RESUMO
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Obesity has been shown to be a modifier of the association between leptin levels and cardiovascular events. We examined whether obesity modifies the association between serum leptin levels and the progression of diabetic kidney disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational longitudinal study on patients with type 2 diabetes. We enrolled 410 and 348 patients in the eGFR and ACR cohorts, respectively. Patients were classified into three groups by sex-specific tertile of leptin levels. Obesity was defined as body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2). Outcomes were the rate of change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and progression to a more advanced stage of albuminuria. RESULTS: In the eGFR cohort, the mean eGFR change during the median follow-up period of 4.7 years was -1.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year. An interaction between leptin levels (low, medium or high) and obesity (present or absent) on the change in eGFR was detected (P interaction = 0.003). In the lean group, adjusted eGFR decline in patients with low leptin was steeper than that in patients with medium leptin (2.1 and 0.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year, P = 0.023). In the obese group, patients with high leptin had a steeper adjusted eGFR decline than those with medium leptin (1.7 and 0.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year, P = 0.044). In the ACR cohort, 29 patients showed progression of albuminuria during the median follow-up period of 3.9 years. There was no interaction between leptin levels and obesity on the outcome (P interaction = 0.094). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity might modify the effects of leptin on kidney function decline in patients with type 2 diabetes.
RESUMO
The vasorelaxant effects of sildenafil and T-1032 [methyl-2-(4-aminophenyl)-1,2-dihydro-1-oxo-7-(2-pyridinylmethoxy)-4-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-3-isoquinoline carboxylate sulfate], two phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, were examined in the isolated rat aorta. Sildenafil and T-1032, both of which have almost the same potency and selectivity regarding phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitory activity, produced a similar, moderate, relaxation at 10(-10) to 10(-7) M (sildenafil: 66.8 +/- 13.7%; T-1032: 77.9 +/- 10.8% at 10(-7) M). However, sildenafil, but not T-1032, produced further relaxation at the higher concentrations (sildenafil: 102.0 +/- 0.6%; T-1032: 81.0 +/- 7.2% at 10(-4) M, P < 0.05). Sildenafil also produced a more potent relaxation than did T-1032 at the high concentrations (10(-5) and 10(-4) M) in endothelium-denuded aortic rings and in the presence of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (3 x 10(-4) M). Moreover, the high concentrations of sildenafil, but not of T-1032, caused a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve for calcium chloride in K(+)-depolarized endothelium-denuded preparations. In the ligand binding assay for the L-type Ca(2+) channels, the affinities of sildenafil at 10(-5) M for binding sites of nitrendipine and (--)-desmethoxyverapamil [(--)- D888] (35.2 +/- 3.3% and 35.8 +/- 1.9%, respectively) were higher than those of T-1032 (11.8 +/- 4.0% and -13.1 +/- 1.3%, respectively, P < 0.05). Regarding cyclic nucleotide levels, both phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors increased cGMP levels at 10(-6) M. However, sildenafil, but not T-1032, further increased cGMP levels at the higher concentrations (sildenafil: 15.7 +/- 2.7 pmol/mg protein; T-1032: 5.6 +/- 0.6 pmol/mg protein at 10(-4) M, P < 0.05). These results suggested that high concentrations of sildenafil had additional vasorelaxant properties through mechanisms other than phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition. Sildenafil-induced relaxation appears to be due to inhibition of the external Ca(2+)-dependent cascade for contraction and/or to an increase in cGMP levels. In contrast, T-1032 only showed a vasorelaxant property due to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition. In conclusion, T-1032 appears to be a specific phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor compared with sildenafil and a useful compound to examine the physiological function of phosphodiesterase type 5.