Osteonecrosis of the jaw: surgical treatment results before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in one of the reference hospitals in Poland.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a huge impact not only on everyday life but, above all, on the functioning of medical entities. During its duration, there were problems with access to health care, including maxillofacial surgery departments. The aim of the study is to analyze how the pandemic affected the surgical results of the treatment of osteonecrosis of the jaws at the Clinic of Maxillofacial Surgery in Poznan which delivers services in maxillofacial surgery for almost 4.5 million inhabitants in Poland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients' medical records before and during the pandemic restrictions. The data was obtained by entering the appropriate passwords and ICD-10 diagnoses (e.g., M87) in the hospital's IT system. The obtained information was subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The number of patients before and during the pandemic did not differ significantly. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the waiting time of patients after admission to the hospital for surgery and the total time of hospitalization were shortened. The number of complications was similar in both groups. However, the waiting time for a follow-up visit was longer during restriction time. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the course of surgical treatment in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaws. The outcomes of the medical procedure remained consistent with the ones observed before the implementation of restrictions. This is likely due to the urgency of the illness. Despite the pandemic, a critical condition called osteonecrosis of the jaw was treated promptly.

Asymmetrical elevation of esophagogastric junction pressure suggests hiatal repair contributes to antireflux surgery dysphagia.

The radial distribution of esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) pressures with regard to troublesome dysphagia (TDysph) after antireflux surgery is poorly understood. Before and after antireflux surgery, end-expiratory and peak-inspiratory EGJ pressures were measured at eight angles of 45° radial separation in patients with reflux disease. All 34 patients underwent posterior crural repair, then either 90° anterior (N = 13) or 360° fundoplication (N = 21). Dysphagia was assessed prospectively using a validated questionnaire (score range 0-45) and TDysph defined as a dysphagia score that was ≥5 above pre-op baseline. Compared with before surgery, for 90° fundoplication, end-expiratory EGJ pressures were highest in the left-anterolateral sectors, the position of the partial fundoplication. In other sectors, pressures were uniformly elevated. Compared with 90° fundoplication, radial pressures after 360° fundoplication were higher circumferentially (P = 0.004), with a posterior peak. Nine patients developed TDysph after surgery with a greater increase in end-expiratory and peak-inspiratory EGJ pressures (P = 0.03 and 0.03, respectively) and significantly higher inspiratory pressure at the point of maximal radial pressure asymmetry (P = 0.048), compared with 25 patients without TDysph. Circumferential elevation of end-expiratory EGJ pressure after 90° and 360° fundoplication suggests hiatal repair elevates EGJ pressure by extrinsic compression. The highly localized focal point of elevated EGJ pressure upon inspiration in patients with TDysph after surgery is indicative of a restrictive diaphragmatic hiatus in the presence of a fundoplication.

Endoscopic dilatation improves long-term dysphagia following head and neck cancer therapies: a randomized control trial.

Long-term pharyngeal dysphagia is a common complication following head and neck cancer (HNC) therapies. High-level evidence for pharyngoesophageal junction (POJ) dilatation as a treatment in this population is lacking. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of POJ dilatation in dysphagic HNC survivors. This single-center, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial (St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia) randomly assigned (1:1) HNC survivors with long-term dysphagia (≥12 months postcompleted HNC therapies) to receive either graded endoscopic dilatations or sham dilatation (placebo). Patients were blinded to intervention types. Two strata were used for permuted randomization: (1) HNC therapies (total laryngectomy vs. chemoradiation alone); (2) Prior POJ dilatation (nil vs. previous dilatation). The primary endpoint was a short-term clinical response in swallowing function (3 months), defined as (1) a decrease in Sydney Swallow Questionnaire score by ≥200 or a score ≤ ULN; and (2) satisfactory global clinical assessment. The secondary endpoints were dysphagia relapse and serious adverse events. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000707369). Between 13 January 2013 and 16 January 2017, 41 patients were randomly assigned to endoscopic dilatation (n = 21) or placebo (n = 20). The short-term response rate in the endoscopic dilatation group was 76% (n = 16), compared with 5% (n = 1) in the placebo group (P < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events. The finding of a mucosal tear postdilatation was associated strongly with clinical response (OR 13.4, 95% CI [2.4, 74.9], P = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier estimate of dysphagia relapse is 50% by 9.6 months (95% CI [6.0, 19.2]) from completion of dilatation. Endoscopic dilatation of the POJ is a safe and efficacious therapy for the treatment of long-term dysphagia in HNC survivors. Close follow-up and repeat dilatation are necessary given the high dysphagia relapse rate.

The critical importance of pharyngeal contractile forces on the validity of intrabolus pressure as a predictor of impaired pharyngo-esophageal junction compliance.

INTRODUCTION: Restrictive defects of the pharyngo-esophageal junction (PEJ) are common in both structural and neurological disorders and are amenable to therapies aiming to reduce outflow resistance. Intrabolus pressure (IBP) acquired with high-resolution manometry and impedance (HRMI) is an indicator of resistance and a marker of reduced PEJ compliance. Constraints and limitations of IBP as well as the optimal IBP parameter remain undefined. AIMS: To determine: (i) the impact of peak pharyngeal pressure (PeakP) on the diagnostic accuracy of IBP for the detection of a restrictive defect at the PEJ and (ii) the optimal IBP parameter for this purpose. METHODS: In 52 dysphagic patients previously treated for head and neck cancer. Five candidate IBP measures and PeakP were obtained with HRMI, as well as a presence of a stricture determined by a mucosal tear after endoscopic dilatation. Predictive values of IBP measures were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for all patients and reiterated as patients with lowest PeakP were progressively removed from the cohort. RESULTS: All IBP parameters had fair to good accuracy at predicting strictures. Intrabolus pressure measured at a discrete point of maximum admittance 1 cm above the maximal excursion of the upper esophageal sphincter had highest sensitivity (0.76) and specificity (0.78). When PeakP was at least 57 mm Hg both sensitivity and specificity improved to 0.9. CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngeal propulsive force has substantial impact on the accuracy of IBP as a predictor of a PEJ stricture. When PeakP is ≥57 mm Hg, an elevated IBP is highly predictive of a restrictive defect at the PEJ.

Pathophysiology of swallowing following oropharyngeal surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and coblation channeling of the tongue (CCT) are oropharyngeal surgeries used to treat obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. The extent to which UPPP and CCT affect pharyngeal swallow has not been determined. We therefore conducted a novel case series study employing high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) to quantify the swallowing-related biomechanics following UPPP and/or CCT surgery. METHODS: Twelve patients who underwent UPPP+CCT or CCT only were assessed an average 2.5 years postsurgery. Swallow function data were compared with ten healthy controls. All patients completed the Sydney swallow questionnaire (SSQ). Pharyngeal pressure-flow analysis of HRIM recordings captured key distension, contractility and pressure-flow timing swallow parameters testing 5, 10, and 20 mL volumes of thin and thick fluid consistencies. KEY RESULTS: Postoperative patients had more dysphagia symptoms with five returning abnormal SSQ scores. Swallowing was biomechanically altered compared to controls, consistent with diminished swallowing reserve, largely driven by elevated hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure due to a reduced capacity to open the upper esophageal sphincter to accommodate larger volumes. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Patients who have undergone UPPP and/or CCT surgery appear to have a deficiency in normal modulation of the swallowing mechanism and a reduced swallowing functional reserve. We speculate that these changes may become relevant in later life with the onset of age-related stressors to the swallowing mechanism. This case series strikes a note of caution that further studies are needed to determine the role of preoperative swallow assessment in patients undergoing UPPP and/or CCT surgery.

Inter-rater reliability and validity of automated impedance manometry analysis and fluoroscopy in dysphagic patients after head and neck cancer radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Pharyngeal automated impedance manometry (AIM) analysis is a novel non-radiological method to analyze swallowing function based on impedance-pressure recordings. In dysphagic head and neck cancer patients, we evaluated the reliability and validity of the AIM-derived swallow risk index (SRI) and a novel measure of postswallow residue (iZn/Z) by comparing it against videofluoroscopy as the gold standard. METHODS: Three blinded experts classified 88 videofluoroscopic swallows from 16 patients for aspiration and degree of postswallow residue. Pressure-impedance recordings of the patient and age-matched control swallows were analyzed using AIM by three observers who derived the SRI and iZn/Z. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for videofluoroscopic and AIM measures. Patient pressure/impedance measurements were compared with videofluoroscopy scores and control subjects to determine validity for detecting clinically relevant swallowing dysfunction. KEY RESULTS: Agreement among observers assessing presence of penetration and aspiration was modest (ICC 0.57) for videofluoroscopy and good (ICC 0.71, 0.82) for AIM-derived SRI and iZn/Z. When compared with age-matched controls, the SRI was higher in patients with aspiration (mean diff. 28.6, 95% CI [55.85, 1.355], p < 0.05). The iZn/Z had moderate positive correlation with bolus residue on fluoroscopy (BRS score) (rs (86) = 0.4120, p < 0.0001) and was increased in both patients with aspiration (∆244 [419.7, 69.52; p < 0.05]) and penetration (∆240 [394.3, 85.77]; p < 0.05) compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: AIM-based measures of swallowing function have better inter-rater reliability than comparable fluoroscopically derived measures. These measures are easily determined and objective markers of clinically relevant features of disordered swallowing following radiotherapy.

Persistent dysphagia after head and neck radiotherapy: a common and under-reported complication with significant effect on non-cancer-related mortality.

AIMS: Dysphagia is a well-recognised acute complication after radiotherapy. However, knowledge about the long-term prevalence and effect remains limited. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence, severity, morbidity, time course and reporting patterns of dysphagia symptoms after head and neck radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in a large consecutive series of head and neck cancer patients. All patients in the St George Hospital Cancer Care database who had received head and neck radiotherapy with curative intent 0.5-8 years previously and recorded as being alive were surveyed using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ). Case notes were reviewed to determine the level of awareness of swallowing dysfunction in all patients, as well as the causes of mortality in the 83 deceased patients. RESULTS: The mean follow-up at the time of survey was 3 years after radiotherapy (range 0.5-8 years). Of the 116 patients surveyed by questionnaire, the response rate was 72% (83). Impaired swallowing (SSQ score > 234) was reported by 59% of patients. Dysphagia severity was not predicted by tumour site or stage, nor by the time since therapy, age, gender or adjuvant chemotherapy. Review of the hospital medical records and cancer database revealed that cancer accounted for 55% of deaths and aspiration pneumonia was responsible for 19% of non-cancer-related deaths. Of those with abnormal SSQ scores, only 47% reported dysphagia during follow-up clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent dysphagia is a prevalent, under-recognised and under-reported long-term complication of head and neck radiotherapy which currently cannot be predicted on the basis of patient, tumour or treatment characteristics. Aspiration pneumonia is an important contributor to non-cancer-related mortality in these patients. These data highlight the need for closer monitoring of swallow dysfunction and its sequelae in this population.

Pancolonic motor response to subsensory and suprasensory sacral nerve stimulation in patients with slow-transit constipation.

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is emerging as a potential treatment for patients with constipation. Although SNS can elicit an increase in colonic propagating sequences (PSs), the optimal stimulus parameters for this response remain unknown. This study evaluated the colonic motor response to subsensory and suprasensory SNS in patients with slow-transit constipation. METHODS: Patients with confirmed slow-transit constipation were studied. Either a water-perfused manometry catheter or a high-resolution fibre-optic manometry catheter was positioned colonoscopically to the caecum. A temporary electrode was implanted transcutaneously in the S3 sacral nerve foramen. In the fasted state, three conditions were evaluated in a double-blind randomized fashion: sham, subsensory and suprasensory stimulation. Each 2-h treatment period was preceded by a 2-h basal period. The delta (Δ) value was calculated as the frequency of the event during stimulation minus that during the basal period. RESULTS: Nine patients had readings taken with a water-perfused catheter and six with a fibre-optic catheter. Compared with sham stimulation, suprasensory stimulation caused a significant increase in the frequency of PSs (mean(s.d.) Δ value - 1·1(7·2) versus 6·1(4·0) PSs per 2 h; P = 0·004). No motor response was recorded in response to subsensory stimulation compared with sham stimulation. Compared with subsensory stimulation, stimulation at suprasensory levels caused a significant increase in the frequency of PSs (P = 0·006). CONCLUSION: In patients with slow-transit constipation, suprasensory SNS increased the frequency of colonic PSs, whereas subsensory SNS stimulation did not. This has implications for the design of therapeutic trials and the clinical application of the device.

Upregulation of the esophago-UES relaxation response: a possible pathophysiological mechanism in suspected reflux laryngitis.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate or excessive, non-swallow related, reflexive relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in response to esophageal distension may be the principal mechanism permitting retrograde trans-sphincteric flow during acid regurgitation. The neural pathways mediating reflexive UES relaxation in the human have received little attention. Patients with laryngitis demonstrate an increased acid reflux in the proximal esophagus. Such events, combined with an increased tendency for UES relaxation, might precipitate regurgitation into the pharynx. The aim was to determine whether the esophago-UES relaxation reflex induced by rapid esophageal distension is upregulated in patients with posterior laryngitis. METHODS: In 21 healthy volunteers and 14 patients with posterior laryngitis, UES responses to rapid air insufflation were examined. UES responses were monitored with perfused manometry catheter with a oval sleeve sensor. KEY RESULTS: The probability of triggering UES relaxation in response to the rapid esophageal air distension, for all volumes of insufflation, was higher in laryngitis (45%) than in health (17%). The minimum distension volume required to elicit an UES relaxation response was significantly lower in laryngitis patients when compared with controls. Patients who demonstrated a laryngoscopic response to a trial of omeprazole, were less likely to generate a distension-induced UES contractile response (5%) than patients who did not respond (23%). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The threshold for esophageal distension-induced UES relaxation is reduced in patients with laryngitis when compared with controls. This finding supports the hypothesis that in this population, a hypersensitive belch-like response may be one contributory mechanism of regurgitation when triggered by an abrupt spontaneous gastro-esophageal reflux event.

Bowel preparation affects the amplitude and spatiotemporal organization of colonic propagating sequences.

BACKGROUND: Colonic manometry is performed using either colonoscopically assisted catheter placement, after bowel preparation, or nasocolonic intubation of the unprepared bowel. There has been little systematic evaluation of the effects of bowel cleansing upon colonic propagating pressure wave sequences. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers underwent nasocolonic placement of a water-perfused silicone catheter which recorded pressures at 16 recording sites each spaced 7.5 cm apart in the unprepared colon for 24 h. These measures were compared with those obtained in another eight healthy volunteers in whom the catheter was placed to the caecum at colonoscopy in the prepared colon. KEY RESULTS: The colonic motor responses to meals and morning waking, and the normal nocturnal suppression did not differ between the two groups, nor were the overall frequency, regional dependence nor extent of propagating sequences (PS) influenced by bowel preparation. Bowel preparation did result in a significant increase in the frequency of high amplitude PS (22 +/- 7 vs 8 +/- 4 HAPS/24 h; P = 0.003). Additionally, a number of the measures of spatiotemporal organization among consecutive PS (linkage among sequences and predefecatory stereotypical patterning) were significantly altered by bowel preparation. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The overall frequency of PSs, the colonic responses to physiological stimuli such a meal and morning waking and nocturnal suppression, are not influenced by prior bowel preparation. However, investigators wishing to study HAPS frequency, or the more complex spatiotemporal relationships among consecutive PSs, should control for bowel preparation when making comparisons among study groups.

Predictors of outcome in an open label, therapeutic trial of high-dose omeprazole in laryngitis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux is implicated in some cases of laryngitis. There are no established predictors of response to acid suppression therapy in suspected reflux laryngitis. AIM: In a population with laryngitis, the aim is to determine whether (a) omeprazole 20 mg tds (3 months) improves symptoms and laryngitis, and (b) the outcome in response to potent acid suppression can be predicted by esophageal and/or pharyngeal parameters during ambulatory pH monitoring or by other pretreatment variables. METHODS: From the 70 consecutive patients with laryngitis screened, 20 patients met the inclusion criteria (dysphonia >3 months; laryngoscopically demonstrated laryngitis); and 50 patients were excluded because of one or more criteria indicating alternative causes for laryngeal injury. The primary outcome measure was improvement of at least one level in a 4-point laryngitis grading at 3 months. Twenty-four-hour dual, pharyngo-esophageal pH monitoring was performed at baseline. Secondary outcomes (symptom questionnaire; computerized voice analysis) were measured at baseline, and at 6 and 12 wk. RESULTS: Response rates at 6 and 12 wk were 47% and 63%, respectively. GERD symptoms (heartburn (p= 0.03) and regurgitation (p= 0.0001)) improved. However, neither baseline GERD symptoms nor endoscopic findings predicted laryngoscopic or symptomatic response. Neither baseline laryngitis grade (p= 0.46) nor esophageal acid exposure on pH testing (p= 0.3) predicted outcome. Four of 20 patients demonstrated pharyngeal regurgitation on pH testing, all four of whom responded to potent acid suppression (p= 0.2). Computerized voice measures were not predictive of outcome, although fundamental frequency (Fo) was inversely related to baseline laryngoscopic grade. CONCLUSION: In a carefully defined population of patients with laryngitis (a) 63% have a laryngoscopic response to 3 months of potent acid suppression without significant improvement in laryngeal symptoms; (b) neither voice measures, esophageal acid exposure time, symptoms nor severity of laryngitis predict outcome; and (c) although numbers were small, all patients with a positive pharyngeal pH study responded to therapy and pharyngeal pH-metry may prove useful; (4) available evidence supports an empiric trial of high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPI), for at least 12 wk, as the initial diagnostic step for suspected reflux laryngitis.