The impact of delayed versus early administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on transplantation outcome.

Objectives: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is routinely administered after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) to decrease the duration of neutropenia and diminish the incidence of febrile neutropenia. Nevertheless, the most advantageous timeframe for administering G-CSF in the transplantation setting remains elusive. Material and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 200 patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies who underwent auto-HSCT between July 2017 and January 2022. Patients were divided into two groups of 100 individuals based on the timing of G-CSF administration after auto-HSCT. In the first group, G-CSF was administered on post-transplantation day +1, while in the second group, G-CSF was administered on post-transplantation day +5. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes, including time to neutrophil engraftment, time to platelet engraftment, length of hospital stay, duration of fever, and incidence of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections, were compared between the two groups. Results: We identified a significantly shorter platelet engraftment time in the day +5 group than in the day +1 group (P<0.001), though the groups were similar regarding neutrophil engraftment time. The total number of G-CSF injections differed significantly according to the administration schedule. The number of red blood cells and length of hospital stay was greater in the day +1 group (all P<0.001). The incidence of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections and duration of fever did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: Delayed administration of G-CSF on day +5 is as effective as early administration and can positively influence platelet engraftment, transfusion support, and hospitalization time.

The performance of Machine Learning for prediction of H3K27M Mutation in Midline Gliomas; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) encompass a set of tumors, and those tumors with H3K27M mutation carry a poor prognosis. In recent years, machine learning (ML)-based radiomics have shown promising results in predicting gene mutation status non-invasively. Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic performance of ML-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in predicting H3K27M mutation status in DMG patients. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using relevant keywords in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to May 2023. Original studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of ML models in predicting H3K27M mutation status in DMGs were enrolled. Quality assessment of the enrolled studies was conducted using QUADAS-2. Data were analyzed using STATA version 17.0 to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic score, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). RESULTS: A total of 13 studies, including 12 retrospectives and one both retrospective and prospective study, enrolled 1510 (male=777) DMG patients. Six studies underwent meta-analysis which showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, diagnostic score, and DOR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.77-0.97), 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.88), 4.86 (95% CI 3.25-7.24), 0.11 (95% CI 0.04-0.29), 3.75 (95% CI 2.62-4.88), and 42.61 (95% CI 13.77-131.87), respectively. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive prediction of H3K27M mutation status in patients with DMGs using MRI radiomics is a promising tool with good diagnostic performance. However, the pooled metrics had a wide confidence interval, which required further studies to enhance ML algorithms' accuracy and facilitate their integration into daily clinical practice.

Hearing loss and COVID-19: an umbrella review.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 can result in an extensive range of extrapulmonary, and neurological signs and symptoms such as olfactory and/or taste dysfunction, and otologic symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate the hearing loss manifestation from COVID-19. METHODS: The goal of this umbrella review was to examine hearing loss associated with COVID-19 disease. English literature published until October 15, 2022 in online databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was considered for this purpose. Eligibility of the articles for subsequent data extraction was evaluated in a two-step selection process with consideration to an inclusion/exclusion criterion. This review followed the PRISMA protocol and the Amstar-2 checklist for quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of four treatment strategies were used by different studies which included oral corticosteroids, intratympanic corticosteroids, combined oral and intratympanic corticosteroids, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Five studies investigated corticosteroid use in the forms of oral or intratympanic injection; four studies reported (complete or partial) hearing improvements after steroid treatment, while one study stated no significant improvement in hearing function. One study reported that oral corticosteroid monotherapy alone was not effective, while vestibular symptoms were ameliorated by a combination of oral prednisone, intratympanic dexamethasone injection, and hydroxychloroquine. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that despite being one of the rare complications of COVID-19, hearing loss can impact a patient's quality of life. The most common type reported was sensorineural hearing loss, which can be diagnosed with variable techniques.