Evaluation of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a smoking cessation service in Derbyshire: An interrupted time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data published early in the COVID-19 pandemic suggested that smokers infected with SARS-CoV-2 were more likely to need hospital treatment or die than non-smokers, and thus this was seen as a motivator to encourage smokers to make a quit attempt. Live Life Better Derbyshire (LLBD) is an integrated lifestyle service providing free support for residents Derbyshire, UK, who want to quit smoking. On 19 March 2020, LLBD converted from offering face-to-face cessation support to a smoking cessation service delivered remotely. METHODS: Interrupted time series analysis to investigate the impact of COVID-19, and the shift to remote delivery of smoking cessation support, on the number of smokers who accessed cessation support with LLBD, set a quit date, and self-reported having quit at 4-week follow-up. RESULTS: 11,393 episodes of smoking cessation support were opened with LLBD between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. The weekly count of all outcomes was increasing prior to the date when LLBD converted to remote-only delivery. There was a 20% immediate drop in the number of episodes opened coinciding with this date (IRR 0.88, 95% CI 0.646-0.992) but no change in the number of quit dates set or 4-week quits or the underlying longer-term trends. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic, and associated shift to remote delivery of smoking cessation support by LLBD, had no substantial sustained overall impact on measures of smoking cessation service activity and success.

The Relationship Between Reported Daily Nicotine Dose from NRT and Daily Cigarette Consumption in Pregnant Women Who Smoke in an Observational Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: For nonpregnant people unable to quit smoking, the NHS recommends nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for smoking reduction. This is not recommended during pregnancy due to concerns about higher nicotine intake than smoking alone. We investigated the relationship between daily nicotine dose from NRT and cigarette consumption reported by pregnant women receiving smoking cessation support. METHODS: We conducted secondary analysis of data from currently smoking pregnant women, recruited from antenatal clinics (Nottingham University Hospitals, UK) or online between June 2019-September 2020. Participants set a quit date, received a prototype NRT adherence intervention, and reported cigarettes per day (CPD) and daily NRT dose (mg) via smartphone app for 28 days. RESULTS: 388 women were screened, 32 (8%) were eligible and joined the study. 24 (75%) submitted 510 app reports in total. 17 (71%) reported smoking and using NRT concurrently on at least one day, with concurrent use reported on 109 (21%) of app reports.The relationship between daily NRT dose and CPD followed an exponential decay curve of approximately 7%. In multilevel repeated measures modelling using 4 linear splines (knots 17, 40, and 85 mg/NRT), significant fixed effects of daily NRT dose on CPD were observed for splines 1, 3, and 4. The strongest association was spline 1 (0-17 mg/NRT), where each 10 mg NRT increase was associated with a 0.6 CPD reduction (24% on average). CONCLUSIONS: Among women in a cessation study, many smoked and used NRT concurrently; within these women, daily nicotine dose and heaviness of smoking were inversely related. IMPLICATIONS: Findings have implications for the design of future interventions intended to reduce harm associated with smoking in pregnancy. They suggest using NRT alongside smoking in pregnancy could help some women reduce the number of cigarettes they smoke per day.

Respiratory management and outcomes in high-risk preterm infants with development of a population outcome dashboard.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is associated with adverse long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental outcomes. No recent studies examined the changing respiratory management and outcomes, particularly severe BPD, across a whole population. PURPOSE: Evaluate the temporal trends in the respiratory management and outcomes of preterm infants born below 32 weeks gestational age and develop an individualised dashboard of the incidence of neonatal outcome. METHODS: Using the National Neonatal Research Database, we determined changes in respiratory management, BPD rates, postdischarge respiratory support and mortality in 83 463 preterm infants in England and Wales from 2010 to 2020. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2020, antenatal corticosteroids use increased (88%-93%, p<0.0001) and neonatal surfactant use decreased (65%-60%, p<0.0001). Postnatal corticosteroid use increased, especially dexamethasone (4%-6%, p<0.0001). More recently, hydrocortisone and budesonide use increased from 2% in 2017 to 4% and 3%, respectively, in 2020 (p<0.0001). Over the study period, mortality decreased (10.1%-8.5%), with increases in BPD (28%-33%), severe BPD (12%-17%), composite BPD/death (35%-39%) and composite severe BPD/death (21%-24%) (all p<0.0001). Overall, 11 684 infants required postdischarge respiratory support, increasing from 13% to 17% (p<0.0001), with 1843 infants requiring respiratory pressure support at discharge. A population dashboard (https://premoutcome.github.io/) depicting the incidence of mortality and respiratory outcomes, based on gestation, sex and birthweight centile, was developed. CONCLUSION: More preterm infants are surviving with worse respiratory outcomes, particularly severe BPD requiring postdischarge respiratory support. Ultimately, these survivors will develop chronic respiratory diseases requiring greater healthcare resources.

Impact of postnatal dexamethasone timing on preterm mortality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Postnatal dexamethasone (PND) is used in high-risk preterm infants after the first week of life to facilitate extubation and prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) but the optimal treatment timing remains unclear. Our objective was to explore the association between the timing of PND commencement and mortality and respiratory outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective National Neonatal Research Database study of 84 440 premature infants born <32 weeks gestational age from 2010 to 2020 in England and Wales. Propensity score weighting analysis was used to explore the impact of PND commenced at three time-points (2-3 weeks (PND2/3), 4-5 weeks (PND4/5) and after 5 weeks (PND6+) chronological age) on the primary composite outcome of death before neonatal discharge and/or severe BPD (defined as respiratory pressure support at 36 weeks) alongside other secondary respiratory outcomes. RESULTS: 3469 infants received PND. Compared with PND2/3, infants receiving PND6+ were more likely to die and/or develop severe BPD (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.28-2.21), extubate at later postmenstrual age (mean difference 3.1 weeks, 95% CI 2.9-3.4 weeks), potentially require respiratory support at discharge (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06-1.70) but had lower mortality before discharge (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.51). PND4/5 was not associated with severe BPD or discharge respiratory support. CONCLUSIONS: PND treatment after 5 weeks of age was associated with worse respiratory outcomes although residual bias cannot be excluded. A definitive clinical trial to determine the optimal PND treatment window, based on early objective measures to identify high-risk infants, is needed.

Observational cohort study of use of caffeine in preterm infants and association between early caffeine use and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify trends in caffeine use in infants born at <32 weeks' gestational age (GA), and to investigate the effects of early vs late caffeine on neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective propensity score matched cohort study using routinely recorded data from the National Neonatal Research Database of infants born at <32 weeks' GA admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales (2012-2020). RESULTS: 89% (58 913/66 081) of infants received caffeine. In 70%, caffeine was started early (on the day of birth or the day after), increasing from 55% in 2012 to 83% in 2020. Caffeine was given for a median (IQR) of 28 (17-43) days starting on day 2 (1-3) and continued up to 34 (33-34) weeks postmenstrual age.In the propensity score matched cohort of 13 045 pairs of infants, the odds of preterm brain injury (early caffeine, 2306/13 045 (17.7%) vs late caffeine, 2528/13 045 (19.4%), OR=0.89 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.95)) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (early caffeine, 4020/13 045 (32.8%) vs late caffeine, 4694/13 045 (37.7%), OR=0.81 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85)) were lower in the group that received early caffeine compared with those who received it later. CONCLUSIONS: Early use of caffeine has increased in England and Wales. This is associated with reduced risks of BPD and preterm brain injury. Randomised trials are needed to find the optimal timing of caffeine use and the groups of infants who will benefit most from early administration of caffeine.

Management of patent ductus arteriosus in very preterm infants in England and Wales: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the diagnosis and treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in infants born at <32 weeks' gestational age (GA) in England and Wales between 2010 and 2017. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using routinely recorded data from the National Neonatal Research Database of infants born at <32 weeks admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales from 2010 to 2017. RESULTS: Among 58 108 infants born at <32 weeks' GA, 28.3% (n=16 440) had a PDA diagnosed clinically or with echocardiographic confirmation. Of these, 34.8% (n=5721; 9.8% of total <32 weeks' infants included) had PDA treatment including 7.6% (n=1255) with indomethacin, 23.5% (n=3857) with ibuprofen and 5.6% (n=916) with surgical closure. The highest incidence of PDA was among infants born at 24 and 25 weeks' GA (70.2% and 70.8%, respectively), decreasing to 6.1% among infants born at 31 weeks' GA. The percentage of infants with a PDA increased over the study period (25.5% in 2010 to 28.5% in 2017). The percentage of infants who received ibuprofen or indomethacin or had PDA surgery decreased from 41.3% in 2010 to 33.7% in 2017, with an increase in use of ibuprofen from 20.2% to 27.3% while use of indomethacin decreased from 20.0% to 8.8%. Surgical closure of PDA decreased from 9.1% to 3.0%. Indomethacin was used for median (IQR) 3 (2-5) days while ibuprofen was given for 3 (2-4) days, at a median of 8 and 10 days after birth, respectively; surgical treatment was used later at 33 (24-45) days after birth. CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen is the preferred drug and surgical interventions are becoming less frequent for PDA closure among very preterm infants in England and Wales. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03773289.

Observational cohort study of changing trends in non-invasive ventilation in very preterm infants and associations with clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the change in non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use over time in infants born at <32 weeks' gestation and the associated clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using routinely recorded data from the National Neonatal Research Database of infants born at <32 weeks admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales from 2010 to 2017. RESULTS: In 56 537 infants, NIV use increased significantly between 2010 and 2017 (continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) from 68.5% to 80.2% in 2017 and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) from 14% to 68%, respectively) (p<0.001)). Use of NIV as the initial mode of respiratory support also increased (CPAP, 21.5%-28.0%; HFNC, 1%-7% (p<0.001)).HFNC was used earlier, and for longer, in those who received CPAP or mechanical ventilation. HFNC use was associated with decreased odds of death before discharge (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.19, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.22). Infants receiving CPAP but no HFNC died at an earlier median chronological age: CPAP group, 22 (IQR 10-39) days; HFNC group 40 (20-76) days (p<0.001). Among survivors, HFNC use was associated with increased odds of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (aOR 2.98, 95% CI 2.81 to 3.15) and other adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: NIV use is increasing, particularly as initial respiratory support. HFNC use has increased significantly with a sevenfold increase soon after birth which was associated with higher rates of BPD. As more infants survive with BPD, we need robust clinical evidence, to improve outcomes with the use of NIV as initial and ongoing respiratory support.

Trends in Prescribing of Nicotine Replacement Therapy to Pregnant Women in Primary Care in England.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking during pregnancy remains common, and the English National Health Service (NHS) has recently been directed to prioritize providing cessation support for pregnant women. We investigated the impact on prescribing of stop smoking treatments to pregnant women of the 2013 transfer of public health budgets from the NHS to administrative authorities responsible for local social care and other nonhealth services (local authorities). METHODS: We used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics to determine annual proportions (2005-2017) of women who smoked during pregnancy and who were prescribed, at least once before childbirth, (1) any NRT and (2) long- and short-acting NRT together (dual NRT). Segmented regression was used to quantify the impact of the 2013 transfer of smoking cessation budgets to local authorities, assessing changes in the level and the trend of the proportions post-2013 compared with pre-2013. RESULTS: We identified 84 539 pregnancies in which women were recorded as smoking; any NRT was prescribed in 7.9% (n = 6704) and dual NRT in 1.7% (n = 1466). Prescribing of any NRT was declining prior to 2013 at an absolute decrease of -0.25% per year, but the rate of decline significantly increased from 2013 onwards to -1.37% per year. Prescribing of dual NRT was increasing prior to 2013 but also decreased post-2013. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that transferring responsibility for English Smoking Cessation Services from the NHS to local authorities adversely affected provision of cessation support in pregnancy. Consequently, some women may have been denied access to effective cessation treatments. IMPLICATIONS: Women who smoke during pregnancy may be being denied potentially effective means to help them quit, contrary to NICE guidance, at what can be a teachable moment with substantial immediate and longer-term health benefits for woman and their unborn child, and economic benefits for the NHS. When the organizations responsible for offering smoking cessation support are changed, health systems should consider potential adverse effects on the delivery of support and deploy strategies for mitigating these.

Early childhood respiratory morbidity and antibiotic use in ex-preterm infants: a primary care population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Globally, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) continues to increase in preterm infants. Recent studies exploring subsequent early childhood respiratory morbidity have been small or focused on hospital admissions. AIMS: To examine early childhood rates of primary care consultations for respiratory tract infections (RTI), lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), wheeze and antibiotic prescriptions in ex-preterm and term children. A secondary aim was to examine differences between preterm infants discharged home with or without oxygen. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using linked electronic primary care and hospital databases of children born between 1997 and 2014. We included 253 277 eligible children, with 1666 born preterm at <32 weeks' gestation, followed-up from primary care registration to age 5 years. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) were calculated. RESULTS: Ex-preterm infants had higher rates of morbidity across all respiratory outcomes. After adjusting for confounders, aIRRs for RTI (1.37, 95% CI 1.33-1.42), LRTI (2.79, 95% CI 2.59-3.01), wheeze (3.05, 95% CI 2.64-3.52) and antibiotic prescriptions (1.49, 95% CI 1.44-1.55) were higher for ex-preterm infants. Ex-preterm infants discharged home on oxygen had significantly greater morbidity across all respiratory diagnoses and antibiotic prescriptions compared to those without home oxygen. The highest rates of respiratory morbidity were observed in children from the most deprived socioeconomic groups. CONCLUSION: Ex-preterm infants, particularly those with BPD requiring home oxygen, have significant respiratory morbidity and antibiotic prescriptions in early childhood. With the increasing prevalence of BPD, further research should focus on strategies to reduce the burden of respiratory morbidity in these high-risk infants after hospital discharge.

Stillbirth Among Women Prescribed Nicotine Replacement Therapy in Pregnancy: Analysis of a Large UK Pregnancy Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare risk of stillbirth between maternal smokers and those prescribed nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) during pregnancy. AIMS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis on a pregnancy cohort of 220,630 singleton pregnancies ending in live or stillbirth between 2001 and 2012 from The Health Improvement Network UK general practice database. Women were categorized into three groups: NRT (prescribed during pregnancy or 1 month before conception); smokers; and controls (nonsmokers without a pregnancy NRT prescription). We calculated Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for stillbirth in the NRT group and smokers compared to controls. RESULTS: A total of 805 pregnancies ended in stillbirth (3.6/1000 births). Absolute risks of stillbirth in NRT and smoker groups were both 5/1000 births compared with 3.5/1000 births in the control group. Compared with the control group, the adjusted odds of stillbirth in the NRT group was not statistically significant (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.00), although it was similar in magnitude to that in the smokers group (OR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.77). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of a statistically significant association between being prescribed NRT during pregnancy and odds of stillbirth compared with nonsmoking women. Although our study had much larger numbers than any previously, an even larger study with biochemically validated smoking outcome data and close monitoring of NRT use throughout pregnancy is required to exclude effects on findings of potential exposure misclassification.

Estimating the health-care costs of children born to pregnant smokers in England: cohort study using primary and secondary health-care data.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Little is known about the long-term economic consequences of smoking during pregnancy. We estimated the association between smoking in pregnancy and the costs of delivering health-care to infants and children in England, and investigated which aspects of care are the key drivers of these costs. METHODS: We used Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) linked with Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data in England from January 2003 to January 2015 in children with longitudinal data for at least 1, 5 and 10 years after birth. Poisson regression provided rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing health-care episode rates between those exposed and not exposed to smoking during pregnancy. Linear regression was used to compare estimated costs between groups (£ sterling, 2015 prices) and generalized linear multivariable (GLM) models adjusted for potentially moderating factors. RESULTS: A total of 93 152 singleton pregnancies with the required data were identified. Maternal smoking in pregnancy was associated with higher primary care, prescription and hospital in-patient episode rates, but lower out-patient visit and diagnostic test rates. Adjusting for year of birth, socio-economic deprivation, parity, sex of child and delivery method showed that maternal smoking in pregnancy was associated with increased child health-care costs at 1 year [average cost difference for children of smokers, ß = £91.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = £47.52-134.83 and 5 years of age (ß = £221.80, 95% CI = £17.78-425.83], but not at 10 years of age (ß = £365.94, 95% CI = -£192.72 to £924.60). CONCLUSION: In England, maternal smoking in pregnancy is associated with increased child health-care costs over the first 5 years of life; these costs are driven primarily by greater hospital in-patient care.

Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence from the US Truth campaign suggests that interventions focusing on tobacco industry practices and ethics may be effective in preventing youth smoking uptake. We developed, piloted and evaluated a school-based intervention based on this premise. METHODS: Exploratory study students in years 7-8 (aged 11-13) in two UK schools received Operation Smoke Storm, comprising three 50 min classroom-based sessions in year 7, an accompanying family booklet and a 1-hour classroom-based booster session in year 8. We compared the risk and odds of ever smoking and susceptibility to smoking in year 8 students in study schools postintervention with students in control schools. Focus groups and interviews with students, teachers and parents evaluated the acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS: In intervention schools, the combined prevalence of ever smoking and susceptibility increased from 18.2% in year 7 to 33.8% in year 8. There was no significant difference in the odds of a year 8 student in an intervention school being an ever smoker or susceptible never smoker compared with controls (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.97, p=0.263) and no significant difference in the odds of ever smoking (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.58, p=0.549). Teachers highlighted differences by academic ability in how well the messages presented were understood. Use of the family component was low but was received positively by parents who engaged with it. CONCLUSIONS: Operation Smoke Storm is an acceptable resource for delivering smoking-prevention education, but it does not appear to have reduced smoking and susceptibility.

Physician Support of Smoking Cessation After Diagnosis of Lung, Bladder, or Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer.

PURPOSE: Smoking cessation after a diagnosis of lung, bladder, and upper aerodigestive tract cancer appears to improve survival, and support to quit would improve cessation. The aims of this study were to assess how often general practitioners provide active smoking cessation support for these patients and whether physician behavior is influenced by incentive payments. METHODS: Using electronic primary care records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, 12,393 patients with incident cases of cancer diagnosed between 1999 and 2013 were matched 1 to 1 to patients with incident cases of coronary heart disease (CHD) diagnosed during the same time. We assessed differences in the proportion for whom physicians updated smoking status, advised quitting, and prescribed cessation medications, as well as the proportion of patients who stopped smoking within a year of diagnosis. We further examined whether any differences arose because the physicians were offered incentives to address smoking in patients with CHD and not cancer. RESULTS: At diagnosis, 32.0% of patients with cancer and 18.2% of patients with CHD smoked tobacco. Patients with cancer were less likely than patients with CHD to have their general practitioners update smoking status (OR = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.17-0.19), advise quitting (OR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.36-0.40), or prescribe medication (OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.63-0.73), and they were less likely to have stopped smoking (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84). One year later 61.7% of patients with cancer and 55.4% with CHD who were smoking at diagnosis were still smoking. Introducing incentive payments was associated with more frequent interventions, but not for patients with CHD specifically. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners were less likely to support smoking cessation in patients with cancer than with CHD, and patients with cancer were less likely to stop smoking. This finding is not due to the difference in incentive payments.

Effect of implementation of a smoke-free policy on physical violence in a psychiatric inpatient setting: an interrupted time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: Smoke-free policies are important to protect health and reduce health inequalities. A major barrier to policy implementation in psychiatric hospitals is staff concern that physical violence will increase. We aimed to assess the effect of implementing a comprehensive smoke-free policy on rates of physical assaults in a large UK mental health organisation. METHODS: We did an interrupted time series analysis of incident reports of physical assault 30 months before and 12 months after the implementation of the policy in the inpatient wards of South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK. We used a quasi-Poisson generalised additive mixed model to model the monthly incidence of physical assaults as a function of several explanatory variables. FINDINGS: 4550 physical assaults took place between April 1, 2012, and Sept 30, 2015; 225 (4·9%) of which were smoking-related. After adjustment for temporal and seasonal trends and key confounders (sex, age, schizophrenia or related disorders, or having been sectioned under the Mental Health Act), there was a 39% reduction in the number of physical assaults per month after the policy introduction compared with beforehand (incidence rate ratio 0·61, 95% CI 0·53-0·70; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Introduction of a comprehensive smoke-free policy appeared to reduce the incidence of physical assaults. Adequately resourced smoke-free policies could be part of broader violence reduction strategies in psychiatric settings. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London (King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust).

Outcomes of Nosocomial Viral Respiratory Infections in High-Risk Neonates.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neonatal respiratory disease, particularly bronchopulmonary dysplasia, remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in newborn infants. Recent evidence suggests nosocomially acquired viral respiratory tract infections (VRTIs) are not uncommon in the NICU. The goal of this study was to assess the association between nosocomial VRTIs, neonatal respiratory disease, and the health care related costs. METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted in 2 tertiary NICUs during a 6-year period in Nottingham, United Kingdom. Case subjects were symptomatic neonatal patients with a confirmed real-time polymerase chain reaction diagnosis of a VRTI. Matched controls had never tested positive for a VRTI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for associations with key respiratory outcomes. RESULTS: There were 7995 admissions during the study period, with 92 case subjects matched to 183 control subjects. Baseline characteristics were similar, with a median gestation of 29 weeks. Rhinovirus was found in 74% of VRTIs. During VRTIs, 51% of infants needed escalation of respiratory support, and case subjects required significantly more respiratory pressure support overall (25 vs 7 days; P < .001). Case subjects spent longer in the hospital (76 vs 41 days; P < .001), twice as many required home oxygen (37%; odds ratio: 3.94 [95% confidence interval: 1.92-8.06]; P < .001), and in-hospital care costs were significantly higher (£49 664 [$71 861] vs £22 155 [$32 057]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Nosocomial VRTIs in neonatal patients are associated with significant greater respiratory morbidity and health care costs. Prevention efforts must be explored.

A qualitative evaluation of a novel intervention using insight into tobacco industry tactics to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from the US Truth campaign suggests that interventions focusing on tobacco industry tactics can be effective in preventing smoking uptake by children. Operation Smoke Storm is the first school-based intervention based on this premise and comprises three classroom sessions in which students act as secret agents uncovering tobacco industry tactics through videos, quizzes, discussions, and presentations. We report a qualitative evaluation of its acceptability. METHODS: We conducted eight focus groups with 79 students aged 11-12 who participated in Operation Smoke Storm at two UK schools in Autumn 2013, and 20 interviews with teachers who delivered the intervention. These were digitally audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework method. RESULTS: Students enjoyed the secret agent scenario and reported acquiring new knowledge about smoking and the tobacco industry, which seemed to strengthen their aversion to smoking. Teachers felt confident delivering the 'off the shelf' resource, although they would have welcomed more background information about the topic and guidance on steering discussions. Teachers highlighted a need for the resource to be flexible and not dependent on lesson length, teacher confidence, or expertise. Students and teachers endorsed the idea of developing a booster component for older students and supported the development of printed information complementing the resource to encourage parents to support their child not to smoke. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that Operation Smoke Storm can be delivered by teachers to raise awareness about smoking-related issues. The ideas and issues raised are now being used to improve and extend the resource for further evaluation.

Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision.

BACKGROUND: Before 2012, UK GPs were paid only to offer cessation advice to smokers and only to those with smoking-related disease, a minority of all smokers. From 2012, GPs are now paid to offer all smokers referral for behavioural support and medication to assist cessation at least once every 2 years. AIM: To quantify the impact of this new recommendation and payment on indicators of smoking cessation activity. DESIGN AND SETTING: Interrupted time series analysis of data from general practices in England contributing data to The Health Improvement Network (THIN). METHOD: Data were extracted on monthly rates of recorded delivery of smoking cessation advice, referral to NHS Stop Smoking Services, and prescription of smoking cessation medications, among an average of 3.3 million patients aged >16 years registered each month in THIN. ARIMA models were used to quantify changes in rates of cessation activity after the 2012 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) revision compared with beforehand. RESULTS: The proportion of patients each month with a record of advice to quit smoking increased by 19.6% (95% CI = 7.9 to 31.4) in the year after the introduction of payments compared with the 8 years beforehand; the recording of referral to Stop Smoking Services increased by 38.8% (95% CI = 15.2 to 62.4). There was no significant change in prescription of smoking cessation medication, -7.7% (95% CI = -21.6 to 6.2). CONCLUSION: Paying GPs to intervene with all smokers and offer support rather than just advice to quit is associated with an increase in recording of advice and referring patients for behavioural support to stop smoking, but no change in prescribing pharmacotherapy for cessation.

Small area synthetic estimates of smoking prevalence during pregnancy in England.

BACKGROUND: Complete and accurate data on maternal smoking prevalence during pregnancy are not available at a local geographical scale in England. We employ a synthetic estimation approach to predict the expected prevalence of smoking during pregnancy and smoking at delivery by Primary Care Trust (PCT). METHODS: Multilevel logistic regression models were used with data from the 2010 Infant Feeding Survey and 2011 Census to predict the probability of mothers (a) smoking at any point during pregnancy and (b) smoking at delivery, according to age, deprivation, and the ethnic profile of the home area. These probabilities were applied to demographic information on mothers giving birth from 2010/11 Hospital Episode Statistics data to produce expected counts, and prevalence figures, of smokers by PCT, with Bayesian 95 % credible intervals. The expected prevalence of smoking at delivery by PCT was compared with midwife-collected Smoking at the Time of Delivery (SATOD) data using a Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: The expected prevalence of smoking during pregnancy by PCT ranged from 8.1 % (95 % CI 5.6-1.0) to 31.6 % (27.5-34.8). The expected prevalence of smoking at delivery ranged from 2.5 % (1.4-4.0) to 17.1 % (13.7-20.4). Figures for expected smoking prevalence at delivery showed some agreement with SATOD, though SATOD data were generally higher than the synthetic estimates (mean difference 2.99 %). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to derive good estimates of expected smoking prevalence during pregnancy for small areas, potentially at much lower cost than conducting large surveys. Such data may be useful to help plan and commission smoking cessation services and monitor their effectiveness.

Smoke-free legislation and the incidence of paediatric respiratory infections and wheezing/asthma: interrupted time series analyses in the four UK nations.

We investigated the association between introduction of smoke-free legislation in the UK (March 2006 for Scotland, April 2007 for Wales and Northern Ireland, and July 2007 for England) and the incidence of respiratory diseases among children. We extracted monthly counts of new diagnoses of wheezing/asthma and RTIs among children aged 0-12 years from all general practices in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink during 1997-2012. Interrupted time series analyses were performed using generalised additive mixed models, adjusting for underlying incidence trends, population size changes, seasonal factors, and pandemic influenza, as appropriate. 366,642 new wheezing/asthma diagnoses and 4,324,789 RTIs were observed over 9,536,003 patient-years. There was no statistically significant change in the incidence of wheezing/asthma after introduction of smoke-free legislation in England (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.81-1.09) or any other UK country (Scotland: IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83-1.19; Wales: IRR 1.09, 95% CI 0.89-1.35; Northern Ireland: IRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76-1.22). Similarly no statistically significant changes in RTI incidence were demonstrated (England: IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.06; Scotland: IRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.11; Wales: IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.09; Northern Ireland: IRR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.03). There were no demonstrable reductions in the incidence of paediatric wheezing/asthma or RTIs following introduction of smoke-free legislation in the UK.

What are the main sources of smoking cessation support used by adolescent smokers in England? A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent smoking is a worldwide public health concern. Whilst various support measures are available to help young smokers quit, their utilization of cessation support remains unknown. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2012 Smoking, Drinking and Drug Use among Young People survey to quantify the use of seven different types of cessation support by adolescents aged 11-16 in England who reported current smoking and having tried to quit, or ex-smoking. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the associations between participant characteristics and reported use of cessation support. RESULTS: Amongst 617 current and ex-smokers, 67.3% (95% CI 63.0-71.2) reported use of at least one cessation support measure. Not spending time with friends who smoke was the most commonly-used measure, reported by 45.4% of participants (95% CI 41.1-49.8), followed by seeking smoking cessation advice from family or friends (27.4%, 95% CI 23.7-31.5) and using nicotine products (15.4%, 95% CI 12.6-18.7). Support services provided by the National Health Service (NHS) were infrequently utilized. Having received lessons on smoking was significantly associated with reported use of cessation support (adjusted OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.34) and not spending time with friends who smoked (adjusted OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.33-2.95). Students with family members who smoked were more likely to report asking family or friends for help to quit (adjusted OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.07-2.81). Respondents who smoked fewer cigarettes per week were generally less likely to report use of cessation support measures. CONCLUSION: The majority of young smokers reported supported attempts to quit, though the support they used tended to be informal rather than formal. Evidence is needed to quantify the effectiveness of cessation support mechanisms which are acceptable to and used by young smokers.