Fentanyl Analogs Exert Antinociceptive Effects via Sodium Channel Blockade in Mice.

The formalin test is one approach to studying acute pain in rodents. Similar to formalin, injection with glutamate and veratrine can also produce a nociceptive response. This study investigated whether opioid-related compounds could suppress glutamate- and veratrine-induced nociceptive responses in mice at the same dose. The administration of morphine (3 mg/kg), hydromorphone (0.4 mg/kg), or fentanyl (0.03 mg/kg) suppressed glutamate-induced nociceptive response, but not veratrine-induced nociceptive response at the same doses. However, high doses of morphine (10 mg/kg), hydromorphone (2 mg/kg), or fentanyl (0.1 mg/kg) produced a significant reduction in the veratrine-induced nociceptive response. These results indicate that high doses are required when using morphine, hydromorphone, or fentanyl for sodium channel-related neuropathic pain, such as ectopic activity. As a result, concerns have arisen about overdose and abuse if the dose of opioids is steadily increased to relieve pain. In contrast, trimebutine (100 mg/kg) and fentanyl analog isobutyrylfentanyl (iBF; 0.1 mg/kg) suppressed both glutamate- and veratrine-induced nociceptive response. Furthermore, nor-isobutyrylfentanyl (nor-iBF; 1 mg/kg), which is a metabolite of iBF, suppressed veratrine-induced nociceptive response. Besides, the optimal antinociceptive dose of iBF, unlike fentanyl, only slightly increased locomotor activity and did not slow gastrointestinal transit. Cancer pain is a complex condition driven by inflammatory, neuropathic, and cancer-specific mechanisms. Thus, iBF may have the potential to be a superior analgesic than fentanyl.

Simultaneous Pseudoprogression and an Immune-related Adverse Event of Pulmonary Pleomorphic Carcinoma after Combined Therapy with Cytotoxic Anticancer Agents and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor.

Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma is rare among lung tumors. Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma is resistant to chemotherapy. However, treatment with taxane anticancer agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors has been reported to be effective. When using immune checkpoint inhibitors, pseudoprogression and true progression are difficult to distinguish, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common. We herein report a patient with simultaneous pseudoprogression and irAEs after combined therapy with cytotoxic agents and an immune checkpoint inhibitor for pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective against pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma, but patients should be monitored for pseudoprogression and irAEs.