Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: an angiographic discussion.

The understanding of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy has evolved rapidly in the past three decades. The hallmark of the disease is the presence of typical hyperfluorescent nodules in the early phase of indocyanine green angiography. Although the classical clinical presentation is recurrent serosanguinous detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium, it may present with clinical features indistinguishable from exudative age-related macular degeneration secondary to choroidal neovascularization. Some cases may present initially with submacular haemorrhage, but later with features of exudative age-related macular degeneration. Studying the associated network of vessels using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy indocyanine green dynamic angiography revealed in many cases feeder vessels, branching pattern, and leakage similar to choroidal neovascularization. Owing to the overlap of clinical and angiographic features, it may be considered as a vascular subtype of exudative age-related macular degeneration. However, having seemingly better natural history, better response to photodynamic therapy, and incomplete response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy suggests that it should be studied as a separate entity from choroidal neovascularization. Combining angio-occlusion of the polyps using photodynamic therapy and anti-permeability effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy on the branching vascular network may provide a synergistic effect. We await the result of EVEREST trial, a multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing photodynamic therapy, with or without ranibizumab, with ranibizumab monotherapy.

Safety and efficacy of manual small incision cataract surgery for brunescent and black cataracts.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety, visual outcome and complications of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in the treatment of patients with brunescent and black cataract (BBC). METHODS: In a non-randomised interventional case series, 102 consecutive patients with BBC underwent cataract extraction by MSICS, with staining of the anterior capsule by trypan blue. RESULTS: Of the 102 eyes with BBC, MSICS was performed through superior scleral tunnel (SST) in 31 eyes (30.4%) and through temporal scleral tunnel (TST) in 71 eyes (69.6%). The main intraoperative complication was posterior capsule rupture in two patients (2.0%). Postoperatively, 20 eyes (19.6%) developed corneal oedema. Mild iritis was seen in six eyes (5.9%) and moderate iritis with fibrin membrane formation occurred in three eyes (2.9%). On the 40th postoperative day, 80 patients (78.4%) achieved uncorrected visual acuity of 6/18 or better, and 99 (97.1%) had best-corrected visual acuity of 6/18 or better. Patients in the SST group had significantly higher postoperative astigmatism compared to those in the TST group (-1.08 D vs -0.72 D, P=0.017). CONCLUSION: MSICS with trypan blue staining of the anterior capsule is a safe and effective method of cataract extraction for patients with BBC.

Patients' expectation and experience of visual sensations during phacoemulsification under topical anaesthesia.

PURPOSE: To describe what patients expect to see and the visual sensations they actually experience during phacoemulsification under topical anaesthesia. We also sought to determine if patients find their intraoperative visual experience frightening and the factors associated with this. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation under topical anaesthesia were interviewed preoperatively on what they expected to see with their operated eye during surgery and again postoperatively on what they actually saw. No patient received counselling about possible intraoperative visual sensations. A logistic (multivariate) regression model was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 36 patients (36.7%) expected at least light perception, 38 (38.8%) expected no light perception, and 24 (24.5%) were unsure what to expect. Some patients also expected a variety of different visual sensations. Postoperatively, all patients (100%) reported seeing light intraoperatively and many experienced various other visual sensations. Nineteen patients (19.4%) found their visual experience frightening. The following factors were statistically associated with a frightening visual experience: preoperative anxiety, previous cataract surgery in the fellow eye, experiencing an intraoperative increase in clarity, not seeing movement intraoperatively, and not knowing what to expect. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients in this study either expected that they would see nothing at all during the surgery or were unsure of what to expect. All patients subsequently saw at least some light, and many perceived various other visual sensations that were frightening to nearly one in five patients. Preoperative counselling should inform about possible intraoperative visual experience.

A survey on the knowledge and attitudes of anaesthesia providers in the United States of America, United Kingdom and Singapore on visual experiences during cataract surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of anaesthesia providers on the patients' possible intraoperative visual experiences during cataract surgery under local anaesthesia. METHODS: Anaesthesia providers from the Ophthalmic Anaesthesia Society (USA); British Ophthalmic Anaesthesia Society (UK); Alexandra Hospital, National University Hospital, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore General Hospital and Changi General Hospital (Singapore) were surveyed using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 146 anaesthesiologists (81.6%), 10 ophthalmologists (5.6%) and 23 nurse anaesthetists (12.8%) responded to the survey. Most respondents believed that patients would experience light perception and many also felt that patients might encounter other visual sensations such as movements, flashes, colours, surgical instruments, hands/fingers and the surgeon during the surgery. A significantly higher proportion of anaesthesia providers with previous experience of monitoring patients under topical anaesthesia believed that patients might experience the various visual sensations compared to those who have not previously monitored. For both topical and regional anaesthesia, anaesthesia providers who routinely counsel their patients are (1) more likely to believe that preoperative counselling helps or (2) were previously told by patients that they could see intraoperatively and/or that they were frightened by their visual sensations. These findings were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of anaesthesia providers in the USA, UK and Singapore are aware that patients may experience a variety of visual sensations during cataract surgery under regional or topical anaesthesia. Those who have previously managed patients undergoing cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia are more likely to believe this compared to those who have not.

An unusual presentation of a giant frontal sinus mucocele manifesting with a subcutaneous forehead mass.

INTRODUCTION: To describe the unusual manifestation of a giant frontal sinus mucocele. CLINICAL PICTURE: A 33-year-old female presented with blurring of vision in the left eye, periorbital swelling and a painless forehead mass. There was proptosis, partial ptosis, and an elongated, soft, subcutaneous mass over the left side of the forehead. CT scan showed a mass arising from the frontal sinus with both intraorbital and intracranial extension. TREATMENT: Surgical excision of the mass confirmed the diagnosis of a mucocele. OUTCOME: Postoperatively, the patient was asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: A subcutaneous soft-tissue mass may be the presenting complaint of a frontal mucocele. Careful examination of the surrounding skin may suggest the diagnosis of sinus-related disease and thus direct appropriate investigations.