Pan-Asian adaptation of the EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx was published in 2020. It was therefore decided by both the ESMO and the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO) to convene a special, virtual guidelines meeting in July 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2020 guidelines to consider the potential ethnic differences associated with the treatment of SCCs of the head and neck (SCCHN) in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with SCCHN (excluding nasopharyngeal carcinomas) representing the oncological societies of Korea (KSMO), China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug access restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter was discussed when appropriate. This manuscript provides a series of expert recommendations (Clinical Practice Guidelines) which can be used to provide guidance to health care providers and clinicians for the optimisation of the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with SCC of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx across Asia.

Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated clinical benefit in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Combining immunotherapies targeting PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has shown evidence of additive activity in several tumor types. This phase III study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody) versus standard of care (SoC) in R/M HNSCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 : 1 : 1 durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [q2w]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (durvalumab 20 mg/kg q4w plus tremelimumab 1 mg/kg q4w × 4, then durvalumab 10 mg/kg q2w), or SoC (cetuximab, a taxane, methotrexate, or a fluoropyrimidine). The primary end points were overall survival (OS) for durvalumab versus SoC, and OS for durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and duration of response. RESULTS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (n = 240), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 247), or SoC (n = 249). No statistically significant improvements in OS were observed for durvalumab versus SoC [hazard ratio (HR): 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-1.08; P = 0.20] or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85-1.26; P = 0.76). The 12-month survival rates (95% CI) were 37.0% (30.9-43.1), 30.4% (24.7-36.3), and 30.5% (24.7-36.4) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were consistent with previous reports. The most common trAEs (any grade) were hypothyroidism for durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (11.4% and 12.2%, respectively), and anemia (17.5%) for SoC. Grade ≥3 trAE rates were 10.1%, 16.3%, and 24.2% for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences in OS for durvalumab or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. However, higher survival rates at 12 to 24 months and response rates demonstrate clinical activity for durvalumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02369874.

Phase II trial of combination treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CSPOR-HN02).

Background: The standard of care for first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) is combination treatment with platinum, 5-FU and cetuximab (PFE). However, this regimen requires hospitalization to ensure proper hydration and continuous infusion of 5-FU, and causes severe nausea and anorexia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) as first-line treatment in patients with R/M SCCHN. Patients and methods: Eligibility criteria included recurrent and/or metastatic, histologically proven SCC of the oropharynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx or larynx; PS 0-1; adequate organ function; no suitable local therapy for R/M SCCHN; and no prior systemic chemotherapy for R/M SCCHN. Chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8; carboplatin area under the blood concentration-time curve 2.5 on days 1, 8, repeated every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles; and cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg/m2, followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Primary end point was overall response rate. Secondary end points were safety, treatment completion rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and clinical benefit rate. Planned sample size was 45 patients. Results: Forty-seven subjects were accrued from July 2013 to October 2014. Of 45 evaluable, 40 were male; median age was 63 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status was 0/1 in 23/22 cases; site was the hypopharynx/oropharynx/oral cavity/larynx in 17/11/10/7 cases; and 36/9 cases were smokers/nonsmokers, respectively. Overall response rate, the primary end point, was 40%. Median overall survival was 14.7 months and progression-free survival was 5.2 months. Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (68%), skin reaction (15%), fatigue (9%) and febrile neutropenia (9%). A potentially treatment-related death occurred in one patient with intestinal pneumonia. Conclusions: The PCE regimen shows promising activity with acceptable toxicity in the outpatient clinic. Further studies are needed to compare PCE with PFE in this population. Registered clinical trial number: UMIN000010507.

Biomarkers predict enhanced clinical outcomes with afatinib versus methotrexate in patients with second-line recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the phase III LUX-Head & Neck 1 (LUX-H&N1) trial, second-line afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus methotrexate in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Here, we evaluated association of prespecified biomarkers with efficacy outcomes in LUX-H&N1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomized patients with R/M HNSCC and progression following ≥2 cycles of platinum therapy received afatinib (40 mg/day) or methotrexate (40 mg/m2/week). Tumor/serum samples were collected at study entry for patients who volunteered for inclusion in biomarker analyses. Tumor biomarkers, including p16 (prespecified subgroup; all tumor subsites), EGFR, HER2, HER3, c-MET and PTEN, were assessed using tissue microarray cores and slides; serum protein was evaluated using the VeriStrat® test. Biomarkers were correlated with efficacy outcomes. RESULTS: Of 483 randomized patients, 326 (67%) were included in the biomarker analyses; baseline characteristics were consistent with the overall study population. Median PFS favored afatinib over methotrexate in patients with p16-negative [2.7 versus 1.6 months; HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.50-0.97)], EGFR-amplified [2.8 versus 1.5 months; HR 0.53 (0.33-0.85)], HER3-low [2.8 versus 1.8 months; HR 0.57 (0.37-0.88)], and PTEN-high [1.6 versus 1.4 months; HR 0.55 (0.29-1.05)] tumors. Afatinib also improved PFS in combined subsets of patients with p16-negative and EGFR-amplified tumors [2.7 versus 1.5 months; HR 0.47 (0.28-0.80)], and patients with p16-negative tumors who were EGFR therapy-naïve [4.0 versus 2.4 months; HR 0.55 (0.31-0.98)]. PFS was improved in afatinib-treated patients who were VeriStrat 'Good' versus 'Poor' [2.7 versus 1.5 months; HR 0.71 (0.49-0.94)], but no treatment interaction was observed. Afatinib improved tumor response versus methotrexate in all subsets analyzed except for those with p16-positive disease (n = 35). CONCLUSIONS: Subgroups of HNSCC patients who may achieve increased benefit from afatinib were identified based on prespecified tumor biomarkers (p16-negative, EGFR-amplified, HER3-low, PTEN-high). Future studies are warranted to validate these findings. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01345682.

Efficacy and safety of rebamipide liquid for chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Recent preclinical and phase I studies have reported that rebamipide decreased the severity of chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients with oral cancer. This placebo-controlled randomized phase II study assessed the clinical benefit of rebamipide in reducing the incidence of severe chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Patients aged 20-75 years with HNC who were scheduled to receive chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive rebamipide 2% liquid, rebamipide 4% liquid, or placebo. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade ≥ 3 oral mucositis determined by clinical examination and assessed by central review according to the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 3.0. Secondary endpoints were the time to onset of grade ≥ 3 oral mucositis and the incidence of functional impairment (grade ≥ 3) based on the evaluation by the Oral Mucositis Evaluation Committee. RESULTS: From April 2014 to August 2015, 97 patients with HNC were enrolled, of whom 94 received treatment. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 oral mucositis was 29% and 25% in the rebamipide 2% and 4% groups, respectively, compared with 39% in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who did not develop grade ≥ 3 oral mucositis by day 50 of treatment was 57.9% in the placebo group, whereas the proportion was 68.0% in the rebamipide 2% group and 71.3% in the rebamipide 4% group. The incidences of adverse events potentially related to the study drug were 16%, 26%, and 13% in the placebo, rebamipide 2%, and rebamipide 4% groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in treatment compliance among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present phase II study suggests that mouth washing with rebamipide may be effective and safe for patients with HNC receiving chemoradiotherapy, and 4% liquid is the optimal dose of rebamipide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT02085460 (the date of trial registration: March 11, 2014).

T-bet over-expression regulates aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated T helper type 17 differentiation through an interferon (IFN)γ-independent pathway.

Various transcription factors are also known to enhance or suppress T helper type 17 (Th17) differentiation. We have shown previously that the development of collagen-induced arthritis was suppressed in T-bet transgenic (T-bet Tg) mice, and T-bet seemed to suppress Th17 differentiation through an interferon (IFN)-γ-independent pathway, although the precise mechanism remains to be clarified. The present study was designed to investigate further the mechanisms involved in the regulation of Th17 differentiation by T-bet over-expression, and we found the new relationship between T-bet and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). Both T-bet Tg mice and IFN-γ-/- -over-expressing T-bet (T-bet Tg/IFN-γ-/- ) mice showed inhibition of retinoic acid-related orphan receptor (ROR)γt expression and IL-17 production by CD4+ T cells cultured under conditions that promote Th-17 differentiation, and decreased IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) expression and signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT-3) phosphorylation in CD4+ T cells. The mRNA expression of ahr and rorc were suppressed in CD4+ T cells cultured under Th-17 conditions from T-bet Tg mice and T-bet Tg/IFN-γ-/- mice. CD4+ T cells of wild-type (WT) and IFN-γ-/- mice transduced with T-bet-expressing retrovirus also showed inhibition of IL-17 production, whereas T-bet transduction had no effect on IL-6R expression and STAT-3 phosphorylation. Interestingly, the mRNA expression of ahr and rorc were suppressed in CD4+ T cells with T-bet transduction cultured under Th17 conditions. The enhancement of interleukin (IL)-17 production from CD4+ T cells by the addition of AHR ligand with Th17 conditions was cancelled by T-bet over-expression. Our findings suggest that T-bet over-expression-induced suppression of Th17 differentiation is mediated through IFN-γ-independent AHR suppression.

Afatinib versus methotrexate in older patients with second-line recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis of the LUX-Head & Neck 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the phase III LUX-Head & Neck 1 (LHN1) trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus methotrexate in recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients progressing on/after platinum-based therapy. This report evaluates afatinib efficacy and safety in prespecified subgroups of patients aged ≥65 and <65 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized (2:1) to 40 mg/day oral afatinib or 40 mg/m(2)/week intravenous methotrexate. PFS was the primary end point; overall survival (OS) was the key secondary end point. Other end points included: objective response rate (ORR), patient-reported outcomes, tumor shrinkage, and safety. Disease control rate (DCR) was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 483 randomized patients, 27% (83 afatinib; 45 methotrexate) were aged ≥65 years (older) and 73% (239 afatinib; 116 methotrexate) <65 years (younger) at study entry. Similar PFS benefit with afatinib versus methotrexate was observed in older {median 2.8 versus 2.3 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-1.03], P = 0.061} and younger patients [2.6 versus 1.6 months, HR = 0.79 (0.62-1.01), P = 0.052]. In older and younger patients, the median OS with afatinib versus methotrexate was 7.3 versus 6.4 months [HR = 0.84 (0.54-1.31)] and 6.7 versus 6.2 months [HR = 0.98 (0.76-1.28)]. ORRs with afatinib versus methotrexate were 10.8% versus 6.7% and 10.0% versus 5.2%; DCRs were 53.0% versus 37.8% and 47.7% versus 38.8% in older and younger patients, respectively. In both subgroups, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events were rash/acne (73%-77%) and diarrhea (70%-80%) with afatinib, and stomatitis (43%) and fatigue (31%-34%) with methotrexate. Fewer treatment-related discontinuations were observed with afatinib (each subgroup 7% versus 16%). A trend toward improved time to deterioration of global health status, pain, and swallowing with afatinib was observed in both subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Advancing age (≥65 years) did not adversely affect clinical outcomes or safety with afatinib versus methotrexate in second-line R/M HNSCC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01345682 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

KRAS mutations in primary tumours and post-FOLFOX metastatic lesions in cases of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations are predictive markers for the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibody therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Although the mutational status of KRAS is reportedly highly concordant between primary and metastatic lesions, it is not yet clear whether genotoxic chemotherapies might induce additional mutations. METHODS: A total of 63 lesions (23 baseline primary, 18 metastatic and 24 post-treatment metastatic) from 21 patients who were treated with FOLFOX as adjuvant therapy for stage III/IV colorectal cancer following curative resection were examined. The DNA samples were obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens, and KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were evaluated. RESULTS: The numbers of primary lesions with wild-type and mutant KRAS codons 12 and 13 were 8 and 13, respectively. The mutational status of KRAS remained concordant between the primary tumours and the post-FOLFOX metastatic lesions, irrespective of patient background, treatment duration and disease-free survival. Furthermore, the mutational statuses of the other genes evaluated were also concordant between the primary and metastatic lesions. CONCLUSION: Because the mutational statuses of predictive biomarker genes were not altered by FOLFOX therapy, specimens from both primary tumours and post-FOLFOX tumour metastases might serve as valid sources of DNA for known genomic biomarker testing.

KRAS mutations detected by the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assays strongly correlate with therapeutic effect of cetuximab.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the sensitive and quality-controlled KRAS testing with direct sequencing and to assess the impact on decision making of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed genomic DNA isolated from macrodissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens by direct sequencing and an amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assay (ARMS/S) method. Cetuximab was administered to patients identified as having wild-type (WT) KRAS using direct sequencing. Therapeutic effects were evaluated according to their KRAS status as determined by ARMS/S. RESULTS: Among the 159 patients, the overall mutation rate was determined to be 37.0% by direct sequencing and 44.0% by ARMS/S. For the patients diagnosed as WT by direct sequencing and treated with cetuximab (n=47), a response rate of 16.0% was observed for 38 ARMS/S WT patients, whereas 9 ARMS/S mutant (MUT) patients failed to respond. The ARMS/S WT patients showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with ARMS/S MUT patients (PFS median 5.0 vs 1.7 months, hazards ratio (HR)=0.29, P=0.001; OS median 12.1 vs 3.8 months, HR=0.26, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Sensitive and quality-controlled KRAS testing may provide improved predictive power to determine the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies.

Phase I trial of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 (TPS) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: we investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combination therapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (TPS) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: treatment consisted of docetaxel (Taxotere) at doses of 50, 60, and 70 mg/m(2); cisplatin at 70 mg·m(2)/day on day 1; and S-1 twice daily on days 1-14 at doses of 40, 60, and 80 mg·m(2)/day, repeated every 3 or 4 weeks. RESULTS: forty patients were enrolled. MTD was not reached until level 4. Subjects at expanded dose were limited to patients with locally advanced disease. Two dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs) were observed at dose level 5 (TPS: 70/70/80 mg·m(2)/day, every 3 weeks), namely one grade 3 infection and one grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, establishing this as the MTD. Of 12 patients treated at dose level 6 (TPS: 70/70/60 mg·m(2)/day, every 3 weeks), 2 DLTs were seen. Six achieved a complete response and 22 a partial response, giving a response rate of 70%. CONCLUSIONS: TPS was well tolerated. The recommended phase II dose as induction chemotherapy for locally advanced HNC was determined as 70/70/60 mg·m(2)/day every 3 weeks. Antitumor activity was highly promising and warrants further investigation.

Weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) by combined analysis of early and late phase II trials. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included histologically proven HNC with recurrent or metastatic disease, measurable disease, PS 0-2, and one or no prior chemotherapy regimens. Treatment consisted of a 1-h infusion of paclitaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks of a 7-week cycle. A total of 74 patients were enrolled: 37 between February and November 2004 in an early phase II trial and 37 between October 2005 and July 2006 in a late phase II trial. RESULTS: The median number of treatment cycles was two, and median dose intensity was 84.2 mg/m(2)/week. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia (37.5%), neutropenia (30.6%), anemia (12.5%), constipation (8.3%), peripheral neuropathy (5.6%), anorexia (5.6%), and pneumonitis (5.6%). Overall response rate was 29.0% according to RECIST. The median duration of response, median time to progression, and median survival time were 7.4, 3.4, and 14.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that weekly paclitaxel has promising activity with acceptable toxicity in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic HNC.

Clinical features of interstitial lung disease induced by standard chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is rarely reported, but its clinical features remain to be clarified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a computerized database, we retrospectively identified patients who developed ILD from 734 patients with CRC treated with infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) from April 2005 to December 2008 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. RESULTS: Of 734 patients, 11 patients developed ILD (1.5%) and 4 of those patients died (0.54%). Of the 11 patients, 10 showed pulmonary shadows other than lung metastases before chemotherapy. ILD developed during FOLFOX in six patients, at 137 days after completion of FOLFOX in one patient, during oxaliplatin interruption of FOLFOX in one patient and during FOLFIRI in the remaining three patients. FOLFOX had been administered at some point for all ILD patients, with a median of 10 cycles (range 2-17 cycles) and a median dose of administered oxaliplatin of 850 mg/m(2) (range 170-1445 mg/m(2)). CONCLUSIONS: ILD following FOLFOX or FOLFIRI is an uncommon but life-threatening complication. Care must be taken regarding the onset of ILD, not only during but also after chemotherapy for CRC.

Phase I/II study of oxaliplatin with oral S-1 as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Two phase II studies of S-1 monotherapy have shown promising response rates (RR) of 35-40% with good tolerability in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. To investigate the usefulness of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) as an alternative to infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin, the recommended dose (RD) of SOX was determined, and its safety and preliminary efficacy were evaluated in a phase I/II study. Oxaliplatin was administered at a dose of 100 mg m(-2) (level 1) or 130 mg m(-2) (level 2) on day 1, and S-1 (80-120) was given twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest. This schedule was repeated every 3 weeks. Level 2 was determined to be the RD. For the 28 patients who received the RD, the median treatment course was 6.5 cycles (2-14), RR of 50% (1 CR and 13 PR: 95% CI 31-69%), with a median progression-free survival of 196 days. Survival rate (1 year) was 79%. Peripheral neuropathy was observed in all patients but with no functional disorders. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions at the RD were neutropaenia (14%), thrombocytopaenia (28%), and diarrhoea (3%). SOX regimen is effective and easily manageable without central vein access.

A case of plasmacytic hyperplasia arising in a kidney allograft salvaged with immunosuppression reduction alone.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-known complication of organ transplantation. Plasmacytic hyperplasia (PH) is thought of as the mildest form of PTLD; however, a graftectomy is necessary in most situations. We experienced an interesting case of PH arising in a kidney allograft, which could be relieved with a reduction in immunosuppression. A 27-year-old female underwent a living-related kidney transplantation. A 3-month non-episode protocol biopsy unexpectedly showed the devastating appearance of polymorphic plasma cell infiltration into the graft intersitium, compatible with PH. The PH was located in the graft by radiographic examinations. The infiltration of plasma cell disappeared completely on the 6-month graft biopsy specimen following immunosuppression reduction and the graft is functioning, although it was damaged by a subsequent acute rejection. Our present case indicates that some PTLD can be completely cured with a reduction in immunosuppression alone. The diagnostic modality for the evaluation of PTLD cell extinction is necessary to maintain graft function with adequate immunosuppression thereafter.

[Induction chemoradiotherapy in small adenocarcinoma of the lung with bulky mediatinal lymph node metastasis].

A 56-year-old man, who visited our hospital due to chest pain, was pointed out a large tumor, 60 mm in diameter, on the left superior mediastinum on the chest computed tomography (CT) scan. He was diagnosed as having mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis of adenocarcinoma through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) biopsy. He received induction chemoradiotherapy: cisplatin and paclitaxel were administered once per week for 2 weeks, and radiotherapy was simultaneously performed. No serious adverse reactions were noted. The ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes dissection was performed. Intraoperative frozen section analysis showed a small nodule in the left upper lobe, 5 mm in diameter, was adenocarcinoma. He was finally diagnosed as having mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis from the small adenocarcinoma of the lung, and left upper lobectomy was performed. Histopathological examination of the mediastinal lymph nodes showed no evidence of viable maligmant cell. Induction chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and paclitaxel might be effective treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Discrepancies between the gene expression, protein expression, and enzymatic activity of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in human gastrointestinal cancers and adjacent normal mucosa.

The relationships between gene expression, protein expression, and enzymatic activity of thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) have not been clarified in tumor and non-tumor tissues of human. In this study, we compared three different parameters by evaluating TS and DPD levels, mRNA expression assessed by RT-PCR, protein expression evaluated by immunohistochemical examination, and enzymatic activity measured by biochemical assay, in the tumor tissue and adjacent normal mucosa of 43 patients with gastrointestinal cancer. TS enzymatic activity in the tumor tissue was significantly higher than in normal tissue in both the stomach (median activity: 81.0 and 38.0 pmol/mg protein, respectively, p=0.012) and the colorectum (49.8 and 30.8, respectively, p=0.023). Similarly, TS mRNA expression in the tumor tissue was significantly higher than in normal tissue in both the stomach (median TS/GAPDH ratio: 6.0 and 2.0, respectively, p=0.009) and the colorectum (3.20 and 0.91, respectively, p=0.001). But no significant differences in DPD activity were observed between the tumor and normal tissue in either stomach (median activity: 41.3 and 41.6 pmol/min/mg protein, respectively) or colorectum (34.9 and 49.0, respectively). On the other hand, DPD mRNA levels in normal tissue were significantly higher than in tumor tissue only in the colorectum (DPD/GAPDH ratio: 0.83 and 0.20, respectively, p=0.003). No linear relationships were found between the enzymatic activity and mRNA expression of TS or DPD either in tumor or normal tissue. Nor were any correlations found between protein expression and either mRNA expression or enzymatic activity for either TS or DPD. These results suggest that tissue TS and DPD levels may vary with differences in the methods used to measure them. These discrepancies must be taken into account when interpreting correlation between TS and DPD levels and clinical outcome.

Sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Most gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination have been excluded from clinical studies because they usually have no measurable lesions. They also have a high risk of toxicity because of complications such as intestinal obstruction and ascites. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of sequential methotrexate (MTX) and 5-flurorouracil (5FU) therapy for this population. METHODS: This analysis was based on 56 consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with confirmed peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer who were being treated with sequential MTX/5FU. The therapy comprised a weekly schedule of MTX 100 mg/m2, given as a bolus infusion 3 h prior to a bolus infusion of 5FU 600 mg/m2. Leucovorin 10mg/m2 was administered six times, every 6h, starting 24h after MTX administration. RESULTS: Evidence of peritoneal dissemination was confirmed by laparotomy in 16 patients, by cytologic examination of ascites in 11 patients, and by clinical imaging in 29 patients (15 with ascites, 13 with intestinal obstruction; in 10 of the 29 patients, detection was by barium enema or computed tomography [CT] scan). Neutropenia of grade 3 or worse and anemia were observed in 8 (14%) and 10 (18%) of the 56 patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis. Of the 26 patients with measurable lesions, 9 showed a response (36%). The median survival time and median time to treatment failure were 259 days and 167 days, respectively. Objective improvement of ascites was seen in 13 of 26 patients (50%), including 5 with showed complete disappearance of ascites. Seven of the 15 patients (47%) with intestinal obstruction showed resolution, and 8 of the 21 patients (38%) who needed nutritional support before the treatment were free of that support for a median duration of 220 days after the completion of the treatment. Forty-seven of the 56 patients (84%) could be treated at outpatient clinics. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen may be of clinical benefit for patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer.

[Latest progress on chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer].

Although recent phase II studies have demonstrated high antitumor activity in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, no significant survival benefit has been clearly demonstrated yet, when compared with 5-FU alone. More recently, a number of new agents including irinotecan and S-1 have demonstrated significant activity against gastric cancer as single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. A phase III trial of 5-FU alone versus irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone in advanced gastric cancer patients will be initiated in Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) within a few months. These new regimens have a potential becoming a new standard chemotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer. The patients with peritoneal dissemination has usually not yet evaluated and explored from clinical study because of risk of toxicity and having no measurable disease. A next randomized phase III trial comparing 5-FU alone with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with peritoneal metastasis will be initiated in JCOG next year. The development of molecular biology has demonstrated the molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance or chemosensitivity, as well as a number of molecular targets against cancer cells. To date, many molecular targeted agents are being evaluated in various stages of clinical testing. These advances may provide a possibility of tailor made treatment.

[Dose escalation strategies of molecular target drugs].

During the last decade, advances in cell biology and molecular biology have produced molecular targets for cancer treatment, and many molecular targeted drugs, or "cytostatic agents," have been clinically evaluated. Dose limiting toxicities are not always observed with these drugs and there is little relationship between drug dose and biological effect. Therefore, the traditional strategy used in the clinical development of cytotoxic drugs may not be appropriate for evaluation of these cytostatic agents. In order to determine the optimum dose for these agents, new clinical strategies must be developed on the basis of the following considerations: 1. the relationship between the effective plasma concentration in preclinical data and mean trough plasma levels in clinical trials, 2. changes in plasma concentration in the tumor or expression of molecular targets according to dose escalation, and 3. application of surrogate markers for biological activity.