Evaluation of the Effects of ß-Adrenergic Receptor-Propranolol on Osseointegration of the Titanium Implants.

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to investigate the effects of systemic propranol on the osseointegration of titanium implants. After the surgical insertion of titanium implants into the metaphyseal part of the tibial bone, the rats were randomly divided into 2 equal groups: the control (CNT) (n = 10) and propranol group (P) (n = 10); CNT: Rats received no further treatment during the 4 week experimental period after surgery. Rats received 10 mg/kg propranol in every day during the 4 week experimental period in PRP group after the surgical insertion of the implants. After the experimental period, the rats were euthanized, blood serum were collected to biochemical analysis and the implants and surrounding bone tissues were used for the histopathologic analysis. To analysis of the data between tests and controls student T test was used. There were no significant differences in the biochemical parameters (alcaline phosphatase, calcium, phosphor) of the groups (P > 0.05). Bone implant connection (BIC) ratios was detected higher in test animals compared with the controls (P < 0.05). Systemic propranolol may increases titanium implant osseointegration.

Evaluation of knowledge, attitudes, and clinical education of dental students about COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a new viral respiratory illness, first identified in Wuhan province, China. Dental professionals and dental students are at an increased risk for these viruses from dental patients, as dental practice involves face-to-face communication with the patients and frequent exposure to saliva, blood, and other body fluids. Dental education can play an important role in the training of dental students, adequate knowledge and adopting attitudes regarding infection control measures. The aim of this study was to evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and clinical education of dental students about COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A total of 355 pre-clinical and clinical dental students (242 and 113, respectively, comprising 190 females and 165 males) at Firat University Dentistry Faculty, in Elazig, Turkey answered an online questionnaire about the biosafety procedures for and their attitudes to and knowledge of COVID-19. The study was conducted in March 2020, Turkey. The data gained were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods and chi-square test. RESULTS: Both the clinical and preclinical students were found to be afraid of infecting themselves and their environment with COVID-19, and the difference between them was statistically significant. Three quarters (74.9%) of the participants responded yes to the question of whether they thought that experiences related to COVID-19 affected them psychologically, with the differences between gender and clinical status were statistically significant. Responses to the question of which clinical rotation worried them more were 29.9% endodontics, 25.1% oral and maxillofacial surgery, 16.3% prosthesis, 15.2% periodontology, 6.8% restorative dentistry, 3.9% oral diagnosis and radiology, 1.7% pedodontics, and 1.1% orthodontics, with a significant difference between the preclinical and clinical students. Regarding the measures applied by the clinical students in their clinical rotation, the responses were 100% gloves and 100% mask (with 11.5% FFP3/N95 mask), 73.6% face protective shield and 37.1% safety glasses, and 49% bonnet and 16.8% disposable box, with 90.2% frequent hand washing, and 86.7% frequent hand antiseptic usage. CONCLUSIONS: While students gave good responses regarding the standard measures they take to protect against transmission of COVID-19, their knowledge and attitudes about the extra measures they can take should be improved. For students to be least affected by fears associated with the disease, dental faculties should be ready to provide psychological services to those in need.

The Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Lateral Wall Thickness, Alveolar Bone Loss, and Demographic Variables: A Cross-Sectional Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography Study.

OBJECTIVES: Sinus floor elevation and augmentation surgery is widely used as a reliable procedure to increase insufficient bone height in the posterior maxillary area. The purpose of the present clinical study was to determine the associations between periodontal bone loss (PBL), maxillary sinus lateral bone wall thickness, age, and gender using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current retrospective study consists of 716 maxillary sinus CBCT images of 358 patients. The CBCT scans were assessed to detect the relationship between lateral wall thickness and PBL. ANOVA and Student t test analysis were used to determine the influence of PBL on sinus lateral wall thickness. RESULTS: Sinus lateral wall thickness was significantly associated with PBL (p < 0.05) at 3, 13, and 15 mm height. There was no significant association between lateral wall thickness and gender (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant association between lateral wall thickness at 3 and 13 mm and age (p < 0.05). There were significant associations between PBL and age (p < 0.001), and PBL and gender (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PBL might have an association with maxillary sinus lateral bone wall thickness. Further studies are needed to confirm this possible relationship.

Associations of alveolar bone loss and interleukin-1ß levels in one- and two-stage surgical procedures: a randomized prospective trial.

OBJECTIVE: Dental implants have been widely and successfully used in recent years as an alternative treatment for removable and fixed dental prostheses. The aim of this randomized prospective study was to determine the alveolar bone loss rate (ABLR) and IL-1ß levels in one- and two-stage surgical procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 40 patients with a single missing tooth in the posterior mandible; dental implants were inserted using a one-stage surgical procedure (Group I) or a two-stage surgical procedure (Group II). All clinical periodontal parameters were recorded; peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) samples were collected before loading (T0) and during the third (T1) and sixth (T2) months after loading. ABLR values were evaluated at T0 and T2 by using dental tomography. PICF was analysed after T2 samples were collected. The study was registered through clinicaltrials.gov; identifier NCT03045458. RESULTS: This study found that, the probing pocket depth was found to be significantly higher in Group I than Group II at both T1 and T2 (p < .05). There was no significant difference in other clinical parameters between the groups (p > .05). There was a significant difference between Group I ABLR values at T0 and T2 (p < .05). The PICF IL-1ß levels were not significantly different between groups (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the short observational period and small sample size of this study, two-stage implant placement shows comparable clinical outcomes to implants placed using a one-stage placement protocol.