Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Am J Public Health ; 112(11): 1599-1610, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36223572

RESUMO

Objectives. To explore previous COVID-19 diagnosis and COVID-19 vaccination status among US essential worker groups. Methods. We analyzed the US Census Household Pulse Survey (May 26-July 5, 2021), a nationally representative sample of adults aged 18 years and older. We compared currently employed essential workers working outside the home with those working at home using adjusted prevalence ratios. We calculated proportion vaccinated and intention to be vaccinated, stratifying by essential worker and demographic groups for those who worked or volunteered outside the home since January 1, 2021. Results. The proportion of workers with previous COVID-19 diagnosis was highest among first responders (24.9%) working outside the home compared with workers who did not (13.3%). Workers in agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting had the lowest vaccination rates (67.5%) compared with all workers (77.8%). Those without health insurance were much less likely to be vaccinated across all worker groups. Conclusions. This study underscores the importance of improving surveillance to monitor COVID-19 and other infectious diseases among workers and identify and implement tailored risk mitigation strategies, including vaccination campaigns, for workplaces. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(11):1599-1610. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307010).


Assuntos
Vacinas contra a AIDS , COVID-19 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Vírus Sincicial Respiratório , Vacinas contra a SAIDS , Adulto , Vacina BCG , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Teste para COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche , Humanos , Intenção , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Vacinação
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(3): 265-75, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24488817

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Alternative shift work is classified as a probable human carcinogen. Certain cancer screening tests reduce cancer mortality. METHODS: The 2010 National Health Interview Survey was used to examine associations between adherence to breast, cervical, and colon cancer screening recommendations and alternative shift work among female workers. RESULTS: Workers on alternative shifts, compared to workers on daytime shifts, were more likely to be non-adherent to screening recommendations for breast (34% vs. 23%) and colorectal (55% vs. 48%) cancer (P < 0.05). Workers on alternative shifts in two industries ("Manufacturing" and "Accommodation/Food Services") and three occupations ("Food Preparation/Serving," "Personal Care Services," and "Production") were more likely to be non-adherent to screening recommendations for at least two cancers (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Affordable Care Act eliminates out-of-pocket screening expenses for these three cancers. Greater efforts are needed to promote this benefit, particularly among workers with demonstrated non-adherence. Am. J. Ind. Med. 57:265-275, 2014. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Tolerância ao Trabalho Programado , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Serviços de Alimentação/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Indústrias/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Ocupacional , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA