Dynamic Changes in Lumbar Spine Kinematics During Gait May Explain Improvement in Back Pain and Disability in Patients With Hip-Spine Syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: Determine if total hip arthroplasty (THA) changes lumbar spine kinematics during gait in a manner that explains the improvements in back pain seen in patients with hip-spine syndrome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with hip-spine syndrome, improvements in both hip and back pain have been demonstrated after THA; however, the exact mechanism of improvement in back pain remains unknown, as no corresponding changes in lumbar spine static radiographic parameters have been identified. METHODS: Thirteen patients with severe, unilateral hip osteoarthritis scheduled to undergo THA with concomitant back pain and disability were tested at baseline and 6 months after THA. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires were completed; the static orientation of the spine and pelvis were measured on standing radiographs, and lumbar spine kinematics were measured during treadmill walking using a validated measurement system that matched subject-specific bone models created from CT scans to dynamic biplane radiographs. RESULTS: After THA, both the Oswestry Disability Index (36.3-11.3, P <0.001) and Harris Hip Score (55.7-77.9, P <0.001) improved; however, there were no changes in static intervertebral or pelvis orientation. During gait after THA, the overall lumbar spine (L1 to L5) was less lordotic from heel strike to contralateral toe off ( P <0.001), the L4 and L5 vertebra were less anteriorly tilted by 3.9° ( P =0.038) from midstance to contralateral heel strike and by 3.9° ( P =0.001) during stance, respectively. CONCLUSION: The decreased anterior tilt of the 2 lowest lumbar vertebrae and the corresponding loss of lumbar lordosis may reduce facet loading during the stance phase of gait after THA. This change in lumbar spine kinematics during gait is a potential mechanism to explain the observed improvements in back pain and disability after THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Minimum 10-Year Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair for Isolated Posterior Shoulder Instability.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for posterior shoulder instability has been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes and return to sport at short-term and midterm follow-up, but long-term outcomes are unknown. PURPOSE: To determine the objective and subjective clinical outcomes of shoulder function after arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization at a minimum 10-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 53 patients (55 shoulders) with unidirectional recurrent posterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 15.4 years. Outcomes such as the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score, and subjective strength, stability, range of motion, and pain were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Outcomes from the same patient cohort were previously collected at 3.0-year follow-up and were evaluated for longitudinal analysis. Subgroup analyses for sport type (contact vs noncontact), position (thrower vs nonthrower), and revision versus nonrevision were performed. Risk factors for revision surgery based on magnetic resonance imaging findings, patient characteristics, and surgical findings were investigated. RESULTS: Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for posterior shoulder instability led to a statistically significant improvement on all outcome measures, with similar values at short-term (3.0-year) and long-term (15.4-year) follow-up. Across the total population, patients with 19 of 55 shoulders (35%) returned to sport at the same preinjury level, and patients with 33 of 55 shoulders (60%) returned to sport at some level. At long-term follow-up, patients with only 22% of shoulders were involved in the primary sport in which the injury was sustained, with patients with 28% of shoulders discontinuing sporting participation because of ongoing shoulder issues. Throwers trended toward lower Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic scores than nonthrowers both preoperatively (36.5 ± 22.8 vs 48.7 ± 22.9, respectively; P = .10) and postoperatively (57.4 ± 27.0 vs 73.5 ± 26.8, respectively; P = .09) but had similar improvements. Contact and noncontact athletes had similar preoperative and postoperative values, with equal improvements after surgery. With failure defined as revision surgery, an ASES score <60, or a stability value >5, 19 of 55 shoulders (35%) met failure criteria at final follow-up. Overall, 7 of 55 shoulders (13%) underwent revision surgery. At long-term follow-up, patients who underwent revision surgery had worse outcomes than those who did not undergo revision (ASES score: 53.1 ± 25.9 vs 81.8 ± 19.4, respectively; P < .001). An acute injury in the postoperative period (P < .001) and a smaller glenoid bone width on magnetic resonance imaging (P = .02) were the only identified risk factors for revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for posterior shoulder instability was a durable treatment option that improved long-term shoulder pain and function and facilitated return to sport in the majority of patients at a mean follow-up of 15.4 years, although a notable proportion of patients met various criteria for failure.

Pre-Operative Bariatric Surgery Imparts An Increased Risk of Infection, Re-Admission and Operative Intervention Following Elective Instrumented Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on patient outcomes following elective instrumented lumbar fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Patients who underwent a bariatric procedure prior to an elective instrumented lumbar fusion were evaluated. Lumbar procedures were performed at a large academic medical center from 1/1/2012 to 1/1/2018. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) requiring surgical debridement. Secondary outcomes were prolonged wound drainage requiring treatment, implant failure requiring revision, revision secondary to adjacent segment disease (ASD), and chronic pain states. A randomly selected, surgeon and comorbidity-matched group of 59 patients that underwent an elective lumbar fusion during that period was used as a control. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's two-way t-tests for continuous data, with significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified who underwent bariatric surgery prior to elective lumbar fusion. Mean follow-up was 2.4 ± 1.9 years in the bariatric group vs. 1.5 ± 1.3 years in the control group. Patients with a history of bariatric surgery had an increased incidence of SSI that required operative debridement, revision surgery due to ASD, and a higher incidence of chronic pain. Prolonged wound drainage and implant failure were equivalent between groups. CONCLUSION: In the present study, bariatric surgery prior to elective instrumented lumbar fusion was associated increased risk of surgical site infection, adjacent segment disease and chronic pain when compared to non-bariatric patients.

To Cross the Cervicothoracic Junction? Terminating Posterior Cervical Fusion Constructs Proximal to the Cervicothoracic Junction Does Not Impart Increased Risk of Reoperation in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of caudal instrumentation level on revision rates following posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Minimum follow-up was one year. Patients were divided into two groups based on the caudal level of their index fusion construct (Group 1-cervical and Group 2- thoracic). Reoperation rates were compared between the two groups, and preoperative demographics and radiographic parameters were compared between patients who required revision and those who did not. Multivariate binomial regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for revision surgery. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven (137/204) patients received fusion constructs that terminated at C7 (Group 1), while 67 (67/204) received fusion constructs that terminated at T1 or T2 (Group 2). The revision rate was 8.33% in the combined cohort, 7.3% in Group 1, and 10.4% in Group 2. There was no significant difference in revision rates between the 2 groups (P = .43). Multivariate regression analysis did not identify any independent risk factors for revision surgery. CONCLUSION: This study shows no evidence of increased risk of revision in patients with fusion constructs terminating in the cervical spine when compared to patients with constructs crossing the cervicothoracic junction. These findings support terminating the fusion construct proximal to the cervicothoracic junction when indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Repair of high-grade partial thickness supraspinatus tears after surgical completion of the tear have a lower retear rate when compared to full-thickness tear repair.

PURPOSE: High-grade partial thickness rotator cuff tears (i.e., those involving at least 50% of the tendon thickness) are especially challenging to treat and various treatment strategies have been described. Prior studies have demonstrated equivalent outcomes between in situ tear fixation and tear completion repair techniques. However, it is unknown how repair of completed high-grade partial thickness tears to full tears compares to repair of full-thickness tears. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcome measures at least 1 year postoperatively between patients who had completion of a high-grade partial thickness supraspinatus tear to a full-thickness tear (PT) and those who had an isolated full-thickness supraspinatus tear (FT). The hypothesis of this study was equivalent retear rates as well as equivalent clinical and patient-reported outcomes between the two groups. METHODS: A retrospective review of 100 patients who underwent isolated arthroscopic supraspinatus repair between 2013 and 2018 with a minimum of 1 year follow-up was performed. Patients were separated into two groups based on their treatment: 56 had completion of a partial thickness supraspinatus tear to full-thickness tear with repair (PT) and 44 had isolated full-thickness supraspinatus repairs (FT). The primary outcome was rotator cuff retear, which was defined as a supraspinatus retear requiring revision repair. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) including visual analog pain scale (VAS) and subjective shoulder value (SSV), range of motion (ROM) and strength in forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), and internal rotation (IR). RESULTS: There was a significantly lower rate of retear between the PT versus FT groups (3.6% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.040). There were no significant differences between groups for all PROs, all ROM parameters, and all strength parameters (all n.s.). DISCUSSION: The data from this study demonstrated that the PT group had a significantly lower retear rate at 1 year follow-up than the FT group, while PROs, ROM, and strength were similar between the two groups. Patients with PT supraspinatus tears can have excellent outcomes, equivalent to FT tears, after completion of the tear, and subsequent repair with low retear rates. These findings may aid the treating surgeon when choosing between in situ fixation of the PT supraspinatus tear or completion of the tear and subsequent repair, as it allows the treating surgeon to choose the procedure based on comfort and experience level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Ten Years of Sports Health: Authorship Characteristics and Levels of Evidence.

CONTEXT: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, now 10 years into production, has been ranked a top-25 journal in sport sciences and has tripled its impact throughout its existence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate authorship trends and levels of evidence (LOE) of articles published in Sports Health from 2009 to 2018. The secondary aim was to analyze funding sources and internationalization throughout the journal's tenure. DATA SOURCES: All clinical studies published in Sports Health between the years 2009 and 2018 were examined. STUDY SELECTION: All publications from the provided years were electronically reviewed by 2 reviewers and evaluated for inclusion criteria. Editorials, society news, memorials, letters to the editor, and corrigenda were excluded. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were examined for number of authors, presence of female authorship, funding, country of origin, international collaboration, academic degree or certification of first and senior authors, and LOE. Clinical articles were assigned LOE based on guidelines from the University of Oxford's Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. RESULTS: A total of 654 articles were examined. The percentage of high-LOE studies increased throughout the study period. The percentage of publications with female authors also increased throughout the study period. The mean number of authors per article increased from 3.2 to 4.6 over the 10-year period (P < 0.05). The percentage of publications with international collaboration stayed consistent, while the number of countries per year increased during the study period. Overall, institutions from 23 countries have published in Sports Health since its inception to the time of this study. CONCLUSION: Female authorship in Sports Health surpasses industry standards, and the percentage of high-LOE studies remains remarkably high. Sports Health has stayed true to its multidisciplinary scope, as evidenced by the authors' varying degrees and numerous countries that publish in the journal.