Giant Hepatic Cyst: A Possible Cause of Inferior Vena Cava Syndrome.

An 80-year-old man was transferred to our institution with lower limb edema and worsening dyspnea following the administration of diuretic medication. Transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography revealed a giant hepatic cyst (176×190 mm) compressing his right atrium and inferior vena cava (IVC). Laparoscopic cyst deroofing combined with omental packing and subsequent tube drainage immediately alleviated all his symptoms. The procedure was uneventful, and he was discharged without any complications on postoperative day 9; he had no recurrent symptoms or hepatic cysts at the postoperative 2-month follow-up. Therefore, a giant hepatic cyst can cause IVC syndrome, and laparoscopic deroofing is a beneficial approach for the treatment of accessible cysts.

Gastric Emptying Improved Significantly After PRG Compared to Billroth-I Reconstruction: Assessment of Gastric Emptying With a 13C-Breath Test.

BACKGROUND: We advocated the usefulness of pylorus-reconstruction gastrectomy (PRG) to improve quality of life following surgery for gastric cancer. The current study assessed gastric emptying following PRG in comparison with those who underwent conventional Billroth-I (B-I) reconstruction and in healthy controls using a 13C breath test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 24 patients who underwent PRG from September 20, 2007 to July 26, 2012 at the Department of Surgery at Daisan Hospital (affiliated with The Jikei University School of Medicine). These patients underwent the 'standard' version of a gastric-emptying study using a 13C breath test at 20.5±11.8 months after surgery. During the study, the half gastric-emptying time (T1/2) and gastric retention at 5 min after ingestion (RR5) were measured. The data of the PRG group were compared to those for 26 patients who underwent conventional B-I reconstruction and with a group consisting of 20 healthy controls. RESULTS: RR5 was 69.6±21.8% in the patients who underwent PRG, 45.3±28.6% in those who underwent B-I reconstruction, and 93.7±5.7% in healthy controls. T1/2 was 17.0±13.0 min in patients who underwent PRG, 5.9±4.0 min in those who underwent B-I reconstruction, and 23.3±4.9 min in healthy controls. Gastric emptying was delayed in patients who underwent PRG compared to those who underwent B-I reconstruction (RR5: p<0.0014, T1/2: p<0.0002), and was comparable to that of healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Gastric emptying improved significantly after PRG compared to B-I reconstruction, and approached that of healthy controls.

Durable Flap-Valve Mitigation of Duodenogastric Reflux, Remnant Gastritis and Dumping Syndrome Following Billroth I Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: We have reported the short-term results of pylorus reconstruction gastrectomy (PRG) that prevents duodenogastric reflux (DGR) and remnant gastritis after distal gastrectomy. We herein report the long-term results of the PRG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PRG was performed in 37 patients (age 31 to 86 [mean 67.8 ± 12.3] years, male:female = 22:15) with gastric cancer from June 2006 through December 2013. We examined the long-term outcome in 28 patients (age 41 to 86 [mean 67.0 ± 10.7] years, male:female = 18:10) that passed over 3 years after surgery (LTR 44.1 ± 11.7 months), and compared with their short-term result after the operation (STR 13.1 ± 6.9 months). The adverse events of gastric surgery evaluated in this study consisted of the degree of remnant gastritis, the presence of dumping syndrome, and degree of weight loss (%). RESULTS: There was no difference in the degree of DGR and remnant gastritis by gastroscopic finding between LTR and STR after PRG (P = 0.21). Statistically, there was no difference in the bile acid concentration of remnant gastric juice between LTR and STR (108.4 ± 254.1 vs. 94.0 ± 208.6 µmol/L, P = 0.33), and weight loss of LTR was the same as that of STR (5.67 ± 7.08 vs. 4.59 ± 5.63%, P = 0.34). There were few morphological changes in the reconstructed pylorus by the long-term course, but 2 patients showed mild atrophy. CONCLUSION: The form of reconstructed pylorus and the effect that reduces side effects of Billroth I seem to last for a long time.

Usefulness of pyloric reconstruction without compromising curative resection in gastric cancer treatment.

INTRODUCTION: We herein report the short-term results of the newly developed modified technique of Billroth I (modified B-I; pylorus reconstruction) that prevents duodenogastric reflux (DGR) and remnant gastritis after distal gastrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Distal gastrectomy with this technique was performed in 20 patients (age, 41 to 86 years [mean, 68.5 ± 11.8 years], male/female = 12:8) with gastric cancer from June 2006 through December 2009. These patients were compared with another 20 patients who underwent conventional B-I after distal gastrectomy (age, 41 to 85 years [mean, 69.3 ± 8.69 years], male/female = 11:9). The side effects of gastric surgery evaluated in this study were the degree of remnant gastritis, the presence of dumping syndrome, and the degree of weight loss. RESULTS: By gastrografin contrast imaging on the fifth day after pylorus reconstruction, the remnant stomach was not dilated and gastrografin flowed physiologically to the duodenum without backward reflux into the remnant stomach. By gastroscopy at 6 months after the operation, DGR and the degree of remnant gastritis after pylorus reconstruction was lower than those of conventional B-I (P = 0.00068). The bile acid concentration of remnant gastric juice of pylorus reconstruction was lower than that of conventional B-I (55.5 ± 93.5 vs. 1,369.5 ± 2,502.1 µmol/L, P = 0.0415). Weight loss at 1 year after distal gastrectomy was less in pylorus reconstruction compared with conventional B-I (6.2 ± 5.2% vs. 9.8 ± 8.7%, P = 0.0725). CONCLUSION: Pylorus reconstruction is a simple and safe anastomotic technique that reduces the side effects of B-I reconstruction.

Disadvantage of operation cost in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy under the national health insurance system in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The utility and problems including the socioeconomic aspect of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer have not been fully evaluated. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We compared open distal gastrectomy and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the clinical benefit, quality of life, and problems of operation cost by the reference documents in which the difference between open distal gastrectomy and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy was examined in detail. The reference documents retrieved by the key words 'gastric, cancer, laparoscopic, surgery' were 22 in PubMed with the following limits activated: Humans, Clinical Trial, Meta-Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial, Review, English, Core clinical journals, published in the last 10 years. RESULTS: The operation time of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy is longer than that of open distal gastrectomy. However, if skilled, the blood loss of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy is less, the hospitalization days and the duration of fasting after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy are shorter than those after open distal gastrectomy. The number of excised lymph nodes and the incidence of postoperative complications were similar between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy. On the other hand, in the national health insurance system, the operation fee of open distal gastrectomy was USD 6,637 as compared to USD 7,586 for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. In spite of the USD 949 difference in the operation fee, the use of disposable instruments for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy results in a deficit of USD 1,500 over open distal gastrectomy. CONCLUSION: In spite of the medical superiority of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy over open distal gastrectomy (if a skilled surgeon operates) as less invasive surgery, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy is associated with less financial benefit to the hospital as compared to open distal gastrectomy in the current Japanese health insurance system.