Precision Medicine in Rheumatology: The Promise of Ultrasound-Guided Synovial Biopsy, Barriers to Its Implementation in the United States, and Proposed Solutions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the clinical evaluation of inflammatory arthritis and the research into its pathogenesis, there is a growing role for the direct analysis of synovial tissue. Over the years, various biopsy techniques have been used to obtain human synovial tissue samples, and there have been progressive improvements in the safety, tolerability, and utility of the procedure. RECENT FINDINGS: The latest advancement in synovial tissue biopsy techniques is the use of ultrasound imaging to guide the biopsy device, along with evolution in the characteristics of the device itself. While ultrasound guided synovial biopsy (UGSB) has taken a strong foothold in Europe, the procedure is still relatively new to the United States of America (USA). In this paper, we describe the expansion of UGSB in the USA, elucidate the challenges faced by rheumatologists developing UGSB programs in the USA, and describe several strategies for overcoming these challenges.

Best practices for ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy in the United States.

The target organ in many forms of inflammatory arthritis is the synovium. However, synovial tissue has historically been perceived as either difficult to obtain or of little practical value. Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy [UGSB] is a safe and well-tolerated bedside procedure that is established in Europe and rapidly growing in popularity in the United States. The technique can be mastered by rheumatologists who are already experienced in ultrasound-guided procedures such as joint aspirations. The USGB procedure allows the proceduralist to access small, medium, and large joints and is inexpensive and less invasive compared to surgical alternatives. The relative ease of obtaining this tissue, along with recent research suggesting that synovium may have more clinical and investigational utility than previously thought, has led clinicians and researchers to a new appreciation of the role of synovial biopsy in both the clinical and research setting. In this manuscript, the authors present recommendations on best practices for ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy in the United States, based on our initial training with well-established experts overseas and our own subsequent collective experience in performing numerous synovial biopsies in the United States over the past 7 years for both clinical and research indications. We envision a future where UGSB is more frequently incorporated in the standard diagnostic workup of arthritis and drives novel research initiatives.

Activated Peripheral Blood B Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Their Relationship to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Treatment and Response: A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effects of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor on B Cells.

OBJECTIVE: B cells can become activated in germinal center (GC) reactions in secondary lymphoid tissue and in ectopic GCs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovium that may be tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and lymphotoxin (LT) dependent. This study was undertaken to characterize the peripheral B cell compartment longitudinally during anti-TNF therapy in RA. METHODS: Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive standard dosing regimens of etanercept (n = 43) or adalimumab (n = 20) for 24 weeks. Eligible participants met the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for RA, had clinically active disease (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints >4.4), and were receiving stable doses of methotrexate. The primary mechanistic end point was the change in switched memory B cell fraction from baseline to week 12 in each treatment group. RESULTS: B cell subsets remained surprisingly stable over the course of the study regardless of treatment group, with no significant change in memory B cells. Blockade of TNF and LT with etanercept compared to blockade of TNF alone with adalimumab did not translate into significant differences in clinical response. The frequencies of multiple activated B cell populations, including CD21- double-negative memory and activated naive B cells, were higher in RA nonresponders at all time points, and CD95+ activated B cell frequencies were increased in patients receiving anti-TNF treatment in the nonresponder group. In contrast, frequencies of transitional B cells-a putative regulatory subset-were lower in the nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Overall, our results support the notion that peripheral blood B cell subsets are remarkably stable in RA and not differentially impacted by dual blockade of TNF and LT with etanercept or single blockade of TNF with adalimumab. Activated B cells do associate with a less robust response.

Divergent gene activation in peripheral blood and tissues of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis following infliximab therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The immune inflammatory disorders rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis (Ps) share common pathologic features and show responsiveness to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents yet they are phenotypically distinct. The aim of this study was to examine if anti-TNF therapy is associated with divergent gene expression profiles in circulating cells and target tissues of patients with these diseases. METHODS: Peripheral blood CD14+ and CD14- cells were isolated from 9 RA, 12 PsA and 10 Ps patients before and after infliximab (IFX) treatment. Paired synovial (n=3, RA, PsA) and skin biopsies (n=5, Ps) were also collected. Gene expression was analyzed by microarrays. RESULTS: 26 out of 31 subjects responded to IFX. The transcriptional response of CD14+ cells to IFX was unique for the three diseases, with little overlap (<25%) in significantly changed gene lists (with PsA having the largest number of changed genes). In Ps, altered gene expression was more pronounced in lesional skin (relative to paired, healthy skin) compared to blood (relative to healthy controls). Marked suppression of up-regulated genes in affected skin was noted 2 weeks after therapy but the expression patterns differed from uninvolved skin. Divergent patterns of expression were noted between the blood cells and skin or synovial tissues in individual patients. Functions that promote cell differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis in all three diseases were enriched. RA was enriched in functions in CD14- cells, PsA in CD14+ cells and Ps in both CD14+ and CD14- cells, however, the specific functions showed little overlap in the 3 disorders. CONCLUSION: Divergent patterns of altered gene expression are observed in RA, PsA and Ps patients in blood cells and target organs in IFX responders. Differential gene expression profiles in the blood do not correlate with those in target organs.

Decreased influenza-specific B cell responses in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor.

INTRODUCTION: As a group, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients exhibit increased risk of infection, and those treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy are at further risk. This increased susceptibility may result from a compromised humoral immune response. Therefore, we asked if short-term effector (d5-d10) and memory (1 month or later) B cell responses to antigen were compromised in RA patients treated with anti-TNF therapy. METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were obtained from RA patients, including a subset treated with anti-TNF, and from healthy controls to examine influenza-specific responses following seasonal influenza vaccination. Serum antibody was measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay. The frequency of influenza vaccine-specific antibody secreting cells and memory B cells was measured by EliSpot. Plasmablast (CD19+IgD-CD27hiCD38hi) induction was measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls, RA patients treated with anti-TNF exhibited significantly decreased influenza-specific serum antibody and memory B cell responses throughout multiple years of the study. The short-term influenza-specific effector B cell response was also significantly decreased in RA patients treated with anti-TNF as compared with healthy controls, and correlated with decreased influenza-specific memory B cells and serum antibody present at one month following vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients treated with anti-TNF exhibit a compromised immune response to influenza vaccine, consisting of impaired effector and consequently memory B cell and antibody responses. The results suggest that the increased incidence and severity of infection observed in this patient population could be a consequence of diminished antigen-responsiveness. Therefore, this patient population would likely benefit from repeat vaccination and from vaccines with enhanced immunogenicity.

Severe long-standing dysimmune sensory neuronopathy responsive to etanercept.

Sensory neuronopathy in association with connective tissue disease is a disabling disorder for which there is no well-established therapy. Various immunosuppressive agents, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin have shown only anecdotal or modest beneficial effects. Tumor necrosis factor alpha is a proinflammatory cytokine that mediates TH1-cell inflammatory responses and is a plausible contributor to dorsal root ganglion injury in sensory neuronopathy. We describe a patient with severe painful and ataxic sensory neuronopathy in association with systemic lupus erythematosus, who showed marked and sustained improvement on etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor, despite a chronic and progressive course that was refractory to several immunomodulatory interventions. We review the therapeutic potential of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade in immune-mediated neuropathies and the reported neurologic complications from its use, most notably central and peripheral demyelination.