Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for combined aortic and mitral stenoses: Insights from the OCEAN-TAVI Registry.

AIMS: Mitral stenosis (MS) occasionally coexists with aortic stenosis (AS). Limited data are available regarding the functional class and clinical outcomes of patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for combined AS and MS. This study compared the clinical outcomes in patients with and without MS who underwent TAVI for severe AS and assessed the impact of mitral annulus calcification (MAC) severity, transmitral gradient (TMG) and mitral valve area (MVA) on outcomes in patients with combined AS and MS. METHODS: We investigated patients in the OCEAN-TAVI registry who underwent TAVI. MS was defined as an MVA ≤ 1.5 cm2 or TMG ≥ 5 mmHg. The composite of all-cause death and admission for heart failure was compared between patients with and without MS. The impact of MAC, TMG and MVA on outcomes was assessed in patients with combined AS and MS. RESULTS: We identified 106 patients with MS (MAC 84%; TMG 6.4 ± 2.6 mmHg; MVA 1.10 ± 0.31 cm2) and 6570 without MS as controls. The MS group was older (85 ± 5 vs. 84 ± 5 years, P = 0.033), more of women (85 vs. 67%, P < 0.01), and had a higher risk of surgery (the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Mortality Score 8.7 ± 5.1 vs. 7.6 ± 5.9, P = 0.047) than the controls. In the MS group, the New York Heart Association Functional Class was 3 or 4 in 56% of the patients at baseline and 6% at 1 year after TAVI. Thirty-day mortality (2.8% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.18) and early composite outcomes (17% vs. 15%, P = 0.56) were comparable between patients with and without MS. During a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the presence of MS was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events compared with controls (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-2.51, P < 0.01), even on propensity score matched analysis (adjusted HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.14-3.22, P < 0.01). Moderate or severe MAC contributed to increased risk of adverse events in patients with MS (adjusted HR 2.89; 95% CI 1.20-6.99, P = 0.018), but TMG and MVA did not. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing TAVI for severe AS, those with moderate or severe MS experienced worse outcomes after TAVI compared with those without MS. Patients with combined AS and MS sustained symptom improvement at 1-year post-TAVI. MAC severity was a useful predictor of adverse events compared with MS haemodynamics such as TMG and MVA in patients with combined AS and MS.

Evaluation of radiation dose to the lens in interventional cardiology physicians before and after dose limit regulation changes.

In response to the International Commission on Radiological Protection, which lowered the lens equivalent dose limit, Japan lowered the lens dose limit from 150 mSv y-1to 100 mSv/5 years and 50 mSv y-1, with this new rule taking effect on 1 April 2021. DOSIRIS®is a dosimeter that can accurately measure lens dose. Herein, we investigated lens dose in interventional cardiology physicians 1 year before and after the reduction of the lens dose limit using a neck dosimeter and lens dosimeter measurements. With an increase in the number of cases, both personal dose equivalent at 0.07 mm depth [Hp(0.07), neck dosimeter] and personal dose equivalent at 3 mm depth [Hp(3), lens dosimeter] increased for most of the physicians. The Hp(3) of the lens considering the shielding effect of the Pb glasses using lens dosimeter exceeded 20 mSv y-1for two of the 14 physicians. Protection from radiation dose will become even more important in the future, as these two physicians may experience radiation dose exceeding 100 mSv/5 years. The average dose per procedure increased, but not significantly. There was a strong correlation between the neck dosimeter and lens dosimeter scores, although there was no significant change before and after the lens dose limit was lowered. This correlation was particularly strong for physicians who primarily treated patients. As such, it is possible to infer accurate lens doses from neck doses in physicians who primarily perform diagnostics. However, it is desirable to use a dosimeter that can directly measure Hp(3) because of the high lens dose.

Midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with active cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant active cancer remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess the midterm outcomes of TAVR in patients diagnosed with AS and active cancer. METHODS: Data from the OCEAN-TAVI, a prospective Japanese registry of TAVR procedures, was analysed to compare prognoses and clinical outcomes in patients with and without active cancer at the time of TAVR. RESULTS: Of the 2336 patients who underwent TAVR from October 2013 to July 2017, 89 patients (3.8%) had active cancer, whereas 2247 did not. Among patients with active cancer, 49 had limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). The prevalent cancers identified before TAVR were colon (21%), prostate (18%), lung (15%), liver (11%) and breast (9%). Although the periprocedural complications and 30-day mortality rates were comparable between the groups, the 3-year survival rate after TAVR was notably lower in patients with active cancer (64.7%) than in those without active cancer (74.7%; p=0.016). Nevertheless, the 3-year survival rate of patients with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2) did not significantly differ from those without cancer (70.6% vs 74.7%, p=0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The patients with active cancer exhibited significantly reduced midterm survival rates. However, no distinct disparity existed in those with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). Although TAVR is a viable treatment in patients with AS with active cancer, the type and stage of cancer and prognosis should be carefully weighed in the decision-making process.

Rationale and design of Non-antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (NAPT) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the wide implementation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the optimal antithrombotic therapy after TAVI has not been established yet. Owing to the accumulating evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) over dual antiplatelet therapy, the latest guideline recommends life-long SAPT. However, there is scarce evidence supporting SAPT compared with non-antithrombotic therapy. Given the vulnerability of patients undergoing TAVI in terms of high bleeding risk, the benefit of SAPT may be canceled out by its potential increased bleeding risk. STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES: Non-antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (NAPT) Trial is a prospective, randomized controlled, open-label blinded endpoint multicenter trial conducted in Japan, testing the non-inferiority of non-antithrombotic therapy compared with aspirin monotherapy in patients who underwent TAVI and had no indications for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients who successfully underwent trans-femoral TAVI for severe aortic stenosis with either balloon-expandable or self-expandable valves are eligible for inclusion. Key exclusion criteria are (i) occurrence of perioperative complications (ii) indications of taking antithrombotic drugs for other reasons; (iii) eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. A total of 360 patients will be randomized (1:1) to aspirin monotherapy vs. non-antithrombotic therapy. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. All bleeding events based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 are included as a component of the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: The NAPT trial will determine the non-inferiority of a non-antithrombotic therapy compared with aspirin monotherapy after TAVI.

Eye Lens Radiation Dose to Nurses during Cardiac Interventional Radiology: An Initial Study.

Although interventional radiology (IVR) is preferred over surgical procedures because it is less invasive, it results in increased radiation exposure due to long fluoroscopy times and the need for frequent imaging. Nurses engaged in cardiac IVR receive the highest lens radiation doses among medical workers, after physicians. Hence, it is important to measure the lens exposure of IVR nurses accurately. Very few studies have evaluated IVR nurse lens doses using direct dosimeters. This study was conducted using direct eye dosimeters to determine the occupational eye dose of nurses engaged in cardiac IVR, and to identify simple and accurate methods to evaluate the lens dose received by nurses. Over 6 months, in a catheterization laboratory, we measured the occupational dose to the eyes (3 mm dose equivalent) and neck (0.07 mm dose equivalent) of nurses on the right and left sides. We investigated the relationship between lens and neck doses, and found a significant correlation. Hence, it may be possible to estimate the lens dose from the neck badge dose. We also evaluated the appropriate position (left or right) of eye dosimeters for IVR nurses. Although there was little difference between the mean doses to the right and left eyes, that to the right eye was slightly higher. In addition, we investigated whether it is possible to estimate doses received by IVR nurses from patient dose parameters. There were significant correlations between the measured doses to the neck and lens, and the patient dose parameters (fluoroscopy time and air kerma), implying that these parameters could be used to estimate the lens dose. However, it may be difficult to determine the lens dose of IVR nurses accurately from neck badges or patient dose parameters because of variation in the behaviors of nurses and the procedure type. Therefore, neck doses and patient dose parameters do not correlate well with the radiation eye doses of individual IVR nurses measured by personal eye dosimeters. For IVR nurses with higher eye doses, more accurate measurement of the radiation doses is required. We recommend that a lens dosimeter be worn near the eyes to measure the lens dose to IVR nurses accurately, especially those exposed to relatively high doses.

Usefulness of 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Images of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiogram in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Bentall Operation.

Anastomotic complications of the coronary arteries were observed in approximately 5% of patients undergoing Bentall-type surgery. Given the high surgical risk of reoperation, percutaneous coronary intervention could be a treatment for anastomotic complications but is challenging because of the complicated anatomy after Bentall-type surgery. Here, a 70-year-old man underwent a Bentall operation during which the left main coronary artery was accidentally injured. Therefore, coronary artery bypass using a saphenous vein graft was performed. The saphenous vein graft was anastomosed from the right side of the aortic graft to the left main coronary artery. Three years later, the patient presented with an anterior non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Because his unusual anatomy, the saphenous vein graft could not be cannulated with diagnostic catheters, even after perusing the surgical record of the Bentall surgery. Subsequently, coronary computed tomography angiography was performed. Three-dimensional reconstructed images visualized the positional relationship between the saphenous vein graft and anatomical landmarks, such as the implanted surgical valve prosthesis. The angiogram angle was adjusted using these landmarks and projection angles estimated by the images. Then, the ASAHI Hyperion Judkins right 4 catheter could be easily inserted, and percutaneous coronary intervention was successfully performed. Three-dimensional reconstruction images were useful for performing percutaneous coronary intervention by aiding in the identification of the anatomic location of the saphenous vein graft and the positional relationship between the saphenous vein graft and anatomic landmarks. In patients with unusual anatomy, as in this case, coronary computed tomography angiography should be strongly considered.

Atrial Septal Defect Closure via Left Subclavian Vein Approach in a Patient With Absent Inferior Vena Cava.

Without the femoral venous approach, transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect is challenging. We performed percutaneous closure via the left subclavian vein in a patient with absence of the inferior vena cava with azygos continuation. Considering that inferior vena cava anomalies are not extremely rare among those with congenital heart disease, the left subclavian vein approach can be an alternative to the femoral approach.

Risk assessment in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with post-procedural left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains high. We investigated clinical variables associating with worse clinical outcomes following TAVR in patients with systolic dysfunction. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 2588 patients with severe aortic stenosis who received TAVR and were enrolled in the optimized transcatheter valvular intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) multicenter registry (UMIN000020423). The association between the clinical variables following TAVR and 2-year cardiovascular mortality was investigated among those with post-TAVR left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%. RESULTS: A total of 298 patients (median 85 years old, 131 men) were included. The presence of moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation following TAVR was independently associated with 2-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 3.41, 95% confidence interval 1.15-10.1), and significantly discriminated 2-year cardiovascular mortality (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.001). No patients with any improvement in tricuspid regurgitation had cardiovascular death. CONCLUSION: Following TAVR, the existence of significant tricuspid regurgitation was associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Long-Term Prognostic Value of the Society of Thoracic Surgery Risk Score in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry).

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk model, designed to predict operative mortality after cardiac surgery, is often used for the risk assessment of patients considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We investigated the long-term prognostic value of the STS score by utilizing the data of 2588 patients undergoing TAVI from the OCEAN (Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention)-TAVI Japanese multicenter registry. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to their pre-procedural STS score as follows: low-risk (STS score <4%, n = 467 [18%]), intermediate-risk (4%≤ STS score <8%, n = 1200 [46.4%]), and high-risk (8%≤ STS score, n = 921 [35.6%]). Low-risk patients were younger and were more frequently male. The prevalence of most of the comorbidities were higher in high-risk patients, while active cancer was more frequent in low-risk patients (p <0.001).The cumulative 4-year all-cause mortality rates were higher in high-risk patients (49.0%) but comparable in low-risk (22.6%) and intermediate-risk patients (28.7%) (hazard ratio [HR] for intermediate-risk versus low-risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.37; p = 0.85; HR for high-risk versus low-risk, 2.27; 95% CI 1.72 to 2.99; p = <0.001). Similarly, the cumulative 4-year cardiovascular mortality rates were higher in high-risk patients (20.5%) but comparable in low-risk (9.9%) and intermediate-risk patients (10.3%) (HR for intermediate-risk versus low-risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.77; p = 0.69; HR for high-risk versus low-risk, 2.33; 95% CI 1.48 to 3.67; p = <0.001). After adjustment for several confounders, STS score ≥8% was independently associated with increased long-term mortality (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.68). In conclusion, the risk stratification according to STS score demonstrated an increased risk of long-term mortality after TAVI in high-risk patients, albeit with comparable risks in intermediate- and low-risk patients.

Venography and Selective Ablation for Recurrent Varices after Surgery Using Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter.

Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS) is a common problem with no established treatment. Ultrasonography is a hard method to identify the source of veins that cause REVAS, especially in obese patients with thick thighs. Here, we report the case of a 64-year-old obese patient who previously underwent endothermal venous ablation for her right great saphenous vein. The patient presented with right leg swelling and venous ulceration due to REVAS. Although the source of REVAS was unclear because the patient had thick thighs on ultrasonography assessment, venography revealed that the source of REVAS was the incompetent perforator vein (IPV). Selective ablation for the IPV with radiofrequency ablation catheter was performed. We could ablate the target veins selectively so as not to ablate within the deep vein. The patient remains asymptomatic for 2 years after the procedure, and there has been no recurrence of her varicose veins. Venography allows better visualization of the source of REVAS than ultrasonography. With selective ablation, it is especially effective procedure in obese patients, in whom it is difficult to identify and access the source of REVAS with ultrasonography.

Clinical risk model for predicting 1-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Estimating 1-year life expectancy is an essential factor when evaluating appropriate indicators for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: It is clinically useful in developing a reliable risk model for predicting 1-year mortality after TAVR. METHODS: We evaluated 2,588 patients who underwent TAVR using data from the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN) Japanese multicenter registry from October 2013 to May 2017. The 1-year clinical follow-up was achieved by 99.5% of the entire population (n = 2,575). Patients were randomly divided into two cohorts: the derivation cohort (n = 1,931, 75% of the study population) and the validation cohort (n = 644). Considerable clinical variables including individual patient's comorbidities and frailty markers were used for predicting 1-year mortality following TAVR. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, a multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that sex, body mass index, Clinical Frailty Scale, atrial fibrillation, peripheral artery disease, prior cardiac surgery, serum albumin, renal function as estimated glomerular filtration rate, and presence of pulmonary disease were independent predictors of 1-year mortality after TAVR. Using these variables, a risk prediction model was constructed to estimate the 1-year risk of mortality after TAVR. In the validation cohort, the risk prediction model revealed high discrimination ability and acceptable calibration with area under the curve of 0.763 (95% confidence interval, 0.728-0.795, p < .001) in the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis and a Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistic of 5.96 (p = .65). CONCLUSIONS: This risk prediction model for 1-year mortality may be a reliable tool for risk stratification and identification of adequate candidates in patients undergoing TAVR.

Percutaneous Aortic Valve Intervention in Patients Scheduled for Noncardiac Surgery: A Japanese Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of preexisting severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery (non-CS) remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous aortic valve intervention (PAVI) in patients with AS before non-CS. METHODS: We analyzed pooled data within a multicenter Japanese registry from 118 patients with severe AS who underwent PAVI before non-CS. Sixty patients underwent percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and 58 patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The groups' baseline characteristics, perioperative complications, and 30-day mortality and midterm mortality after non-CS were compared. RESULTS: The postprocedural mean pressure gradient was higher in the BAV group than in the TAVR group (35.0 ±â€¯11.5 mmHg vs. 11.5 ±â€¯4.8 mmHg, p < 0.001). The non-CS operation risk did not differ between the groups (p = 0.69). One patient in each group experienced a noncardiac death (p = 0.74), and the 30-day mortality rate after non-CS was 1.7%. Heart failure occurred in 2 patients in each group (p = 0.68). One patient in the TAVR group experienced a non-disabling stroke, and no myocardial infarctions occurred. Consequently, the combined adverse events were 5.0% and 6.9% in the 2 groups (p = 0.48). The bleeding rates during the non-CS were similar in both groups (33.3% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.25). There were no differences between the groups regarding midterm mortality (p = 0.60), whereas 53.3% of the patients in the BAV group required invasive treatment of their AS during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe AS, PAVI before non-CS reduces the AS severity and may contribute to procedural safety during non-CS.

Successful percutaneous treatment of recurrent post-infarction ventricular septal rupture using an Amplatzer duct occluder.

A 78-year-old woman was brought to our hospital for chest pain with shock status. An electrocardiogram showed ST elevation in the precordial leads. Echocardiography showed an anteroseptal wall motion abnormality with left-to-right shunt at the apex. Emergency coronary angiography revealed occlusion in the mid portion of the left anterior descending artery, and left ventriculography showed ventricular septal rupture (VSR). Despite successful emergency surgical VSR repair, the VSR recurred 10 days after surgery, and the patient required intra-aortic balloon pumping and mechanical ventilation. Although reoperation for VSR closure was attempted 33 days after admission, open heart surgery was not completed due to severe tissue adhesions from the prior cardiac surgery. The patient ultimately underwent transcatheter closure for VSR using an Amplatzer duct occluder 56 days after hospital admission, and her hemodynamics markedly improved. She was transferred to a regional hospital for rehabilitation without oxygen therapy or intravenous treatments 81 days after the percutaneous intervention. In conclusion, percutaneous device closure of post-infarction VSR may be an alternative treatment to surgical repair for inoperable cases. .

Prognostic impact and periprocedural complications of chronic steroid therapy in patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Propensity-matched analysis from the Japanese OCEAN registry.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of chronic steroid use on periprocedural complications and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid use increases the risk of periprocedural complications and mortality during surgery. METHODS: We investigated 1,313 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral (TF)-TAVR using data from a Japanese multicenter registry. The baseline characteristics, periprocedural complications including vascular complications (VCs), access route related VCs, and clinical outcomes were compared between patients in the steroid group and nonsteroid group. RESULTS: Major VCs and access route VCs occurred more in the steroid group than in the nonsteroid group (13.4 vs. 5.8%, p = .019; 20.9% vs. 9.8%, p = .004). Especially in the surgical cut-down group, the rate of access route VCs was differed between the two groups (28.0% vs. 7.5%, p = .003). The 30-day mortality rates were similar between the two groups (0% vs. 1.4%, p = .39). In the propensity score-matched model, the higher incidence of major VCs in the steroid group was maintained, although early mortality was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although chronic steroid therapy is not associated with increased early mortality, chronic steroid use may affect periprocedural VCs and access route VCs mainly due to surgical cut-down in patients following TF-TAVR.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation after aortic valve neocuspidization using autologous pericardium: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo), a novel surgical procedure used in the treatment of aortic valve diseases, including aortic stenosis (AS), involves the replacement of three aortic valve cusps by glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. Although reoperation risk is low, no case report on the deterioration of the AVNeo has yet been published. CASE SUMMARY: An 80-year-old woman who underwent AVNeo for severe degenerative tricuspid AS 6 years previously complained of shortness of breath. Echocardiographic assessment revealed the reconstructed aortic valve leaflet was elongated, thickened, and marginally calcified resulting in recurrent severe AS. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve was successfully performed. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first case report regarding the structural deterioration of the AVNeo resulting in restenosis 6 years after the first surgery. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is possibly a suitable approach for post-procedural recurrence after AVNeo to avoid redo open-heart surgery which would be of prohibitive risk especially in an elderly population.

Utility of preprocedural multidetector computed tomography in alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Preprocedural computed tomography (CT) imaging appears to provide an advantage in localization of the appropriate septal branch targeted for alcohol septal ablation (ASA). The objective of this study was to compare the clinical backgrounds, procedural characteristics, and outcomes of patients who underwent ASA with preprocedural CT assessment against those without CT assessment. Thirty consecutive patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent ASA were retrospectively included. Patients who underwent preprocedural CT (CT-guided ASA group, n = 11) were compared with patients who underwent ASA without CT (traditional ASA group, n = 19). The CT-guided ASA group had a significantly lower number of approached target vessels (1 [interquartile range {IQR}, 1-2] vs. 2 [IQR, 2-3], P = 0.036) and non-ablated target vessels (0 [IQR, 0-1] vs. 1 [IQR, 0-2], P = 0.031) than the traditional ASA group. There were no differences between the two groups in total fluoroscopy time, the amount of delivered radiation dose, and the volume of contrast medium used during the procedures. There were also no differences between the two groups in procedural success rate and improvement of left ventricular outflow tract gradient and New York Heart Association functional class at 1 month follow-up. CT had a significant impact on the ASA procedure diminishing the number of target vessels, and could be a reliable assessment modality to build its procedural strategy.

Comparison of midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with and without previous coronary artery bypass grafting.

The midterm safety and feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for patients with a history of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and high operative risk are unclear. This study compared the midterm outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI with or without previous CABG surgery. Between October 2013 and July 2016, 1,613 patients underwent TAVI according to the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN)-TAVI registry (previous CABG: n = 120; no previous CABG: n = 1493). The propensity score comprised the variables of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score, previous myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease > stage 2 (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and the TAVI approach method. After propensity matching, 118 patients were classified into the CABG and non-CABG groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the incidence of overall cardiovascular death in the CABG group was significantly higher than in the non-CABG group (log-rank; p = 0.004). Overall mortality due to heart failure was higher in the CABG than in the non-CABG group (8.5 vs. 1.7%, p = 0.038). The present study demonstrated that patients with a history of CABG who underwent TAVI had a higher frequency of cardiovascular death, mainly due to heart failure. Heart failure detection and rigorous heart failure management are required after TAVI.

Impact of HAS-BLED score to predict trans femoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Predictors of bleeding and mortality after trans femoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) has not been thoroughly investigated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/alcohol concomitantly (HAS-BLED) score has predictive value for bleeding and mortality in patients after TAVR. METHODS: Between October 2013 and April 2016, 969 patients underwent TF-TAVI were prospectively included in the OCEAN-TAVI registry from Japan. The primary outcomes were severe bleeding (including life-threatening and major bleeding defined in The Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria) and mortality within 1 year after TAVR. RESULTS: Elderly (84 ± 5 years) and high surgical risk patients (The Society of Thoracic Surgery Risk Score 6.7 [4.6-9.3]) were enrolled. Severe bleeding and mortality had occurred in 177 patients (18.2%) and 66 patients (6.8%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, HAS-BLED score was associated with severe bleeding (hazard ratio [HR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-2.00; p < 0.001) and mortality (HR, 2.04, 95% CI, 1.56-2.69, P < 0.001). A HAS-BLED score threshold of 4 points (area under the curve 0.71 for severe bleeding, 0.72 for mortality) predicted a higher rate of severe bleeding (25.3% vs. 14.4%, P < 0.001) and mortality (16.2% vs. 4.0%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HAS-BLED score could predict the risk of severe bleeding and mortality in patients who underwent TF-TAVR independent of the presence of atrial fibrillation.

Safety and efficacy of minimalist approach in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular interventioN-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (OCEAN-TAVI) registry.

OBJECTIVES: Favourable results have been reported for monitored anaesthesia care that includes local anaesthesia and conscious sedation [minimalist approach (MA)] for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the efficacy of MA is still controversial in Japan. We describe our experience from a Japanese multicentre registry. METHODS: Between October 2013 and April 2016, 1215 consecutive Japanese patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR with self-expandable or balloon-expandable valves were prospectively included in the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular intervention-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (OCEAN-TAVI) registry. Of these patients, we retrospectively reviewed 921 consecutive patients who underwent elective transfemoral-TAVR. We evaluated the perioperative results of MA-TAVR and non-minimalist approach (NMA) TAVR using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients underwent MA-TAVR, and 802 patients underwent NMA-TAVR [median age 84 vs 85 years, P = 0.25; Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score 7.6 vs 6.4, P = 0.01]. One hundred eighteen matched pairs were compared after propensity score matching. In-hospital mortality and stroke/transient ischaemic attack were not significantly different between the MA-TAVR and the NMA-TAVR groups (2.5% vs 0.8%, P = 0.3; 1.7% vs 0.8%, P = 0.6, respectively). Major or life-threatening bleeding and the transfusion rate were significantly lower in the MA-TAVR group (3.4% vs 17%, P = 0.003; 6.8% vs 29%, P = 0.0002, respectively). The total intensive care unit days and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the MA-TAVR group (P ≤ 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: MA-TAVR has similar results to NMA-TAVR in terms of mortality and stroke in this Japanese multicentre registry. Shorter procedure time and hospital stays were seen in the MA-TAVR group. MA-TAVR is as safe and effective as NMA-TAVR.