-Mechanisms and Mitigation.

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are 2 of the leading causes of death worldwide. Although improvements in outcomes have been noted for both disease entities, the success of cancer therapies has come at the cost of at times very impactful adverse events such as cardiovascular events. Hypertension has been noted as both, a side effect as well as a risk factor for the cardiotoxicity of cancer therapies. Some of these dynamics are in keeping with the role of hypertension as a cardiovascular risk factor not only for heart failure, but also for the development of coronary and cerebrovascular disease, and kidney disease and its association with a higher morbidity and mortality overall. Other aspects such as the molecular mechanisms underlying the amplification of acute and long-term cardiotoxicity risk of anthracyclines and increase in blood pressure with various cancer therapeutics remain to be elucidated. In this review, we cover the latest clinical data regarding the risk of hypertension across a spectrum of novel anticancer therapies as well as the underlying known or postulated pathophysiological mechanisms. Furthermore, we review the acute and long-term implications for the amplification of the development of cardiotoxicity with drugs not commonly associated with hypertension such as anthracyclines. An outline of management strategies, including pharmacological and lifestyle interventions as well as models of care aimed to facilitate early detection and more timely management of hypertension in patients with cancer and survivors concludes this review, which overall aims to improve both cardiovascular and cancer-specific outcomes.

Successful immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after immune-related pericarditis: Clinical case series.

Pericardial diseases secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are rare. Here, we describe two cases of immune-related pericarditis caused by ICI for treatment of advanced NSCLC. Select patients can be successfully rechallenged with ICI after immune-related pericardial disease.

Early access to a cardio-oncology clinic in an Australian context: a qualitative exploration of patient experiences.

BACKGROUND: Dedicated cardio-oncology services are emerging rapidly around the world in order to provide cardiovascular care (CV) for cancer patients. The perspectives of patients regarding their experience of cardiac surveillance during their cancer journey has not been qualitatively evaluated. METHODS: An interpretative qualitative study. Fifteen, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with a diverse range of community dwelling patients who attended a newly established cardio-oncology clinic in a large regional city in Australia. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Key themes were identified: (1) Access to a cardio-oncology clinic promotes information and understanding, (2) The experience of early CV intervention, (3) Factors promoting integrated care, (4) Balancing cancer treatment and CV symptoms and (5) Managing past and emerging CV risk factors. CONCLUSION: As cardio oncology clinics continue to emerge, this study confirms the benefit of early access to a cardiologist for management of existing or emerging CV risk factors and diseases in the context of cancer treatment. Participants valued the opportunity for regular monitoring and management of CV issues that enabled them to continue cancer treatment. However, we identified gaps in education and support towards making positive lifestyle changes that reduce the risk of CV diseases in cancer patients.

International consensus statement on the management of cardiovascular risk of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CLL.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have altered the treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) by offering effective and well-tolerated therapeutic options. However, since the approval of ibrutinib, concern has risen regarding the risk of cardiovascular (CV) adverse events, including atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension, and heart failure. Newer BTKis appear to have lower CV risks, but data are limited. It is important to understand the risks posed by BTKis and how those risks interact with individual patients, and we convened a panel of physicians with expertise in CLL and CV toxicities in oncology to develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for community hematologists and oncologists. Care providers should thoroughly assess a patient's CV risk level before treatment initiation, including established CV diseases and risk factors, and perform investigations dependent on preexisting diseases and risk factors, including an electrocardiogram (ECG). For patients with high CV risk, BTKi treatment is often appropriate in consultation with a multidisciplinary team (MDT), and more selective BTKis, including acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, are preferred. BTKi treatment should generally be avoided in patients with a history of heart failure. Ibrutinib should be avoided in patients with a history of ventricular arrhythmias, but the risk of newer drugs is not yet known. Finally, an MDT is crucial to help manage emerging toxicities with the goal of maintaining BTKi therapy, if possible. Optimizing heart failure, arrhythmia, and hypertension control will likely improve tolerance and maintenance of BTKi therapy. However, additional studies are needed to identify the most optimal strategy for these drugs.

Heart Failure in Breast Cancer Survivors: Focus on Early Detection and Novel Biomarkers.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Breast cancer survival rate has greatly improved in the last two decades due to the emergence of next-generation anti-cancer agents. However, cardiotoxicity remains a significant adverse effect arising from traditional and emerging chemotherapies as well as targeted therapies for breast cancer patients. In this review, we will discuss cardiotoxicities of both traditional and emerging therapies for breast cancer. We will discuss current practices to detect cardiotoxicity of these therapies with the focus on new and emerging biomarkers. We will then focus on 'omics approaches, especially the use of epigenetics to discover novel biomarkers and therapeutics to mitigate cardiotoxicity. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant cardiotoxicities of conventional chemotherapies remain and new and unpredictable new forms of cardiac and/or vascular toxicity emerge with the surge in novel and targeted therapies. Yet, there is no clear guidance on detection of cardiotoxicity, except for significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and even then, there is no uniform definition of what constitutes cardiotoxicity. The gold standard for detection of cardiotoxicity involves a serial echocardiography in conjunction with blood-based biomarkers to detect early subclinical cardiac dysfunction. However, the ability of these tests to detect early disease remains limited and not all forms of toxicity are detectable with these modalities. There is an unprecedented need to discover novel biomarkers that are sensitive and specific for early detection of subclinical cardiotoxicity. In that space, novel echocardiographic techniques, such as strain, are becoming more common-place and new biomarkers, discovered by epigenetic approaches, seem to become promising alternatives or adjuncts to conventional non-specific cardiac biomarkers.