[Metastatic Tumor of the Uterine Cervical Cancer Occurred in the Infratemporal Fossa].

A 46-year-old woman presented with discomfort in her right lateral gaze, right-sided headache, and facial numbness 17 days after concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT)for a Stage ⅢB cervical cancer. The initial imaging investigations, maxillofacial and otolaryngology reviews did not reveal a diagnosis. After 54 days of CCRT, her symptoms deteriorated. Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)showed a tumor in the right infratemporal fossa and its biopsy confirmed a metastatic cervical cancer. In view of the rapid deterioration and the potential visual loss, palliative intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) was given. Although the symptoms improved temporarily, multiple metastases were subsequently found. Despite chemotherapy, the patient died 11 months after developing the symptoms of infratemporal fossa metastasis.

Hypovolaemic shock due to intra-abdominal haemorrhage from multiple uterine fibroids.

Intra-abdominal bleeding due to uterine fibroids is extremely rare, and preoperative diagnosis is difficult. Herein, we report a case of preoperatively diagnosed hypovolaemic shock due to intra-abdominal haemorrhage, in which fatal sequelae were prevented. A 46-year-old non-pregnant woman was brought to the hospital with a sudden-onset lower abdominal pain. On admission, she was in shock, and abdominal CT showed severe intra-abdominal haemorrhage. Since bleeding from uterine fibroids was suspected, an emergency simple total hysterectomy was performed, and her condition became stable after the operation. Intra-abdominal haemorrhage with hypovolaemic shock requires prompt surgical intervention. Although it occurs very rarely due to bleeding from uterine fibroids, imaging shows large fibroids; if the patient is not pregnant, bleeding from the fibroids should be considered.

[Efficacy of Olaparib Treatment for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancers].

We reviewed our clinical experience of olaparib treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. Of the 10 cases, the primary sites of cancer were the ovaries, fallopian tubes, and peritoneum in 7, 1 and 2 cases, respectively. The median period of treatment administration was 10 months. The observed Grade 3 or 4 adverse events as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 were: anemia, leukopenia and neut r openia in 4, 4 and 3 cases, respectively. Eight cases needed treatment to be interrupted, and 5 cases required a reduction in dose. Three patients were treated for more than 12 months, while the others had to discontinue due to disease progression. However, none of the patients had to discontinue treatment due to adverse events. Therefore, it appears that olaparib can be safely used despite some patients requiring a withdrawal or reduction in treatment.

A prospective randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab versus ranibizumab for the management of diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) outcomes associated with intravitreal (IV) bevacizumab vs IV ranibizumab for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. METHODS: Forty-eight patients (63 eyes) with center-involved DME were randomly assigned to receive 1.5 mg (0.06 cc) IV bevacizumab or 0.5 mg (0.05 cc) IV ranibizumab at baseline and monthly if central subfield thickness was greater than 275 µm. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (60 eyes) completed 48 weeks of follow-up. At baseline, mean ± standard error best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (logMAR) was 0.60 (20/80) ± 0.05 in the IV bevacizumab group and 0.63 (20/85) ± 0.05 in the IV ranibizumab group. A significant improvement in mean BCVA was observed in both groups at all study visits (P < .05); this improvement was significantly greater in the IV ranibizumab group compared with the IV bevacizumab group at weeks 8 (P = .032) and 32 (P = .042). A significant reduction in mean central subfield thickness was observed in both groups at all study visits compared with baseline (P < .05), with no significant difference in the magnitude of macular thickness reduction between groups. The mean number of injections was significantly higher (P = .005) in the IV bevacizumab group (9.84) than in the IV ranibizumab group (7.67). CONCLUSIONS: IV bevacizumab and IV ranibizumab are associated with similar effects on central subfield thickness in patients with DME through 1 year of follow-up. IV ranibizumab is associated with greater improvement in BCVA at some study visits, and the mean number of injections is higher in the IV bevacizumab group.