Two cases of vascular complications after urologic robotic surgery.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) of the lower extremity is common and includes aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Moreover, prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men and is now treated with surgical robotic-assisted procedures. This paper overviews two cases of limb ischemia after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and their resolution. During both RARP, limb ischemia occurred due to the robotic instrument compressing the modified vascular structure. Indeed, in the surgical history of the concerned patients, one was treated by an endovascular procedure and the other one was treated by a surgical bypass for AIOD. Expectantly, these cases will alert the urologic surgeons to pay attention to the vascular surgery history of a patient before RARP.

Thoraflex Graft in an Inverted Position for Post-Dissection Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm.

We present the off-label use of a Thoraflex Hybrid Plexus prosthesis (Vascutek, Renfrewshire, Scotland, UK) to treat a post-dissection type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAA) in a high-risk patient previously treated with a thoracic stent-graft for a chronic type B aortic dissection. The Thoraflex graft was used in a "reversed frozen elephant trunk" fashion: the stent graft portion deployed in the previously placed thoracic stent, and the branched portion used to revascularize visceral arteries and lower limbs. Our off-label use of the Thoraflex graft was technically successful. Further experiences are required to confirm the safety of this technique in high-risk patients.

Clinical Outcome after Endovascular Sealing of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to present the clinical outcome of endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) with the Nellix endoprosthesis in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated in our institution. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single center, observational cohort study. A departmental database was interrogated to extract demographics, clinical information, and outcome of all patients treated with EVAS between December 2013 and December 2015. Outcome measures included technical success (successful device deployment and absence of any endoleak at completion angiography), mortality, major complications, incidence of endoleaks, aneurysm rupture, and reintervention. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (49 men) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 78 (6.9) years were successfully treated with EVAS, with no 30-day mortality. The cohort included 1 patient with ruptured aneurysm, 9 patients with late complications of previous aortoiliac repairs (2 open, 7 endovascular), and 4 patients who required a total of 9 visceral chimneys for juxtarenal aneurysms. Six patients (9%) suffered major postoperative complications and 4 (6%) required intervention. There were no early or late endoleaks or aneurysm ruptures. After a median (range) follow-up of 12 (0-24) months, there was no aneurysm-related mortality; 2 patients (3%) required late aneurysm-related interventions. CONCLUSIONS: EVAS can be performed with good outcomes up to 2 years postoperatively. Longer follow-up on larger cohorts is needed to prove the efficacy of this technique.

Type IIIb Endoleak and Relining: A Mathematical Model of Distraction Forces.

PURPOSE: To examine the changes in distraction force following relining of a conventional abdominal aortic stent-graft with a type IIIb endoleak using the Nellix endovascular sealing device compared to a unilateral stent-graft. METHODS: Relining is often used to repair type IIIb endoleaks, but the consequences to graft stability are unknown. A mathematical model was constructed based on pressure and volume flow through the stent-grafts, incorporating recognized distraction force equations. Steady flow was presumed at peak systolic pressures to calculate the maximum distraction force, with gravity ignored. Distraction forces for 28- to 36-mm-diameter stent-graft bodies with 16-mm limbs were calculated and compared to forces following relining with single and double Nellix devices or the Renu unilateral device. RESULTS: Distraction forces for the 28-, 32-, and 36-mm stent-grafts prior to relining were 5.99, 10.21, and 14.99 N, respectively. Similar forces were reported after relining with bilateral Nellix devices (5.86, 10.08, and 14.86 N, respectively). However, use of a unilateral Nellix increased the distraction forces to 9.92, 14.14, and 18.92 N, respectively. These were comparable to the increase observed after relining with a Renu unilateral stent-graft (9.87, 14.09, and 18.86 N, respectively). The proportional increase in distraction force for a unilateral relining ranged from 26% to 66%, with the greatest increase noted in the smaller diameter main bodies. CONCLUSION: Relining a stent-graft with a type IIIb endoleak using bilateral Nellix devices does not increase the distraction force. However, a unilateral Nellix device or the Renu system could theoretically increase the distraction force by up to 66%, potentially risking migration and type Ia endoleak. In clinical practice, these results suggest that a relining with bilateral Nellix may have benefits over the Renu unilateral stent-graft.