Future Surgical Leaders: Resident Perception Of Longitudinal Leadership And Non-Technical Skills Curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: A paucity of formal leadership training programs exists for residents, and outcomes of those are limited in reporting. Based on a robust needs assessment, our program created a longitudinal cohort curriculum, Future Surgical Leaders, for residents and fellows of all levels to provide training in nontechnical skills. Our objective was to evaluate surgical resident short-term outcomes and satisfaction with the Future Surgical Leaders (FSL) curriculum. DESIGN: Participants were sent a brief survey after each session of the curriculum from October 2020 to February 2022. The data was compiled after seventeen months of delivery. Likert Scale responses and text comments were analyzed with a 2-sample t-test and 2-way analysis of variance. SETTING: Academic tertiary institution. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents. RESULTS: Survey response rate from 54 sessions among all postgraduate year levels was 73%. Overall, 96% of residents/fellows either "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the topics of the FSL curriculum were important to learn during surgical training. Only 24% of learners knew "a lot" or "a great deal" about the topics prior to the session which rose to 73% afterwards (p < 0.01). Each postgraduate year class showed statistically significant increase in knowledge. About 80% of learners wanted to investigate these topics further. Open comment questions identified themes requesting delivery of specific sessions earlier in residency training and positive overall attitudes toward the FSL curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: FSL is a satisfactory means of teaching leadership skills to surgical residents. Residents recognize the need to develop leadership skills prior to entering practice and want to learn more. The FSL curriculum may be considered for application at other surgical training programs.

General surgery applicant perspectives: Two years of virtual interview experiences and supplemental application impressions.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the unique benefits and challenges the virtual recruitment and interviewing platform had on general surgery residency applicants. METHODS: Applicants who interviewed for a categorical position at our institution during the 2021 and 2022 Match season were contacted to participate in the anonymous online survey focused on applicant behavior related to the virtual interview format. Data were analyzed using chi-square and paired t-tests. RESULTS: A response rate of 56.7 â€‹% (n â€‹= â€‹135) was achieved. Applicants accepted a median of 17 (IQR 13-20) interviews in 2021 and 15 (IQR 11-19) interviews in 2022. More than half (54 â€‹%) of applicants indicated they applied to more programs, and 53 â€‹% accepted more interviews, because of the virtual format. The greatest advantages of the virtual interviews as cited by applicants were saving money (96.3 â€‹%), saving time (49.6 â€‹%), and avoiding travel risks (43.7 â€‹%). The top limitations of virtual interviews were less exposure to current residents and faculty (61.5 â€‹%), to the city or location of the program (58.5 â€‹%), and difficultly comparing programs (57.8 â€‹%). The 2022 Match cycle included use of the supplemental application; however, 85 â€‹% of applicants did not feel that the supplemental improved their overall application. Some applicants (20 â€‹%) who "signaled" programs did not receive an interview offer from any of the programs they signaled. CONCLUSION: The transition to virtual interviews saved applicants time and money but limited their exposure. Future efforts to maintain virtual interviews will need to be balanced against the intangible benefit of human interaction and observing a program's culture.

The Importance of General Surgery Residency Program's Online Presence Varies Among Applicant Groups.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated an exclusively virtual 2021 residency application cycle. We hypothesized that residency programs' online presence would have increased utility and influence for applicants. METHODS: Substantial surgery residency website modifications were undertaken in the summer of 2020. Page views were gathered by our institution's information technology office for comparison across years and programs. An anonymous, voluntary, online survey was sent to all interviewed applicants for our 2021 general surgery program match. Five-point Likert-scale questions evaluated applicants' perspective on the online experience. RESULTS: Our residency website received 10,650 page views in 2019 and 12,688 in 2020 (P = 0.14). Page views increased with a greater margin compared to a different specialty residency program's (P < 0.01). From 108 interviewees, 75 completed the survey (69.4%). Respondents indicated our website was satisfactory or very satisfactory compared to other programs (83.9%), and none found it unsatisfactory. Applicants overall stated our institution's online presence impacted their decision to interview (51.6%). Programs' online presence impacted the decision to interview for nonWhite applicants (68%) but significantly less for white applicants (31%, P < 0.03). We observed a trend that those with fewer than this cohort's median interviews (17 or less) put more weight on online presence (65%), compared to those with 18 or greater interviews (35%). CONCLUSIONS: Applicants utilized program websites more during the 2021 virtual application cycle; our data show most applicants depend on institutions' websites to supplement their decision-making; however, there are subgroup differences in the influence online presence has on applicant decisions. Efforts to enhance residency webpages and online resources for candidates may positively influence prospective surgical trainees, and especially those underrepresented in medicine, to decide to interview.

General surgery applicants report the impact of virtual interviews on their rank list and match.

Purpose: The transition to an all-virtual application cycle for General Surgery Match 2021 significantly altered interview day and the interactions of applicants with residency programs. We sought to evaluate the impact of a virtual match cycle on applicants' rank list and Match results. Methods: We surveyed applicants who were offered an interview for a categorical general surgery residency position at our institution during the 2021 match season. Voluntary anonymous surveys were sent after the rank list deadline and again after the Match. Results: Out of 108 interviewees, 43 completed the survey (40%). Median age was 26, and 61% of respondents were male and 82% white, which skewed from our diverse interview pool. They completed a median of 17 interviews. 69% felt they had sufficient exposure to make their rank list, and this group reached statistically significant higher confidence in their decisions when compared with those who endorsed not having enough exposure to the residency programs (58% vs 42%, p = 0.02). Applicants cited the most influential interview day factors to be their interview with faculty and the virtual social with residents. Least important was their ability to assess the hospital facility. Among seven different program factors, comradery between faculty and residents (31%) and perceived happiness of the residents (18.6%) were most often selected most influential. Only 56% reported ranking all programs at which they interviewed. After submitting their rank list, 59% of applicants stated they had not visited the city of their top ranked program; however, post-match surveys revealed only 44% matched to a program in a city unknown to them. 57% of applicants stated they reached out to their top choice program with additional questions, but only 47% matched at one of those institutions. Conclusions: Even in the constraints of the virtual interviews, most applicants felt they had sufficient exposure to programs to make their rank list. Applicants were willing to highly rank cities they had never visited and to reach out to programs but were ultimately less successful matching at those programs. Understanding what factors and communications most impact applicants and programs may lead to a more successful Match. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00071-8.

Leadership skills curriculum development for residents and fellows: A needs-assessment.

BACKGROUND: Non-technical skills (NTS) curricula have demonstrated success in surgical residencies. The purpose of this study is to examine the need for a structured leadership curriculum at our institution. METHODS: A needs-assessment survey analyzing the importance of leadership domains, previously validated by Kazley et al. was delivered to 240 general surgery staff. Respondent groups were broken down into: Attendings, Residents, and Multi-Disciplinary. Statistical analyses were conducted using Cronbach's Alpha (α = 0.9259) and Fisher's exact test (pre-set p-value = 0.05). The importance of each competency was compared among groups and importance was defined as >75% important and very important responses. RESULTS: Nineteen of 33 competencies were important for all groups, including 3 with 100% importance: interpersonal communication, team-work, and problem-solving. Several competencies showed statistically significant differences among groups. CONCLUSION: A diverse range of surgery staff agreed that 19 leadership domains are important to teach residents, with some variance among respondent groups.

ACGME Operative Case Log Accuracy Varies Among Surgical Programs.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the accuracy of reported the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) operative case logs from graduated residents compared to institutional operating room electronic records (ORER). We hope this will help guide review committees and institutions develop complete, accurate resident case logs. DESIGN: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of general surgery (GS), neurosurgery (NS), and orthopedic surgery (OS) resident physicians. ACGME and ORER cases from 2009 to 2010 were analyzed and each case and current procedural terminology (CPT) code directly compared (ORER vs. ACGME). SETTING: Single academic tertiary-care medical center (University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY). PARTICIPANTS: Eleven thousand nine hundred and twenty-three cases for 46 residents among the 3 residency programs were analyzed. RESULTS: There was an overall logging accuracy of 72% for ORER cases reflected in the ACGME case logs. OS residents had a higher rate of logging accuracy (OS 91%, GS 69%, NS 58%, chi-square p = 0.014) and mean annual number of cases compared to the other 2 programs (OS 452, GS 183, NS 237, ANOVA p = 0.001). NS residents had higher accuracy of CPT codes than post-graduate years 2 to 5 in other programs (p < 0.017). There was a strong positive correlation between the number of cases completed per resident and case logging accuracy, (rho = 0.769, p < 0.001) consistent for NS and GS, but not OS. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows only 72% of a residents' operative experience is captured in the ACGME case log across 3 surgical programs. There is significant variability among surgical programs and among post-graduate year cohorts regarding case log and CPT code accuracy. There is a strong correlation with the total number of cases performed and increasing case log accuracy. Low case log accuracy may reflect individual resident behavior instead of program operative exposure. Further studies are needed to determine if ORER may serve as a more complete assessment of the operative experience of a resident and program.

Appendicitis Grade, Operative Duration, and Hospital Cost.

BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) established a grading system for appendicitis to allow prediction of risk and outcomes, to assist in quality improvement and resource management, and to provide a framework for research. Grading is determined in clinical, imaging, operative, and pathologic categories, but has not been completely validated. Our aim was to validate appendicitis grade with respect to duration of symptoms, operative duration, and hospital costs. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective medical record review, working backward until at least 40 of each grade of appendicitis were reviewed. Patients 8 years old and younger and those treated nonoperatively were excluded. Appendicitis severity was determined using the AAST grading scale (I to V), with V being the most severe. Statistical comparisons were made between increased grade and duration of symptoms, operative duration, hospital costs, and revenue. Data were analyzed using ANOVA or chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 1,099 appendectomies performed between August 2013 and December 2016 were analyzed. Most were low grade. Median age was 18 years old, and 44.4% were female. Patients with increasing AAST grade had a longer symptom duration (p < 0.001), longer operative duration (p < 0.001), increased direct costs (p < 0.001) in every category measured (operating room, pharmacy, imaging, lab), and contribution margin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The AAST appendicitis grade is a valid predictor of disease severity as defined by operative duration, hospital cost, and revenue. Duration of symptoms predicts severity. Appendicitis grade can be used in clinical care, residency training, and resource allocation.

The use of intraosseous needles for injection of contrast media for computed tomographic angiography of the thoracic aorta.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and quality of computed tomographic angiography of the thoracic aorta (CTA-TA) exams performed using intraosseous needle intravenous access (ION-IVA) for contrast media injection (CMI). METHODS: All CTA-TA exams at the study institution performed between 1/1/2013 and 8/14/2015 were reviewed retrospectively to identify those exams which had been performed using ION-IVA (ION-exams). ION-exams were then analyzed to determine aortic attenuation and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Linear regression was used to determine how injection rate and other variables affected image quality for ION-exams. Patient electronic medical records were reviewed to identify any adverse events related to CTA-TA or ION-IVA. RESULTS: 17 (∼0.2%) of 7401 exams were ION-exams. ION-exam CMI rates varied between 2.5 and 4 ml/s. Mean attenuation was 312 HU (SD 88 HU) and mean CNR was 25 (SD 9.9). A strong positive linear association between attenuation and injection rate was found. No immediate or delayed complications related to the ION-exams, or intraosseous needle use in general, occurred. CONCLUSION: For CTA-TA, ION-IVA appears to be a safe and effective route for CMI at rates up to 4 ml/s.

Maintaining an open trauma intensive care unit bed for rapid admission can be cost-effective.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, we implemented a ready open trauma intensive care unit (TICU) bed process. Our hypothesis was that this process would decrease emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) in a cost-effective manner without worsening clinical outcomes. METHODS: We developed a charge nurse without a patient assignment to facilitate this open bed. We also provided team training for early ICU resuscitation. All Level 1 activations admitted directly to the TICU before and after the implementation were examined. Patients taken directly to the operating room from the ED, deaths within 24 hours of admission, and patients with nonsurvivable head injuries were excluded. Cost-effectiveness of the position was examined. RESULTS: Age (mean [SD], 45.78 [18.71] years), sex (74.7% male), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) (mean [SD], 17.27 [9.26]) were not significantly different. Median ED LOS for the postimplementation group decreased from 230 minutes to 66 minutes (p < 0.001). Median ICU LOS (from 3.29 to 2.98 days, p = 0.13) and total median hospital LOS (from 10.71 to 7.98 days, p = 0.06) decreased but were not statistically significant. Controlling for age, ISS, sex, and mechanism of injury the postimplementation group had a 29% reduction in ICU LOS (2.12 days), a 28% reduction in hospital LOS (4.34), and a 54% reduction in ED LOS (154 minutes). The LOS decreased despite a small increase in ISS (from 15.89 to 18.37). Observed/expected mortality did not differ between the groups, preimplementation/postimplementation of 0.87 and 0.92. Nursing productivity increased one nurse after implementation at a cost of $624 per day. The ICU LOS decrease of 1.6 days at a rate of $1,144 average ICU daily cost of room and board totaled $1,830 per patient. The decreased ICU LOS dollars minus the increase nurse pay resulted in an overall savings of $1,206 per patient. CONCLUSION: Rapid access to the TICU made possible by the charge nurse without a direct assignment and team training has a potential cost savings without adversely affecting patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cost analysis, level III.

When Operating on Dead People Saves Lives: Benefits of Surgical Organ Donor Intensivists.

Solid organ transplantation has emerged as a life-saving treatment for many patients suffering from end-stage organ failure. Organs have been successfully recovered after a variety of aggressive interventions. We propose that decompressive laparotomy, when clinically indicated, should be considered in the aggressive resuscitation of potential organ donors. A thorough literature review examining aggressive interventions on potential organ donors was conducted after experience with a unique case at this institution. Articles were reviewed for the types of interventions performed as well as the time frame in relation to organ donation. In our case, several ethical issues were raised when considering decompressive laparotomy in a patient pronounced dead by neurologic criteria. We propose that having a surgical intensivist involved in the management of potential donors will further increase the salvage rate, as more invasive resuscitation options are possible.