An Evidence-Based Protocol for Antibiotic Use Prior to Cystoscopy Decreases Antibiotic Use without Impacting Post-Procedural Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection Rates.

PURPOSE: Symptomatic urinary tract infection is a complication of office based cystourethroscopy. Studies are mixed regarding the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent urinary tract infections. Our aim was to develop and evaluate an evidence-based protocol that reduces unnecessary antibiotic use while avoiding an increase in urinary tract infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created a clinic antibiogram based on all urology office visits performed during a 2-year period. Bacterial resistance rates, institutional risk related data and clinical guidelines were applied to create a protocol for antibiotic administration before cystourethroscopy. We then analyzed 1,245 consecutive patients without a renal transplant who underwent outpatient cystourethroscopy, including 610 after protocol initiation. Urinary tract infection rates and antibiotic use were analyzed for an association with the protocol change using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Cultures had an overall 20% rate of resistance to fluoroquinolones, representing 40% of the cultures that grew Escherichia coli. Before the protocol change 602 of 635 patients (94.8%) received a preprocedural antibiotic compared to 426 of 610 (69.9%) after protocol initiation (p <0.01). A total of 19 patients (3.0%) had a symptomatic urinary tract infection prior to the protocol change while 16 (2.6%) had a urinary tract infection after the change (p = 0.69). Regarding resistance, fluoroquinolone resistant organisms grew in the cultures of 12 of 19 patients (63.2%) with a urinary tract infection before the protocol change compared to 5 of 16 (31.3%) with a urinary tract infection after the change. Recent antibiotic administration, hospitalization and chronic catheterization were associated with urinary tract infection in the entire cohort (all p ≤0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A local antibiogram with infection related risk data effectively risk stratifies patients before cystourethroscopy, decreasing the use of antibiotics without increasing the rate of symptomatic urinary tract infection.

Reducing Inappropriate Testing for the Evaluation of Diarrhea Among Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is one of the most common illnesses in the United States. Evaluation frequently does not follow established guidelines. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a computerized physician order entry-based test guidance algorithm with regard to the clinical, financial, and operational impacts. METHODS: Our population was patients with diarrheal illness at a tertiary academic medical center. The intervention was a computerized physician order entry-based test guidance algorithm that restricted the use of stool cultures and ova and parasites testing of diarrhea in the adult inpatient location vs nonintervention sites, which were the emergency department, pediatric inpatient and adult and pediatric outpatient locations. We measured stool culture, ova and parasites, and Clostridium difficile testing rates from July 1, 2012 to January 31, 2016. Additionally, we calculated advisor usage, consults generated, accuracy of information, and cost savings. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in stool culture and ova and parasites testing rates at the adult inpatient (P = .001 for both), pediatric (P < .001 for both), and adult emergency department (P < .001; P = .009) locations. The decrease at the intervention site was immediate, whereas the other locations showed a delayed but sustained decrease that suggests a collateral impact. A significant increase in the rate of stool culture and ova and parasites testing was observed in the outpatient setting (P = .02 and P = .001). We estimate that $21,931 was saved annually. CONCLUSIONS: A point-of-order test restriction algorithm for hospitalized adults with diarrhea reduced stool testing. Similar programs should be considered at other institutions and for the evaluation of other conditions.

Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients after Cystoscopy for Ureteral Stent Removal.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is a known complication of cystoscopy with ureteral stent removal. However, little is known about the incidence and risk factors for post-cystoscopy UTI in renal transplant recipients, who likely represent a high-risk cohort. Our aim was to determine the infection rate following cystoscopy with stent removal in this population and identify opportunities for care improvement. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of office cystoscopies with stent removal in renal transplant recipients performed at a single institution from April 2012 through May 2014. Strict criteria were used to determine presence of symptomatic UTI within one month of the procedure. Fisher's exact tests were completed to examine associations between patient characteristics and post-transplant outcomes with UTI. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were included. Mean age was 50.0 (SD 13.1) years, and 187 (57.7%) patients were male. Within this group,165 (52.5%) patients received a pre-procedural oral fluoroquinolone antibiotic dose prior to the procedure. Nine patients had symptomatic UTIs (2.8%), of which three infections (33.3%) were due to quinolone-resistant organisms. Female sex (P =0.04), but no other patient or post-operative characteristic was associated with symptomatic UTI, including the use of peri-procedural antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of symptomatic UTI after cystoscopy with ureteral stent removal in renal transplant recipients is less than three percent and comparable to post-cystoscopy UTI risk in the general population. Female sex is associated with symptomatic UTI. Further investigation is needed to identify groups most at risk for UTI and other complications.

Recent Antibiotic Treatment Increases the Risk of Urinary Tract Infection after Outpatient Cystoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic urinary tract infection is a complication of office based cystoscopy. AUA guidelines recommend prophylactic antibiotics for patients with an increased risk of urinary tract infection. However, study results are mixed regarding the efficacy of prophylaxis for urinary tract infection prevention. We evaluate predictors of infection to identify groups at increased risk for urinary tract infection after cystoscopy. METHODS: We identified all office cystoscopies performed at a single institution from April 2012 through May 2014. Patients with a positive urine culture within 30 days of the procedure were reviewed for symptomatic urinary tract infection. Those with a urinary tract infection were matched to 4 controls. Patient characteristics were extracted and examined for association with urinary tract infection. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to identify associations between composite clinical variables and urinary tract infection. RESULTS: During the study period 5,488 patients underwent cystoscopy, of whom 29 (0.53%) had a urinary tract infection. Cultures showed quinolone resistant organisms in 13 of 29 (45%) urinary tract infections. The use of an external catheter or intermittent catheterization (p=0.04), hospitalization within 4 weeks (p=0.04) and the use of antibiotics within 6 months of cystoscopy (p=0.01) were associated with urinary tract infection. Recent antibiotic exposure, recent nongenitourinary infection or recent hospitalization was associated with urinary tract infection on multivariable analysis (OR 5.26, 95% CI 1.87-14.8, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Recent antibiotic exposure, infection or hospitalization is associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infection after cystoscopy. Most symptomatic urinary tract infections are due to quinolone resistant organisms in this population. The optimal prophylactic regimen should be tailored to regional antibiotic susceptibility patterns and individual patient risk factors.

Implementation of an enhanced safety-engineered sharp device oversight and bloodborne pathogen protection program at a large academic medical center.

OBJECTIVE: Exposure of healthcare personnel to bloodborne pathogens (BBPs) can be prevented in part by using safety-engineered sharp devices (SESDs) and other safe practices, such as double gloving. In some instances, however, safer devices and practices cannot be utilized because of procedural factors or the lack of a manufactured safety device for the specific clinical use. In these situations, a standardized system to examine requests for waiver from expected practices is necessary. DESIGN: Before-after program analysis. SETTING: Large academic medical center. INTERVENTIONS: Vanderbilt University Medical Center developed a formalized system for an improved waiver process, including an online submission and tracking site, and standards surrounding implementation of core safe practices. The program's impact on sharp device injuries and utilization of double gloving and blunt sutures was examined. RESULTS: Following implementation of the enhanced program, there was an increase in the amount of undergloves and blunt sutures purchased for surgical procedures, suggesting larger utilization of these practices. The rate of sharp device injuries of all at-risk employees decreased from 2.32% to 2.12%, but this decline was not statistically significant (P = .14). The proportion of reported injuries that were deemed preventable significantly decreased from 72.7% (386/531) before implementation to 63.9% (334/523; P = .002) after implementation of the enhanced program. CONCLUSIONS: An enhanced BBP protection program was successful at providing guidance to increase safe practices and at improving the management of SESD waiver requests and was associated with a reduction in preventable sharp device injuries.

Infection control and prevention considerations.

Due to the nature of their underlying illness and treatment regimens, cancer patients are at increased risk of infection. Though the advent and widespread use of anti-infective agents has allowed for the application of ever-greater immune-suppressing therapies with successful treatment of infectious complications, prevention of infection remains the primary goal. The evolutionary changes of microorganisms, whereby resistance to anti-infective therapy is increasingly common, have facilitated a paradigm shift in the field of healthcare epidemiology. No longer is the focus on "control" of infection once established in a healthcare environment. Rather, the emphasis is on prevention of infection before it occurs. The most basic tenet of infection prevention, and the cornerstone of all well-designed infection prevention and control programs, is hand hygiene. The hands of healthcare workers provide a common potential source for transmission of infectious agents, and effective decontamination of the hands reduces the risk of transmission of infectious material to other patients. Once infection is suspected or established; however, implementation of effective control strategies is important to limit the spread of infection within a healthcare environment. This chapter outlines the basic tenets of infection prevention, principles of isolation precautions and control measures, and elements for a successful infection control and prevention program.

An evaluation of immediate-use steam sterilization practices in adult knee and hip arthroplasty procedures.

BACKGROUND: Immediate-use steam sterilization (IUSS) is a safe method to sterilize emergently contaminated instruments, but inappropriate use may lead to an increased risk for surgical site infection. This study aimed to identify risk factors, rationale, and variability in procedural adherence in cases of IUSS. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study compared adult patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty in which IUSS was (n = 104) and was not (n = 81) performed. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed 4 predictive risk factors for IUSS: history of malignancy (odds ratio [OR], 3.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-9.3]), obesity (OR, 2.3 [95% CI: 1.02-5.2]), procedure performed in operating room 13 (OR, 2.5 [95% CI: 1.2-5.4]), and Monday procedure (OR, 3.6 [95% CI: 1.4-9.1]). The only factor that protected against IUSS was performing the procedure in the morning (OR, 0.4 [95% CI: 0.2-0.96]). Only 9.5% of cases of IUSS involved an acceptable indication. Documented adherence to core practices was also variable. CONCLUSION: Several patient- and case-specific factors can help predict the incidence of IUSS. Furthermore, practices should be hardwired to ensure IUSS is utilized for the correct indication. Documentation must be improved to allow institutions to accurately track IUSS.

Clinical impact of blood cultures contaminated with coagulase-negative staphylococci at an academic medical center.

Of all blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci collected in 1 year at an academic hospital, 100 were selected randomly for review and designated true positives or contaminated. For the 85 patients whose cultures were determined to be contaminated, chart abstractions revealed substantial unnecessary antibiotic administration, additional laboratory tests and procedures, and hospital readmissions.

Health care-acquired viral respiratory diseases.

Health care-associated viral respiratory infections, common among hospitalized children, also occur among adults and institutionalized persons and result in increased patient morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Approximately 20% of patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia have viral respiratory infections, with 70% of these infections caused by adenovirus, influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). These infections typically reflect the level of viral activity within the community. This article focuses on the epidemiology, transmission, and control of health care-associated RSV and influenza virus.

Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Preventive care measures remain underutilized despite recommendations to increase their use. The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics, types, and effects of paper- and computer-based interventions for preventive care measures. The study provides an update to a previous systematic review. We included randomized controlled trials that implemented a physician reminder and measured the effects on the frequency of providing preventive care. Of the 1,535 articles identified, 28 met inclusion criteria and were combined with the 33 studies from the previous review. The studies involved 264 preventive care interventions, 4,638 clinicians and 144,605 patients. Implementation strategies included combined paper-based with computer generated reminders in 34 studies (56%), paper-based reminders in 19 studies (31%), and fully computerized reminders in 8 studies (13%). The average increase for the three strategies in delivering preventive care measures ranged between 12% and 14%. Cardiac care and smoking cessation reminders were most effective. Computer-generated prompts were the most commonly implemented reminders. Clinician reminders are a successful approach for increasing the rates of delivering preventive care; however, their effectiveness remains modest. Despite increased implementation of electronic health records, randomized controlled trials evaluating computerized reminder systems are infrequent.

Improving timely surgical antibiotic prophylaxis redosing administration using computerized record prompts.

BACKGROUND: Timely prophylactic antibiotic administration aids in preventing postoperative superficial surgical site infections. However, during lengthy surgical procedures, redosing of prophylactic antibiotics may be unintentionally omitted. We assessed the utility of a computerized reminder as part of the anesthesia charting system to increase the rate of timely intraoperative prophylactic antibiotic redosing. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis was performed on consecutive patients undergoing non-cardiac surgical procedures at a university-affiliated hospital prior to and after the institution of a computerized reminder system. The reminder system presented the clinician with a series of on-screen dialog boxes prior to the redose time for the specific prophylactic antibiotic administered preoperatively. Antibiotic redosing was defined as appropriate if it occurred within 30 min prior to or after the due time, calculated as twice the half-life of the specific antibiotic. Patients were excluded if the case duration was less than twice the half-life of the administered prophylactic antibiotic, or if no prophylactic antibiotic was given. RESULTS: A total of 287 cases were included in the study (148 pre-intervention, 139 post-intervention). Patient age, case length, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score stratification did not differ between the groups. Use of the reminder system resulted in an increase in the appropriate redosing of antibiotics from 20% prior to institution of the reminder to 58% after institution (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A computerized reminder system is an effective tool to assist in appropriate intraoperative redosing of prophylactic antibiotics during lengthy surgical procedures.

Diabetes mellitus and cardiothoracic surgical site infections.

Persons afflicted with diabetes mellitus compose over one fourth of patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery and create a particular challenge to surgical and critical care practitioners. This paper reviews the impact of diabetes mellitus on cardiothoracic surgical site infection (SSI) risk, with specific attention to recent data regarding the role of perioperative hyperglycemia as well as the use of continuous insulin infusion for SSI risk reduction in the cardiothoracic surgical population.

Smallpox vaccination does not elevate systemic levels of prothrombotic proteins associated with ischemic cardiac events.

BACKGROUND: During the recent smallpox vaccination campaigns, ischemic cardiac complications were observed after vaccination. To examine a possible association between the smallpox vaccine and postvaccination ischemic events, we investigated alterations in levels of prothrombotic proteins (plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 [PAI-1] and soluble CD40 ligand [sCD40L]) in recently vaccinated individuals. METHODS: Vaccinia-naive (cohort N; aged 18-32 years) and vaccinia-experienced (cohort E; aged 33-49 years) healthy adults were vaccinated with a 1 : 5 dilution of the Aventis Pasteur smallpox vaccine. Plasma levels of PAI-1 and sCD40L were measured in 30 subjects (cohort N, n=15; cohort E, n=15) at baseline and twice after vaccination (between days 7 and 9 and between days 26 and 30). RESULTS: Baseline mean PAI-1 levels significantly differed between cohorts N and E (P=.04). Within each exposure cohort, mean PAI-1 levels did not significantly change after vaccination. Baseline sCD40L levels did not differ between cohorts N and E. In cohort N, sCD40L levels significantly decreased after vaccination but returned to baseline levels within 1 month. Vaccination did not significantly alter levels of sCD40L in cohort E. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of PAI-1 and sCD40L did not significantly increase after smallpox vaccination. Vaccine-induced alterations in levels of these prothrombotic proteins do not appear to play a role in ischemic events observed after smallpox vaccination.

Focal and generalized folliculitis following smallpox vaccination among vaccinia-naive recipients.

CONTEXT: With the reintroduction of smallpox vaccination, detailed contemporary descriptions of adverse reactions to the vaccine are needed to adequately inform the public and clinicians. During a multicenter, randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of various dilutions of smallpox vaccine, we observed the appearance of a papulovesicular eruption (focal and generalized) in study volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the papulovesicular eruptions by clinical, virologic, and histopathological characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective case series of papulovesicular eruptions following smallpox vaccination in healthy, vaccinia-naive adult participants compared with noncases conducted from October 2002 to March 2003. Variables potentially related to these eruptions were collected retrospectively through chart review. Eruptions were described based on viral culture, clinical examination, and histopathological evaluation (1 biopsy specimen from 1 case). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cases of papulovesicular eruptions following vaccination. RESULTS: During the trial, of 148 volunteers (56% women; mean age 23.6 years), 4 participants (2.7%) developed generalized eruptions and 11 (7.4%) noted focal eruptions. Viral cultures of sample lesions were negative for vaccinia. The result of a skin biopsy sample from 1 case of generalized rash revealed suppurative folliculitis without evidence of viral infection. All lesions resolved without scarring. In the cohort, cases and noncases did not show significant differences in terms of sex, in the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or oral or depo contraceptives, in medication allergies, in the incidence of fever or lymphadenopathy after vaccination, or in the dilution of vaccine received. CONCLUSIONS: Folliculitis is a common and benign eruption observed in vaccinia-naive adult volunteers following smallpox vaccination. This eruption may be seen in volunteers receiving the vaccine in the newly instituted vaccination programs and may be met with heightened anxiety, potentially being confused with generalized vaccinia. This description of folliculitis using clinical, virologic, and histopathological findings should allay these concerns and provide additional insight into this eruption.