Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 28(12): 874-81, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21946824

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Myocardial oxidative stress plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of ischaemia-reperfusion injury associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Both propofol and volatile anaesthetics have been shown to reduce reactive oxygen species in experimental and clinical studies. MAIN OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of sevoflurane and propofol on myocardial oxidative stress markers (F2-isoprostanes and nitrates/nitrites) in coronary sinus blood samples from patients undergoing off-pump CABG. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomised controlled clinical study of patients scheduled for off-pump CABG in a tertiary academic university hospital from June 2007 to August 2009. Forty patients consented to enrolment and were assigned to receive either propofol or sevoflurane. INTERVENTIONS: Upon completion of the proximal anastomosis, a retroplegia cannula was inserted in the coronary sinus to obtain blood samples, according to the study protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Markers of lipoperoxidation (F2-isoprostanes) and nitrosative stress (nitrates/nitrites) were measured in coronary sinus blood samples at three time points: after the end of the proximal anastomosis (T1), after completion of all grafts (T2) and 15 min after revascularisation (T3). RESULTS: Of the 40 recruited patients, 38 fully completed the study. In the sevoflurane group (n = 20), concentrations of oxidative stress markers in the coronary sinus remained almost constant and were significantly lower than those in the propofol group (n = 18) at all time points. F2-isoprostanes concentrations were as follows at T1: sevoflurane group 37.2 ±â€Š27.5 pg ml vs. propofol group 170.7 ±â€Š30.9 pg ml [95% confidence interval (CI) 112.16-155.08, P < 0.0001); at T2: sevoflurane group 31.94 ±â€Š24.6 pg ml vs. propofol group 171.6 ±â€Š29.7 pg ml (95% CI 119.78-159.63, P < 0.0001); and at T3: sevoflurane group 23.8 ±â€Š13.0 pg ml vs. propofol group 43.6 ±â€Š31 pg ml (95% CI 2.87-36.63, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing off-pump CABG, sevoflurane showed better antioxidative properties than propofol.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea , Éteres Metílicos/administração & dosagem , Miocárdio/metabolismo , Estresse Oxidativo/fisiologia , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Cardiotônicos/administração & dosagem , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Peroxidação de Lipídeos/efeitos dos fármacos , Peroxidação de Lipídeos/fisiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estresse Oxidativo/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sevoflurano , Método Simples-Cego
2.
J Card Surg ; 24(5): 534-8, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19740294

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta has shown reduced morbidity and mortality compared with open surgery. We describe our experience with endovascular stent grafting in the treatment of acute thoracic aortic pathology. METHODS: From October 2003 to January 2008, 25 patients underwent endovascular stent graft repair of the thoracic aorta. The underlying pathology was a complicated Stanford type B dissection (n = 13), a symptomatic or ruptured thoracic aorta aneurysm (n = 6), a symptomatic penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (n = 5), or a traumatic aortic injury (n = 1). There were 21 males and four female patients with a mean age of 61.3 years (30-91 years). Routine surveillance included clinical evaluation and contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography scans before discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Stent graft placement was technically successful in all patients. There was no intraoperative mortality. Hospital mortality was of two patients (8%). Paraparesis occurred in one patient (4%). Average intensive care unit and hospital stay was 1 and 10 days, respectively. The mean follow-up was 30 months (range, 7-53). Late mortality was in one patient (4%), due to a type A dissection. During the follow-up, four patients (16%) required a second procedure for type I endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality and morbidity in our small series were low. Close follow-up is mandatory and long-term results have to be awaited.


Assuntos
Aorta Torácica/patologia , Doenças da Aorta/patologia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Prótese Vascular , Stents , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Doenças da Aorta/cirurgia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/mortalidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA