Rectus abdominis muscle abscess after performing colonoscopy-A case report.

Endoscopic removal of premalignant polyps can prevent colorectal cancers. It is considered a safe procedure, yet there are some complications reported. Rectus abdominis muscle abscess (RAMA) is a type of pyomyositis seen as a complication of rectus sheath hematoma. Predisposing factors to RAMA include trauma, diabetes mellitus, alcohol abuse, Intravenous drug abuse and hematologic diseases.In this article, we report a case of a 74-year-old patient with abscess formation in the Rectus Abdominis muscle after colonoscopy and polypectomy with the application of abdominal pressure techniques without any early complications. Diagnosis of RAMA was made after a Computed Tomography scan and ultrasound-guided drainage, in addition to antibiotic therapy, were used as treatment.Although colonoscopy is considered a generally safe procedure, endoscopists should be aware of Rectus Abdominis sheath hemorrhage and RAMA in the following as a complication with the presentation of abdominal pain. Applying abdominal pressure should be done carefully To reduce minor trauma likelihood, owing to it being a predisposing factor of RAMA.

A Case of Pneumoperitoneum after Colonoscopy without Frank Perforation.

Benign pneumoperitoneum can happen after colonoscopy, which shows itself as free air in the abdomen without symptoms or pneumoperitoneum without peritonitis. In this case, we reported a rare case of an elderly man who had acute abdominal stiffness after colonoscopy and observation of free air under the diaphragm that no perforation was observed in the intestine during laparoscopy and only one tiny intestinal tumor was randomly reported. There is no consensus on the treatment of pneumoperitoneum after colonoscopy. Patients with peritonitis benefit from laparoscopy but patients with micro perforation and asymptomatic patients benefit from intravenous antibiotic treatment and bowel rest.

Development, implementation, and evaluation of a program to expand the nurse's roles in colorectal cancer prevention: A mixed-methods protocol study.

BACKGROUND: Nurses play an important role in cancer prevention. However, studies conducted on nurses' roles, in the field of cancer prevention in Iran, are very limited. This study will identify the role of nurses and designs, implements, and evaluates a program to expand their role in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This exploratory mixed-methods study will be performed using quantitative-qualitative methods in three consecutive stages. In the first phase, a qualitative study will be conducted to identify the potential and actual roles of nurses in Iran using in-depth semi-structured interviews. Participants will be selected by purposive and snowball sampling, followed by a literature review; the actual and potential roles of nurses at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of CRC prevention in Iran and around the world will be extracted. And the actual role is determined. In the second phase, the roles of nurses will be prioritized using the modified Delphi method, and the program will be designed. In the third phase, the part of the program will be implemented as a quasi-experimental intervention, and the effect of the intervention will be evaluated. CONCLUSION: Developing a program can provide some evidence for promoting nurses' position in cancer prevention. Moreover, it is expected that this program promotes knowledge and empowerment and the position of nurses to provide primary, secondary, and tertiary cancer prevention. The entry of nurses into the field of cancer prevention leads to better quality care and more cost-effectiveness.

Costs and outcomes of colorectal cancer screening program in Isfahan, Iran.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal cancers in Iran i.e., the fourth and the second prevalent cancer among Iranian males and females, respectively. A routine screening program is effective in the early detection of disease which can reduce the cancer burden both for individuals and society. In 2015, Iran's Package of Essential Non- communicable Diseases program had been piloted in Shahreza city in Isfahan province. Colorectal cancer screening for the population aged 50-70 was a part of this program. So far, there was no study about the cost and outcomes of that program. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the costs and outcomes of colorectal cancer screening done from 2016 to 2019 in Shahreza. METHODS: This cost-outcome description study used the data of 19,392 individuals who were 50-70 years old experienced a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and had an electronic health record. All direct costs including personnel, building space, equipment, training, etc. were extracted from the financial documents existing in the Isfahan province Health Center. The outcome was defined as positive FIT, detection of adenoma or malignancy as recorded in the E-integrated health system. RESULTS: The results of this study indicated that the direct costs of the colorectal cancer screening program during the years 2016-2019 were 7,368,707,574 Rials (321,029 PPP$) in Shahreza, Isfahan province. These costs resulted in identifying 821 people with a positive FIT test, of those 367 individuals were undergone colonoscopy. Of whom 8 cases of colorectal cancer, and 151 cases with polyps were diagnosed. CONCLUSION: This study showed that by paying a small amount of 320 thousand international dollars we could prevent 151 cases of polyps to be progressed to colorectal cancer,resulting in a significant reduction in colorectal cancer incidence.

Adaptation of Clinical Practice Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Screening in People with Average Risk in Isfahan Province.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer among adults in Iran. The aim of colorectal cancer screening is to reduce the cancer burden in the population by diagnosing the disease in its early stages. Methods: We adapted this guideline for the moderate CRC risk population for Isfahan to determine how to screen them and when to start and end the CRC screening. This guideline was developed by clinical appraisal and review of the evidence, available clinical guidelines, and in consultation with members of the Isfahan Chamber of Iranian association of gastroenterology and hepatology. Results: In screening people with average risk for CRC who use personal resources and personally pay all the costs, colonoscopy is recommended as the first choice to be done every 10 years. In case of negative colonoscopy, we recommend FIT test to prevention of interval cancer every 5 years. In screening of people with average risk of CRC, FIT is suggested to be done every 2 years as a first-choice method test for those who use public resources and do not pay for this service personally. In screening individuals with average risk for CRC, g-FOBT is not recommended as the first method of choice. Repeating positive guaiac test is not recommended and if positive, colonoscopy is suggested.

Antibiotic resistance pattern of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from patients in Isfahan, Iran.

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the antibiotic resistance pattern of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from patients in Isfahan province. Materials and Methods: Gastric antrum biopsy specimens of patients undergoing endoscopy were cultured. The samples with the growth of H. pylori underwent antibiotic susceptibility test by disk diffusion method. Reaults: Of 96 samples, 50 samples (53%) were positive for H. pylori. The rates of antibiotic resistance were as follows: amoxicillin, 6%; azithromycin, 20%; furazolidone, 22%; levofloxacin, 16%; metronidazole, 20%; rifampin, 12%; and tetracycline, 22%. Conclusion: H. pylori strains in our area have high rates of resistance to azithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole, tetracycline, and furazolidone.

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of death worldwide and the use of CRC screening tests can reduce the incidence and mortality of the disease by early detection. This study aims to review cost-effectiveness strategies in different ages and countries, systematically. METHODS: We searched ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed and Embase for related studies between 2010 and 2020. Articles that reported costs per Quality-Adjusted Life Year or Life Year Gain and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios to compare the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening strategies in the average-risk population were included in our study. RESULTS: The search strategies identified 426 records and finally 48 articles were included in the systematic review based on included and excluded criteria. We identified seven strategies for CRC screening. Most of the strategies were performed in aged 50-75. These studies were reported by cost per Quality-Adjusted life year (QALY)/Life Year Gain (LYG) based on methods and perspectives and the ICER of comparison of two-by-two strategies. CONCLUSION: Most of the CRC screening strategies were cost-effective, but there was big heterogeneity between the cost-effectiveness analysis of CRC screening strategies because of different screening methods, perspectives and screening populations. So, it is important to consider this heterogeneity to compare the economic evaluation studies in this field.

Nurse's Roles in Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Narrative Review.

The objective of this paper is to investigate the different roles of nurses as members of healthcare teams at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of colorectal cancer prevention. The research team conducted a narrative review of studies involving the role of nurses at different levels of colorectal cancer prevention, which included a variety of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, Magiran, the Scientific Information Database (SID), Noormags, and the Islamic Science Citation (ISC) databases from ab initio until 2021. A total of 117 studies were reviewed. Nurses' roles were classified into three levels of prevention. At the primary level, the most important role related to educating people to prevent cancer and reduce risk factors. At the secondary level, the roles consisted of genetic counseling, stool testing, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, biopsy and screening test follow-ups, and chemotherapy intervention, while at the tertiary level, their roles were made up of pre-and post-operative care to prevent further complications, rehabilitation, and palliative care. Nurses at various levels of prevention care also act as educators, coordinators, performers of screening tests, follow-up, and provision of palliative and end-of-life care. If these roles are not fulfilled at some levels of colorectal cancer, it is generally due to the lack of knowledge and competence of nurses or the lack of instruction and legal support for them. Nurses need sufficient clinical knowledge and experience to perform these roles at all levels.

The Effects of Risk Factors on One- and Five-Year Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer in Isfahan in 2016.

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a frequent and multifactorial malignancy worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between some risk factors of GC and the 1-year or 5-year survival rates in newly diagnosed patients in Isfahan in 2016. Methods: We included 274 newly diagnosed patients in this survival analysis from a database of 484 GC cases. We used a checklist to collect information. To inform about missed data, we call the patients or their families in non-survived cases. We evaluated each patient's age, sex, body mass index (BMI), education, salt, salty foods, and red meat consumption. In addition, we asked patients about the intake of fresh fruits and vegetables, tobacco smoking, opium usage, and alcohol consumption. We surveyed the patient's job, physical activity, Helicobacter pylori infection, family history of GC, history of gastric surgery, and survival status after 1 or 5 years. Variables were evaluated between survived and dead patients and compared for means and frequencies using the independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney, or chi-square test. The univariate relationship of each risk factor, with 1- and 5-year survival, was examined by the log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meyer method and their multivariate relationship with Cox regression. Results: 1- and 5-year survived patients were younger than dead patients with GC (P<0.001; HR for 1-year survival: 1.014, 95% CI: 0.997 to 1.030; HR for 5-year survival: 1.005, 95% CI: 0.994 to 1.017), and had more frequent higher educational levels (P<0.05; HR for 1-year survival: 1.887, 95% CI: 1.046 to 3.406; HR for 5-year survival: 1.482, 95% CI: 0.987 to 2.223). The death rate after 5 years was higher in men than in women (P=0.009; HR: 1.009, 95% CI: 0.593 to 1.717) and depended on the job status of the patients (P=0.021). The other studied variables were not significantly different between 1- or 5-year survived and dead patients. Conclusion: GC development depends on genomic changes, environmental factors, and lifestyle status. But all risk factors that play a role in its development are not notable for a patient's survival. We suggest that risk factors for these patients' survival become elucidated in future studies. It helps to gather the necessary pieces of evidence for the enhancement of survival in patients with GC.

Gastric phytobezoars as a very unusual cause of gastric outlet obstruction.

Bezoars are collections of indigestible foreign material found in the gastrointestinal tract. Phytobezoars are the most common among the types of bezoars. Treatment of phytobezoars is categorized into four types: chemical dissolution, endoscopic removal, adjuvant prokinetics, and surgery. Complications from phytobezoars can include gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), ileus, ulcerations, gastrointestinal bleeding, and perforation. Herein, we present an 86-year-old woman with refractory postprandial vomiting. Then, exploratory laparotomy was performed and the diagnosis was gastric phytobezoar. Phytobezoars-induced GOO is rare and its diagnosis is still a challenge.