Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Utilization in Patients With HR+/ HER2- Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in a Real-World Setting in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand current treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) of women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (advanced breast cancer [ABC]) in Taiwan overall and within the subgroup of patients who were postmenopausal women with no previous systemic therapy in the ABC setting. METHODS: A chart review of anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and HRU was conducted via an online physician survey including 118 patient charts from women ≥ 18 years old with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth receptor negative ABC, diagnosed between 2015 and 2017. RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 56.6 years (range 29-83). Among the 118 patients, the most common first-line systemic therapy group after diagnosis of ABC was endocrine-based therapy (39.0%) or endocrine therapy (ET) plus chemotherapy (ChT) combinations (38.1%). In the postmenopausal subgroup (n = 56), ET-based therapy was the most common (44.6%). Oncologist visits, at annual rate of 9.20 (95% confidence interval 8.81-9.60), and hospitalizations, at annual rate of 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.96-1.22), were key drivers of HRU. Of the 118 patients, the 72 with at least one ChT agent in their first-line regimen had an annual hospitalization rate of 1.4 versus 0.45 admissions compared with the 46 patients on first-line ET-based therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Current treatment patterns suggest an unmet need for new medications that lead to reduction in high rate of ChT use. Results can inform future evaluations of new ABC treatments that estimate the health economic impact of their adoption in Taiwan.

Treatment Patterns, Clinical Outcomes and Health Care Resource Utilisation in Patients with EGFR-mutated Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Despite the dynamic treatment landscape for EGFR mutant-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRm+ mNSCLC), most of the earlier studies have focused on US or Western populations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of South Korean patients with EGFRm+ mNSCLC. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult patients with EGFRm+ mNSCLC who received systemic treatment between January-2019 and June-2019. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included from 21 hospitals, with a median follow-up of 15.6 months. Median age was 65.0 years, 22% had central nervous system metastasis, and 57% and 38% had exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R, respectively. Among 144 patients (89%) who received first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, afatinib was most the common (44%), followed by gefitinib (28%) and erlotinib (13%). First-line chemotherapy was more common when an EGFR-mutation was detected after versus before first-line treatment initiation (31% vs 5%). Discontinuation of first-line treatment was mostly due to disease-progression (81%) and toxicity (7%). Among 58 (78%) patients who received second-line treatment, osimertinib was the most common (40%). Most (60%) patients reported ≥1 Grade ≥3 adverse event during first-line treatment. Following initiation of first-line treatment, physician visits and chest X-rays were the most frequent healthcare utilisation events. Rates of emergency-room visits and hospitalization were 12% and 16%, respectively, with a mean length-of-stay of 10.4 days. At 12 months, overall survival rate was 95%, and numerically worse for patients with exon 21 versus 19 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics and clinical outcomes of Korean patients with EGFRm+ mNSCLC in real-world practice were comparable to those observed in clinical trials. As osimertinib was not reimbursed for first-line treatment before study completion, further investigation is warranted to explore evolving treatment practice.

Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea.

Objective: To understand current treatment patterns and health care resource utilization (HRU) of women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (advanced breast cancer; ABC) in Korea overall and within patients who had progressed with prior endocrine therapy (as first-line treatment for metastatic disease) and patients with no prior systemic treatment (for advanced disease). Methods: A chart review was conducted in 109 patients (women ≥ 18 years old with HR+/HER2- ABC diagnosed between 2015 and 2017) from 11 hospitals. Anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns and HRU was abstracted. Results: Mean (range) age of all patients was 57.5 (40-81) years. Overall, the most common first-, second- and third-line systemic therapy after diagnosis of ABC were letrozole ± palbociclib (51%), endocrine therapy (ET)±everolimus (42%) or chemotherapy (ChT) (39%), and ChT (68%), respectively. In patients progressed with ET (n = 33) and those with no prior systemic treatment (n = 52), the most common first-line treatments were letrozole (82%) and letrozole + palbociclib (42%), respectively. The percentage of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event during first-line therapy was 93.1% vs 39.2% in patients on a ChT based regimen (N = 29) vs. ET (N = 74). Overall, oncologist visits, at an annual rate of 9.27 (95% CI: 8.87, 9.69) visits per month, and hospitalizations, with an annual rate of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.54), and mean (SD) length of stay of 14.3 (10.32) days, were the key drivers of HRU. Conclusions: These findings on real world HRU reflected clinical guidelines and severity of ABC. Results can inform future evaluations of new ABC treatments that estimate the health economic impact of their adoption in Korea.

Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Utilization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Failure of Sorafenib in Real-World Setting in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize current treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) observed among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after the failure of sorafenib in real-world setting in Taiwan. METHODS: A chart review was conducted in 130 patients; the inclusion criteria were patients with HCC who were aged 20 years or older and had received systemic therapy or best supportive care after failure of first-line systemic treatment with sorafenib between 2016 and 2018. Anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment pathways, and survival were abstracted. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 61.7 years (range 27-84); of these 130 patients, 103 (79%) were male, 81 (62%) had high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (≥400 ng/mL), and 96 (78.0%) were deceased at the time of data abstraction. After sorafenib therapy, 60 patients (46%) received systemic therapy, including nivolumab monotherapy (42%) and chemotherapy (25%). Oncologist visits at a semiannual per-patient rate of 3.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4-4.0) and hospitalizations at rate of 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.3) were the key contributors to HRU. Semiannual per-patient hospitalization rate was 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.5) in the high-AFP group. Median survival from discontinuation of sorafenib was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.9-9.0). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world evidence research on treatment patterns reflected substantial HRU consistent with the severity of HCC, particularly in the high-AFP group. Findings highlighted continuing high mortality in HCC, underlying a need for new treatments that can lengthen survival. Results can inform future evaluations of new HCC treatments that estimate the health economic impact of their adoption in Taiwan.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Health-Resource Utilization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Following Failure of Sorafenib: A Retrospective Chart Review of 127 Patients in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: European, US, Asian and Korean treatment guidelines all recommend sorafenib as first-line systemic therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, due to the emergence of several new treatments, post-sorafenib treatment patterns in real-world clinical practice are less well understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize current treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with HCC following the failure of first-line sorafenib in a real-world setting in Korea. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review was conducted in 127 HCC patients who received systemic therapy or best supportive care following failure of first-line systemic treatment with sorafenib (2016-2018). Anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival were abstracted by 37 physicians in Korea. RESULTS: The mean (range) age of patients was 60 (37-79) years; 63 patients had low alpha-fetoprotein (AFP < 400 ng/mL), 64 patients had high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL). Post-sorafenib, 64 (50%) patients had systemic therapy. Regorafenib, used by 54 (84%) patients in second-line, and nivolumab monotherapy, by ten (56%) patients in third-line, were the most common therapies. Hepatologist visits and hospitalizations, at an average rate of 6.89 (95% CI 6.37-7.45) and 2.24 (95% CI 1.95-2.57) per patient-year, respectively, were the key contributors of HRU. The median overall survival (95% CI) from discontinuation of sorafenib was 13.0 (9.8-20.7), 6.5 (5.0-9.5) and 9.5 (6.7-12.3) months in the low AFP, high AFP and overall group, respectively. CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence research on treatment patterns reflected current clinical guidelines and highlighted fast progressing nature and continuing high mortality in HCC, especially among the high AFP group, underlying a need for new treatments that can lengthen survival. Results from this real-world chart review, together with existing clinical trial data, can inform future evaluations of new HCC treatments that estimate their health economic impact in Korea.

Assessment of rituximab-abbs, a biosimilar, and rituximab outcomes in patients with CLL or NHL: A real-world UK study.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab (chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) treatment is approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Rituximab-abbs (first biosimilar approved in 2017) is expected to significantly reduce healthcare economic burden due to lower acquisition costs. This non-interventional, non-comparative study assessed real-world effectiveness and tolerability of rituximab-abbs and rituximab in treatment-naive patients with CLL or NHL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Via an online physician survey, 46 UK-registered hematologists and oncologists retrospectively reported on randomly selected patients aged ≥18 years with CLL or NHL with rituximab-abbs or rituximab as first-line immunotherapy. Overall, 201 patient charts were examined across 4 cohorts: rituximab-abbs in CLL, rituximab-abbs in NHL, rituximab in CLL, rituximab in NHL. RESULTS: Demographic profiles across cohorts were similar. Most patients (94 %-100 %) received combination therapy (rituximab-abbs or rituximab mainly with chemotherapy). For both treatments, overall response rate (94 %-98 %) and 1-year overall survival (98 %-100 %) were very high for patients with CLL or NHL. Most common serious adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia and infusion reactions. The majority of patients (54 %-66 %) did not experience a grade ≥3 adverse event. Healthcare resource utilization was similarly high across cohorts, driven by diagnostic testing, oncologist office visits, and day-case hospital admissions; many patients required supportive medical therapies. Mean annual savings of ∼£1000/patient driven by acquisition costs occurred with rituximab-abbs versus rituximab, administration costs were similar. CONCLUSION: Rituximab-abbs and rituximab demonstrated similar effectiveness and tolerability in treating CLL and NHL in routine UK clinical practice and demonstrate the utility of the biosimilar as a cost-saving alternative treatment.

Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of lipegfilgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in Brazil / Custo-benefício e impacto orçamentário do lipegfilgrastim para a redução de neutropenia induzida por quimioterapia no Brasil

Background: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) reduce the risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Lipegfilgrastim is a long-acting, once-per-cycle G-CSF, while Brazil's standard of care is short-acting filgrastim. A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of lipegfilgrastim was conducted with filgrastim and once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim for adults at risk of neutropenia in Brazil. Methods: The decision model used national and clinical data to evaluate the costs and outcomes of each treatment. Costs included drug and medical expenses, outpatient and inpatient neutropenia treatments, and adverse events. Health outcomes included incidence of neutropenia-related events. For the budget impact analysis, health outcomes and costs for the pre/post-lipegfilgrastim scenarios were combined to identify expenditure with lipegfilgrastim's introduction. Results: Total cost per patient during a course of four chemotherapy cycles was estimated at R$12,920 for lipegfilgrastim, R$15,168 for filgrastim, and R$13,232 for pegfilgrastim. Based on better outcomes and lower total costs with lipegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim as well as pegfilgrastim, lipegfilgrastim was the dominant treatment strategy over both filgrastim and pegfilgrastim during the duration of chemotherapy treatment. Over 5 years, the uptake of lipegfilgrastim led to savings of R$61,532,403 in overall medical costs. Neutropenic events decreased by 17,141 and deaths linked to febrile neutropenia decreased by 239. Conclusion: Due to better outcomes and lower overall cost, lipegfilgrastim was a cost-saving strategy compared with filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in the Brazilian healthcare system. Furthermore, the budget impact analysis estimated a reduction in overall medical costs and improved health outcomes over 5 years following the introduction of lipegfilgrastim.

Introdução: Fatores estimuladores de colônias de granulócitos (G-CSFs) reduzem risco de neutropenia induzida por quimioterapia. Lipegfilgrastim é um G-CSF de longa ação, de "um por ciclo", enquanto o padrão de cuidado no Brasil é filgrastim de curta ação. Realizou-se uma análise de custo/ benefício e impacto orçamentário (IO) no Brasil do lipegfilgrastim um por ciclo com filgrastim e pegfilgrastim para adultos sob risco de neutropenia. Métodos: O modelo de decisão usou dados nacionais e clínicos para avaliar resultados e custos dos tratamentos que incluíam medicamentos, médicos, tratamentos ambulatoriais e hospitalares para a neutropenia, e eventos adversos. Resultados de saúde incluíam a incidência de eventos relacionados à neutropenia. Para a análise do IO, os custos e resultados de antes/depois do lipegfilgrastim foram combinados para identificar gastos com o lipegfilgrastim. Resultados: O custo total por paciente em quatro ciclos foi estimado em R$ 12.920 para lipegfilgrastim, R$ 15.168 para filgrastim e R$ 13.232 para pegfilgrastim. Com base em melhores resultados e custos totais menores, o lipegfilgrastim, comparado ao filgrastim e ao pegfilgrastim, representou a estratégia de tratamento predominante. Em 5 anos, o lipegfilgrastim gerou uma economia de R$ 61.532.403 em custos médicos gerais. Houve 17.141 menos eventos neutropênicos e as mortes relacionadas à neutropenia febril reduziram em 239. Conclusão: Devido a melhores resultados e menores custos, lipegfilgrastim, comparado ao filgrastim e ao pegfilgrastim, foi uma estratégia econômica no sistema brasileiro. A análise de IO estimou uma redução nos custos médicos e melhorou os resultados em 5 anos após a introdução do lipegfilgrastim.

Measurement of utility values in the UK for health states related to immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

OBJECTIVE: To measure utility values associated with immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), as perceived by the United Kingdom (UK) general public. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A multi-step process, including clinical trial data, literature review, and patient focus group, was used to develop ITP health states valued in a web survey. Six ITP health states were defined based on platelet levels, risk of bleeding and key adverse events/disease complications. Clinical trial data on bleeding and ITP-specific quality of life data were key sources for developing health-state descriptions. 359 respondents, randomly selected from a managed web panel in the UK, completed the web-based Time Trade-Off survey. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare differences between each pair of health states. RESULTS: Sample characteristics (mean age: 47.9 +/- 16.9 years; 54% female) were comparable to the UK general population. ITP health states were valued as significantly worse than perfect health. Experiencing bleeding episodes was a more important driver than low platelet levels in valuing a health state to be worse. Substantial disutilities were associated with surviving an intracranial haemorrhage. Mean (SD) utility values for each ITP health state are: HS1: platelets >or=50 x 10(9)/L, no outpatient bleed: 0.863 +/- 0.15; HS2: platelets >or=50 x 10(9)/L, outpatient bleed: 0.734 +/- 0.19; HS3: platelets <50 x 10(9)/L, no outpatient bleed: 0.841 +/- 0.19; HS4: platelets <50 x 10(9)/L, outpatient bleed: 0.732 +/- 0.19; HS5: intracranial haemorrhage (2-6 months): 0.038 +/- 0.46; HS6: steroid treatment adverse events: 0.758 +/- 0.20. Potential limitations relate to web user population characteristics and lack of comparative testing of web-based TTO methods. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide evidence that the UK general population associate substantial loss of value living with ITP, suggesting an important role for new ITP treatments. Utility values based on these health states may be useful in future cost-effectiveness studies of existing and/or new ITP treatments.

Valuation of transfusion-free living in MDS: results of health utility interviews with patients.

BACKGROUND: This study measured how myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients value transfusion independence (TI), reduced transfusions (RT) and transfusion-dependence (TD) using health utility assessment methodology. METHODS: 47 MDS patients were interviewed, US (n = 8), France (n = 9), Germany (n = 9) and the UK (n = 21), to elicit the utility value of TI, RT and TD. Health states were developed based on literature; patient forum discussions; and were validated by a hematologist. Face-to-face interviews used the feeling thermometer Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Time Trade-Off (TTO) method to value the health states on a 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health) scale. Socio-demographic, clinical, and quality-of-life (EQ-5D) characteristics were surveyed to describe the patient sample. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The mean age was 67 years (range: 29-83); 45% male, 70% retired; 40% had secondary/high school education, or higher (32%), and 79% lived with family, a partner or spouse, or friends. The mean time from MDS diagnosis was 5 years (range:1-23). Most patients (87%) received previous transfusions and 49% had received a transfusion in the last 3 months. Mean EQ-5D index score was 0.78; patients reported at least some problem with mobility (45%), usual activities (40%), pain/discomfort (47%), and anxiety/depression (34%). Few patients had difficulty understanding the VAS (n = 3) and TTO (n = 4) exercises. Utility scores for TI were higher than for RT (0.84 vs. 0.77; p < 0.001) or TD (0.84 vs. 0.60; p < 0.001). Three patients rated TD worse than dead. Corresponding VAS scale scores were 78 vs. 56; (p < 0.001), and 78 vs. 31 (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients value TI, suggesting an important role for new treatments aiming to achieve greater TI in MDS. These results can be used in preference-based health economic evaluation of new MDS treatments, such as in future cost-utility studies.

Cost effectiveness of lenalidomide in the treatment of transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes in the United States.

Lenalidomide has been approved for the treatment of transfusion-dependent low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with a chromosome 5q deletion with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of lenalidomide versus best supportive care (BSC) in these patients. We developed a decision analytic model to compare costs and outcomes of lenalidomide with BSC without recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) versus BSC with EPO over 1 year. Outcome measures were transfusion independence and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The model incorporated costs of medications, transfusions, chelation, laboratory tests, office visits, and other resources associated with each therapy. Lenalidomide therapy was associated with an estimated incremental 0.53 transfusion-free and 0.25 QALY gain compared to BSC at 1 year. The costs of lenalidomide therapy were substantially offset by reduced blood transfusion and EPO costs. One-year total treatment costs were estimated at $63,385 for lenalidomide and $54,940 for BSC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for lenalidomide vs BSC was estimated at $16,066 per transfusion-free year and $35,050 per QALY gained, values within the acceptable cost-effectiveness ranges for a new therapy. Results suggest that oral lenalidomide is cost effective in the United States in the treatment of transfusion-dependent, low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality. Confirmation of these findings awaits results of an ongoing randomized phase III trial (MDS-004 study).

Health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes in the European centralized drug regulatory process: a review of guidance documents and performed authorizations of medicinal products 1995 to 2003.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to review and analyze the use of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and other patient-reported outcome (PRO) evaluations for the approval of new pharmaceutical products by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA). METHODS: All published EMEA guidance documents and regulatory information for products authorized at the EMEA and appearing in the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) database between 1995 and 2003 were examined for reference to HRQL and other PROs. RESULTS: More than half of the guidance documents for clinical investigation of pharmaceutical products in specific disease areas included reference to HRQL or other PROs. Guidance notes for 10 conditions indicated PROs can serve as primary endpoints in clinical trials, among which three included HRQL outcomes. The review of EPAR documentation uncovered HRQL and other PRO data for 34% of the drugs registered during the period of the review, with cancer-related treatments most frequently including PRO data. There was a trend toward increasing HRQL and other PRO claims in regulatory documents of pharmaceutical products in recent years, with the proportion exceeding 30% from 1999 to 2003. CONCLUSIONS: There is further scope for health outcomes researchers and regulatory decision-makers to contribute to the more efficient utilization of PROs and HRQL outcomes. Health researchers need to better justify the inclusion of these outcomes in clinical trials and highlight the added value of PRO data; while the regulators should develop harmonized procedures and capacities to adequately appraise the submitted information.